Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline natural resources – Promote public.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Shoreline Master Program Update. Shoreline Management Act approved by voters in the early 1970’s to: – Encourage water-dependent uses – Protect shoreline.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
 Department of Interior – Bureau of Land Management  USDA – Forest Service  CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
Scoping in the EIA process Proposal Identification Screening
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Local Updates to Shoreline Management Master Programs Kitsap County and Cities Discussion Meetings Informational Briefing.
Transforming the Procurement Process
Topic 6 Environmental Impact Assessments. EIA – Introduction The start Effectiveness?
Eric J. Tomasi – Project Manager Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Northeast Energy.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Oversight Team Meeting December 11, INTRODUCTIONS (15 MINUTES) Name and affiliation Purpose of meeting/ review agenda Edits to September’s Oversight.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Project-level SEPA Comprehensive Plan Amendments Zoning Changes JCC Title 17 (Development Regulations) Development Agreements (With Proponent) Legislative.
Planning Processes/Permits “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.” “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.”
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jim Luce, EFSEC Chair Port Of Vancouver Presentation Vancouver, WA June 27, 2013 EFSEC These Slides.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
1 Asset Management Steering Committee Briefing on Senate Bill 408 (Access Management) August 2013 Harold Lasley, P.E. Access Management Program.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
1 Concerned Citizens of Mason County OVERVIEW of ADAGE SEPA PROCESS State Environmental Policy Act Lead Agency - Mason County Department of Community Development.
1 SEPA/NEPA Compliance for Major Projects January 26, 2006 Law Seminars International Eric Laschever Stoel Rives LLP (206)
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Winery Ordinance Update Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report County of Santa Barbara July 16, 2014.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS. Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.
Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Adoption of Stream Corridor Management Regulations for the Lake George Park.
Federal Aviation Administration Wood River Region Replacement Airport EIS Who:Blaine County & City of Hailey Date: February 11, 2008.
Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
1 © 2013 Protiviti Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared for use by OOCEA’s management, audit committee, and board of directors. This.
Town Hall Meeting MLK Community Center July 21, pm.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs) How Do I Prepare.
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) August 6, 2008
Public Meeting For Scoping Of An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For The Perham Resource Recovery Facility: Introductions Agenda Good evening, my.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Public Health Law and Policy: Principles, Examples, and Applications
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC)
Public Scoping Meeting May 3, 2010
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMANTAL AND NATURE PROTECTION
Land Use 101: The Design Process
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use Planner (DSD) Nicholas Matz AICP, Senior Planner (PCD) August 13, 2014

Provide high-level orientation to SEPA Present a preliminary EIS timeline Present information on the Energize Eastside EIS process Identify public engagement opportunities Provide question and answer time Meeting Objective

State Environmental Policy Act Requires environmental information to be considered before an “action” is taken “Agency” with jurisdiction determines process scope (DNS, MDNS or EIS) Process governed by: –State Law – Chapter 43.21C Revised Code of WA (RCW) –State Code – Chapter WA Admin Code (WAC) –Bellevue Code – Chapter Bellevue City Code (BCC) What is SEPA?

SEPA is an “administrative” process for conducting environmental review –Authority delegated by the City Council –Process administered by Development Services staff The process is directed by the City’s Environmental Coordinator –SEPA Responsible Official What is SEPA? (continued)

The most detailed form of environmental review required under SEPA Required when an agency determines a proposal is likely to have probable significant adverse environmental impacts SEPA provides a “safety net” when project impacts are not adequately addressed by government regulations What is an EIS?

