Common Issues Defense Strategy James G. Martingano MehaffyWeber Houston, TX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction/Civil procedure
Advertisements

INTERNATIONAL LAW PARMA UNIVERSITY International Business and Development International Markets and Organizations Law Prof. Gabriele Catalini.
Climate in the Courts: Climate Change Liability and Litigation Tracy D. Hester Bracewell & Giuliani LLP Air & Waste Management Association 13 th Annual.
Chapter 5 1.  Documents that define the plaintiff’s case (cause of action)  Documents that define defendant’s response and affirmative defenses  Documents.
THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION UPDATE Rhon E. Jones Environmental Section Head Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles,
The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Bankruptcy Proceedings * *Portions reprinted by permission of JAMS.
Looking Beyond Law Firm Positions and Alternative Dispute Resolution – “ADR” PART I:MEDIATION Professor Gary G. Geuss ‘86 PART II: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES.
The Coalition for Asbestos Justice: What is it and what has it done for you? Privileged & Confidential Attorney Work Product.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
New HR Challenges in the Dynamic Environment of Legal Compliance By Teri J. Elkins.
John Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.. I. Alleged Facts A. Defendant Exxon hired the Indonesian military to protect their pipeline & property in Indonesia B.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Types of Taxes and the Jurisdictions that Use them McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright.
© 2005 Dechert LLP CLASS ACTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES: OVERVIEW AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS For Presentation at the British Institute of Comparative Law June.
Introduction to Administrative Law and Process The Administrative Procedure Act Getting Into Court Standards of Judicial Review.
1 Agenda for 12th Class Admin – Name plates – Slide handouts – Court visits A-E. M 10/20. Starting at 10AM – Please clear your calendar 9AM-2PM F-J. M.
THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley.
LAW OF TORT Overview. Objective To place the law of tort in context In world legal systems In UK law.
1 Agenda for 22nd Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates Review of fee shifting Intro to 2 nd half of class Joinder Intro to class actions Midsemester feedback.
Courts and the Judiciary Chapter 9. Provide for an open and impartial forum for seeking the truth Provide for a fair and equitable hearing using regulated.
Business Law with UCC Applications, 13e
MDL-875: Past, Present and Future Eduardo C. Robreno, Presiding Judge United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 1 © June 12,
As to which court the civil case will be heard in is determined by the jurisdiction of that particular court. Different courts have different powers,
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
Wed. Mar. 19. Dépeçage renvoi désistement Contract in CT, performance in Mass Mass court would use law of place of contracting CT court would use law.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 4 (8/30/01) READING AND BRIEFING CASES Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer.
Anna Segobia Masters, Esq., Partner Winston & Strawn LLP North America. Asia. Europe Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq., Director Department of Fair.
Vanishing Civil Jury Trial Judge Xavier Rodriguez 1.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Basics of Patent Infringement Litigation UC Berkeley Patent Innovation and Strategy Dr. Tal Lavian November 24, 2008.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Liability for Climate Change-Related Damage in Domestic Courts: Claims for Compensation by Elena Kosolapova Centre for Environmental Law University of.
1 Agenda for 14th Class Admin – Handouts – Name plates Midsemester feedback Class actions Intro to subject matter jurisdiction.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Recent Developments In Group Actions in the United States Elizabeth Cabraser Sara Gourley Luanne Sacks John Sherk March 2, 2006.
Class Actions and Mass Tort Litigation: Aggregative Justice in a Global Context Professor Linda S. Mullenix University of Trento, Italy Spring 2007 – Rule.
Lewis Wiener Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan LLP Washington, DC Class Actions After Dukes: A Whole New World, or Same Song, Different Verse? Christopher Willis.
1 Agenda for 13th Class Admin –Name plates –Handouts Slide Court Visit –Court Visit – Monday 10/19 Dress nicely Get to court by 9:15 so can read tentative.
Andrew Rink Jeld-Wen Steve Morrison NMRS Jim Irvin NMRS Rush Smith NMRS.
Health Economics & Policy 3 rd Edition James W. Henderson Chapter 12 The Legal System and Medical Malpractice.
THE TRIBAL COUNSEL’S RELATIONSHIP WITH PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS PAUL SPRUHAN NAVAJO NATION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
Introduction to American Law Government and Legal System.
Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation in the Federal Courts: MDL-875: Past, Present & Future Eduardo C. Robreno, Presiding Judge United States District Court.
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
1 Agenda for 34th Class Class Action Review Introduction to Res Judicata Supplemental J problems Assignment for next class– Res Judicata –US Constitution.
1 Agenda for 34th Class Slide handout Next week –Monday. No class –Wednesday. Regular class 10-11:15, Rm. 103 –Friday. Rescheduled class. 1:20-2:35, Rm.
HOT TOPICS IN PATENT LITIGATION ABA – IP Section, April 9, 2011 Committee 601 – Trial and Appellate Rules & Procedures Moderator: David Marcus Speakers:
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 CLASS 3 (8/29/03) STAGES AND ESSENTIAL CONCEPTS OF A CIVIL ACTION Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor.
What State Court Practitioners Need to Know About Federal Civil Procedures.
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION
CLASS ACTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES: OVERVIEW AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Chapter Three: Federal Courts
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
There’s No Place Like Home:
The Future of Civil Procedure
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Nuisance Tort Litigation
State Courts Chapter 4.
Climate in the Courts: Climate Change Liability and Litigation Tracy D. Hester Bracewell & Giuliani LLP Air & Waste Management Association 13th Annual.
NRDA Statutory Elements And Defenses
Ambulance Chasing 101: Civil Procedure and Torts
Chapter 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
THE BEST DEFENSE CAN BE A GREAT OFFENSE AND SAVE THE EXPENSE OF TRIAL: Develop your game plan now for early disposition as a result of pre-trial motions.
United States Legal System
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
§ 10.1 Judicial Remedies Part I.
7-1: The Federal Court System
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Evidence - tends to prove a fact by proving other events or circumstances which afford a basis for a reasonable inference of the occurrence of the fact.
Introduction to the Legal System
Presentation transcript:

