Michel Denis, ExoMars Ground Segment Manager, HSO-OPM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESA Iris Programme workplan of activities
Advertisements

June 26, 2002; Page: 1 ESOC (TOS-OGR) European Space Operations Centre Manfred Warhaut Ground Segment Manager TOS-OGR ROSETTA Ground Segment.
OCAMS Orbital Communications Adapter (OCA) Management System NASA/JSC/DO/Tim Hall Aug 2011.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec ESWT # Rover science preparations (RSM, LS) Status, problems, and how we will solve.
Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations The planning concept - current status Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC.
AMS-02 Rebaselining Outbrief ISS PIA/ICD & SSP MIP/ICD ISS Payload Mission Integration & Planning/OZ2 Space Shuttle Mission & Cargo Integration Office/MO3.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Plans for rover operations training at ROCC M. Cinato.
Turin. ALTEC. ExoMars Progress Report ExoMars Science Working Team
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
16 th International Laser Ranging Workshop, Poznan Poland, Oct. 14 th, 2008 Laser Ranging (LR)-Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Data Flow and Scheduling.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
09 May 2014page 1 ROCC to PPL ICD Initial Definition ExoMars Rover Operations Control Center ROCC.
1 ExoMars Programmatic situation December 2014 Rolf de Groot Head of Robotic Exploration Coordination Office ESWT#7 meeting, 9-10 December 2014, Altec,
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test One and Two Tower Integration Readiness Review.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
N A managed approach to planning and controlling the implementation of complex application software. n A flexible tool kit, designed to support the Project.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
EOSC Generic Application Security Framework
RSOC System Testing Status - 1 RSOC System Test Concept –Covered in RO-EST-PL-5013 –Status to be presented at key system reviews (GSRR) Connectivity Tests.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Available Tools for planning and Data Processing I. Musso.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
Flight-like Flight Software Testing Methods Celina A Garcia Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology ©2009 California Institute of.
Design of a Science Operations Centre for the ExoMars 2016 Trace Gas Orbiter Mission A. Cardesin Moinelo, D. Frew, L. Metcalfe, P. Martin, N. Manaud, A.
1 CROSS SUPPORT SERVICE ARCHITECTURE Takahiro Yamada (JAXA/ISAS) CCSDS Meeting, Heppenheim, Germany 2 October 2007.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
SGS: Activities and Requests Helen Middleton. Hermean Environment Working Group Meeting | SGS Team | Key Largo | 16/05/2013 | Slide 2 Contents 1.ESAC.
ExoMars LSEC 2018 Landing Site Engineering Constraints LSSWS# December 2014 L. Lorenzoni and ExoMars Project.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
DOC-TAS-EN-002 ALTEC Auditorium - Torino - Italy December 9-10, 2014 Bruno MUSETTI ESWT#7 – ESWT#7.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
ESWT # Rover operations concept
Planetary Missions Division Dvk, 16 Jul 2002 Interfaces - presented at the SWT #10 To clarify the situation with interfaces, formats, etc. Summary: There.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun Mission Operations Review News Elena Adams 7/16/2015.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations Experimenter to RSOC interfaces Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC
Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
1 Columbus Control Center - Teams and Responsibilities - Roland Luettgens ESA Columbus Lead Flight Director Tel:
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
Inventory and Stowage Overview Kay Standridge February 26, 2004 MSFC/ESA TIM #2.
Payload Inventory Management & Stowage Operations Processes 10/19/99 Point of Contact Gordon Boswell MSFC/POIF/OI (256)
The road to the first E2E tests
ESA Iris Programme workplan of activities
ESA's Ground Station Network Prospects for operations of the Lagrange missions S. Kraft OPS-L , K.-J. Schulz OPS-GS 08/03/2017.
I&T&C Organization Chart
Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
ECSS-E-ST-50-15C Adoption Notice
Solar Orbiter Instrument Testing by MOC-SOC
The RSP Archive System RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Exploitation of ISS Scientific data - sustainability
Ground Segment for WSO/UV
Systems Engineering Management
Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
IOAG – Industry Exchange Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Michel Denis, ExoMars Ground Segment Manager, HSO-OPM ExoMars 2018 Ground Segment and Operations Preparation Overview and Status Michel Denis, ExoMars Ground Segment Manager, HSO-OPM

