Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
Advertisements

Solar Theory (MT 4510) Clare E Parnell School of Mathematics and Statistics.
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Comparing the Large-Scale Magnetic Field During the Last Three Solar Cycles Todd Hoeksema.
Jonathan A. Constable University of St Andrews Solar REU Presentation 2009 A flux rope model for CME initiation over solar cycle 23 Jonathan Constable.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Evolution of the Large-Scale Magnetic Field Over Three Solar Cycles Todd Hoeksema.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
Nonlinear Force Free Field Models for AR J.McTiernan, H.Hudson (SSL/UCB) T.Metcalf (LMSAL)
ZEC Model parameters of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Jan. 18, 2011.
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Physics of the relationship of ICMEs to their CME progenitors (Wed AM) Two major efforts are under way to address the structure of CMEs that hit the Earth,
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
The Asymmetric Polar Field Reversal – Long-Term Observations from WSO J. Todd Hoeksema, Solar Observatories H.E.P.L., Stanford University SH13C-2278.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann (August 19, 2002) CME initiation: A zoo not an animal (Images from the on-line CDAW CME catalogue.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
The Solar Wind.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 2: Corona & Heliophere.
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
ENLIL Modeling for the interaction event: Effect of Interacting CMEs on SEP Intensity NASA/GSFC H. Xie, N. Gopalswamy, P. Makela, S. Yashiro.
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
Solar Wind Helium Abundance and the Minimum Speed of the Solar Wind
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Manuela Temmer Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Austria Tutorial: Coronal holes and space weather consequences.
Long-term measurements of the Sun’s poles show that reversal of the dominant magnetic polarity generally occurs within a year of solar maximum. Current.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
The Sun. Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth 12,742 km or nearly.
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
Dimming analysis 13/05/05 Gemma Attrill
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
A New Methodology to Predict the Axial ICME Magnetic Field at 1 AU
Consequences of the Anomalous Expansion of CMEs in Solar Cycle 24
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Magnetic Topology of the 29 October 2003 X10 Flare
Exploring Large-scale Coronal Magnetic Field Over Extended Longitudes With EUVI EUVI B EIT EUVI A 23-Mar UT Nariaki Nitta, Marc DeRosa, Jean-Pierre.
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
Modeling Coronal Mass Ejections with EUHFORIA
Solar Sources of Wide Coronal Mass Ejections during the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24 Sachiko Akiyama1,2, Nat Gopalswamy2, Seiji Yashiro1,2 , and Pertti.
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
Presentation transcript:

Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting on Heliospheric Phenomena and Earth’s Environment September 7 – 13, 2009 Šibenik, Croatia

Large-Scale Structures CMEs Coronal Holes Global Field of the Sun Heliospheric Current Sheet

CME Interactions Non-radial motion of CMEs during the minimum phase CME – CME interactions during solar maximum CME – Coronal hole interaction during the declining phase CMEs tend to align with the heliospheric current sheet: CME rotation

Non-radial motion: Toward Equator 20 km/s 42 km/s S30 Filippov et al., 2001Gopalswamy and Thompson, 2000 Gopalswamy et al., 2003 ApJ

Other Observations Plunkett et al., 2001 F ~ A/r Cremades et al White-light prominences (CME cores): offset similar to Gopalswamy et al Cremades et al considered only equatorward and poleward deflections

Consequence of Equatorward Deflection: More Magnetic Clouds during Solar Minimum Phase Lat (N) Lat (S) CMD Rise: Max: Decl: All: Gopalswamy, 2006 Outstanding question: Is the deflection due to coronal-hole open field or the global dipolar field?

Why driverless shocks from disk center? The limb sources are normal (geometrical reason), but the disk-center sources are anomalous The anomaly seems to be due to the presence of coronal holes near the source region MAX DECLINING

The Solar Source of a “Driverless” Shock Compact AR 0588 to the south of a large coronal hole produced a 1368 km/s CME from S18E15. CMEs from such disk-center location result in shock+ICME at Earth. In this event only the shock arrived. Why? AR 0588 CH 8

SHEATH S1S2 CME1 CME2 Disk-center CMEs, but only shocks at 1 AU (S1, S2) and no ejecta (No depressed Tp) 9

Open Field Lines on the Sun: 2004/04/06 Red: Negative Blue: Positive CME Coronal hole immediately to the north of AR The coronal hole (CH) influence parameter (CHIP), viz., B 2 A/r 2 = 26 G 2 along PA = 137 o due to the NW CH [B = average photospheric field inside CH; A = area of CH; r = Distance of CH to the eruption region]. CHIP is a vector pointing from the CH centroid to the eruption region The smaller CH in the south contributed very little: the CHIP was only 0.75 G 2 The central position angle of the CME was 167 o, which is close to the direction of the CH influence 10

CH AR 0588 S18E15 From: courtesy: M. DeRosa & K. Schrijver Purple: Open White: Closed MDI Magnetogram with extrapolated field lines Based on the east-west orientation of the neutral line and the location of the large coronal hole to the north, we expect the northern leg of the flux rope is negative, as is the coronal hole. No reconnection is possible between the CME leg and the CH field lines. The CH influence parameter has a value of 26 G 2 which pushes the CME below the ecliptic, so the flux rope is not observed at Earth. The northern flank of the shock is observed rendering it a “driverless” shock 2004/04/06 10:46 UT SOHO magnetogram 11 Magnetogram: white = +; black = -

Coronal Hole Influence Parameter F = ∑ f i f i = A i /r i 2 F MPA (Open field lines only shown) riri AiAi MPA Gopalswamy et al., 2009 JGR F = 14 G pointed along the PA (FPA) of 234 o.

The CME direction roughly coincides with the direction of F

Shocks with ICMEs CH have minimal effect: CHs smaller and/or far from the eruption CH deflect CMEs toward Sun-Earth line F generally small (2.5 G vs.5.8 G for driverless)

Deflection Observer Sun Open field lines from coronal hole Shock ahead of the deflected CME Shock Why ‘driverless’ shocks from disk- center CMEs? +

EUV Wave Reflection from CH: Higher Alfven Speed in the CH Gopalswamy, Yashiro, Temmer et al., 2009 ApJL

CME1 839 km/s CME km/s Two CMEs from the same region AR CME Cannibalism

Only one shock and a merged ICME CME interaction most common during the maximum phase

HCS affecting an ICME Coronal field maps calculated for CR2006 with CCMC/PFSS (top and middle) and MAS models (bottom). Panels a, b and c show maps for source surface radius of 1.6 R , d and e show maps at 2.5 R , while panel f shows MAS map at 16.5 R ,. The thick black contour is the coronal neutral line. The red oval represents the halo CME on Aug 14, 2003, which was aligned with the coronal neutral line at 1.6 R . Magnetic topology has changed further outward from the solar surface so that the neutral line rotated by approx. 50 deg. Yurchyshyn, 2008

Summary CME propagation can be affected by global solar field (min), CME interaction (max), and coronal hole deflection (declining) The presence of coronal holes near the eruption regions seem to make the CMEs behave like limb CMEs When magnetic topology changes outward from the solar surface, the neutral line seems rotated and so does the CME axis.