Common Issues Defense Strategy James G. Martingano MehaffyWeber Houston, TX

Introduction Common Themes –Single event –Multiple parties –Common Sources of Proof Common Problems –Scope –Inherent Delay/Duplication –Discovery –Finality

Main Types Class Action –statutory MDL –statutory Mass Tort/Consolidated Cases –Generally common law

Mass Tort vs. Class Action Similarities –Jurisdiction (State or Federal) –Focus (case disposition) Differences –Procedure (Federal vs. State) –Scope (limited vs. general)

Federal Class Actions Federal Rule 23 – types –True –Spurious –Hybrid “Opt-In” –1966 Criteria –Numerosity –Commonality –Typicality “Opt-Out”

Class Actions Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 –Tort Reform –Expanded Federal Jurisdiction –Limits on Coupon Settlements Trends –Personal Injury –Consumer –Employment State Court –Range of options –California – most complex

A Brief History of MDL Federal MDLs created in U.S.C. § 1407 “common questions of fact” “centralization is for the convenience of the parties and promotes just and efficient conduct of litigation

Current Data on Federal MDLs 310 MDLs in over 60 Federal Districts 240 Judges overseeing one or more MDLs 92,000 pending individual cases –Of which 48,000 are asbestos 15% of the entire Federal Court docket

MDL Highlights Breast Implant –Established Scientific Panel to evaluate Daubert Motion –Global Settlement Welding Rod –Bellwether Trials Chinese Dry Wall –Consumer and Personal Injury –Jurisdiction Vioxx –Settlement Asbestos –Still pending –Largest caseload – 40,000+ Toyota Litigation –personal injury and consumer claims

Class Action Highlights Wal Mart –Largest gender discrimination class action recently certified –Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Northern District of California AT&T –Overtime wage claims –Wlotkowski et al. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Eastern District of Michigan.

Herb Zarov Personal Injury Issues related to Consolidated Cases Case Management Orders –Defenses –Strategy Hypothetical Case Study

Carla Christofferson Punitive Damages in Class Actions –Exxon Valdez Standing Issues –Tobacco II

Carolyn Frantz No-Injury Class Actions –Teflon –BPA