An impartial disclosure document identifying: o Significant environmental impacts o Reasonable alternatives – a feasible alternate course of action that meets the proposal objectives at a lower environmental cost o Mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impact An EIS in not a “permit,” it is: o A consolidated collection of information o Used to facilitate decision-making What is an EIS? (continued)

Energize Eastside Environmental Review Process 2014 Multi-Jurisdiction Collaboration Phase I Programmatic EIS Phase II – Project EIS Select Consultant Team (RFP) Execute Interlocal Agreement Project Need AssessmentAlternatives AnalysisDefine Project Mitigation Coordinated Project Review Bellevue Update -- Electrical Reliability Study Independent Review – Special Topics Study Construction Techniques Final EISIdentify Preferred Alternative

Step 1: Initiation of Energize Eastside EIS PSE agreed to preparation of EIS by the City Discussions initiated with other affected cities Cost of EIS process, including consultant services, to be paid by PSE Independent objective review ensured through oversight by Environmental Coordinator Anticipated Timing: Preliminary steps underway Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 2: Determination of Lead Agency Status Required for projects located in multiple jurisdictions Bellevue identified as lead under state rules –Largest portion of project located within Bellevue –WAC Bellevue required to issue letter of lead agency status to other affected jurisdictions Anticipated timing: August 2014 Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 3: Development of interagency agreement Tool to govern inter-jurisdictional relationships –Approved by City or County Council –Participant jurisdictions - Renton, Newcastle, King County, Bellevue, Redmond, and Kirkland Outlines roles of each participant jurisdiction in EIS preparation Describes participation in and method for incorporation of independent third party review Prescribes the consultant selection process Anticipated timing: September/October of 2014 Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 4: Selection of EIS consultant Partner jurisdictions will work collaboratively to select the EIS consultant Standard contracting/purchasing process applies – eCityGov shared procurement portal Bellevue City Council approves consultant contract amount for EIS preparation Timing Anticipated: October/November of 2014 Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 5: Phasing of Environmental Review Allowed by SEPA rules - WAC (5) Phase I: Non-project level environmental review –Broader analysis of need & methods to address need Phase II: Project-level environmental review –Narrower analysis of project-level construction and operation impacts Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 6: Scoping Occurs after EIS consultant is under contract –Prior to Phase I non-project review –Prior to Phase II project-level review Includes public notice (signs, mailing, advertising) Follows standard process required by SEPA rules Public meeting(s) Public comment use to inform development of EIS scope Scoping summary prepared Anticipated timing: Initiate scoping January 2015 Energize Eastside EIS Process Opportunity for public engagement/comment!

Step 7: Draft Phase I Non-Project EIS Prepared by consultant at City direction Known topics include need and methods to address need Other topics to be included based in scoping Anticipated Timing: February-May 2015 Published and Circulated for Public Comment Comment period open for days Additional public outreach (public meetings, open houses) Anticipated Timing: June 2015 Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 8: Draft Phase II Project-Level EIS Prepared by consultant at City direction Known topics include project level review of construction and operation impacts and identification of mitigation on a range of reasonable alternatives Other topics to be included based in scoping Supplements and expands on review completed in Phase I Anticipated Timing: August February 2016 Published and Circulated for Public Comment Comment period open for days Additional public outreach (public meetings, open houses) Anticipated Timing: February 2016 Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 9: Final EIS Prepared by consultant at City direction Final EIS required to include response to comments on draft EIS Final EIS may include: –Analysis of modified alternatives –Supplemented or improved analysis from draft EIS –Factual corrections Final EIS to be used to inform decision-makers on project level issues Anticipated timing: July 2016 Energize Eastside EIS Process

Step 10: Bellevue Permitting Process Conditional Use Permit required PSE develops project design following EIS EIS analysis to be considered in review of Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit process includes public notice of application, acceptance of public comment, and opportunity to appeal Anticipated timing: following completion of EIS Energize Eastside EIS Process Opportunity for public engagement/comment!

Citizen's Guide to SEPA Review and Commenting What is SEPA? The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) provides a way to identify possible environmental impacts that may result from governmental decisions. These decisions may be related to issuing permits for private projects, constructing public facilities, or adopting regulations, policies or plans. The SEPA Rules establish the requirements for conducting environmental review of a proposal. Information provided during the SEPA review process helps agency decision-makers, applicants, and the public understand how a proposal will affect the environment. This information can be used to change a proposal to reduce likely impacts, or to condition or deny a proposal when adverse environmental impacts are identified. Read more on the Department of Ecology Website at:

Question & Answer Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use Planner (DSD) Nicholas Matz AICP, Senior Planner (PCD) August 13, 2014