Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution 2012 -- 10/14/2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FTA’s Small Starts Program Charlotte, North Carolina October 11, 2007.
Advertisements

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Copyright © 2011 Holland & Knight LLP. All Rights Reserved Capital Investment Grants Proposed Interim Policy Guidance April 15, 2015 Jeffrey F. Boothe.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
1 SCORT 2010 September 21, 2010 David Valenstein Federal Railroad Administration State Rail Planning.
MAP-21 Overview and Programmatic Impacts February 4, 2013 Serge Phillips MnDOT Federal Relations Koryn Zewers.
1 SAFETEA-LU Major Public Transportation Provisions of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Federal.
Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged 07 August 2013 Jennifer Hibbert Director FTA Office of Planning and Program Development.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
1 Federal Transit Programs Federal Transit Administration Jennifer Stewart FTA Region 8 November 9, 2007.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Florida Department of Transportation District 5 David Mulholland, Grady Smith, and Jeff Boothe December 6,
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
2012 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Project Selection Process.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Large Starts Issues for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking New Starts/Small Starts Listening Session and Seminar San Francisco, CA February 15-16, 2006.
New Starts/Small Starts Program APTA Annual Meeting San Diego, CA October 4, 2008.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
MAP-21: Impacts to New Starts and Small Starts Senate Transportation Finance and Policy Committee Mark W. Fuhrmann Program Director, New Starts February.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update ITS.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Ed Mortimer Director, Government Relations URS Corporation July 22, 2013.
1. New Starts Program Debate Preserving the American Dream Conference Washington, DC October 27, 2013 Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public.
Financial Planning Session E-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
New Starts/Small Starts and BRT: An Update APTA Bus Conference Seattle, WA May 5, 2009.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey A. Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
New Starts/Small Starts Workshop APTA’s Legislative Conference March 14, 2007.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
NEW STARTS/SMALL STARTS. New Starts Eligibility  Based on the results of planning and Alternatives Analysis  At least 50% or more of the total project.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
U.S. Department of Transportation Planning Certification Review National Capital Region Transportation Management Area TPB Tech Committee Briefing March.
New Starts/Small Starts Program APTA Rail Conference San Francisco, CA June 5, 2008.
New Starts/Small Starts Program APTA Legislative Conference Washington, DC March 12, 2008.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Federal Transit Funding for Transportation, Community & System Preservation U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration.
Proposed Interim Guidance – Small Starts. 2 Purpose Before Final Rule, evaluate and rate projects to: Advance projects into project development Provide.
Developed from a summary prepared for the New York State Association of MPOs 1.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Real Property Policy Update Planning and Development Committee August 4, 2015.
TRANSIT SYSTEMS PLANNING Module 3, Lesson 4. Learning Objectives Define systems planning Understand the steps required for plan selection and the key.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
APTA Webinar with Congressional Transit Staff– Overview of the FAST Act January 20, 2016.
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Southwest LRT Project Craig Lamothe, AICP Senior Project Manager
APTA Webinar with Congressional Transit Staff– Overview of the FAST Act January 20, 2016.
Transit Systems Planning
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/2012 1

MAP -21 Funding Levels Section 5309 program funding level $1.9 billion No specified funding levels for New Starts, Small Starts or Core Capacity

MAP -21 Environmental Provisions Accelerate project delivery and promote innovation while enhancing safety and protecting the environment Streamline transit and multi-modal project delivery Continue 2012 rulemaking to add additional categorical exclusions for transit projects

MAP -21 Metropolitan Planning Transit representation on MPO boards in regions of 200,000 population or more Performance measures and targets in Long Range Plans and Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) Flexible funding from Title 23 - option for transit

MAP -21 Eligible New Starts Projects Total New Starts funding sought is >$75M and/or project cost ≥ $250M New fixed guideway minimum operable segment or extension to existing fixed guideway system Fixed guideway BRT: 5 – Majority operates in separate right-of-way – Represents substantial investment in a single route in a defined corridor – Includes defined stations, traffic signal priority for transit, and short headway bidirectional services for substantial part of weekdays and weekend days

