Detention of Asylum Seekers in the United States Workshop on the Israeli Asylum System Academic Center of Law and Business November 12-13, 2012 Prof. Stacy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Work Without Fear Legal Briefing: Advancing Workers’ Rights Through Executive Action August 26, 2014 AFL-CIO.
Advertisements

1 Competences and Responsibilities of States. 2 Competences and Responsibilities of States State sovereignty Sovereignty as a concept of international.
Irregural immigration issue and return policy The project is co-financed by European Return Fund and Estonian Ministry of Interior Hungary (2)
APPLICATION FOR INADMISSIBILITY WAIVER U Visa is NonImmigrant Visa, so Need Waivers of Each Nonimmigrant Ground of Inadmissibility Derivatives need their.
POST-DEPORTATION HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE BOSTON COLLEGE Returning to the U.S. After Deportation: Hopes &
Seminar on detention of asylum-seekers and alternatives to detention UNHCR Position and Relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights UNHCR Representation.
ASYLUM PROCEDURE: THE CROATIAN EXAMPLE LEGAL PROVISIONS, PRACTICE AND FAILURES ANDREJ KRBEC FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB.
Estonian asylum policy MINAS-3 Study trip to Norway
[Insert date and place of the launch]. 2 [Add Regional/National] Overview Detention is a global challenge. There is no empirical evidence that the use.
Building a Human Rights Model: Detention and Due Process for US Asylum Seekers Mark Noferi Center for Migration Studies June 3, 2014.
International Conference/ ‘Steps to freedom’ project Riga, December 2011 International Legal Framework on Alternatives to Detention J.E. KAUTZMANN.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
1 Protection of stranded migrants Daniel Redondo – Training / Project Officer IML Unit-IOM Geneva.
Repatriation Agreements El Paso, TX and Ciudad Juarez, Chih.
Unit 8: Practice and Procedure Immigration Detention and Bond.
Obama’s Executive Action Relating to Immigration Enforcement Priorities January 16, 2015 Great Plains United Methodist Conference.
Cross-border cooperation is our way to take responsibility for refugees Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in Europe materials for a better practice.
Alternatives to detention and their practical implementation Introducing the CAP model 1.
Immigration Law Immigration law deals with bringing people into the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act—The immigration code book Code of Federal Regulations.
Presenters Cassandra Lopez Betsy Tao Moderator Teague Briscoe.
AUSTRIAN OMBUDSMAN BOARD Workshop - Sarajevo, September 2011 “The Role of National Human Rights Structures in Protecting against all Forms of Discrimination”
Criminal activity occurs. Prepared by the National Immigrant Victims Access to Justice Partnership (2010). This project was supported by Grant No DG-BX-K018.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
Monitoring immigration detention policy and practice in Norway Opportunities and dilemmas.
IMMIGRATION DETENTION IN THE U.S.. An Exploding Detention System By Kirsten Luce for The Washington Post The Willacy Detention Center, Raymondville, TX.
 ICE= Immigration and Customs Enforcement  Largest investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security.  Their job: identifying, detaining, and.
Admission Requirements Admission: the lawful entry of an alien into the U.S. after inspection & authorization by an immigration officer. Inspection: the.
THE FEDERAL BUREACRACY Examining the “Fourth Branch.
BORDER GUARD HQ ALIENS DEPARTMENT
Claiming Asylum or Protection in the United States To seek Asylum, the alien must show, a “well-founded fear of Persecution” because of 1 of the following:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT: Building Background Knowledge.
Chapter 9: The Executive Branch
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
Christmas Island (May 2010) Migration Act & Regulations  Christmas Island part of ‘excised ’ migration zone  Arrivals to Christmas Island – ‘offshore.
Bakhtiyari v Australia
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Seminar on Migration Legislation Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala 15 – 16 February 2007.
Using Technology to Meet the Needs of Asylum Seekers in the United States: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Design Considerations and Web Content Accessibility.
Discrimination on the grounds of Nationality Ana Rita Gil FDUNL, 13 November 2013.
Trends in detention of illegal migrants in European Union By Juris Gromovs Kiev, 7 February 2005.
The Executive Branch NEXT. Section 1: The Presidency The president and the vice president are required to have certain qualifications. Reading Focus What.
Implementation of reception and detention regimes in Lithuania prepared by Renata Kulesh Kyiv 7-8 February, 2005.
Seeking Relief Through Appeals Appeals Before The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) Should a petition or application be denied or revoked by the USCIS,
Tuesday, December 8 Need: Your notes, pencil/pen Patience EQ: How did the works of the Enlightenment influence the creation of the U.S. Constitution?
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 CIVICS IN PRACTICE HOLT Chapter 6 The Executive Branch Section 1:The Presidency The PresidencyThe Presidency Section 2:Powers.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 Chapter 6 The Executive Branch Section 1:The Presidency The PresidencyThe Presidency Section 2:Powers and Roles of the President.
Recent Enforcement Efforts in the United States: A Call to Action.
ICE National Sheriff’s Association Conference 2016 ICE Detention Authority defined by the US Supreme Court Monday February 8, 2016 Presented by Assistant.
Copyright Green Card Definition: Test Your Eligibility March.
Part 2. Seeking Asylum in Australia The process of seeking asylum in Australia is quite convoluted, especially if you arrived by boat. We’ll endeavour.
Pillkyu Hwang Gonggam Human Rights Law Foundation National Asylum System in South Korea Wednesday, 12 June 2013 UNHCR Annual NGO Consultations National.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 2– Freedom Movement for Workers Bilateral.
July 15, 2008 Hnakuk University of Foreign Studies The Situation of Refugees in Korea & The Korean Civil Society in Action Pill Kyu Hwang Korean Public.
Good Practices and Challenges from the MENA Region The Case of Egypt.
CONSULAR NOTIFICATION & ACCESS. Basic Principles Arrests/Detentions Consular Access Guardianship Notification Death Notification Shipwreck/Aircraft Crash.
LIFE AFTER DACA: ADVANCE PAROLE FOR DACA RECIPIENTS.
Protecting and Supporting DACA Students
Refugee Policy of the Republic of Korea
U.S. Asylum and Refugee Protection
American Civil Liberties Union
Seeking Asylum BA International Relations Yang Ha Lim
Consular Notification & Access
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
REPRESENTING DETAINED NONCITIZENS
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
COMMUNITY SERVICE REMINDER
AILA UPSTATE NEW YORK CHAPTER
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Border Procedures for Minors
Border Procedures for the Removal or Detention of Minors
Presentation transcript:

Detention of Asylum Seekers in the United States Workshop on the Israeli Asylum System Academic Center of Law and Business November 12-13, 2012 Prof. Stacy Caplow Brooklyn Law School

Detention: Definitions UNHCR 1999: Confinement within a narrowly bounded or restricted location where freedom of movement is substantially curtailed and where only option to leave confined area is to leave the territory UNHCR 2012: Deprivation of liberty or confinement in a closed place which an asylum-seeker is not permitted to leave at will. US Dep’t of Homeland Security: The seizure and incarceration of an alien in order to hold him/her while awaiting judicial or legal proceedings or return transportation to his/her country of citizenship.

Pathways to Asylum in U.S. Arrest at the Border Expedited removal Credible Fear Interview by AO with Review by IJ Detention-ICE Asylum Determination by IJ Administrative & Judicial Appeal Arrest in the Interior Defensive Application in Immigration Court Mandatory or Discretionary Detention Administrative & Judicial Appeal Voluntary Post- Admission Affirmative Application to Asylum Office Grant, Deny, Refer to Immigration Court Detention Rare Administrative & Judicial Appeal

President AG Special Counsel Secretary of Labor Secretary of DHS Secretary of HHS U.S. Executive Branch Agencies Secretary of State EOIR BIA ALJsImmigration Judges Chief IJOCAHO BALCAETAWHD ORRPHS ECA* Consular officers (posted worldwide) PRM Consular Affairs Ombudsman Under Secretary, BTS Director, USCIS AAO Field Offices Asylum Offices RSC ICECBPInt’l Affirs, incl. visa policy Field Offices Ports of Entry Border Patrol Sectors * Bureau of Education and Consular Affairs (reorganized USIA)

