P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PDR Presentation 1. Eric P o Team Leader o Payload Manager o Documentation Manager Michael B o Building Team Manager o Safety Manager Sean K o Outreach.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA I NTIMI GATOR PDR. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Component Testing Subscale Flight.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
RezRiders. Mission statement Through the USLI program the Northwest Indian College Space Center’s RezRiders Team enhances its involvement in science,
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team

DIMENSIONS Vehicle Length: 114 in. / 9.5 ft. Diameter: 6.0 in. Span: 12.0 in. Unloaded mass: oz. Fin Dimensions Root: 20.0 in. Tip: 12.0 in. Sweep length: 0 in. Semi Span: 6.0 in.

V EHICLE MATERIALS & JUSTIFICATIONS Airframe: Carbon fiber Superior strength to weight ratio Fin Birch plywood in carbon fiber Past experience with Combined materials provide a strong, rigid fin Bulk-Head / Centering-Ring Birch plywood Locally available, cabinet quality grain with few knots

S TATIC STABILITY MARGIN CP in CG in Safety Margin 2.96

P LAN FOR VEHICLE SAFETY VERIFICATION AND TESTING Flight Simulation in RockSim Verify that vehicle descends at safe velocity for recovery Recovery Subsystem: Altimeters Vacuum testing - pressure changes trigger altimeter activity Black powder ejection charges Will ensure we have enough force to separate rocket safely through various conditions Parachute Deployment Especially for drogue parachute after payload integration Testing of Batteries and Cameras Payload Testing and Confirmation Camera, Wiring, Storage Device, & Camera Mounts Stability after payload integration

B ASELINE MOTOR SELECTION AND JUSTIFICATION Motor Aerotech L2200G. This motor type is still under discussion due to the payload component weights being unknown Altitude: ft. ± 3.00% Diameter: 75 mm. Length: 665 mm. Burn: 2.40 sec. Thrust: N. Impulse: N*Sec.

T HRUST - TO - WEIGHT RATIO AND RAIL EXIT VELOCITY Thrust-to-Weight Ratio: Rail Exit Velocity:

L AUNCH VEHICLE VERIFICATION AND TEST PLAN OVERVIEW Sub-scale Construction: Now – Jan. 25 Launch: Jan. 26 – 31 Full-scale Construction: Jan 26 – Feb. 15 Test flight #1: Feb Test flight #2: Mar. 12 – 29 Final launch : May 17 – 18

RECOVERY SUBSYSTEM Our recovery system consist of altimeters, ejection charges, and parachutes. The parachutes are attached to nylon shock chord with D-rings. Black powder charges will go off based on the altimeter readings. Drogue parachute: 36 in. Deploy 5 seconds after apogee Descend at a velocity of 49.9 ft./sec. Main parachute: 72 in. Deploy at 700 ft. Descent rate of 23.4 ft./sec.

B ASELINE PAYLOAD DESIGN Hazard Detection Payload (3.1) Payload Faring/Deployment System ( ) Liquid Sloshing Analysis Payload ( )

H AZARD D ETECTION P AYLOAD (3.1) Purpose: to scan the ground during decent and relay any landing hazards, in real time, to a ground station. Consist of a camera and the necessary electronics. Major challenges: Creating a 2-way communications system for the rocket. Limited video storage. Viewing video from cameras near real-time from a ground station.

P AYLOAD F ARING /D EPLOYMENT S YSTEM ( ) Purpose: to deploy the Hazard Detection Payload Consist of an altered nose cone and mechanical separation system Nose cone: Cut into two pieces that will be friction fitted together. Each half will be attached to the body tube with hinges. Mechanical cone separation system: Separates the nose cone halves when the drogue chute is deployed Consist of a tether: one end attached to the drogue chute the other to a screw that will have levers with a gear on one end. Initially the levers will be orientated towards the base corners of the nose cone. After drogue is deployed, the tether will pull on the screw causing the levers to expand and separate the two halves of the nose cone. To prevent the halves from interfering with the camera, the hinges attaching the nose cone halves will lock once the halves are out of the cameras viewing area. Major Challenges: Drogue chute fails to exert enough force on the levers. Failure of cones separation will cause hinges to not lock.

L IQUID S LOSHING A NALYSIS P AYLOAD ( ) Purpose: research liquid sloshing in microgravity to support liquid propulsion system upgrades and development. Experiment will be done through a partitioned tank. Liquid in one half cylinder is allowed to move freely Liquid in the other half cylinder will be controlled by a low pressure piston. Four cameras used to collect data: Each tank will be filmed by two cameras. Two cameras are positioned along the body tube 180° from each other. Another two are positioned on the top of one tank, and the bottom of the other Top choice for camera: GoPro HD Hero 960 helmet camera 60 frames per sec, 848x480 resolution. The data from the cameras will be stored onboard. Analyzed post flight. Major challenges: Developing the appropriate software to analyze the video taken by the cameras Ensuring the rocket remains balanced.

P AYLOAD VERIFICATION AND TEST PLAN OVERVIEW Hazard Detection Payload (3.1) Require static ground tests to determine the abilities the camera and software in identifying potential landing hazards. Testing before and after payload integration to launch vehicle. Payload Faring/Deployment System ( ) The mechanical system will require static ground tests to determine the force required to separate the nose cone. Liquid Sloshing Analysis Payload ( ) Several dynamic ground tests to measure the liquid sloshing patterns Allow us to determine liquid patterns in standard gravity. Will use this data to compare with data collected in-flight.

A NY QUESTIONS ?