AUSL Performance Data 1. The turnaround model An AUSL turnaround begins with new leaders, teachers and staff, additional programs and upgraded facilities,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Value Added in CPS. What is value added? A measure of the contribution of schooling to student performance Uses statistical techniques to isolate the.
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Update and 2009 Grant Process. What is ITQ? Part of Federal No Child Left Behind $$ focused on increasing the number of “highly qualified” teachers in.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Blaine: We’re #1 – Again! Blaine has a higher percentage of its students scoring above average on the NWEA MAP assessment than any other neighborhood school.
LEARN Charter School Network. Who We Are Our Mission: to provide children with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree Strong Demand.
Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November, 2012 Maria G. Cervantes, Principal.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Jerry Ross Elementary School All students and staff will grow as learners every day.
Annual Report of Progress The Public Schools of Jersey City Dr. Charles T. Epps, Jr. State District Superintendent of Schools January 4, 2006.
The Heart of Improvement: Leadership. The Story of Thomasville City Schools…
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
New Leaders for New Schools. Vision & Mission To ensure high academic achievement for every student by attracting and preparing outstanding leaders and.
ENSURING OUR STUDENTS GRADUATE COLLEGE & CAREER READY WITH A LONGER SCHOOL DAY November 2011.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Title I Annual Meeting  Information about Title I  Requirements of Title I  Rights of parents to be involved  Curriculum  Academic assessments.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
T3: Turnaround Teacher Teams. T3 Program History The T3 Initiative began in 2009 as a policy proposal from Teach Plus’s first cohort of 16 Teaching Policy.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Student Achievement in Chicago Public Schools
What is the SQRP?  The School Quality Rating Policy (SQRP) is the Board of Education’s policy for evaluating school performance.  It establishes the.
Graham School “State of the School” Address 0 December 11, 2014.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
District Performance Union County Public Schools.
STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Jeff Downs, Executive Director of STEM.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Learning The Namaste Way Kathryn Nelson, Development Associate.
Teacher Education Accountability: Impact on States and Teacher Preparation Programs Sophia McArdle, Ph.D. Office of Postsecondary Education.
Salt Creek School District 48 Annual ISBE School Report Card Board of Education Report October 30, 2012.
1 2 A Parent’s Guide to Title I The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was enacted in The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous Improvement Report for Triton School.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
Correlates of Effective Schools Debbie Russell Elementary Programmatic Staff.
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLANNING MEETING GRAVES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JULY 2015.
Performance Monitoring COURTNEY MILLS SCPCSD DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS.
Prussing Elementary School Budget Presentation FY
Presenters: Dr. Raelynn Parks, Superintendent/Principal Donna Butler, Curriculum & Instruction Coach Date: Aug. 30, 2011 Location: Catherine E. Calvert.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
Family Engagement Framework Vicki Myers, Ph.D. Special Assistant Family and Community Engagement Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Monique Toussaint.
Hodge Elementary School 9/15/15 11:0am & 4:00pm Parent Center Room 188.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
A challenge of maintaining current academic programming (core subjects and exploratory courses) with an increasing student enrollment. Increasing Student.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Apollo 20 Initiative Houston Independent School District Paula Harris Board of Education President Alicia Thomas, Ph.D. Deputy Chief Academic Officer.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Title I Annual Meeting
Comprehensive Planning
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Tough Decisions Julie Kowal.
Summary of Central Park School for Children’s Economic Diversity
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Title I Annual Meeting
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Teacher Name Teacher Name Teacher Name Teacher Name Teacher Name
Title I Annual Meeting Parker Elementary
Presentation transcript:

AUSL Performance Data 1

The turnaround model An AUSL turnaround begins with new leaders, teachers and staff, additional programs and upgraded facilities, resulting in more opportunities for Chicago’s children. This proven method brings in highly qualified staff specially trained to work in low-performing schools to help meet the specific needs of those students. Turnarounds have a laser focus on driving student learning, providing additional academic support in core subjects, implementing a high-quality instruction and setting transparent goals for schools, staff and students to reach.

3 Proven results Working in some of the District’s most challenging environments, AUSL has had a profound impact on academic performance and school culture: Thirteen of 16 AUSL turnarounds have outpaced the District average on ISAT meets or exceeds growth since undergoing the turnaround process. In 2013, four AUSL schools, including Piccolo, Herzl, Fuller and Marquette placed in the top 10 percent of growth for the District. All of these schools were in their first year under AUSL’s management. AUSL turnaround schools have outpaced the District average on NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) meets or exceeds growth in core subjects, including math and science.

Elementary Turnaround Schools 4

AUSL Schools Since Turnaround 13 of the 16 AUSL Turnarounds outpaced the District on Meets or Exceeds Gains since turnaround. 5

AUSL Turnaround Schools YearAUSL Schools included in One-Year Gains 2007 Sherman Harvard Howe and Morton Dulles, Johnson, and Bethune Bradwell, Deneen, and Curtis 2012 Same as Casals, Fuller, Herzl, Marquette, Piccolo, and Stagg AUSL Turnarounds had better one-year gains than the District on Meets or Exceeds in each of the last six years. 6

Average growth at AUSL was higher than most networks in NOTES: AUSL average includes all AUSL schools, including non-turnarounds. Charter school data is limited to charter schools that tested through CPS in 2013 and may not be representative of all charter schools.

AUSL Schools Since Turnaround 14 of the 16 AUSL Turnarounds have seen increases in attendance since turnaround. +1.1%+3.9% +5.6% +3.9% +2.9% +1.2% +5.0% +6.4% +3.0% +2.4% -0.3% +2.0% +0.2% -0.3% +1.9% +0.1% 8

AUSL Schools Since Turnaround 12 of the 16 AUSL Turnarounds have seen increases in enrollment since turnaround. * *2013 9

Proposed 2014 Turnaround Schools 10

2013 Performance Policy

2013 ISAT Composite District Average (52.5%)

ISAT Meets/Exceeds Composite

Attendance Rate