Environment - Facilities/Equipment Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SciENcv, myBibliography, NIHMS & ORCID : an introduction Julie Schneider Ebling Library Director.
Advertisements

Writing a Winning NIH Biosketch
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
HARRINGTON d e p a r t m e n t of b I o e n g i n e e r i n g Eric J. Guilbeau, Ph.D. Olin Professor and Chair Bioengineering Seed Grant Program.
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
Science Experts Network Curriculum Vitae (SciENcv)
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
Roger Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA Program Official National Institute on Drug Abuse 1 Update on “New” Investigator Activities.
4/17/2017 Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for New and Early Stage Investigators (R35) Jon Lorsch, Director, NIGMS Peter Preusch, Program Director,
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION Laboratory School and Model Early Childhood Learning Grant
SPA Updates 1 st Quarter 2015 February 19, :30 – 4:00 pm SOP N103.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
A Review of Recent Changes to NIH Forms & Instructions Jane Tolbert ORPA December 15, 2009.
Avrom Caplan, PhD Associate University Dean for Research
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
R01 NIH Grants John E. Lochman, PhD, ABPP Center for Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems Department of Psychology Psychosocial Development, Risk and.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
THE NEW NIH BIOSKETCH AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMUNICATE KEY CONCEPTS TO REVIEWERS.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
California State University, Fresno – Office of Research and Sponsored Programs NIH BIOSKETCH Nancy Myers Sims, Grants & Contracts Development Specialist.
Overview of the Application Changes Application forms will be revised in three sections:  Research Plan  Biographical Sketch  Resources and Facilities.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
Using the NCBI SciENcv application to generate NIH Biosketches in new format Hermanie Pierre-Noel and Silvia Pulido, Ph.D University of Central Florida.
NHMRC Development Grants Overall Objectives The aim of a Development Grant is to progress research to a stage where it can attract investment from.
Background (and significance) Section Things to remember: As your progress through the literature review be sure to highlight in summary sentences where.
Diego E. Rincon-Limas. Ph.D. GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant Writing for Biomedical Sciences University of Florida Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
November 2015 The New NIH Biosketch. Outline  Formats/Templates  Rules  Instructions/Recommendations  NCBI Tools  SciENcv  My Bibliography.
Ruth Greenblatt Dept of Clinical Pharmacy UCSF
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
NIHR Fellowship Schemes Dr Lisa Cotterill Director, NIHR Coordinating Centre for Research Capacity Development [DATE]
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
HIP Buffet: Mapping Your Career with NIH
The NIH Biosketch UZ-UCSF CTU Writer’s Workshop July 2017
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Career Development Plan: the cornerstone of the K award
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Writing that First Research Grant
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
AURA August 22, 2018.
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
University of Missouri Research Board Why this, why now, why me?
K R Investigator Research Question
K Awards: Writing the Career Award Development Plan
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Presentation transcript:

Environment - Facilities/Equipment Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015

2 Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements? ENVIRONMENT – what the reviewers look for

2 Facilities: Describe how the scientific environment will contribute to the probability of success of the project, and unique features of the environment. Discuss ways in which the proposed studies will benefit from unique features of the scientific environment or subject population or will employ useful collaborative arrangement. ENVIRONMENT

Early Stage Investigators (ESIs) – will require the institutional investment in the success of the investigator. –e.g. classes, travel, training, collegial support, administrative support, and financial support. (i.e. – GET A LETTER FROM YOUR CHAIR) Definition of Early Stage Investigator (ESI): Within 10 years of completing their terminal research degree or within ten years of completing their medical residency. Facilities Section

Investigators/Biographical Sketch Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015

5 Investigators: What the reviewers look for  Are the PD/PIs, collaborators, and other key researchers well suited to the project?  If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, do they have appropriate experience and training?  If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)?  If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?

6 Investigator evidence - Biographical Sketch New format: You have to do this for the next deadline A.Personal Statement B.Positions and Honors C.Contribution to Science D.Research Support Limited to 5 pages

Biographical Sketch Section A - Personal Statement Briefly describe why your experience and qualifications make you particularly well-suited for your role (e.g. PD/PI, collaborator, mentor, etc.) in the project that is the subject of the application.  Training / technical experience  Previous experimental work relating to project  May identify up to four peer reviewed publications that highlight your qualifications for the project  Impediments to past productivity (family care, illness, disability, active service. This part of the Biosketch WILL have to be revised for EVERY proposal submission depending on your role on the project.

Biographical Sketch Section B – Positions and Honors List in chronological order previous positions, concluding with the present position. List any honors. Include present membership on any Federal Government public advisory committee.

Biographical Sketch Section C – Contribution to Science – NEW!!! Briefly describe up to five of your most significant contributions to science.  Historical background that frames the scientific problem; the central finding(s); the influence of the finding(s) on the progress of science or the application of those finding(s) to health or technology; and your specific role in the described work.  Reference up to four peer-reviewed publications or other non- publication research products that are relevant to the described contribution.  Provide a URL to a full list of your published work as found in a publicly available digital database such as SciENcv or My Bibliography ( which are maintained by the US National Library of Medicine.

Biographical Sketch Section D – Research Support List both selected ongoing and completed research projects for the past three years (Federal or non-Federally-supported). Begin with the projects that are most relevant to the research proposed in the application. Briefly indicate the overall goals of the projects and responsibilities of the key person identified on the Biographical Sketch. Do not include number of person months or direct costs.