Strategic Planning Presented by: Cindy Banyai, Ph.D. Executive Director, Refocus Institute IREX Community Solutions Program August 25 – September 1, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
Advertisements

Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference The EAB: Past, Present and Future David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 13, 2008.
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Methodologies of monitoring and evaluating capacity development Makoto Kato Japan 1 UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating.
Building blocks for adopting Performance Budgeting in Canada Bruce Stacey – Executive Director Results Based Management Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Constructing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan Presented by: Cindy Banyai, Ph.D. Executive Director, efocus Institute IREX Community Solutions Program September.
Monitoring of Capacity Development in GEF Operations UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building in Developing Countries St.
Theory of Change, Impact Monitoring, and Most Significant Change EWB-UK Away Weekend – March 23, 2013.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
The Logical Framework. 2 Definition of a Project A “project” is defined as: a set of executed interventions, over an established timeline and budget,
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
Monitoring Progress & Evaluating Impact Presented by: Cindy Banyai, Ph.D. Executive Director, efocus Institute IREX Community Solutions Program September.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
(c) 2014 Michael Sikes, Ph.D. Theory of Change: Bridging Ideas, Actions, and Results Michael Sikes, Ph.D. (805)
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
The Measurement and Evaluation of the PPSI Oregon Pilot Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative Portland, Oregon December 10, 2009 Matt Keene Office.
Results Based Management: Logical Framework Matrix (LFM) December 30 th, 2009 Abeer Shakweer, Ph.D., Planning and Monitoring Manager Science and Technology.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
ROMA In a Nutshell Oklahoma department of Commerce.
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK by Lorelyn T. Dumaug.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
FUNCTION 5: MONITORING M5 – S1. 1.Situation Monitoring 2.Humanitarian Response Monitoring 3.Coordination Performance Monitoring Types of Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Monitoring & Evaluation
PREPARING FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION 27 – 31 May 2013 Bangkok Bangkok Office Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education United Nations Educational,
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Integrating Evaluation into the Design of the Minnesota Demonstration Project Paint Product Stewardship Initiative St. Paul, MN May 1, 2008 Matt Keene,
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Anastasia Muiti, NEMA Monitoring of adopt a river project.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
SUMMARY Macerata, 8 th April Andrea Gramillano, t33 srl.
Developing Effective Performance Measures: A Skill-Building Workshop David J. Bernstein, Ph.D., Senior Study Director, Westat Sponsored by the Government.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Building an ENI CBC project
The Logical Framework Approach
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Planning Presented by: Cindy Banyai, Ph.D. Executive Director, Refocus Institute IREX Community Solutions Program August 25 – September 1, 2011

Learning Objectives How to plan strategically How to effectively employ short and long term strategic plans Importance of incorporating monitoring and evaluation (M&E) into program design and implementation IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

HOW TO PLAN STRATEGICALLY IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

Logical Framework Approach Process to organize policy, programs and projects for management –Provides theory for evaluation Promotes accountability and effectiveness Connects tangible inputs and deliverables with conceptual goals IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

Logical Framework Model 5 Miyoshi, 2009; based on JICA IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

Otherwise known as…. Program Theory Matrix (PTM) Managing for development results, results- based management (RBM) Project Cycle Management (PCM) See also – Social network analysis, Outcome mapping 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 6

Logframe Definitions End outcomes – change in society Intermediate outcomes – change in target group Outputs – results of activities Activities – actions in project Inputs – requirements to begin project 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 7

Management roles in the logframe Project management – controls inputs, activities and outputs Policy planning – controls intermediate outcomes and end outcomes 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 8

Finding the logic Vertical logic - activities deliver outputs, which contribute to intermediate outcomes, which help bring about the overall goal (end outcomes) Horizontal logic - shows how progress against each objective is assessed (through verifying indicators) and the external factors (assumptions and risks) that might affect the achievement of objectives at the next level (Fujita 2010, p. 2) 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 9

Logframe considerations There are many different types, but based on same thrust Make simple and specific Needs to be flexible to guide programs and evaluation –Avoid outside impositions –Update regularly –Change when appropriate 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 10

EFFECTIVE SHORT AND LONG TERM PLANNING IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

In general… Policies focus on large, long-term societal goals (end outcomes) Programs focus on target groups to meet policy goals – includes short and long term plans (intermediate outcomes, outputs) Projects are shorter-term, targeted components of programs (outputs) 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 12

Policy, Programs & Projects 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 13

Localization All levels of governance need to design their own policy structure incorporating all programs and projects under their jurisdiction –Short and long term planning is important at all levels –Allowing donors or national authorities dictate policy disempowers local authorities 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 14

Planning and M&E Evaluation results feed back into planning Monitor ongoing progress toward long term goals – set benchmarks Set achievable short term goals –Modify program approach or goal according to evaluation data 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 15

M&E IN PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

Policy Management Policies, programs and projects should have their own logframe Evaluation should be a continuous part of management –Starts before planning –Continues through implementation and after IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

Project Management Cycle (PMC) 18 Based on Miyoshi, IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com

Evaluation Evaluation is the systematic collection and assessment of information related to the outcomes, operation, or process of a policy structure, organization or relationship. (based on Patton 2002; Weiss 1998; see also USAID 2011) 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 19

PMC and Evaluation Evaluation is an integral part of the management process –Occurs before, during and after policy/program/project duration –Evaluation results should be available and used for the next policy/program/project development –Internal evaluation is a continuing management activity –External evaluation supports accountability 2011 IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 20

Thanks for your attention! Please send questions & comments to com

References Banyai, Cindy. (2010). Community capacity and governance – New approaches to development and evaluation. PhD diss., Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University. Bureau for Policy, Planning, and Learning – United States Agency for International Development [USAID]. (2011). Evaluation Policy. Washington, D.C.: USAID. Fujita, Nobuko. (2010). Beyond Logframe; Systems Concepts in Evaluation. Tokyo: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development [FASID]. Japan International Cooperation Agency - Office of Evaluation and Post Project Monitoring, Planning and Evaluation Department (2004). JICA Evaluation Handbook: Practical Methods for Evaluation. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency. Miyoshi, Koichi. (2008). What is Evaluation?. In Miyoshi, Koichi (Ed). Hyoka-ron wo Manabu Hito no tameni (For People Learning Evaluation Theory). (pp ). Tokyo. Sekaishisosha. Patton, Michael Quinn (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Weiss, Carol H. (1998). Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice- Hall, Inc IREX CSP, Cindy Banyai, refocusinstitute.com 22