Teacher Quality, Distribution, and Turnover in El Paso Ed Fuller The University of Texas at Austin El Paso, Tx June28, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the North Carolina School Report Card.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation and Rewards OECD Mexico Joint Workshop December 1-2, 2009 Susan Sclafani National Center on Education and the Economy.
Ed Fuller, PhD University Council for Educational Administration and
Highly Qualified/Highly Effective Teachers. Presenter  Bev Pratt Education Specialist, ODE (503)
1 Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers in Texas: Supply, Demand, and Quality Ed Fuller, PhD University Council for Educational Administration Department.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Teacher Effectiveness in Urban Schools Richard Buddin & Gema Zamarro IES Research Conference, June 2010.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
No Child Left Behind Application Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education April 2007.
A “Best Fit” Approach to Improving Teacher Resources Jennifer King Rice University of Maryland.
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
Unfulfilled Promise: Ensuring High Quality Teachers for our Nation’s Students No Child Left Behind: A Status Report from Southeastern Schools Eric Hirsch.
Explaining Race Differences in Student Behavior: The Relative Contribution of Student, Peer, and School Characteristics Clara G. Muschkin* and Audrey N.
Challenging middle schools Presentation by Houston A+ Challenge.
Informing Policy: State Longitudinal Data Systems Jane Hannaway, Director The Urban Institute CALDER
Conditions to Support Successful Teaching Challenging Coursework: School Climate and Organization Elaine Allensworth April 10, 2012.
Understanding Teacher Labor Markets: An Update Don BoydHamp Lankford University at Albany Susanna Loeb Jim Wyckoff Stanford UniversityUniversity at Albany.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
Pey-Yan Liou and Frances Lawrenz Quantitative Methods in Education of the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota Abstract This research.
Using School Climate Surveys to Categorize Schools and Examine Relationships with School Achievement Christine DiStefano, Diane M. Monrad, R.J. May, Patricia.
ENG131 TECHNICAL WRITING ORAL PERSUASIVE PRESENTATION DELIVERED TO XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX DR. ELIZABETH LOHMAN, TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CC-BY Quality Teachers.
Developing High-Quality Campus Plans for Teacher Mentoring.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Teacher and Principal Effectiveness: What Do We Know? Philanthropy Roundtable Atlanta, GA September, 2009.
Per Pupil Spending and Student Achievement By Hilary Bachman.
Developing An Educational Model for a Competitive Alaska SWAMC March 6, 2014 Diane Hirshberg Center for Alaska Education Policy Research at ISER University.
What is the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future? National Commission with 29 members Chairman is Governor Jim Hunt (former Governor,
Teaching Makes A Difference Michael Allen, Ph.D. Program Director Education Commission of the States March 14, 2002 Little Rock, Arkansas.
HQT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS OSPA Spring Conference Newport, Oregon May 8, 2007 Pat Burk, Oregon Department of Education.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
The Distribution and Retention of Illinois Teachers Jennifer B. Presley Illinois Education Research Council Illinois New Teacher Collaborative Working.
Research conducted by SRI International California State University, Office of the Chancellor | Policy Analysis for California Education | University of.
Ensuring a Highly Qualified Teacher for Every Classroom With Support From the Pew Charitable Trusts Q U A L I T Y C O U N T S “If I can’t learn.
Education Reform in Alabama: Progress and Promise Rotary Club of Birmingham June 9, 2010.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Carroll County New Teacher Induction Champion for Kids “Delivering Support One Teacher at a Time!”
TSUS Education Policy Implementation Center (EPIC) February 21, 2011 Dr. Leslie Huling.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California.
NEW TEACHER INDUCTION By Amber Keller Dr. Massingill December 5, 2013.
Developing Talent Enhancing Careers Improving Student Learning REIL “Update” Rewarding Excellence in Instruction and Leadership Education Service Agency.
RESEARCH ON MEASURING TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS Roxanne Stansbury EDU 250.
High Stakes Testing Using Citywide Tests to Measure Student Learning High Stakes Testing Using Citywide Tests to Measure Student Learning P. Lewis P.S.
HEAD OF THE CLASS A Quality Teacher in Every Pennsylvania Classroom.
CONSORTIUM FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION – NORTH CAROLINA The NC Race to the Top Evaluation Plan: An Introduction October 10, 2011 Gary T. Henry,
Summer  Review research and current practices  Overview of ESEA and ARRA  Share state data  Examine evaluation systems  Discuss Oregon’s transition.
Ensuring Equitable Access to Excellent Educators Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Jennifer Baker Office of Next.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
March 15, :00pm Daryton A. Ramsey Educator Quality Grant Administrator.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Best Practices and New Perspectives in HR The Strategic Data Project Human Capital Diagnostic Spring GASPA | May 5, 2011.
1 Leaving Schools or Leaving the Profession: Setting Illinois’ Record Straight on New Teacher Attrition Karen J. DeAngelis and Jennifer B. Presley IERC.
SREE Inaugural Conference Low Performing Schools and The Market for Teachers Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University December 2006.
CSU Center for Teacher Quality Assessing Teacher Preparation Outcomes for Program Improvement and Institutional Accountability CSU Academic Council Meeting.
California State University, Office of the Chancellor University of California, Office of the President WestEd The Center for the Future of Teaching and.
The Importance of Equitable Access to Effective Educators.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
The ISLLC Standards for School Leaders: A Comparison of Traditionally Certified Administrators and Administrators Certified Via Examination in California.
Strategies for Promoting Equity with Diverse Student Populations: Students in Rural Communities 1.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS)
Merit & Incentive Pay Based on High Stakes Testing
Trends in Michigan Teacher Certification and Mobility
Holli G. Bayonas, Ph.D & Eric S. Howard, M.A.
Induction & Assignment
Dan Goldhaber1,2, Vanessa Quince2, and Roddy Theobald1
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Quality, Distribution, and Turnover in El Paso Ed Fuller The University of Texas at Austin El Paso, Tx June28, 2006

