March 3, 2014 IN SIXTY: Cancer Patient Journey. RELEASE AVAILABLE AT:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Developing the NCSI 2012 document: taking action to improve outcomes.
Advertisements

Physician Assistants Optimizing Patient Care. Presentation Objectives What is a PA? Scope of Practice PAs in Canada PAs benefiting the Health Care System.
Leading and innovating for excellence. Working towards the Best Cancer System in the World.
Midland Region Primary Healthcare Forum 30 May 2014.
Department of Vermont Health Access Vermont Blueprint for Health: Using APCD to Evaluate Health Care Reform Pat Jones, MS Blueprint Assistant Director.
Let Us Bring You the Insight You Need. I need to limit risk. I need to improve quality. I need access to information. I need to make informed decisions.
Living with and beyond treatment for cancer – the challenge for secondary care Nigel Acheson Medical Director Peninsula Cancer Network.
7 Day Working A Practical Perspective Dr Janet Williamson, National Director, NHS Improvement.
Somaiya Medical College and Maina Foundation Five Year Project for Raising breast Cancer Awareness in Pratikshanagar - Mumbai.
Paula Kealey Senior Macmillan Development Manager 8 th May 2014 Partnership Working and Developments in Cancer Care.
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Living with & Beyond Adult Cancer: What has been achieved so far? Adam Glaser National Clinical Lead.
Use Case 7 IHE Profiles & Actors Care Theme: Leveraging Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Use Case: Optimizing Cancer Care Coordination Leveraging.
Putnam County Hospital CANCER CENTER The Cancer Center is located on the 2 nd floor of Putnam County Hospital. Continuously Accredited by the American.
Enabling a Medical Home With a Patient Communication Strategy Jeanette Christopher Northwest Primary Care Group, P.C.
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
Pathway Model: A Tool to Measure Outcomes Target Population Engage those at greatest risk Assure connection to evidence-based intervention Measureable.
Keith J. Mueller, Ph.D. Director, RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis Head, Department of Health Management and Policy College of Public Health.
Achieving improved cancer outcomes- a pathway approach, engaging primary care and partners Kathy Elliott Programme Director – NHS Improving Quality (Delivery.
D etection of E arly Lung C ancer A mong M ilitary P ersonnel Study 1 Version
Patient-Centered Medical Home.
Decision Support for Quality Improvement
The “HELP” program Introducing case management approaches to HIV services in Lithuania Professor Malcolm Whitfield Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Program: COG Update CTOP Research Retreat David Nalepinski Director, Oncology Service Line & Business Operations May 23,
Health Provider Teams: How you can support cancer survivors after treatment Washington CARES about Cancer Partnership: Survivorship Taskforce June 2012.
Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Affiliated with Children’s Medical Services Introduction to the Medical Home Part 2 How does a Practice adopt.
Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Community-wide Coordinated Care. © 2011 Clarity Health Services The typical primary care physician has 229 other physicians working in 117 practices with.
Implementing a Provincial Cancer Performance Measurement Program in Saskatchewan, Canada 4 th International Cancer Control Congress November 2011 Riaz.
Organized Diagnostic Assessment Demonstration Projects Organized Diagnostic Assessment Demonstration Projects Grand River Regional Diagnostic Assessment.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Electronic Health Records in the Hospital Electronic Health.
Wait Times and Access MHRC Applied Health Services Research Workshop March
Coordinating Care Sierra Dulaney Lisa Fassett Morgan Little McKenzie McManus Summer Powell Jackie Richardson.
Lymphoedema Management: the Northern Ireland Model Jane Rankin Regional Lead Lymphoedema Network Northern Ireland (LNNI) February 2010.
File #1 Table of Contents Introduction Presenter’s Notes Oncology Rehabilitation: Web-based Learning for Physical Therapists Who Provide Rehabilitation.
An Integrated Approach to Breast Cancer Control A flexible approach that can be adapted to national or local circumstances.
System Changes and Interventions: Registry as a Clinical Practice Tool Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care, a national program of the Robert.
Chester Ellesmere Port & Neston Rural Making sure you get the healthcare you need West Cheshire CCG Strategy Dr Andy McAlavey Medical Director West Cheshire.
1000 Lives Annual Report North of England Cancer Network Annual Conference 20 th September 2013.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
A GP for Me Making it Work in Victoria November 27, 2013.
1 North West Toronto Health Links. 2 1.Primary care attachment 2.Coordinated care planning 3.7-Day post-discharge primary care follow-up 4.Reduce avoidable.
HEALTH GROUP REPORT Russell Patmore Medical Director, Clinical Support.
Integration of General Practice in Health services Doris Young Professor of General Practice.
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
Cancer Services Collaborative A Service Improvement Partnership between Cancer Networks, the National Cancer Programme and the NHS Modernisation Agency.
Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.
“A HEALTHY OUTSIDE STARTS FROM THE INSIDE” Robert Urich.
Improving Cancer Outcomes in Camden Dr Lucia Grun 19 March 2014.
Disease Pathway Management: Cancer Care Ontario’s Approach
Andrew Copley Director Of Finance & IM&T ~ Airedale NHS FT Care Anywhere the story so far…..
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative 2010 Update.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration - 1 Increasing Engagement in HIV Care through Health Department and Community Health Center Collaboration.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
PREPARED BY Cancer Programme Work Programme 2012/13.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
Florida Cancer Plan Phil Roland, MD FACS FACOG Florida State Chair A Commission on Cancer.
The Cancer Registry of Norway Jan F Nygård Head of the IT-department.
Gynaecological Oncology Patient Pathway Cecile Bergzoll Gynaecological Oncologist Wellington.
 Nearly 20 years old  Achieved College Status 2013  National ‘go to’ group for cancer nursing and cancer care  Influential  Submissions and lobbying.
Clinical evaluation of UHC for cancer
BREAST CANCER ONCOLOGY NAVIGATION SERVICE
Coordination (benign lesions)
Champlain LHIN Collaboration
The Nursing Process and Pharmacology Jeanelle F. Jimenez RN, BSN, CCRN
Six stage journey When diagnosed with a brain tumour.
How are PHNs Personalising the Mental Health System?
Oncology Market Forecast
Assessment of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Manitoba
Living With & Beyond Cancer (Personalised Care): SWAG Colorectal CAG Update 5th June 2019 Catherine Neck, Macmillan Cancer Rehabilitation/ LWBC Lead On.
Presentation transcript:

March 3, 2014 IN SIXTY: Cancer Patient Journey

RELEASE AVAILABLE AT:

1. Routine Visit to Doctor Referral to specialist Scheduling of tests Referral to surgery WAIT Referral to Oncologist Referral to Surgery Treatment Staging If necessary, return to oncology or surgery to choose another round of treatment WAIT Recovery Results Rapid Assessment 3. Treatment 4. Follow -up Go to 3: Treatment 6. Five Years Later 5. Later Living Cancer Free End of Life Recurrence? Patient Visit Tests to rule out simple explanations GP Disbelief/ Misdiagnosis Untreatable: Go to 5: (Supportive/ Palliative Care) Unclear Diagnosis Watchful Waiting Preventative Measures Medical, Surgical, Lifestyle Interventions Surgery ? Tests, Pathology, Imaging Diagnos is Results Suspicion of Cancer No Yes  Learn everything you can about this type of cancer  Talk to your family  Check insurance and finances  Talk to your employer  Find a support group More tests, pathology, imaging Treatable Cancer WAIT Scheduling Goo d New s Good News WAIT Radiation Therapy ? Stem Cell or Bone Marrow Transplant ? Try special request Investigate Clinical Trials Private Payment Fund Raising Drugs not covered Chemo Therapy ? Referral No Yes Treatmen t not sufficient Decisions to continue with further treatment Consider: Risks Side effects Quality of life Financial impacts Supportive/ Palliative Care Goo d New s 2. Diagnosis

1. Routine Visit to Doctor Referral to specialist Scheduling of tests Referral to surgery WAIT Referral to Oncologist Referral to Surgery Treatment Staging If necessary, return to oncology or surgery to choose another round of treatment WAIT Recovery Results Rapid Assessment 3. Treatment 4. Follow -up Go to 3: Treatment 6. Five Years Later 5. Later Living Cancer Free End of Life Recurrence? Patient Visit Tests to rule out simple explanations GP Disbelief/ Misdiagnosis Untreatable: Go to 5: (Supportive/ Palliative Care) Unclear Diagnosis Watchful Waiting Preventative Measures Medical, Surgical, Lifestyle Interventions Surgery ? Tests, Pathology, Imaging Diagnos is Results Suspicion of Cancer No Yes  Learn everything you can about this type of cancer  Talk to your family  Check insurance and finances  Talk to your employer  Find a support group More tests, pathology, imaging Treatable Cancer WAIT Scheduling Goo d New s Good News WAIT Radiation Therapy ? Stem Cell or Bone Marrow Transplant ? Try special request Investigate Clinical Trials Private Payment Fund Raising Drugs not covered Chemo Therapy ? Referral No Yes Treatmen t not sufficient Decisions to continue with further treatment Consider: Risks Side effects Quality of life Financial impacts Supportive/ Palliative Care Goo d New s 2. Diagnosis Primary Areas of Focus GOAL STATEMENT: To reduce the time from suspicion of cancer to first treatment to no longer than 60 days, by no later than 2016, in a sustainable manner that improves the quality of the cancer patient experience.

