Preparing for End of Year (April 2013). School leaders will: Practice scoring Professionalism Understand the EOY Data Reports Understand available support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
LEAP Logistics. Essential Questions How does LEAP connect with other DPS initiatives? What instruments will be used during the LEAP pilot?
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Summer Training Update WebinarSummer Training Update Webinar February 2015February 2015 Division of Curriculum & InstructionDivision of Curriculum & Instruction.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23,
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
Linked Learning: Utilizing Data High School Teachers Council September 22, :00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Envisioning Success: Setting the Stage July 24, 2012 Diane Foley, Network Leader Mary Barton, SATIF.
LEAP in School Staff. Training Objectives  Understand the changes to LEAP for  Have questions answered.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 SUPPORTING SSPS IN THE MIDYEAR PROCESS ActionDescriptionSupport Resources Available online Reflect on SSP performance to date Review beginning of year.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Welcome to the LEAP Mid-Year Conversation Training! 1.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
FLEXIBILITY and the DENVER PLAN Objectives for today: Understand DPS’ future direction related to academic supports. Understand DPS’ approach to.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
New School Year Preview HISD Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Tools & Resources TEAM HISD Literacy Support Network/Job Alike August 17, 2010.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Subject line: Teacher Evaluation Feedback Form - Deanery ____
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Implementing Race to the Top
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for End of Year (April 2013)

School leaders will: Practice scoring Professionalism Understand the EOY Data Reports Understand available support for hosting EOY LEAP Conversations Understand rationale and next steps with Standards and Teacher Leader strategies for Objectives

Professionalism Initial Calibration (60 min.) EOY Data Reports and Conversations (40 min.) Standards-Based Instruction and Teacher Leadership Strategy for (20 min.) Parking Lot: Include address if you want a response. Agenda

Professionalism Initial Calibration

Calibrate Professionalism scores through discussion of 2 scenarios Create confidence in scoring teachers using the Professionalism rubric Create confidence in how to discuss Professionalism Entering Professionalism scores Goals

Rubric Review

Noticings about Performance Level Characteristics Principal has Information Requested (“IR”) option If IR chosen, contact teacher for information prior to the conversation

7 min. Read the scenario Independently score Chandra using the Professionalism rubric Briefly note evidence for scores on your chart 13 min. Discuss the scores and evidence for each indicator your table group. Come to consensus on one final rating for each indicator Professionalism Scenario 1 – Chandra from Foley Elementary

Share consensus scores Professionalism Scenario 1 – Chandra from Foley Elementary

5 min. Read the scenario Independently score Lori using the Professionalism rubric– ONLY P.2, P.3, P.5, and P.6 Briefly note evidence for scores on your chart 5 min. Discuss the scores and evidence for each indicator your table group. Come to consensus on one final rating for each indicator Professionalism Scenario 2 – Lori from Rice Middle School

Share consensus scores Indicators you couldn’t score? How can you address “IR” prior to the conversation? Professionalism Scenario 2 – Lori from Rice Middle School

April 5 – Begin entering Professionalism scores with online tool via Principal/Teacher Portals April 19 – Last day to perform an observation April 25 – End-of-Year report data available on Principal/Teacher Portals; EOY Conversations can begin April 30 – Last day to finalize observation data in Schoolnet May 21 – Last day to host End-of-Year Conversations – Reminder: Non-Renewal decisions need to be communicated to teachers and HR by 5/1 LEAP End-of-Year Timeline

Access Professionalism Scoring via the Principal Portal How to Enter Professionalism Scores

How Principals Score Professionalism Principal enters scores and comments here

LEAP If You Need Assistance

End-Of-Year Conversations

Available on the Principal Portal April 25 Announce via ConnectEd, Principal & Teacher Portals the week of April 22 Online training for teachers explaining the LEAP EOY report prior to April 25 LEAP EOY Data Reports

Summary view: Professional Practice components of LEAP Data supports teacher self-reflection and growth planning EOY data: – Observation: Averaged indicator scores, snapshot of district comparison – Professionalism: Teacher and principal scores by indicator – SPS: Overall rating (Distinguished, Effective, Approaching and Not Meeting) Sharing the data: – Reflect and strategize on how to make progress in specific areas in the coming school year LEAP EOY Data Reports

