The Effectiveness of Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs) in Fiji Alifereti Tawake 1, Stacy Jupiter 2, Fulori Waqairagata 3, Cody Clements 3, Ron Vave.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To live with the sea Towards community-centred marine conservation in Andavadoaka.
Advertisements

Strengthening MPA Management through Local Communities Philippine Environmental Governance Project (EcoGov)
Coral reefs: apex predator paradise or mesopredator nirvana? MR Heupel, DM Knip, CA Simpfendorfer, NK Dulvy.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Tourism Contribution to Communities in Fiji Alifereti Tawake, JCU PhD student 24 th October, 2009.
Mariculture and aquaculture livelihood options for the Pacific Islands region Cathy Hair and Paul Southgate – James Cook University, Townsville.
“Strengthening MPA Management through Local Communities” Philippine Environmental Governance Project (EcoGov)
Modeling MPAs in regulated fisheries: assessing the role of larval dispersal distance Carey McGilliard and Ray Hilborn July 12, 2006.
Addressing environment management and local livelihood in Fiji’s coastal communities FIJI Patrick Sakiusa Fong The University of the South Pacific Fiji.
James R. Foley, MSc. Toledo Institute for Development & Environment (TIDE) Belize
Modeling reef fish biomass, recovery potential, and management priorities in the western Indian Ocean T.R. McClanahan 1, J.M. Maina 1,2, N.A.J. Graham.
Incorporating Ecosystem Objectives into Fisheries Management
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS. What Are MPAs? – Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are geographic areas designated to protect or conserve marine life and habitat.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Outline 1.Background to the concept 2.Justification for the proposed TBCA 3.Proposed TBCA delineation 4.Possible institutional and management frameworks.
Marine Protected Areas An Overview. What is a Marine Protected Area ? A Marine Protected Area (MPA) is a part of the ocean protected from harmful human.
Fiji Locally Managed Marine Area (LMMA) Network.
“Strengthening MPA Management through Local Communities” Philippine Environmental Governance Project (EcoGov)
Joanne Wilson, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Lukas Rumetna, Karel Wamafma
Building Resilient Marine Protected Areas in Madagascar By Harifidy Ralison 31 January 2008.
NATIONAL OCEAN POLICY FRAMEWORK WEALTH CREATION THROUGH A HEALTHY, SECURE AND SUSTAINABLE OCEAN BY: DATO’ DR. SHARIFAH ZARAH SYED AHMAD DEPUTY SECRETARY.
How Are Marine Protected Areas Created? A Guide for the Lay Person.
Partnership  excellence  growth Vulnerability: Concepts and applications to coral reef-dependent regions (Work in progress) Allison Perry.
Spatial fisheries management for conservation and profitability Christopher Costello* University of California and National Bureau of Economic Research.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
The Philippine Reef Rangers….. The Philippine Reef Rangers…. ….removing barriers.
Our mission… We believe that the Earth’s natural heritage must be maintained if future generations are to thrive spiritually, culturally & economically.
Policy drivers for seabed mapping Evanthia Karpouzli Marine Ecological Adviser Scottish Executive.
WP5 Status Report Will Le Quesne Nick Polunin School of Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle University, UK.
Outreach and Education USVI STYLE Building Fisher and Community Awareness and Appreciation for Our USVI Fisheries and Marine Resources Roy A Pemberton,
An NGO perspective to Blue Growth Rencontres internationales de la biodiversité marine et côtière Nicolas Fournier | 13/14 Nov 2012.
Marine Conservation Marine protected areas and reserves.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
Steve Gaines Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Sustainable Fisheries Group UC Santa Barbara12 May 2011.
Supported by the Mekong Institute New Zealand Ambassador Scholarship Program Presented by CHHOM Vichar People’s Participation in Community Based Natural.
10. STEP 1: DEFINE & SCOPE Essential EAFM Date Place 10. Step 1: Define and scope the FMU Version 1.
SPC HOF8 Meeting Noumea, New Caledonia 6 March, 2013 Kazuo Udagawa JICA.
Projected changes to coastal fisheries. Based on......
Rare Program for Sustainable Fishing in the Philippines Strengthening MPA management through local communities Pride English Program 2 (PEP-II)
Building Capacity for Sustainable and Responsible Development in the Bismarck Sea is a collaboration between Papua New Guinea’s Conservation and Environmental.
Laely Nurhidayah Indonesian Institute of Sciences–LIPI (Jakarta) IUCN Colloquium 7-12 September 2015.
Challenges in conservation Alan Law, Director for Biodiversity Delivery, Natural England.
The FAO Technical Guidelines on MPAs and Fisheries in the context of the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Pedro de Barros FAO Fisheries Department.
MPA network planning in the Scotian Shelf Bioregion Where does Marxan fit in? Introduction to Marxan Training June 23, 2011 Marty King Oceans and Coastal.
A time long ago in an Agency far far away... Historical Perspective on Marine Tenure.
Geoff Dews and Jo Akroyd. Overview of Lecture Management of the Marine Environment.
Solving the Mystery of MPA Performance: linking governance, biodiversity conservation, & poverty Working Draft Mike Mascia, Helen Fox, & Al Lombana WWF.
Collaborative in Conservation An Initial Framework and Example Nick Salafsky Foundations of Success & Conservation Measures Partnership *** Note: This.
Closures. 2 Seasons –Can fish only at certain times. Areas –Fishing restricted in specific locations. Fisheries –Fishing is completely prohibited.
Challenges Cyclones El Nino Tsunamis Over fishing Alien Species Tourism Political Instability Economic Development Deforestation Climate Change.
ELFSim: a fisheries decision support tool for coral reef line fish on the Great Barrier Reef of Australia Rich Little MSEAS 2016 Oceans and Atmosphere.
IBFMPs Goals and Objectives
Community based Natural Resource Management: Impacts and Lessons Learned from Southern Africa Mike McGahuey and Bob Winterbottom USAID/FRAME May 7,
Management approaches for CEAFM
Tony Smith (*) and Jake Rice (#) MSEAS 2016, Brest, France May 2016
SPC - FAO Discussion on developing a Concept Note
Citizen Science in the policy arena
Assessing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) In Indonesia
SPC - FAO Discussion on developing a Concept Note
Projected changes to coastal fisheries
CEAFM in Coastal Communities in Fiji
CEAFM in Coastal Communities in Fiji
POLICY INITIATIVES TO STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Projected changes to coastal fisheries
Management approaches for CEAFM
Fiji: Strengthening community stewardship for effective co-management of LMMAs to support resilient and sustainable livelihoods. Background Fiji has dual.
Ending overfishing can mitigate impacts of climate change
History of the Pacific Islands Oceanic Fisheries Management Project
Presentation transcript:

The Effectiveness of Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs) in Fiji Alifereti Tawake 1, Stacy Jupiter 2, Fulori Waqairagata 3, Cody Clements 3, Ron Vave 4, Apisai Bogiva 4, Semisi Meo 4, Patrick Fong 4, James Comley 4, Bill Aalbersberg 4 & Lavenia Tawake 5 1 School of Environmental Science, James Cook University 2 Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji 3 School of Marine Studies, University of the South Pacific 4 Institute of Applied Science, University of the South Pacific 5 University of Sunshine Coast, Brisbane International Coral Reef Society, Cairns, Australia 9 th July, 2012

OUTLINE OF TALK 1. Concept 2. Background: FLMMA 3. Method of Evaluation 4. Results 5. Conclusion 6. Acknowledgement

CONCEPT  Are Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs) in Fiji achieving their intended outcomes to communities?  Ecological benefits  Socioeconomic benefits

Background  Fiji Locally Managed Marine Area (FLMMA) Network – started 1997, formalized in 2001, registered as a non- charitable organization by 2004  2012:  20 partner organizations (4 Govt, 13 NGOs & 2 Universities)  1 MPA (1997) > 386 MPAs (2012)  Dual governance - government, science-based decisions - communities, traditional management practices  Overfishing driven by population growth and efficient technology, made worse by climate change

FLMMA works in 47% or 192 of Fijis 410 fishing grounds By 2012: 386 Tabu or MPAs (in red)