2 Do teachers influence student achievement? Is teacher quality equitably distributed across schools and classrooms? Which teachers are most likely to quit or move? Where do teachers go when they leave a district? How much do districts spend on replacing teachers? Why do teachers quit or move? What can districts do?

3 Teacher Quality Matters A growing body of research has found that teacher quality is THE most important education factor associated with school achievement. Students assigned to effective teachers make greater gains in student achievement than students assigned to ineffective teachers.

4 Students Who Start 3 rd Grade at About the Same Level of Reading Achievement… Source: Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on Longitudinal Student Achievement, 1997.

5 …Finish 5 th Grade at Dramatically Different Levels Depending on the Quality of Their Teachers 24 Source: Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on Longitudinal Student Achievement, 1997.

6 Low-Achieving Students Become High- Achieving When Assigned to Effective Teachers Source: Sitha Babu and Robert Mendro, Teacher Accountability: HLM-Based Teacher Effectiveness Indices in the Investigation of Teacher Effects on Student Achievement in a State Assessment Program, AERA Annual Meeting, 2003.

7 “…having a high quality teacher throughout elementary school can substantially offset or even eliminate the disadvantage of low socio-economic background.” John Kain, Eric Hanushek, and Steven Rivkin Source: Steven G. Rivkin, Eric A. Hanushek, and John F. Kain, Teachers, Schools and Academic Achievement, Univeristy of Texas-Dallas Schools Project, 2002.

8 Inequitable Distribution of Teachers Students who need effective teachers the most are the LEAST likely to have access to such teachers. Schools serving high percentages of poor and/or minority students are LESS likely to have well-qualified teachers than schools serving low percentages of such students. Schools with LOW LEVELS of achievement have LOWER percentages of well-qualified and effective teachers. Within schools, poor and/or minority students are LESS likely to be taught by a well-qualified or effective teacher. Within schools, low-achieving students are LESS likely to be assigned to a well-qualified or effective teacher.

