Adaptive Dynamics studying the change

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Mechanics and Evolutionary Theory
Advertisements

ANALYSIS OF MULTI-SPECIES ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS
POPULATION ECOLOGY.
Genetic Terms Gene - a unit of inheritance that usually is directly responsible for one trait or character. Allele - an alternate form of a gene. Usually.
Point-wise Discretization Errors in Boundary Element Method for Elasticity Problem Bart F. Zalewski Case Western Reserve University Robert L. Mullen Case.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم وقل ربِ زدني علماً صدق الله العظيم.
DAY ONE Chapter 8 Understanding Populations
What is a Population A population is a group of organisms of the same species that live in a specific geographical area and interbreed. A population is.
Conflict between alleles and modifiers in the evolution of genetic polymorphisms (formerly ADN ) IIASA Hans Metz VEOLIA- Ecole Poly- technique & Mathematical.
Towards a synthesis between Adaptive Dynamics and Evo-Devo
Models of Evolutionary Dynamics: An Integrative Perspective Ulf Dieckmann Evolution and Ecology Program International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Introduction to Adaptive Dynamics. Definition  Adaptive dynamics looks at the long term effects of small mutations on a system.  If mutant invades monomorphic.
Mathematical Modelling of Phage Dynamics: Applications in STEC studies Tom Evans.
Trade-off & invasion plots, accelerating/decelerating costs and evolutionary branching points. By Andy Hoyle & Roger Bowers. (In collaboration with Andy.
Adaptive Dynamics of Temperate Phages. Introduction Phages are viruses which infect bacteria A temperate phage can either replicate lytically or lysogenically.
Adaptive Dynamics, Indirectly Transmitted Microparasites and the Evolution of Host Resistance. By Angela Giafis & Roger Bowers.
KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
Populations I: a primer Bio 415/ questions 1. What is exponential growth, and why do we care about exponential growth models? 2. How is the parameter.
C HAPTER 51 Population Ecology. E COLOGY B ASICS Terms to know… Ecology Branch of biology Relatively new science Biotic factors Abiotic factors Environmental.
Population Ecology Chapter 19.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint Lectures for Biology, Seventh Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings Population Ecology.
Population Growth and Regulation
How Populations Grow What is a population?  A population consists of all the individuals of a species that live together in one place at one time. What.
KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
Population Genetics Learning Objectives
Tom Wenseleers Dept. of Biology, K.U.Leuven
The canonical equation of adaptive dynamics a new role for the effective population sizes of population genetics Hans (= J A J * ) Metz (formerly ADN )
Demographic matrix models for structured populations
Section 3: Beyond Darwinian Theory
Adaptive Dynamics studying the dynamic change of community dynamical parameters through mutation and selection Hans (= J A J * ) Metz (formerly ADN ) IIASA.
Math 3120 Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems
Boltzmann Machine (BM) (§6.4) Hopfield model + hidden nodes + simulated annealing BM Architecture –a set of visible nodes: nodes can be accessed from outside.
The interplay of infectivity that decreases with virulence with limited cross-immunity (toy) models for respiratory disease evolution Hans (= J A J * )
What is a QUASI-SPECIES By Ye Dan U062281A USC3002 Picturing the World through Mathematics.
Two-species competition The Lotka-Volterra Model Working with differential equations to predict population dynamics.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules The Schrödinger equation and how to use wavefunctions Dr Grant Ritchie.
Introduction to History of Life. Biological evolution consists of change in the hereditary characteristics of groups of organisms over the course of generations.
Evolution of Populations
Fall 2009 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors IB Opportunities in C-U Tuesday, Sept. 15 4:00-5:00pm 135 Burrill There are many local opportunities.
Essential Questions What are the characteristics of populations and how they are distributed? What are the differences between density-independent and.
Hans Metz Michel Durinx On the Canonical Equation of (directional) Adaptive Dynamics for Physiologically Structured Populations ADN, IIASA.
Speciation by Sexual Selection? It is attractive to consider the analogy between competition for food and competition for mating partners. Female mate.
Genetic Polymorphism and Speciation - An Adaptive Dynamics Perspective - Eva Kisdi & Stefan Geritz Dept. of Mathematics, University of Turku.
Thoughts on the Geometry of Macro-Evolution steps towards a postmodern synthesis ADN IIASA Hans Metz.
Population Genetics Chapter 16 & 17.
Adaptive Dynamics in Two Dimensions. Properties of Evolutionary Singularities n Evolutionary stability Is a singular phenotype immune to invasions by.
EMERGENCE OF ASYMMETRY IN EVOLUTION PÉTER VÁRKONYI BME, BUDAPEST GÁBOR DOMOKOS BME, BUDAPEST GÉZA MESZÉNA ELTE, BUDAPEST IN COOPERATION WITH.
Spatial Invasion Fitness: Interesting Research Avenues Régis Ferrière, Jean-Francois Le Galliard, and Ulf Dieckmann.
Chapter 8. What is a population? The given number of a given species in a given area at a given time.
Evolution Natural Selection Evolution of Populations Microevolution vs. Macroevolution.
The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology - Summary What did this paper do that made it a citation classic? 1.It summarized a large body of work on spatial.
Application of Game Theory to Biology A long-standing puzzle in the study of animal behavior is the prevalence of conventional fights in the competition.
Scales of Ecological Organization
Scales of Ecological Organization
Chapter 4 Population Ecology
Section 3: Beyond Darwinian Theory
Quantum One.
AP Environmental Chapter 6
One- and Two-Dimensional Flows
The role of non-linear functional response on predator’s body size evolution Savannah Nuwagaba Cang Hui Ulf Dieckman Åke Brännström.
 Population  group of individuals of same species in same general area
Boltzmann Machine (BM) (§6.4)
The number of organisms per unit area
Population Ecology pp ; 972
Ecology PART 3.
Biological Evolution and Environmental Factors
Population Ecology.
Speciation along Environmental Gradients
Chapter 4 Population Ecology
Presentation transcript:

Adaptive Dynamics studying the change of community dynamical parameters through mutation and selection Hans (= J A J *) Metz VEOLIA- Ecole Poly- technique & Mathematical Institute, Leiden University (formerly ADN) IIASA 1

context

evolutionary scales micro-evolution: changes in gene frequencies on a population dynamical time scale, meso-evolution: evolutionary changes in the values of traits of representative individuals and concomitant patterns of taxonomic diversification (as result of multiple mutant substitutions), macro-evolution: changes, like anatomical innovations, that cannot be described in terms of a fixed set of traits. Goal: get a mathematical grip on meso-evolution.

components of the evolutionary mechanism ecology environment (causal) ( causal ) demography function trajectories physics form selection fitness trajectories development ( darwinian ) genome almost faithful reproduction

Stefan Geritz, me & various collaborators adaptive dynamics Stefan Geritz, me & various collaborators (1992, 1996, 1998, ...) ecology environment (causal) ( causal ) demography function trajectories physics form selection fitness trajectories development ( darwinian ) genome almost faithful reproduction

terminology trait vector (trait value) corresponding terms: (pheno)type morph strategy trait vector (trait value) point (in trait space) population genetics: evolutionary ecology: (meso-evolutionary statics) adaptive dynamics: (meso-evolutionary dynamics)

adaptive dynamics limit    rescale numbers to densities   ,  ln()  rescale time, only consider traits (usual perspective)  = system size,  = mutations / birth

from individual dynamics through community dynamics to adaptive dynamics (AD)

community dynamics: residents Populations are represented as frequency distributions (measures) over a space of i(ndividual)-states (e.g. spanned by age and size). Environments (E) are delimited such that given their environment individuals are independent, and hence their mean numbers have linear dynamics. Resident populations are assumed to be so large that we can approximate their dynamics deterministically. These resident populations influence the environment so that they do not grow out of bounds. Therefore the community dynamics have attractors, which are assumed to produce ergodic environments.

