2006-06-21Coll Eng E Doyle 1/18 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Prototype Engineering Status 6/21/06 Jaw-hub-shaft concept - continued Permanent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator Prototype 30 September 2013 LHC Collimation WG Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US.
Advertisements

Status of the LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator Prototype 14 October 2013 LHC Collimation WG Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC.
SLAC rotating collimator for HiRadMat beam tests 14 March 2014 S. Redaelli, A. Bertarelli, CERN T. Markiewicz, SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
BNG Industrial experience on Superconducting Undulators C. Boffo, T. Gehrard, B. Schraut, J. Steinmann, W. Walter, Babcock Noell GmbH T. Baumbach, S. Casalbuoni,
LARP Collimator Tasks Summary 28 April 2006 LARP Collaboration Meeting-LBL Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
Engineering Department ENEN 16/08/2013 LR - BBC Pre-Study 1 STATUS of BBC DESIGN and ENGINEERING : PRELIMINARY RESULTS G. MAITREJEAN, L. GENTINI.
LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation 26 October 2006 LARP Collaboration Meeting – Port Jefferson, NY Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Representing.
Beam LARP Rotatable Collimator Mechanical Engineering Discussion 03 October 2008 Phase II CERN ME Video Mtg. Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC.
LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation 26 October 2006 LARP Collaboration Meeting – Port Jefferson, NY Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Representing.
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
LHC Phase II Collimator teleconference - 4 March 2008LHC Rotatable Phase II Collimators 1 beam LARP Phase II collimator Progress and Plans 4 March 2008.
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 06 June 2006 No 1 /17 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Test Program Plan Forward Revised.
Status of Phase II Energy Loss Studies 1. FLUKA with “simple” CERN-provided input file modeling ~40m around primary collimators used for all SLAC studies.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 16 May 2006 No 1 /22 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Test Program Revised 5/15/06.
The SLAC Phase II Collimator Program 15 June 2005 CERN Team Visit Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
CMS FPIX Cooling System Studies Joe Howell, Fermilab for the FPIX Upgrade Mechanical Working Group CMS Upgrade Workshop April 27,
A. Bertarelli – R. Perret CERN TS – MME Group 1 CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research Mechanical Engineering and Thermo-mechanical.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Summary of Winding Pack Thermal Results K. Freudenberg
F. Regis, LINAC4 – LBS & LBE LINES DUMP DESIGN.
LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation 18 April 2007 LARP Collaboration Meeting – Fermilab Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Representing Gene Anzalone,
1 LARP Collimator Engineering E. Doyle 2/3/05. 2 Review: SS Thermal Simulation 150mm OD 25mm wall Simply supported Heat: 1hr beam life, FLUKA results,
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Beam Rotatable Collimators as a Possible US Contribution to the LHC Luminosity Upgrade Project 20 June 2008 LARP DOE Review Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL-
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 Prototype Engineering.
LHC Collimators Phase 2 - Visit to Plansee 28th August Materials for Phase II collimators.
LARP Coll. Video-conf. May 12, '05Phase II Collimator Engineering - E. Doyle1/20 Adapting the NLC Consumable Collimator to LHC Phase II Secondary Collimation.
Phase II Collimators for LHC Upgrade at SLAC - Material Issues E. Doyle 03 Sept /25 Workshop on Materials for Collimators CERN 2007/09/03 Phase.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
LARP Rotatable Collimators 19 June 2006 ILC R&D Status Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 30 Jan 2007 No 1 /13 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Development and Test Program Status.
LARP LHC PHASE II COLL RC1 TESTS - S. Lundgren 10 Dec 2007 No 1 /12 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Collimator Development and Test Program Status.
accident deformation – doyle 1/12 Phase II Collimator - Accident Deformation Simulation December 11, 2006.
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator Status Report SLAC ILC R&D Summary Meeting 24 April 2006 T. Markiewicz/SLAC.
1 Calorimeter 4-May-2009 Added Slides Data from MAS GCALOR with phojet min-bias events in ATLAS detector.
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1, ETC - Status 4/10/06
Status of material tests
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 RC1 Construction and Test Plan LARP LHC PHASE II COLL REVIEW – RC1.
Dump Core Studied Design Solutions
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
2th EuCard Col/Mat WP Meeting
New approach for evaluating Equivalent fire severity of Design fires
Recommendations of 12/16/05 review committee & SLAC response
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
accident deformation – doyle (rev1) 1/8
Phase II Collimators : design status
LARP Phase II Secondary Rotatable Collimator
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-0 and RC-1
LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Micro Status Report of SLAC Phase II Plan Tom Markiewicz SLAC
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
LHC Collimator – RF Contact Concept (180o wrap)
Engineering Update E. Doyle 5/16/06
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-0 and RC-1
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
accident deformation – doyle 1/8
Phase II Collimator, Alternative Jaw Simulations
Presentation transcript:

Coll Eng E Doyle 1/18 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Prototype Engineering Status 6/21/06 Jaw-hub-shaft concept - continued Permanent deformation (elastic/plastic analysis)

Coll Eng E Doyle 2/18 Overview Review –Baseline jaw –Central stop Concept Discuss RC1 baseline deflection reference Refine baseline –Shorter pitch cooling helix –Solid core New jaw-hub-shaft concept Eliminate central stop? Plastic deformation

Coll Eng E Doyle 3/18 Exceeds Allowed Deflections All temperature simulations based on 20C supply. For CERN 27C supply add 7 to all temperature results. CERN max water return temp 42C Exceeds spec, or other possible problem as noted Review: Baseline Jaw Performance (deflections referred to edge of jaw - Note this is not a realistic mounting possibility) Baseline: hollow Cu, 25mm wall, helical cooling - 5cm pitch V V

Coll Eng E Doyle 4/18 Two concepts for reducing deflection Central aperture stop Separate shaft and jaw

Coll Eng E Doyle 5/18 86C Bending exceeds 25um spec => Compromise: Central aperture stop controls deflection - causes jaw to deflect away from beam – Note: this is idealized stop  x=394  m Spec: 25  m support Steady State operation (End supports as modeled) More realistic: shaft support -Swelling toward beam -Bending toward beam Idealized Central Aperture Stop -Swelling neutrallized -Bending neutralized

Coll Eng E Doyle 6/18 Leaf springs allow jaw end motion up to 1mm away from beam RC1 Concept as presented to reviewers: Flexible end supports with central aperture stop Stop prevents thermal bowing of jaws from intruding on minimum gap Local swelling not controlled

Coll Eng E Doyle 7/18 Real aperture stop allows some swelling Stop hidden out of beam’s reach at 45 o Swelling not fully neutralized – note bulge of hot region between stop and aperture. Peak temperature due to beam heating Stop V

Coll Eng E Doyle 8/18 Jaw-hub-shaft - Eliminate Central Stop? 1.Hub acts as a heat sink near peak temperature location, lowering peak temperature, reducing gradient and bending. 2.Both ends of jaw deflect away from beam. (Note: swelling component of deflection is not corrected - ~ the same as for 45 o.) 3.Max deflection toward beam reduced if the shaft deflection can be minimized 4.Cooling coils embedded in I.D. of jaw. shaft jaw hub

Coll Eng E Doyle 9/18 Advances since RC1 Baseline solid core more cooling

Coll Eng E Doyle 10/18 Evolution of jaw-hub-shaft 25mm deep cooling tubes SS 1hr beam Transient beam RC1 – not a practical support scheme More realistic Note reduced shaft end deflection – a positive result if stop is used Next for jaw-hub-shaft: Alternative materials to reduce shaft deflection

Coll Eng E Doyle 11/18 Alternative Shaft Materials Shaft supported case - Slight Improvement Deflection is combo of bending & swelling

Coll Eng E Doyle 12/18 Alternative Shaft Materials Central stop-supported case - No Improvement Note: values in table manually adapted from simulation results based on jaw edge or shaft end supports. Stop located in mid-jaw at 45 degrees from point closest to beam.

Coll Eng E Doyle 13/18 Evaluate jaw-hub-shaft 25mm deep cooling tubes Transient beam SS 1hr beam With stop con: 2x deflection pro: 75% reduction of shaft motion Shaft support only con: 4x deflection pro: simpler mechanism, same control architecture as Ph I 4x 2x Note: deflection means deviation from straight (in um). Eff length is length of jaw (in m) deflected <100 um compared to maximum deflection point. New Baseline

Coll Eng E Doyle 14/18 Permanent Deformation Initial condition: 1 hr beam lifetime heating rate. Transient: 10 seconds heating at 12min beam lifetime rate followed by 50 seconds cooling. Copper Glidcop AL15

Coll Eng E Doyle 15/18 Permanent Deformation Permanent Deflection – deviation from straight (um) Refined baseline73 All Cu shaft-hub-jaw62 All Glidcop AL15 shaft-hub-jaw~0 Permanent bending of jaw after one transient heating cycle. Deflection is concave as seen from beam. Glidcop AL15 effectively prevents plastic deformation.

Coll Eng E Doyle 16/18 Further refinements Optimize hub length, location Hub region solid Cu, two stub shafts of alternative material, butted to hub Shallow cooling tubes (~15mm) Glidcop only where necessary – outer radii

Coll Eng E Doyle 17/18 Xtra Slide

Coll Eng E Doyle 18/18 Evolution of jaw-hub-shaft 25mm =>10mm deep cooling tubes SS 1hr beam Transient beam SS Transient