CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.
Advertisements

MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Senate Criminal Justice Committee October 7, 2009 Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections.
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Klamath County Justice Reinvestment Jail Resources and Treatment: Lessons learned Lieutenant Jeanette Davidson, Klamath County Sheriff’s Office CEO, Stan.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
Measuring 109 In Fresno County
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Offender Population Forecasting in Virginia. 2 Background - Studies by JLARC in 1980s  Staff of the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (JLARC)
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
1 The Importance of Successful Reentry to Jail Population Growth Presented by: Allen J. Beck, Chief Corrections Statistics Program Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Jail Population Mitigation Strategies January 18, 2007.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Hamilton County, Ohio Correctional Master Plan Pre-architectural Program Analysis of Options.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Presented By: Chief Edward Medrano Gardena Police Department.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform : System-wide Criminal Justice Spending June 3, 2015.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
Oregon Presented by: Office of Economic Analysis Date: September 22, 2009 Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee.
O.P.E.N. Opportunity for Probation with Enforcement in Nevada Intermediate Sanction Program Nevada Department of Corrections Re-entry Services.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Basic Supervision Funding We will receive the following amounts in basic supervision: FY 2008 FY 2009 $105,744,392 $107,326,403 Currently we are receiving.
Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 1. 6-Month Preliminary Evaluation Report Post Release Community Supervision Offenders ▫From October 2011.
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Measuring Realignment at the Two-Year Mark: Jail Population Trends Linda M. Penner, Chair Kathleen T. Howard, Executive Director Curtis J. Hill, Executive.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
Skagit County Criminal Justice Master Plan Conclusions and Recommendations.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Realignment: The Role of the BSCC and the Composition of Local Detention Facilities Patricia Mazzilli, Executive Director Board of State and Community.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure - Research Proposal.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
2018 Budget Presentation – DOCCR
California State Association of Counties
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
Sentencing Reform in California and Public Safety
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES

Overview Department of Finance (DOF) estimated population reductions to CDCR What is Average Daily Population (ADP) What is the difference between ADP and monthly movement What will be the projected impact to counties

Population Reductions as a Result of Realignment Requires Parole Violators to serve their violations in local custody –Currently approximately 14,000 in CDCR Requires Non-Serious/Non- Violent/Non-Sex Offenders to serve their sentence under local jurisdiction – (excludes 61 offenses)

CDCR Population Reductions Factoring Realignment Impacts The following slide is specific to CDCR inmate population to demonstrate how CDCR will be reducing overcrowding to meet the Three Judge Panel Order. The CDCR ADP reduction was based on a July 1 implementation date so the ADP reduction is less in the first Fiscal Year do to the October implementation date The reductions are realized through reduced intake coupled with the normal release process –The CDCR ADP reductions do not tie directly to equal impacts to county populations

CDCR Population Reductions Associated with Realignment Department of Finance Average Daily Population (ADP) projections reducing CDCR population – (19,417 ADP) 6,500 Low Level Offenders remain in Local Custody 12,917 Parole Violators remain in Local Custody – (32,500 ADP) 18,500 Low Level Offenders 14,000 Parole Violators – (39,733 ADP) 25,733 Low Level Offenders 14,000 Parole Violators – (39,800 ADP) 25,800 Low Level Offenders 14,000 Parole Violators

Average Daily Population Average Daily Population (ADP) –One inmate in One bed/alternative custody program slot for One year If an inmate is only going to serve 6 months it equals ½ ADP. If 2 inmates are serving 6 months it only requires 1 bed/alternative custody program slot –One probation/parolee on probation/parole for One year If a probation/parolee is only on probation/parole for 6 months it is ½ of a caseload

Sentencing Capacity and Case Load Needs If you have 24,000 inmates serving 6 months, you will need 12,000 post sentencing solutions. Post Sentancing solutions include: Jail beds; Contract beds; Alternative custody programs; GPS units; Fire camp contracted beds with CDCR. If you have 24,000 inmates released to probation supervision but they are only supervision for 6 months, it would result in a 12,000 probation case load

Data Provided CDCR is providing two types of data –Monthly data Which will help counties identify the projected monthly increase in sentenced offenders under the jurisdiction of the county who require management –Sentencing Solutions Include »Jail Beds »Contract Beds via other jails, public entities or CDCR »Alternative Custody Programs (i.e. substance abuse programs) »GPS or EID »House Arrest –ADP data Which will help identify total resources needed at FULL implementation