Method of Evaluation LEVEL 1 (Anecdotal): Preliminary observation LEVEL 2 (Community data) : Preliminary observations LEVEL 3 (Rigorous scientific data): Some results Tawake et al (JCU): 30 FLMMA sites with at least 5 years of engagement chosen & also a learning site Stacy Jupiter (WCS-Fiji) Cody Clements (USP Masters) Fulori Waqairagata (USP Masters) Assessment methods includes: Diagnosis & content analyses of versions of mgmt plans Scientific literature on FLMMA sites Research uses ‘Before/After or Control/Intervention (BAI)’ design

Intended Outcomes of Community Management Plans (Purpose of having MPAs)  More fish to eat  More income from fishing  Restore degraded reefs and depleted species  Provide opportunities to develop alternative income sources  Protect fish aggregation sites  Foster social and community relations  Revive traditional practice, knowledge & language Tawake et al 2011

Theory of Change: Intended pathway to influencing communities livelihoods Protecti on strategi es Safe haven Reseedi ng and spillover Healthy Qoliqoli More Fish & Catch Source of food & More income Improve d Liveliho ods Protection strategy – Ecosystem (Yaubula) management including LMMA strategy and tools Tawake et al 2011

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

RESULTS: Improved fish abundance & biomass  Significantly greater density of total fish abundance inside MPAs (Pre-harvest of Kia Island MPA) – Jupiter et al 2012  Significantly greater amount of total fish biomass inside MPAs (Kubulau & Kia Island MPAs)  Significantly greater density of targeted fish abundance inside MPAs (Goetze et al, 2011) – Namena Island (Bua)  Significantly greater amount of herbivorous fish inside MPAs resulting in increased grazing thus leading to reduction in macroalgae (Waqairagata et al, 2011)

 More herbivorous fish inside MPAs MPA Fished Area Waqairagata et al 2011

 More herbivorous fish inside MPAs = More grazing (Improved habitat health) Waqairagata et al 2011

Improved fish catch (Mgmt plan review) Tawake et al 2011

Improved fish catch  Significantly greater CPUE/BPUE inside MPA  Significantly greater catch diversity within intact MPAs  Significantly greater proportion of fish above size reproductive maturity in MPAs Clements 2012

Greater catch diversity within intact MPAs  Significantly greater catch diversity within intact MPAs Clements 2012

More mature fish in MPAs  More sexually mature fish in MPAs except in Komave Size at Sexual Maturity (SSM) Clements 2012

LMMA- Improving Household Income growth Tawake et al 2011

Unity and Social Cohesion Tawake et al 2011

 DISCUSSION: Contributing factors for Success  CBAM has transformed decision making of natural resources from autocratic to participatory & democratic From chiefs to “village yaubula (natural resource) committees”  Social customs that facilitate compliance within closures  Exclusive & locally recognized tenure over marine resources  Relatively small human populations  Distance away from fishing villages  Innovative selection of fish wardens = licensed fishermen

 NEGATIVE EVIDENCE  No significant difference in total fish abundance inside MPAs (Goetze et al 2011 – Kubulau & Namuri)  No significant difference in total fish biomass inside MPAs (Jupiter & Egli 2011 – some Kubulau MPAs & only in some years)

 DISCUSSION:  Contributing factors for non-success  Small size of closures  Short duration of closures  Non-compliance with management rules  Disclosure of management success to fishers from villages with high reliance on fisheries products

Conclusion  The Fiji study revealed that some LMMA sites are showing improvements, both ecologically & socioeconomically, thus meeting communities needs and therefore being effective  That the effectiveness of some LMMA strategies are reduced or nullified with uncontrolled opening of the MPA  That preliminary scientific data validates some FLMMA communities perception of improvements. That perhaps, community monitoring data, though not highly accurate & cheap to undertake, are giving similar results to rigorous scientific studies  Question is: should decision making of a communities natural resources await rigorous scientific data or can it be based on the ‘best, available community data’?

Acknowledgements  All FLMMA partners and sites for willingness to take part in the assessment (Tawake et al)  Scientific literature (Cody Clements, Stacy Jupiter & Fulori Waqairagata)  FLMMA & LMMA Network Learning group  David & Lucille Packard Foundation, United Nations University (UNU), Foundation of Success, CRISP/SPREP for the partial funding support that enabled this assessment.  James Cook University, USP-IAS and CSIRO for supporting PhD study (Alifereti Tawake)