Ground Segment and Ops Preparation Status Mission Definition and Assumptions Mission Overview Responsibilities Ground Segment Ground Segment Overview Stations and Facilities Schedule Operations Mission to Mars: SC Composite Operations, Mission Analysis, Flight Dynamics, MOC Systems Mission at Mars: Coordinated Ops; ERCO Roles and Interfaces Conclusions

SC Composite Transfer to Mars (incl. EDL Prep.) Overview – 3 Operational top-level “Phases” SC Composite Transfer to Mars (incl. EDL Prep.) Platform Ops: Egress Support, Handover Relay Coordination Jan 2019 Jan-Sep 2019 (+) May 2018 – Jan 2019

EXM 2018 Ops Responsibilities – Assumptions (to be agreed by all parties) Before Launch  Mars Arrival SCC Transfer: ESOC responsible, with single interface to Industry to be established (TBC) EDL: Industry responsible for definition and validation of SW and sequence of events (like EXM2016) - including delivery of validated in-flight updates to ESOC for uplink Rover: ROCC responsible for Checkout; ESOC provides access SP Payload/Systems: SPOCC responsible for Checkout; ESOC provides access After Mars Arrival (Rover/SP Operations on Surface) Rover Ops performed by ROCC, with supervision by ESA , located in ROCC SP early ops (ending with Rover egress) ESOC responsible for SP operations needed for Rover egress; SPOCC responsible for minimum set of science ops (if any?) SP operations during science phase by Surface Platform Operations Center (SPOCC)

Ground Segment Overview – “data interfaces” EXM2016 Orbiter (TGO) ESA ExoMars 2018 Spacecraft Composite ESA ROS Surface Platform Rover ESA ROS NASA ESA TM/TC TM/TC TM/TC EXM2016 ESA Ground Stations ROS Russian 64m Ground Station(s) DSN Ground Stations NASA Already exists now (EXM2016, or other) 2018 ROCC (Safe/Survival Mode) TM/TC TM/TC TM/TC TM/TC ESA Relay Coord. Office (ERCO) ExoMars 2016 OrbiterMOC ESOC Egress, Relay EXM2018 SCC MOC DSN DSOC ALTEC TM/TC TM/TC 2018 SPOCC TM/TC ESOC ESOC TM/TC Transfer Egress ROS Planning / TC TBC UHF Radio Telescope For 2018 DM EDL MaROS ExoMars 2016 OrbiterMOC ESOC Relay NRO MOC NASA TM NASA DSN DSOC NASA TM/TC NASA landed assets

Stations and Space Communications Space-Ground interfaces Request for Frequency Assignment (RFA) - Draft + Space-Ground SGIRD available SCC SGICD Vol.1 to be written (with Industry); Vol. 2 available ROSCOSMOS 64m Station Bear Lakes in baseline to complement ESTRACK Full support (downlink, uplink, ranging/Doppler) for all phases EXM 2018 requirements: doc available, under discussion Finalise and define plan of works;  Define combined Usage Profile ESTRACK + Russian Stations. Transfer to Mars ESTRACK Malarguë 3 * 4h / week + (non-critical ops) ; longer, daily, + Cebreros / New Norcia for SCC critical phases (LEOP, Mars Approach) ROS 64m (routine +critical): for unfavourable conditions, but not only  Schedule of support TBD Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) Visibility of Earth at Arrival time  Search for UHF radio telescope once time known Monitor via TGO, reuse for EXM2018 DM arrival the Electra Open Loop tool [EXM2016] Relay at Mars – current Rover Ops Concept requires ESTRACK (1 pass/day): covered by existing [EXM2016] TGO plans Plus ROS 64m Relay 1 pass/day with [EXM2016] TGO

