Preimplantation analysis of kidney biopsies from expanded criteria donors Amaia Sagasta, Ana Sánchez-Escuredo, Frederic Oppenheimer, Manel Solé Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount.
Advertisements

Significance of the total i-score
Chronic vascular injury of the kidney allograft: The contribution of rejection Heinz Regele Heinz Regele Department of Pathology Innsbruck Medical University.
Tuesday Case Conference May Biopsy finding LM –Glomeruli are normal in size to mildly enlarged Mild enlargement of the mesangial areas with occasional.
Lysaght, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002 Number of patients worldwide treated with chronic dialysis from 1990 to ,000 1,490,000 2,500,000.
Kidney allografts with biopsy features of chronic mixed rejection reflect poorer survival than those with pure chronic antibody-mediated rejection D. Dobi,
Christopher Berlin // März 2015 A Histologic Scoring System for Prognosis of Patients with Alcoholic Hepatitis Altamirano et.al., Gastroenterology 2014.
FORECASTING ONE-YEAR RENAL ALLOGRAFT FUNCTION AND SURVIVAL Yuriy Yushkov 1, Nikolina Icitovic 1, Ruslan Fedkiv 1, and Michael J. Goldstein 1,2 (1)New York.
Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Off- pump vs On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass.
The Value of Zero-Hour Implantation Biopsies Volker Nickeleit Nephropathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology The University of North Carolina, Chapel.
AN ANALYSIS OF CADAVER DONOR AND KIDNEY BIOPSY PARAMETERS WITH CORRELATION TO TRANSPLANT OUTCOMES Martin Mozes MD, Mel Schwartz MD, Janis Orlowski MD Michael.
Introduction: Eighth Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology - Edmonton, AB Kim Solez, M.D. and Lorraine C. Racusen.
Hospital de Santo António – CHP, Portugal Patholo
The value of protocol biopsies in renal allografts Gordana Petrusevska Skopje, Macedonia Gordana Petrusevska Skopje, Macedonia.
SUMMARY REPORT: DONOR SELECTION CRITERIA Parmjeet Randhawa, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Transplantation Pathology, Department of Pathology, University.
Sum Scores & Components’ Scores Chronic Scores Acute Rejection Scores Lillian W. Gaber University of Tennessee.
Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity In Kidney Allograft Protocol Biopsies Neeraja Kambham M.D. Stanford University.
The Banff Classification: Slide Seminar Kim Solez, M.D.
Donor Organ Selection Criteria: What is Ideal? A Consensus (?) Discussion.
GRADING OF REJECTION IN PANCREAS ALLOGRAFTS Are changes needed? Cinthia B. Drachenberg, M.D. University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Schemas for Histopathological Diagnosis of Rejection: Kidney Schemas for Histopathological Diagnosis of Rejection: Kidney Kim Solez, M.D.
HISTOPATHOLOGY OF PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION
The European experience with protocol biopsies Ian Roberts Oxford, UK Oxford Pathology.
Sum Scores and Scores of Individual Components in Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials Lillian W. Gaber University of Tennessee.
Draft guideline for scoring and reporting interstitial fibrosis Working Group on Fibrosis Banff 09 Colvin RB Banff 2009.
BACKGROUND ON PANCREAS HISTOLOGICAL FINDINGS: University of Maryland experience John C. Papadimitriou, M.D.,Ph.D. Professor of Pathology.
C4d - staining: Comparison of methods C. Seemayer, A. Gaspert, M. Mihatsch.
Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasinska1, M. Ciszek, A.L. Urbanowicz, L. Paczek,
Allocation of elderly deceased donor kidneys Lisa Bradbury, Niaz Ahmad, Paul Gibbs, Richard Baker, Adam McLean, Chris Callaghan Renal Transplant Services.
A Guide to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Organ Procurement Organization Reports
Monitoring HLA-specific antibodies
INFLUENCE OF HLA MISMATCH ON GRAFT SURVIVAL IN RENAL TRASPLANTATION IN ADULTS IN ARGENTINA Bisigniano Liliana MD., López-Rivera Arturo MD., Tagliafichi.
Pathology of Kidney and the Urinary tract
Study of cytokine gene polymorphism and graft outcome in live-donor kidney transplantation By Rashad Hassan MD Amgad El-Agroudy, Ahmad Hamdy, Amani Mostafa.
Severe vascular lesions and poor functional outcome
The Expanded Criteria Donors in Kidney Transplantation: 3 Years Experience FAM Shaheen, B. Al-Attar, MZ Souqiyyeh, J.E Cillo, A. Al Sayyari.