New Starts Project Development Process Alternatives Analysis Preliminary Engineering Final Design Full Funding Grant Agreement Develop and review alternatives Select locally preferred alternative (LPA) Adopt LPA into fiscally constrained long range transportation plan Complete environmental review process Gain commitments of at least 50% of non-New Starts funding Gain commitments of all non-New Starts funding Complete sufficient engineering and design Under SAFETEA-LU = FTA evaluation, rating, and approval= FTA approvalLegend Complete environmental review process including developing and reviewing alternatives, selecting locally preferred alternative (LPA), and adopting it into the fiscally constrained long range transportation plan Gain commitments of all non-New Starts funding Complete sufficient engineering and design Project Development Engineering Full Funding Grant Agreement Under MAP-21 Construction

MAP -21 Eligible Small Starts Projects Total cost <$250 million and Small Starts share <$75 million New fixed guideway systems and extensions Fixed guideway BRT Corridor-based BRT that represents a substantial investment in a defined corridor, with features including: – Defined stations – Traffic signal priority for transit – Short headway bi-directional services for a substantial part of weekdays and weekend days

Small Starts Project Development Process Complete environmental review process including developing and reviewing alternatives, selecting locally preferred alternative (LPA), and adopting it into fiscally constrained long range transportation plan Gain commitments of all non-5309 funding Complete sufficient engineering and design Project Development Expedited Grant Agreement Alternatives Analysis Project Development Project Construction Grant Agreement Develop and select locally preferred alternative (LPA) Adopt LPA into fiscally constrained long range transportation plan Complete environmental review process Gain commitments of all non-5309 funding Complete sufficient engineering and design Under SAFETEA-LU Under MAP-21 = FTA evaluation, rating, and approval= FTA approvalLegend Construction

MAP -21 Core Capacity Eligibility Substantial corridor-based investment in existing fixed guideway system Project must: – Be located in a corridor that is at or over capacity or will be in five years – Increase capacity by 10% – “not include project elements designed to maintain a state of good repair”

MAP -21 Core Capacity Definition includes: – Acquisition of real property and ROW – Double tracking – Signalization improvements – Electrification – Expanding system platforms – Acquisition of rolling stock for increasing capacity – Infill stations Specifically says “does not include elements to improve general station facilities or parking or acquisition of rolling stock alone.”

MAP -21 Core Capacity Process = FTA evaluation, rating, and approval= FTA approvalLegend Complete environmental review process including developing and reviewing alternatives, selecting locally preferred alternative (LPA), and adopting it into the fiscally constrained long range transportation plan Project Development Engineering Full Funding Grant Agreement

MAP -21 Evaluation and Rating Criteria Core CapacityNew StartsSmall Starts Project Justification :  mobility ;  environmental benefits ;  congestion relief ;  economic development ;  capacity needs of the corridor ;  cost effectiveness ( cost per trip ) Project Justification :  mobility ;  environmental benefits ;  congestion relief ;  economic development ;  land use ;  cost effectiveness ( cost per trip ) Project Justification :  mobility ;  environmental benefits ;  congestion relief ;  economic development ;  land use ;  cost effectiveness ( cost per trip ) Local financial commitment :  acceptable degree of local financial commitment including evidence of stable and dependable financing sources Local financial commitment :  acceptable degree of local financial commitment including evidence of stable and dependable financing sources Local financial commitment :  acceptable degree of local financial commitment including evidence of stable and dependable financing sources

MAP -21 Pilot Program for Expedited Project Delivery Demonstrate whether innovative project development & delivery methods or innovative financing can expedite project delivery No separate funding pot Eligible projects are new fixed guideways or core capacity projects seeking Section 5309 funds and not yet under an FFGA 3 projects will be selected – At least 1 shall be seeking > $100M in 5309 funding – At least 1 shall be seeking < $100M in 5309 funding

MAP -21 TOD Pilot Program Section 20005(b) of MAP-21 $10 million annually to assist in financing comprehensive planning associated with Section 5309 projects No funding available under a continuing resolution. Must await full year FY13 appropriation, as determined by Congress.

Next Steps Interim guidance Regulations Federal Register notices seeking applicants for pilot programs