community dynamics: mutants Mutations are rare.  They enter the population singly. Hence, initially their impact on the environment can be neglected.  The initial growth of a mutant population can be approximated with a branching process. Invasion fitness is the (generalised) Malthusian parameter (= averaged long term exponential growth rate of the mean) of this proces:  (Existence guaranteed by the multiplicative ergodic theorem.)

fitness as dominant transversal eigenvalue mutant population size i.a. population sizes of other species resident population size

fitness as dominant transversal eigenvalue or, more generally, dominant transversal Lyapunov exponent mutant population size i.a. population sizes of other species resident population size

implications Fitnesses are not given quantities, but depend on (1) the traits of the individuals, X, Y, (2) the environment in which they live, E : (Y,E) | (Y | E) with E set by the resident community: E = Eattr(C), C={X1,...,Xk) Residents have fitness zero.

fitness landscape perspective Evolution proceeds through uphill movements in a fitness landscape that keeps changing so as to keep the fitness of the resident types at exactly zero. Evolution proceeds through uphill movements in a fitness landscape r e s i d n t a v l u ( ) x evolutionary time f c p : y , E m

underlying simplifications 1. mutation limited evolution 2. clonal reproduction 3. good local mixing 4. largish system sizes 5. “good” c(ommunity)-attractors 6. interior c-attractors unique 7. fitness smooth in traits 8. small mutational steps essential conceptuallly essential essential for most conclusions i.e., separated population dynamical and mutational time scales: the population dynamics relaxes before the next mutant comes

repeated substitution meso-evolution proceeds by the repeated substitution of novel mutations

fate of novel mutations C := {X1,..,Xk}: trait values of the residents Environment: Eattr(C) Y: trait value of mutant Fitness (rate of exponential growth in numbers) of mutant sC(Y) := (Y | Eattr(C)) • Y has a positive probability to invade into a C community iff sC(Y) > 0. • After invasion, Xi can be ousted by Y only if sX1,..,Y,.., Xk(Xi) ≤ 0. • For small mutational steps Y takes over, except near so-called “ess”es.

“For small mutational steps invasion implies substitution.” community dynamics: ousting the resident Proposition: Let e = | Y – X | be sufficiently small, and let X not be close to an “evolutionarily singular strategy”, or to a c(ommunity)-dynamical bifurcation point. Invasion of a "good" c-attractor of X leads to a substitution such that this c-attractor is inherited by Y Y and up to O(e2), sY(X) = – sX(Y). “For small mutational steps invasion implies substitution.”

community dynamics: ousting the resident Proof (sketch): When an equilibrium point or a limit cycle is invaded, the relative frequency p of Y satisfies = sX(Y) p(1-p) + O(e2), while the convergence of the dynamics of the total population densities occurs O(1). dp dt Singular strategies X* are defined by sX*(Y) = O(e2 ), instead of O(e).

community dynamics: the bifurcation structure Near where the mutant trait value y equals the resident trait value x there is a degenerate transcritical bifurcation:

community dynamics: the bifurcation structure Near where the mutant trait value y equals the resident trait value x there is a degenerate transcritical bifurcation:  relative frequency of mutant evolution will be towards decreasing x mutant trait value y evolution will be towards increasing x The effective speeds of evolutionary change are proportional to the probabilities that invading mutants survive the initial stochastic phase

community dynamics: invasion probabilities The probability that the mutant invades changes as depicted below: probability that mutant invades evolution will be towards increasing x evolution will be towards decreasing x The effective speeds of evolutionary change are proportional to the probabilities that invading mutants survive the initial stochastic phase

graphical tools

Pairwise Invasibility Plot fitness contour plot x: resident y: potential mutant Pairwise Invasibility Plot PIP + - y x x1 x x x0 x1 x2 t r a i t v a l u e

Mutual Invasibility Plot Pairwise Invasibility Plot PIP Mutual Invasibility Plot MIP X 1 2 - ? + y X + - x1 x x protection boundary t r a i t v a l u e substitution boundary