Monthly Data Monthly data (2 different sets) The document titled: “AB 109 Impact by County eff Oct 11” –Shows the felons convicted by the courts that will remain in local county jurisdiction The “DCH_to_Post eff Oct 11” file –Shows how many inmates that will parole from CDCR that will require probation supervision each month

Monthly Court Sentancing Example Estimated Impact of AB 109: Number of Persons Not Sent to State Prison as New Admissions or Parole Violators with New Terms Alameda MonthNew Admission Parole Violator with New TermTotal OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL Total

Monthly Court Sentancing The prior chart demonstrates that for Alameda County by July 2012 the courts will have sentenced 420 felons to be supervised through local jurisdiction –Supervision includes: Alternative Sanctions Community Based Sanctions Incarceration

Monthly Post Sentence Population Although Alameda County will have 420 inmates sentenced to local jurisdiction from October 1 to July 2012, the ADP will be less than 420 because some inmates sentenced in October 2011 will have already served their time by July 2012

Monthly Post Release Supervision This chart represents offenders being released each month in Alameda that the designated Alameda county entity will supervise through July Although 628 inmates will released to probation supervision during this time frame, inmates released in October may no longer require probation supervision by July 2012 so the total ADP will most likely be less than 628 post release community offenders under Alameda county supervision.

ADP for Counties The Department of Finance has provided the ADP numbers for the counties at FULL implementation so counties can identify total resource needs at FULL implementation

DOF Assumptions DOF separated the Non’s into two groups –Sentenced to less than 3 years DOF assumed those inmate will serve 6 months on average under county jurisdiction –Sentenced to more than 3 years DOF assumed those inmates will serve 24 months on average under county jurisdiction

ADP Data ADP data (2 different sets) The “Realignment – Adult Inmate Average Daily Population Projections by County” report –Shows at FULL implementation, how many offenders will be under county jurisdiction at any given time The “Realignment – Community Supervision and State Parole Average Daily Population Projections by County” –Shows how many parolees/probationers will be on supervision at any given time after FULL implementation

Realignment – Adult Inmate Average Daily Population Projections by County Number of inmates under local jurisdiction for Alameda at FULL implementation 6-Month Average Length of Stay 24-Month Average Length of Stay

“Realignment – Community Supervision and State Parole Average Daily Population Projections by County” Alameda Probation Caseload CDCR Parole Caseload Jail Beds Needed for Violations

Now Does Monthly Intake and ADP Work Together? Intake happens every month –If your county is projected to get 30 inmates per month [New Admissions (NA) and Parole Violators With a New Term (WNT)] The first month you will need a combination of 30 beds and alternative sanction solutions The second month you will need a combination of 60 beds and alternative sanction solutions ADP Mitigation Factor –Even though there are 30 inmates leaving a month, by the sixth month you will not need 180 sentencing solutions. (30 inmates x 6 months = 180) Some of the offenders received the first month will have already been released by the sixth month and are already gone. The ADP at full implementation is when there is a balance of offenders coming and going out so the post sentencing needs remain constant

Seasonal Intake CDCR’s monthly intake numbers are not the same every month This is based on historical data that shows intake increases and decreases at specific times during the year The best example is November –Intake reduces because staff normally take vacations and court production slows The number of working days in a month also impacts monthly intake

Historical Seasonal Intake

County Intake When reviewing the county intake numbers for your county there may be significant variances per month Those variances are based on historical data for intake from your county that demonstrate patterns similar to the statewide intake patterns

Post Sentancing Needs To determine total bed and alternative sanction needs at FULL implementation, you must add the following data from the DOF ADP chart: –Total Inmates N/N/N no Prior S/V ADP (these inmates can also go to alternative sanctions rather than to an incarceration setting) –And RTC ADP 30-Day Average Length of Stay (ALOS) How fast you will need those beds will be determined by monthly intake for both N/N/N plus the RTC 30-Day ALOS

Questions Every county may have different impact depending on how local authorities make decisions It is important to ask CDCR if you do not understand the data provided CDCR has Subject Matter Experts that can walk you through the data specific to your county The Counties also have extreme expertise in this information and can provide support. CDCR will be presenting webinars on this information as requested