9 Teacher Quality Measures in El Paso County by School Achievement

10 How do these inequalities arise? Are the inequitable distributions from hiring practices? Do the inequitable distributions from teacher turnover?

11 Some evidence suggests that district hiring policies contribute to these inequalities: Hiring teachers late in the summer Placing teachers in positions for which they are not prepared Hiring under-qualified teachers Other evidence suggests that the inequalities are initially small, but grow over time: The novice teacher quality is fairly equal across schools Teacher transfers and attrition results in growing inequities across schools

12 Initial Distribution of Novice Teachers in El Paso County by School Achievement (2003)

13 Teacher Retention by Elementary Pedagogy Certification Test Score (Class of 2000)

14 Five Year Retention Rate for Novice Teachers by Elementary ExCET Pedagogy Score (El Paso)

15 Novice Teachers Never Failing the ExCET Pedagogy Test Moving Schools by Student Achievement (El Paso)

16 Three-Year Average of the Percentage of Teacher FTEs Moving to Other Schools by the Quintiles of 2003 TAKS Performance

17 Teacher Retention by School Level (Class of 2000)

18 Five Year Retention Rate for Novice Teachers by School Level

19 Retention Rate by Certification Area (Elementary Class of 2000)

20 Retention Rate by Certification Area (Secondary Class of 2000)

21 Teacher Retention by Secondary Pedagogy Certification Test Score (Class of 2000)

22 Non-White Teacher Retention by Secondary Pedagogy Certification Test Score (Class of 2000)

23 Five Year Retention Rate for Novice Teachers by Secondary ExCET Pedagogy Score (El Paso)

24 Teacher Retention by Race/Ethnicity (Class of 2000)

25 Five-Year Teacher Attrition and Mobility by Years of Teaching Experience

26 El Paso Teachers: Stayers, Movers, and Leavers (2001 to 2005) Stayed: remained in the same district. Moved: Transferred to another district. Quit: Left the TX public school system.

27 El Paso Novice Teachers: Stayers, Movers, and Leavers (2001 to 2005) Stayed: remained in the same district. Moved: Transferred to another district. Quit: Left the TX public school system.

28 Number and Percentage of Teachers Moving to Locations

29 Receiving El Paso County Districts

30 Recruitment and Hiring Costs Incurred by Due to Teacher Attrition (excludes mobility) Based on assumption of $15,000 to replace a teacher

31 Percentage of Teachers Stating that Mentoring/Induction Influenced Their Decision to Stay at Their School 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey, Center for Teaching Quality

32 Percentage of Teachers Stating Their Intention to Stay at the Same School by Degree of Help in Selected Mentoring Activities

33 Most Important Factors in Influencing Teachers’ Future Intentions

34 Leadership Behavior that Affects Teachers’ Future Intentions 2006 North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey, Center for Teaching Quality

35 What can districts do to improve student achievement? Ensure EVERY child has access to a well-qualified teacher, but focus on the lowest achieving students. How? By recruiting and retaining the most qualified and effective teachers. Implement effective hiring practices. Invest in an effective and research-based mentoring and induction program. Provide monetary incentives to teach in hard-to-staff schools (e.g., hiring stipends, retention stipends) Ensure effective principals are placed and retained in the schools that need them the most. Increase pay for those teachers in shortage areas. Focus on teacher working conditions.

36 Research and Evaluation Policies Develop an on-line data collection system for: Collecting data on teachers’ reasons for staying and leaving Collecting data on teacher working conditions Create a consortium of districts and preparation programs to focus on research: Tracking individuals from high school through college and into teaching Investigating the relationship between teacher characteristics, teacher behaviors, and preparation program practices and student achievement. Investigating the relationship between administrator characteristics, administrator behaviors, and preparation program practices and teacher turnover.

37 Contact Information: Ed Fuller (512)