Mutual Invasibility Plot Pairwise Invasibility Plot PIP Mutual Invasibility Plot MIP X 1 2 - + y x2 X + - x x t r a i t v a l u e

Pairwise Invasibility Plot Trait Evolution Plot Pairwise Invasibility Plot PIP Trait Evolution Plot TEP y x + - X 2 1 X 1 2 x2 x t r a i t v a l u e

evolutionarily singular strategies

definition

neutrality of resident (monomorphic) linearisation around y = x = x* c 1 + 2 = a=0 b +b =0 neutrality of resident s u (u)= 0

 local PIP classification

the associated local MIPs

Only directional derivatives (!) dimorphic linearisation around y = x1 = x2 = x* Only directional derivatives (!)

community dynamics: non-genericity strikes

Only directional derivatives (!) dimorphic linearisation around y = x1 = x2 = x* Only directional derivatives (!) : u1=uw1, u2=uw2 s u ,u (v) = a + b 1 (w , w 2 ) + b v g 11 + g 10 uv 00 V h.o.t. ( *

dimorphic linearisation around y = x1 = x2 = x*

local dimorphic evolution

local TEP classification

more about adaptive branching population t i m e t r a i t fitness evolutionary time fitness minimum

beyond clonality: thwarting the Mendelian mixer assortativeness

extensions

a toy example Lotka-Volterra  all per capita growth rates are linear functions of the population densities Lotka-Volterra  all per capita growth rates are linear functions of the population densities LV models are unrealistic, but useful since they have explicit expressions for the invasion fitnesses.

a toy example 1 √2 width competition kernel carrying capacity –––––––––––– √2 competition kernel carrying capacity viable range

interrupted: branching prone ( trimorphically repelling) matryoshka galore isoclines correspond to loci of monomorphic singular points. interrupted: branching prone ( trimorphically repelling)

of two lines about to merge one goes extinct

more consistency conditions There also exist various global consistency relations. Use that on the boundaries of the coexistence set one type is extinct.

a more realistic example

a potential difficulty: heteroclinic loops 1 2 3 ?

? a potential difficulty: heteroclinic loops The larger the number of types, the larger the fraction of heteroclinic loops among the possible attractor structures !

things that remain to be done Analyse how to deal with the heteroclinic loop problem. Classify the geometries of the fitness landscapes, and coexistence sets near singular points in higher dimensions. Extend the collection of known global geometrical results. Develop a fullfledged bifurcation theory for AD. Develop analogous theories for less than fully smooth s-functions. Delineate to what extent, and in which manner, AD results stay intact for Mendelian populations. (Many partial results are available, e.g. Dercole & Rinaldi 2008.) (Some recent results by Odo Diekmann and Barbara Boldin.) (Some results in next lecture.)

The end Stefan Geritz Ulf Dieckmann in next lecture:

subsequent levels of abstraction The different spaces that play a role in adaptive dynamics: the physical space inhabited by the organisms the state space of their i(ndividual)-dynamics the state space of their p(opulation)-dynamics the space of the influences that they undergo (fluctuations in light, temperature, food, enemies, conspecifics): their ‘environment’ the trait space in which their evolution takes place (= parameter space of their i- and therefore of their p-dynamics) = the ‘state space’ of their adaptive dynamics the parameter spaces of families of adaptive dynamics

population dynamics: branching process results In an a priori given ergodic environment E : mutant populations starting from single individuals either go extinct, or "grow exponentially” (with a probability that to first order in | Y – X | is proportional to ((E,Y))+, and with (E,Y) as rate parameter).

adjacent purple volumes are mirror symmetric around a diagonal plane matryoshka galore polymorphisms are invariant under permutation of indices X3 the six purple volumes should be identified ! X2 X1 adjacent purple volumes are mirror symmetric around a diagonal plane

matryoshka galore the sets of trimorphisms connect to the isoclines of the dimorphisms X3 X1 X2 (x2 = x3) (x2 = x1)