IN SIXTY: Disease Site Group Priorities 1.Breast 2.Colorectal 3.Lung 4.Prostate 5.Lymphoma

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee Deputy Minister Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee Co-Chair: Arlene Wilgosh Co-Chair: Dhali Dhaliwal Health Senior Leadership Council Emergency Working Group Clinical Lead Admin Lead Clinical Lead Admin Lead Clinical Lead Admin Lead Clinical Lead Admin Lead Clinical Lead Admin Lead Information Mgmt Working Group Primary Health Care Cancer Working Group Cancer Diagnostic Working Group Surgery Working Group Vulnerable Cancer Patients Working Group Program Evaluation and Monitoring Working Group Patient Participation Advisory Group Project Mgmt Team Clinical Lead Admin Lead Clinical Lead Admin Lead Medical - Radiation Oncology Working Group Community Cancer Hub Working Group Patient Participants Improvement Sub-Group(s) Improvement Sub-Group(s) Improvement Sub-Group(s) Improvement Sub-Group(s) Improvement Sub-Group(s) Current and future cancer patients & their families Rapid Improvement Community of Practice Improvement Sub-Group(s) Clinical Lead Admin Lead Cancer Disease Specific Groups ( Breast, Colorectal, Lung, Prostate, Lymphoma)

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

60 days

29 % of Manitoba’s breast patients moved from suspicion of cancer to treatment in 60 days or less (2010)

90 % of Manitoba’s breast patients moved from suspicion of cancer to treatment in 160 days or less (2010)

IN SIXTY – Use of Lean Six Sigma to Drive Improvement DMAIC Methodology Define MeasureAnalyzeImproveControl Find Solution Implement & Verify Solution Control Solution Define the problem properly so that you solve the right problem right Measure the as- is process in order to characterize the problem and to enable measurement of improvement Hunt for clues using analysis and experience Test hypotheses and get a repeatable solution Keep new process locked in

What does this mean for a breast cancer patient?  Direct referral  Same day service for mammography, ultrasound, and biopsy  Breast surgery slating improvements: o Coordination of surgery and plastics o Central referrals o Slating “ownership” review Systemic Opportunities

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

Evolution of the Community Cancer Program

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

1.Establish Manitoba Cancer Partnership Steering Committee 2.Implement efficiency & quality improvement initiatives within each care environment 3.Implement effective and efficient coordination, integration, and transitions between care environments. 4.Enhance Community Cancer Program Services 5.Implement Rapid Diagnostic Networks 6.Reduce Disparities of Access to Cancer Control Programs 7.Enhance capacity for assessment, measurement, monitoring, and reporting IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

Objective: Use existing data sources maintained by CPJI’s partner organizations to measure the pre-Initiative cancer patients’ journey from suspicion to treatment, beginning with breast cancer. Methods: Used record linkage to combine the Manitoba Cancer Registry and various population-based health services and clinical datasets for all Manitoba women diagnosed with breast cancer in With clinical advisors, developed an algorithm for assigning key points along the cancer journey. The algorithm was built on a sample of cases and validated through chart review before being applied to the population. Standard summary statistics and cumulative incidence (time to event) curves were used to describe the patients’ experience. IN SIXTY: The Deliverables

Community EMR & FFS Abstract eReferral and Patient Access Registry Tool Radiology Information System (RIS) and Picture Archiving System Lab Information System (LIS) Hospital EMR and Discharge Abstract Systems Hospital Admission Discharge Transfer System EDIS – Regional Emergency Department Information System CancerCare Manitoba Electronic Health Record (ARIA) MANITOBA CANCER TRACKING SYSTEM - Suspected Cancer - Diagnosed Cancer CANCER PATIENT JOURNEY TRACKER DATA MART IN SIXTY: Tracking the Journey Integration of Key Systems Providers Public Reporting

Thank-you Questions…?