Sulen Sarioglu, Mehtat Unlu, Mustafa Sakar, Taner Camsari, Mehmet Turkmen, Hulya Ellidokuz Departments of Pathology, Biomedical Technology, Nephrology,
Pathology of Kidney and the Urinary tract Dr. Amar C. Al-Rikabi Dr. Hala Kasouf Kfouri.
RAPAMUNE ® TM 1 Randomization Variable Day* to Day 386 Randomization Variable Day* to Day 386 RAPA, C min, TN0.765 CsA, C min, TN0.201 Gender0.117 Increasing.
3 Patrick T Anderson, 2,3 Vivian McAlister, 1,3 Alp Sener, 1,3 Patrick P Luke Divisions of 1 Urology and 2 Surgery, Department of Surgery, 3 Schulich School.
UK National Renal Transplant EQA Scheme Ian Roberts Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals The National Renal Transplant EQA Scheme.
Table 1. Clinicopathological findings at biopsy Clinical Number of patients Age (years) Gender (%Male) eGFR (ml/min/1.73m 2 ) UPE (g/day) Serum albumin.
Interobserver Reliability of Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria A single center cohort study Figure 2 The acute kidney injury network (AKIN) criteria.
INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE C-EOS. COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIENCED SPINE SURGEONS AND TRAINEES. María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD José.
Andreas A. Rostved, MD Research assistant Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation Rigshospitalet – Copenhagen University Hospital Denmark.
C4d in pancreas transplant biopsies: the Leiden experience Ingeborg Bajema Ingeborg Bajema Ingeborg Bajema.
Ki-67 index cutoff value of 1% is a valuable prognostic biomarker for pulmonary carcinoids based on this large cohort. Our data also provide strong evidence.
Histological markers of CNI nephrotoxicity: Specific or not specific? Marion Rabant MD, Renaud Snanoudj MD, Virginie Royal MD, C. Girardin, E.Morelon MD.
Quebec experience from 2003 to 2009 M Carrier MD, JF Lize MD and Quebec transplant programs Impact of Expanded Criteria Donors on outcomes of recipients.
U # Chronic renal failure – secondary to IgA nephropathy. Deceased donor kidney transplant – August Complicated by delayed graft.
Impact of Recipient and Donor Non-immunological factors on the Outcome of Expanded Criteria Deceased Donors Kidney Transplantation Dr Hajar Al Hayyan.
D. Serón Nephrology Department Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Interpretation of sequential protocol biopsies in terms of prognosis and clinical implications.
Pathology of Renal Transplantation
Is it possible to predict New Onset Diabetes After Transplantation (NODAT) in renal recipients using epidemiological data alone? Background NODAT is an.
National Histopathology Service for Transplantation
Rapid Fibrosis and Significant Histologic Recurrence of Hepatitis C After Liver Transplant Is Associated With Higher Tumor Recurrence Rates in Hepatocellular.
Improving Outcomes in DCD Renal Transplantation Reference: Hoogland ERP, Snoeijs MGJ, van Heurn LWE. DCD kidney transplantation: Results and measures to.
Acute Renal Failure in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Nationwide Analysis of Hospitalizations in the United States Kavelin Rumalla 1, Adithi Y. Reddy.
The significance of Focal C4d+: The WU experience Helen Liapis, M.D. Professor of Pathology & immunology Kedainis RL et al. Am J Transplant Apr;9(4):812-9.
The ALERT Trial.
2 Renal Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, BT9 7AB
BUONA FUNZIONE RENALE DEI TRAPIANTI RENALI DA DONATORI ANZIANI VALUTATI CON CLEARANCE DELLA CREATININA SECONDO GAULT-COCKCROFT, CON DATI ECOGRAFICI E CON.
Enterprise | Interest Nothing to disclose.
Preservation of Renal Function: The Key to Long-term Kidney Allograft and Patient Survival.
Anand Yuvaraj International Transplant Fellow
U
Figure 4 The relationship between the time-dependent changes in the expression of immunoglobulin, mast cell, acute kidney injury (AKI), and fibrillar collagen.
Post-transplant membranous glomerulonephritis as a manifestation of chronic antibody-mediated rejection Hyeon Joo Jeong, Beom Jin Lim, Myoung Soo Kima,
Overview of the cellular and molecular basis of kidney fibrosis
Representative Light Micrographs of Kidney Sections Illustrating the Histologic Scoring Criteria Giuseppe Remuzzi, et al, N Engl J Med 2006;3354:
Presentation transcript:

Preimplantation analysis of kidney biopsies from expanded criteria donors Amaia Sagasta, Ana Sánchez-Escuredo, Frederic Oppenheimer, Manel Solé Department of Pathology and Kidney Transplant Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain * DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Introduction I Patients with end-stage renal disease attain longer life expectancy and better quality of life through kidney transplantation Critical shortage of kidneys for transplantation ONT 2011 > 60 y y y y < 15 y

Introduction II ECD group definition Efforts to expand the kidney donor pool Incorporation of expanded criteria donors (ECD) Age ≥ 60 years OR Age years with ≥ 2 risk factors : Death by cerebrovascular accident History of hypertension Creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL

Introduction III ECD group associated problems # ONT 2011 ImplantedDiscarded (total) Discarded (due to bx) USA (ECD) *59%41%51% Spain (>60y) # 67.5%32.5%41.5% *Sung RS, et al. Transplantation May 15;79(9): Suboptimal post-transplant function Shorter graft survival Careful selection of the grafts before trasplantation Preimplantation kidney biopsy in ECD

Introduction IV IB practice and interpretation Scores in use: –Remuzzi score (Rs): Glomerular global esclerosis (GS), tubular atrophy (TA), interstitial fibrosis (IF), arterial and arteriolar narrowing (CV ) –Banff score based modifications: Arteriolar hyalinosis (AH), mononuclear cell interstitial inflammation (ii) Techniques in use: –Frozen sections, Paraffin sections Interobserver variability Lack of universally accepted practice guidelines for biopsy processing and interpretation of the histological findings

Aim of the study 1.To analyze the correlation between: a.Different observers, using frozen sections b.Different techniques: paraffin vs. frozen (same observer) 2.To analyze if the modification of the score parameters could improve the correlation: a.Analysis of an alternative score (As) i.Alternative GS parameter ii.Combined tubulo-interstitial parameter iii.AH parameter

Materials and Methods I Study design

Original report Pathologist-on-call: Several general pathologists Time of transplantation Frozen section

Materials and Methods II Scoring of biopsies GS: Rs As0= none 1= <20% 1= 1-10% 2= 20-50% 2= 11-20% 3= > 50% 3= > 21% TA: 0= absent 1= ≤ 25% 2= 26-50% 3= > 50%. IF: 0= ≤ 5% 1= 6-25% 2= 26-50% 3= > 50%. CV: 0= absent 1= ≤ 25% 2= 26-50% 3= > 50%. AH: 0= absent 1= mild to moderate in at least one 2= moderate to severe in >1 3= severe in many

Materials and Methods III Elegibility; statistics Elegibility for transplant or discard (biopsy): –≤ 4 points Remuzzi score: acceptance / >4 : discard Statistics for concordance in organ elegibility analysis: –Kappa index (K): values between 0 (no agreement) and 1 (perfect agreement) Statistics for correlation analysis (parameters, scores): –Kendall’s Tau b (KTb): values between -1 (perfect disagreement) and 1 (perfect agreement), 0 (absence of association)

Results I - Parameters Interobserver correlation (frozen sections) correlation between techniques: PS/FS (same observer) Kendall’sTau bLower C.I.,KTbUpper C.I.,KTbKendall’s TaubLower C.I.,KTbUpper C.I.,KTb GS (Rs) GS (As) TA IF TA/IF (As) CV AH (As) PS: parraffin sections (PAS); FS: frozen sections (H/E)

Results II - Scores Interobserver correlation (frozen sections) correlation between techniques: PS/FS (same observer) Kendall’s Tau b Lower C.I., KTb Upper C.I., KTb Kendall’s Taub Lower C.I., KTb Upper C.I., KTb Remuzzi score Alternative sc PS: parraffin sections (PAS); FS: frozen sections (H/E)

Results III Concordance in organ acceptance Interobserver concordance (frozen sections) concordance between techniques: PS/FS (same observer) Kappa value ( 95% CI) 0.33 ( ) 0.35 ( ) PS: parraffin sections (PAS); FS: frozen sections (H/E); ORFS: original report frozen section (H/E) Importance of observed differences in organ acceptance: FS revision a posteriori by single observer would have resulted in 9.75% more discard than ORFS FS revision would have resulted in 7.6% more discard than PS revision by the same observer

Conclusions The evaluation of the score items by a single, trained observer improved the correlation in all values, despite the use of different techniques Remuzzi score was the parameter with the best improvement in correlation Given the relevance of the observed differences in organ acceptance, specific training is advisable irrespective of the technique used

Thank you for your attention

References Remuzzi G, Grinyo J, Ruggenenti P et al. Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG). J. Am. Soc.Nephrol. 1999; 10; 2591–2598. Perico N, Ruggenenti P, Scalamogna M, Remuzzi G.Tackling the shortage of donor kidneys: how to use the best that we have. Am.J.Nephrol.2003;23: Munivenkatappa RB, Schweitzer EJ, Papadimitriou JC et al. The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure. Am. J.Transplant. 2008; 8; 2316–2324. El-Husseini A, Sabry A, Zahran A et al.Can Donor implantation renal biopsy predict long-term renal allograft outcome?Am.J.Nephrol.2007;27: Snoeijs MG, Boonstra LA, Buurman WA et al.Histological assessment of pre-transplant kidney biopsies is reproducible and representative. Histopathology 2010;56; Sung RS, Christensen LL, Leichtman AB et al.Determinatns of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am.J.Transplant.2008;8: Furness PN, Taub N, Assmann KJ et al. International variation in histologic grading is large, and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2003; 27; 805–810. Organización Nacional de Transplantes (ONT) Database