U.S. Refugee Statistics-2011* 24,988 individuals were granted asylum in the U.S. 13,484 granted asylum affirmatively by the Department of Homeland Security at Asylum Office interview 11,504 who were granted asylum defensively by the Department of Justice in Immigration Court 9,550 individuals were approved for derivative asylum status while located abroad (spouse and unmarried children under 21) 56,384 individuals were admitted to the United States as refugees * USCIS Statistical Report-2011 (FY 2010)

U.S. Detention Statistics: 2011 In 2010, ICE detained 363,064 foreign nationals. ICE detains more than 30,000 individuals per day. The average length of stay in detention is 31 days. Since 2005, the number of detention beds increased by 60%. =>34,000 in 2013 Since 2005, the number of detainees increased by 52.3%. The current cost of detention to taxpayers $122 per person per day=>approximately $2 billion per year. Detention of asylum seekers: Approximately 48,000 between Vast majority are defensive applicants Less than 2% are affirmative applicants The most recent figures from the Department of Homeland Security indicate that in fiscal year 2007 approximately 10,000 of the more than 300,000 individuals detained were asylum-seekers.

US Immigration Detention Centres

U.S. Detention Centers

Statutory Framework: The Immigration & Nationality Act Mandatory Detention No individualized release determination All “arriving aliens” who are not admissible Individuals awaiting expedited removal or whose prior removal is reinstated Individuals who have established credible fear and await hearing Returning residents who are removable based on criminal convictions “Criminal aliens” following conviction for a deportable offense Discretionary Detention Individualized release determination Parole Bond (minimum $1500) Individuals in interior removal proceedings facing deportation (other than serious crimes) Initial decision by ICE Redetermination by IJ Appealable Grounds Likelihood of flight Dangerousness

Regulatory Framework for Detention of Asylum Seekers Affirmative applicants for asylum previously admitted are rarely detained unless other grounds arise Arriving aliens seeking asylum Arriving aliens have few, if any, rights Not entitled by statute or regulation to individualized release decision Can be detained throughout administrative proceedings including appeals ICE Agency advisory directive (does not carry the force of law) in 2009 requires case-by-case custody determination ICE claims: more than 75% of individuals who pass credible fear interview are released Difficulties: no means of identification, no ties to the community although return rate for those released fairly high (70% approximately) May not be released immediately ICE must provide reasons for denying parole No independent mechanism for challenging decision about necessity of detention No procedure for periodic review although detainee may request it Defensive asylum applicants often in detention for other reasons

Issues Affects of Detention on Asylum Seekers Mental and physical health Ability to obtain counsel Ability to prepare for the hearing Likelihood of success decreases dramatically Conditions of Detention The Asylum-Seeking Population Privatization Transfers Length of Detention Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) Clark v. Martinez (2005) Demore v. Kim (2003)

Responses NGO and professional calls for reform Inter-American Commission on Human Rights American Bar Association Amnesty International Human Rights First Human Rights Watch Detention Watch Network American Civil Liberties Union News articles expose conditions Some Congressional hearings Department of Homeland Security 2010 Immigration Detention Overview and Recommendations 2008, 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards Prosecutorial Discretion Development of Alternatives to Detention

Karnes, Texas Civil Detention Facility

Thank you very much. Questions?

Bibliography Alice Edwards, Back to Basics: The Right to Liberty and Security of Person and ‘Alternatives to Detention’ of Refugees, Asylum- Seekers, Stateless Persons and Other Migrants, UNHCR LEGAL AND PROTECTION POLICY RESEARCH SERIES (2011) Eleanor Acer & Jake Goodman, Reaffirming Rights: Human Rights Protections of Migrants, Asylum Seekers, and Refugees in Immigration Detention, 24 GEORGETOWN IMMIGRATION LAW JOURNAL 507 ( ) Human Rights First, U.S. Detention of Asylum Seekers: Seeking Protection, Finding Prison (2009)