2009 ICN Merger Workshop Maria Coppola Tineo Taipei, Taiwan March 9, 2009 Session 1. Merger Notification and Initial Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparency and Domestic Regulation Mina Mashayekhi Division on International Trade UNCTAD.
Advertisements

SIS Report Jerry Smith Albuquerque, NM March 7, 2008.
DRAFT GUIDANCE NOTE FOR MEMBER STATES ON FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT
POLICY AND OVERSIGHT DIVISION (POD) February 2014 Documentation of Evaluation for Award 1.
Presented by: Kathryn Hodges, NH
1 Shaimerden Chikanayev, Partner May 26, 2011 “Kazakhstan Regulatory Issues: Practical Observations.
ICN Merger Working Group Work Product Merger Review Workshop March 10-11, 2009 Taipei.
D&O Issues for Closely Held Corporations Simon Bieber Emerging Issues in Directors’ and Officers’ Liability 2013 Law Society of Upper Canada March 4, 2013.
Draft Operational procedures for registry systems 09 November 2004 Bonn, Germany Technical Breakout Group.
April Amman, Jordan DoHoon KIM Senior Research Fellow Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
Energy and Environmental Competition Case Study The Sixth Annual African Dialogue Consumer Protection Conference Lilongwe, Malawi 8-12 September 2014.
Procedure under the Merger Regulation. Procedure – legal documents The Merger Regulation Art. 4 – notification of concentration Art. 7 – suspension of.
Chapter 18: Intercorporate Equity Investments Relevant circumstances Consolidation Pooling of interests Purchase method New entity approach Pro rata Equity.
State aid evaluation Rodrigo PEDUZZI
[Organization’s Name] [Author’s Name] [Date]
1 Recent Developments in Competition Law in Australia ABA Spring Meeting, Global Antitrust Panel (The East) Washington DC, April 2009 Elizabeth M. Avery.
The Sixth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference
Making the Services Directive Work Dublin 6 March 2014 Services Directive and why it matters.
Breakout Session 3: Case Selection and Prioritisation Fifth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference Livingstone, Zambia.
1 ICN Merger Workshop March 10 – 11, 2009 Taipei, Taiwan Panel I: Setting Notification Thresholds “Determining Whether a Filing is Required or Advisable”
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
VIETNAM TRAINING WORKSHOP ON M&A EVALUATION SKILLS FOR COMPETITION AUTHORITY OFFICIALS Ha Long Bay, Vietnam, 13 & 14 August 2005.
The Portuguese Competition Authority’s Experience with the ICN Recommended Practices and Anti-Cartel Enforcement Manual Abel M. Mateus President Autoridade.
1 Structural and Behavioral Remedies December 6, 2007 Kaoru, OKAMURA * Competition Policy Research Center Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC)
The ASEAN Competition Conference Session 5: Comparisons of Competition Regimes in ASEAN Bali, Indonesia November 2011 Lim Chong Kin Director Head,
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
SHORT FORM and FORM CO Bruxelles, 27 November 2012 Giorgio Castaldo / Michele Piergiovanni* * The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are.
European Corporate Governance: What are the current issues? European Union Corporate Governance Standards - Working Group Meeting December 17, 2013 Brussels.
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS AND COMPETITION LAW. Index 1. Why are competition / antitrust issues important? 2. Merger control 3. Distribution systems 4.
Cross-border anticompetitive practices and global supply chains: Challenges for developing countries.
Mergers and Acquisitions: China's New Anti- Monopoly Law Edward Lehman Managing Director – Lehman, Lee & Xu Gerson Lehrman Group.
Better Results and Fairness Through Transparency, Confidentiality, and Procedural Fairness Russell W. Damtoft Associate Director Office of International.
Merger Remedies By Kenneth L. Danger Presented at the OECD-Korea Regional Centre for Competition.
NOTIFICATION AND PROCEDURES SUBGROUP Maria Coppola Tineo US Federal Trade Commission Sixth Annual Conference Moscow, Russia May 31, 2007.
Acting Director - Policy and Strategy
ABA Int Law Spring ABA Spring 2009 Meeting- Section of International Law Panel on Antitrust in the East Presentation on Indian Competition Act—Combinations.
Regulation of Mergers & Acquisitions Presentation by Magdeline Gabaraane GICC 14 th March
1 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN TURKEY: COMPETITION LAW ASPECTS Ece Gürsoy One Fleet PlaceLevent Cad. Alt Zeren Sokak London EC4M 7WSNo 7/ Levent.
Merger Control in Uruguay American Bar Association- South American Regional Conference Buenos Aires, March, 2007 Guyer & Regules Juan Manuel Mercant.
SPS Workshop Taipei, 5-6/12/2001 The Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement.
REPARIS, Vienna, March 14, 2006 | | Seite 1 Bridging the gap between IFRS and regulatory accounting by Ludger Hanenberg, BaFin REPARIS Workshops.
CAA Program Reporting Clarification Regarding Federally-Reportable Violations for Clean Air Act Stationary Sources (March 2010) (FRV Clarification Memo)
EU MERGER LAW: fundamentals Eleanor M. Fox Professor, New York University School of Law ABA Antitrust Section Spring Meeting 2005.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Day Two, Session One Competitive Effects Andreas Bardong Head of Section Merger Policy, Bundeskartellamt, Germany.
Merger Working Group Workshop March 10-11, 2009 – Taipei, Taiwan Introduction to Merger Investigation and Investigative Planning International Competition.
Brazil: Implementing ICN’s Recommended Practices Brazil: Implementing ICN’s Recommended Practices Mariana Tavares de Araujo Secretary of Economic Law –
General Principles of Merger Remedies Ingrid Zappia & Mark Rakers International Competition Network Merger Working Group Workshop Taipei, March 10 & 11.
Barbara BRANDTNER Head of Unit, Enforcement and Procedural Reform DG Competition Brussels, 6 March 2012 Session 3 : Procedural reform.
Best Practices for Competition Law Enforcement: March 18, 2016 Russell W. Damtoft Associate Director Office of International Affairs United States Federal.
Proposed Sale Notice (PSN) and Request For Interest (RFI) for New York BOEM NEW YORK TASK FORCE MEETING APRIL 28, 2016 Erin C. Trager New York Project.
1 Timothy Sullivan Thompson Coburn LLP 1909 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC (202)
US Merger Guidelines 1.Does the merger significantly increase competition? Source: Mergers, Acquisitions And Corporate Restructurings by Patrick A. Gaughan,
NICNAS Reforms Treatment of Confidential Commercial Information Workshop.
Introduction to ICN Work Products ICN Agency Effectiveness Workshop 2016 Gaborone, Botsuwana, March.
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
European Union Law Week 10.
The JFTC’s ICN Work Products implementation
M&A Regulation under Competition Law in Japan
NATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LABOUR COUNCIL (NEDLAC)
Beneficial Ownership Roadmap, Naypidaw, Myanmar March 2017
Making the Most of Your Debriefing
IPR AND CONCENTRATIONS
2017 ICN Annual Cartel Workshop Romina Polley
Pre-Close Rules of Engagement
Information Sharing Mini Plenary 4 Antonio Capobianco
CHAPTER 12 MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, AND OTHER CHANGES TO THE CORPORATE STRUCTURE © 2013 Delmar Cengage Learning.
Part B Suspension When Suspended Under Part A
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
Presentation transcript:

2009 ICN Merger Workshop Maria Coppola Tineo Taipei, Taiwan March 9, 2009 Session 1. Merger Notification and Initial Review

Recommended Practices for Merger Notification and Review Procedures The Practices address: (1) nexus between the merger's effects and the reviewing jurisdiction; (2) clear and objective notification thresholds; (3) timing of merger notification; (4) merger review periods; (5) requirements for initial notification; (6) conduct of merger investigations; (7) procedural fairness; (8) transparency; (9) confidentiality; (10) interagency coordination; (11) remedies; (12) competition agency powers; and (13) review of merger control provisions.

Recommended Practice I Jurisdiction should be asserted only over transactions that have a nexus with the jurisdiction concerned that meets an appropriate standard of materiality, based on activity within that jurisdiction. Example: Company A is buying Company B. Both Company A and B have sales in the reviewing jurisdiction. For threshold calculation, sales of the parent of Company A can be included, but not the sales of the parent of Company B. Company B has material sales in the reviewing jurisdiction. The threshold applies to only the sales of the actual business being acquired (the “target”, here Company B. This does not include the sales of the parent of Company B.) Company A has material sales in the reviewing jurisdiction, Company B does not, and the threshold is triggered by the combined firms’ sales. Company B has a 60% market share in the reviewing jurisdiction.

Recommended Practice II Notification thresholds should be clear and understandable, based on objectively quantifiable criteria (such as sales or assets, rather than market share), and based on information that is readily accessible to the merging parties. Example: Notification is required if the merged parties both either supply or acquire certain goods or services and will, after the merger takes place, supply or acquire 25% or more of those goods and services in the reviewing jurisdiction or in a substantial part of it. There must be an increment to the share of supply. Notification is required if the target company’s sales are more than $50m in the preceding financial year.

What’s the perfect threshold? Factors to consider: Set clear goals of threshold reform. Consider different types of thresholds. Benchmark based on past experience. Compare thresholds with similarly situated jurisdictions. Introduce flexibility for future reform.

Recommended Practice III Parties should be permitted to notify proposed mergers upon certification of a good faith intent to consummate the proposed transaction, and suspensive jurisdictions should not have a filing deadline. Example: The concentration shall be notified within one week after the conclusion of the agreement, or the acquisition of a controlling interest. The parties may notify the agency of a draft agreement provided that they declare that their intention is to conclude an agreement that does not significantly differ from the draft notified.

Recommended Practice V Initial notification requirements should be limited to information necessary to initiate the merger review process. For transactions that do not pose material competitive concerns, notification requirements should avoid unnecessary burdens and consider flexibility in the initial notification (e.g., “short form”). Competition authorities should consider providing an opportunity for pre-notification guidance on the content of notification. Jurisdictions should limit translation requirements (e.g., summaries) and formal authentification burdens for notifications.

Implementation Report 11/050505Merger_NP_ImplementationRpt.pdf 11/050505Merger_NP_ImplementationRpt.pdf Implementation Handbook nference_5th_capetown_2006/ImplementationHandbookApril2006.pdf nference_5th_capetown_2006/ImplementationHandbookApril2006.pdf Defining Merger Transactions for Purposes of Merger Review nference_6th_moscow_2007/23ReportonDefiningMergerTransacti onsforPurposesofMergerReview.pdf nference_6th_moscow_2007/23ReportonDefiningMergerTransacti onsforPurposesofMergerReview.pdf Setting Notification Thresholds for Merger Review ergers/Merger_WG_2.pdf ergers/Merger_WG_2.pdf Web Link and Template Projects blication/293 blication/293 Other Resources

For further information… N&P Subgroup Merger Working Group Advocacy and Implementation Network