High-level Preparation Schedule  Possibly to be adapted wrt Industrial Schedule and ESA-level reviews

Operations Preparation MIRD / MIP (Project ↔ ESOC) Ops Interface Requirements OIRD baseline available Mission Implementation Requirements (MIRD) – Close to signature TBW: Mission Implementation Plan MIP Flight Control Team (FCT) - Key Activities Secured resources for Ops Engineering and Ops Management to build the FCT  To be started : Flight Operations Plan (FOP): + Ops Spacecraft Database (from Industry inputs) TBW: User requirements + User acceptance for MOC systems Validation on SCC Hardware and Software: to be defined PFM: System Validation Tests SVTs Preceded + complemented by tests MOC ↔ Avionics Test Bench Ground Station Preparation ESTrack Validation Assistance to ROS 64m validation

Mission Analysis, Flight Dynamics, MOC Systems Mission Analysis Guidelines available + ad hoc studies on going  Consolidated Report on Mission Analysis (CREMA) - TBW Flight Dynamics  Requirements to be started for EXM2018 specifics, from Industry SCC User Manual Mìssion Control System (MCS) Requirements to be started: ESOC S2K infra (EXM2016) + EXM2018 customization System Simulator (Sim) Procedure validation, Team training for Cruise, EDL (upload verif), Surface Egress Requirements TBW : ESOC infrastructure, plus EXM2018 (OBC, attitude control) MOC Hardware and Facilities Computers  maximize commonality with EXM2016 Control Room, shared, already existing.  Proximity to EXM2016 MOC and ERCO ROCC-provided mini-system at ESOC (for major ROCC issue)  Integrate and Test

European Relay Coordination Office ERCO (@ ESOC) - Roles RELAY Ops Coordination (in preparation via [EXM2016]) Planning and Execution of all landed assets Ensure redundancy and 7/7 manning for critical ops and on-surface prime relay phase  Plan ahead TGO relay for ROV + SP ROVER and ROCC Ops: (In-flight) Check-out of Rover Cooperation SCC MOC (+ERCO) with ALTEC / ROCC for Egress Ops  Setup / responsibility lines to be consolidated between ESA, TAS-I, ROCC Surface Platform and SPOCC Ops: (In-flight) Check-out of Science payload Cooperation SCC MOC (+ERCO) with ROS / SPOCC for early SP ops and Handover  Define ROS Involvement in early SP operations and Handover + define Handover

European Relay Coordination Office ERCO – System and Ops Interfaces Mission Control System from [EXM2016] for data / cmds relayed via TGO Standard interface? Mission Planning System: Relay Planning Tool and central database of overflights, to support European + Russian assets with TGO independently of NASA tool Specific “Relay MPS“ Interfaces with ROCC / Rover: MOC/ERCO-ROCC IRD - baseline available Interplanetary Transfer: check-out (via file, as per relay ops) On Surface: via SP (before Egress) or from TGO. Interfaces with SPOCC / Surface Platform: Similar to ROCC TBW: MOC/ERCO - SPOCC Interface Agreement Define Responsibilities, reqts, database, procedures, validation Interplanetary Transfer: check-out (via file) On Surface: TBD depending on design (OBC-1 /OBC-2)

Conclusions – Items Critical To Success For Launch (and beyond) Ground Segment development very compressed schedule for 2018 Launch Complex reqts archiecture on a network of flight and ground assets. 4 Ops centres. Validation: “end-to-end” testing of a multi-spacecraft/multi-centre system Russian station (with ESTRACK) key to mission For EDL DM preparation responsibilities share/split with Industry For Science and Relay Routine Cooperation and coordination between several ground segments ESA/ESOC hands over Surface Platform to ROS at end of Rover egress Relay of multi-agency multiple assets