Prioritisation and Resource Allocation Dr. Arun Ahluwalia Dr. Carol Chatt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rationing in health care
Advertisements

Interpreting Social Values in Health Sarah Clark University College London Presentation to UCL Conference: ‘How Can We Set Priorities in Health Fairly?’
How do we achieve cost effective cancer treatments in the UK? Professor Peter Littlejohns Department of Public Health and Primary Care.
Should We Ration Health Care for Older People?
Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis of a £15 million Welsh Government Health Improvement Fund Professor Rhiannon Tudor Edwards CHEME, Bangor University.
Lessons Learned from Health Care Reform Presentation to Citizens’ Health Care Working Group September 23, 2005 Jean Thorne, Administrator Oregon Public.
Making Decisions in Health Care: Cost-effectiveness and the Value of Evidence Karl Claxton Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related.
We show that MP can be used to allocate resources to treatments within and between patient populations, using a policy-relevant example. The outcome is.
“Rational Pharmacology” and Health Economics By Alan Maynard.
A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE COST- UTILITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL INTERVENTIONS Quality of improved life opportunities (QILO)
Government and Health Care Roughly 15 cents of every dollar spent in US is on health care US health care spending equaled $5841 per person in 2002 Governments.
Should Decision-Makers Embrace “Non- Constant” Discounting? Mike Paulden Samprita Chakraborty Valentina Galvani Christopher McCabe.
Economic evaluation considers assessment of intervention effects in economic terms, which is often of greatest interest to fund allocators Intervention.
The Rational Decision-Making Process
Government and Health Care Roughly 15 cents of every dollar spent in US is on health care US health care spending equaled $5841 per person in 2002 Governments.
Chapter 14 – Efficient and Equitable Taxation
1 Module 1 INTRODUCTION TO DECISION ANALYSIS. 2 Introduction To Decision Analysis Learning Objectives Reasons for studying decision analysis Basic sources.
COST–EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS AND COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
Health care decision making Dr. Giampiero Favato presented at the University Program in Health Economics Ragusa, June 2008.
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
Yay health care!. The Problem Background 14% of Oregonians Uninsured Health Care costs increasing Hmm… If only there was a way to increase the number.
6 th GCC Primary Health Care Conference Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 05 June 2007 The Effectiveness of Primary Care Elizabeth A. Dubois Associate Director.
Newcastle City Council budget Financial context.
AGEC 608 Lecture 17, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 17 Objective: Review the main aspects of cost- effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA).
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
Health Economics & Policy 3 rd Edition James W. Henderson Chapter 4 Economic Evaluation in Health Care.
Health Care guaranteed – The Right to Health in Germany Which Lessons could be learned about or from Germany? Remarks by Franz Knieps, Managing Partner.
Designing Influential Evaluations Session 2 Topics & Timing Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.
Rational Decision Making SSEF2. Decision Making Decision making refers to the process by which rational consumers seeking their own happiness or utility.
Enhanced Services- Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis Health Economics Team.
Copyright 2011 Right Care The Accountable Integrated Care System Sept 2011 Commissioning for Value.
Cost-Effectiveness Problem l You have a $1.5 billion budget to spend on any combination of these programs:
The Oregon Story Health Care Rationing: A Case Study.
Setting Priorities Delivering Best Value Managing Scarcity: Experience from Tayside Danny Ruta.
Knowing what you get for what you pay An introduction to cost effectiveness FETP India.
Introducing the budget World Bank Institute’s Parliamentary Staff Training Program.
IN THE NAME OF GOD Flagship Course on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing; Module 4: : How to construct.
Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds Professor of Health Economics
Shifting resources: disinvestment and re-investment Craig Mitton, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research.
Biomedical Engineering for Global Health Lecture Six.
Ten Principles of Economics
EFFECTIVE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING Successfully combining the strategic and the responsive Raising achievement through effective planning.
Elizabeth Docteur European Health Forum Gastein 7 October 2004 Towards High-Performing Health Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Reform.
Basic Economic Analysis David Epstein, Centre for Health Economics, York.
3/12/2009 Decision and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis James G. Kahn after Eran Bendavid When Rationality Falters: Limitations and Extensions of Decision Analysis.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 23: Nov 17, 2008.
Flagship Program on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing.
PHARMACOECONOMICS Dr. Mohammad Aljawadi, PharmD PhD Department of Clinical Pharmacy King Saud University Aug, 2015 PHCL 431.
SE 361 Lecture-03. Science is defined as: a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study; knowledge or a system of knowledge covering.
Rationing Priority setting
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 12: Health and health care Barr: Economics of the Welfare.
EAP Task Force Handbook for Appraisal of Environmental Projects Financed from Public Funds Nelly Petkova Paris, 22 February 2007 EAP Task Force.
DIFFICULT DECISIONS IN HEALTH CARE Presentation to OJHOSC Dr Ljuba Stirzaker Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust 13 March 2008 ITEM JHO8(a) JHO3.MAR1308R03.ppt.
Social Values and Health Priority Setting Sarah Clark and Albert Weale University College London NICE International Health Priority Setting Conference.
Waiting Time Management Strategies for Scheduled Services Ottawa March 28, 2012 Minimizing the Cost of Waiting Ray Naden, New Zealand.
Flagship Program on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing.
Cam Donaldson Yunus Chair in Social Business and Health NIHR Senior Investigator Joint Strategic Commissioning – analysis event 8 th October 2014 PBMA.
Cost-Effectiveness and Outcomes Research Setting value to what we do.
Health Economic Course Series
Purchasing Sustainable Care for Patients across the Care Continuum (Health Partners)
Who is involved in making NICE guidance recommendations and what evidence do they look at? Jane Cowl, Senior Public Involvement Adviser Tommy Wilkinson,
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 25: Dec 1, 2008.
© University of South Wales Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Outcomes Conference and Hub Launch Belfast, May 1, 2014 Running a tight ship:
Jan 2002 EDMA The central role of the Medical Laboratory in a World of Managed Health An EDMA presentation of the benefits of in vitro testing as a basis.
Economics for Commissioning Angela Bate. IHS, Newcastle University UK.
An Economic Perspective
Health Economics M.MHLANGA 1.
Resource Allocation in Health Care
Health care decision making
Why do/should we do economic evaluation?
Presentation transcript:

Prioritisation and Resource Allocation Dr. Arun Ahluwalia Dr. Carol Chatt

In the next 5 years the NHS will have to set out more clearly what is – and what is not – available to patients free at the point of use on the NHS. Do you…. Strongly agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know ?

Prioritisation We saw earlier that when demand exceeds available resources, choices have to be made. Choices implies priorities

What is rationing? The allocation of resources, services or goods under some rational, emotional or political criterion Is this the same as prioritisation or resource allocation?

Implicit and Explicit Rationing Implicit rationing: care is limited, but neither the decisions, nor the bases for those decisions are clearly expressed. Explicit rationing: care is limited and the decisions are clear, as is the reasoning behind those decisions.

Rationing in the UK “Rationing in Great Britain has been implicit…It is a silent conspiracy between a dense, obscurating bureaucracy, intentionally avoiding written policy for macroallocation (rationing), and a publicly unaccountable medical profession privately managing microallocation so as to conceal life and death decisions from patients” (Crawshaw, 1990)

Explicit methods of rationing 1.League tables 2.Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA)

1. League Tables Economic evaluations produce information on cost-effectiveness If using comparable outcomes (e.g. QALY) can ‘rank’ according to cost-effectiveness Can use resultant ‘league table’ to allocate resources to most cost-effective first E.g. The Oregon Plan

The Oregon Plan In 1989, the state of Oregon embarked on a controversial experiment in the financing of health care. The state planned to add many uninsured people to the Medicaid program and to pay for this expansion by reducing the Medicaid benefit package — more people would be covered, but for fewer services. In 1991, Oregon ranked more than 700 diagnoses and treatments in order of importance. The state legislature then drew a line at item 587; treatments below the line would not be covered. Oregon had openly embraced the “R word”: rationing On February 1, 1994, the Oregon Health Plan, with its prioritized list, went into operation Thomas Bodenheimer The Oregon Health Plan — Lessons for the Nation N Engl J Med 1997; 337:

In 1987, Coby Howard contracted acute lymphocytic leukemia and needed a bone marrow transplant. Earlier that year, the Oregon legislature had discontinued Medicaid coverage for organ transplantation

Problems with League Tables Limited data on cost-effectiveness Studies to determine cost-effectiveness use different methods – e.g. compare new treatment to placebo / current treatment Determining cut-off point Needs constant updating

2. PBMA combines both technical and political rationing methods Principles: – If £1 were to be made available that £1 should be invested in an area in which the most benefit would be gained – If £1 were to be disinvested that £1 should be taken away from an area where the least benefit would be lost.

Which programme would you invest in? Which programme would you disinvest in?

Steps of PBMA 1. Choose a set of meaningful programmes. 2. Identify current activity and expenditure in those programmes. 3. Think of improvements. 4. Weigh up incremental costs and incremental benefits and prioritise a list. 5. Consult widely. 6. Decide on changes. 7. Effect the changes. 8. Evaluate progress. Brambleby and Fordham, What is PBMA? Oxford University

PBMA Main objective of PBMA is to reallocate resources so that benefits are maximised Successful implementation of PBMA requires resources to be shifted from the disinvestment list to the investment list But, – Disinvestment is difficult – PBMA is data hungry and time consuming – Difficult to obtain a representative advisory panel

Methods of rationing In your area of work, how do you deal with high demand?

Methods of rationing Delay – Create waiting lists Denial – Non-urgent or unsuitable cases are not done

Possible methods for quantity rationing In groups of 4 choose your preferred 3 methods of quantity rationing and your least favourite 3 methods. (10 minutes)

In Summary, Prioritisation is inevitable in a resource limited health care system PBMA is attractive to decision-makers – Seems ‘rational’ – Supported by DoH However, it is not easy – Increasing the input of various stakeholders may shift the culture of the public / media to accept rationing