Observation Data

Professionalism Scores

SPS Data

Take 3 min. to read the Guide Materials Notes Tool If you would like practice with the Guide, please speak to your HR School Partner LEAP EOY Conversation Guide

Differentiating for Teacher Types Low Performer High Performer Middle Performer

Making Decisions About Your School’s Pathway to Standards

EOY Conversations & PD RESULTS BASED PD PLAN EOY Conversation between Principal & IS EOY Conversation between Principal & Teachers Principal PD Plan Teacher PD Plan (incl Teacher Leaders) Strategy for Standards-Based Instruction Initial Planning for 13/14

Refining Our Approach You and your teachers gave us feedback: You want clearer roles and guidance for implementing professional learning in your school You want more time to work with and learn from colleagues You want more differentiation We have learned new things about new Standards (CCSS, CAS, and ELD) and Assessments (PARCC) over the last year: Expected rigor of content Areas of primary focus from standards underlying the assessment maps Teacher and student fluency of technology is both exciting and alarming

Paradigm Shift: Central Approach to Standards-Based Instruction

Standards-Based Instruction LOOKS LIKE: MEASURED BY: OUTCOMES CONTENT INSTRUCTIONCOLLABORATIONSTRUCTURE Educators who exhibit a deep level of content knowledge Educators who demonstrate effective instructional decision-making School Teams that use a data inquiry process to address standards-based instruction School & district leaders who create conditions to support instruction Student Outcomes (e.g. iTasks/iUnits, Interims, Team- and Teacher-Created Assessments) ACHIEVED THROUGH: Results-Based PD Curricular Resources Support Partners EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS THROUGH: Framework for Effective Teaching (e.g. Observation Data, SPS, Professionalism) School Leadership Framework

Support Strategy/PD: Standards-Based Instruction Schools can: Choose their path to Standards-Based Instruction (with support and progress monitoring from IS/EDs) Have data aligned to clear outcomes for standards-based instruction Make more informed, site-based decisions about what PD is needed (with manager guidance when appropriate) Design differentiated PD offerings Align all PD to Frameworks (Leadership and Effective Teaching) Help schools reach clearly defined outcomes Be collaborative Embed technology, best practices for ELLs, and data inquiry throughout Be results-based, small group, social, and as learner-directed as possible Paths will be differentiated and will include: Content Deep Dives Standards-based Instruction Toolkit Standards Scope and Sequence Documents Teacher Leadership Academy (Collaborative team leader) Classroom Assessment cohorts (including Short Cycle Assessments) Literacy Design collaborative (6 th -12 th Social Studies and Science only) OTHER Year-long study opportunities - TBD for certain schools The Paradigm Shift Commitments to Schools PATHS for Standards- Based Instruction

Mid-April: (ConnectEd and Principal Portal): Info about pathway options from which schools select to support progress toward the Standards Outcomes (Content, Instruction, Collaboration and Structures) Detailed guidance for school diagnosis to make pathway decisions that best support the school context Teacher Leader Information regarding: Teacher leader allocation and compensation details, and more details at the optional May 14 Teacher Leadership Academy Awards Mid-April - May: EOY Conversations between Principals and Teachers May 14: Teacher Leader Academy Awards ( School & Teacher Leaders)May: EOY Conversations between IS/EDs and Principals June 1: Schools identify their pathway selections for standards-based instruction in , including final identification of teacher leaders June 6: Universal Values Celebration July 29 - August 2: Preparing for : Self-directed planning & access to choice-based learning sessions July : (Secondary Teams) July 31: Living the VALUES Day (ALL Secondary, Elementary and K-8 Teams) August (Elementary and K-8 Teams) Standards / Teacher Leadership Timeline

Student Outcomes Module 3

Student Outcomes Training Timeline Module 1. Making Foundational Connections Module 1. Making Foundational Connections Module 2. Understanding the Student Outcomes System Module 3. Understanding Student Growth for the State and School Categories Module 3. Understanding Student Growth for the State and School Categories Module 4. Understanding Student Growth for the District and Classroom Categories Module 4. Understanding Student Growth for the District and Classroom Categories

Sign Up for Module 3, April-May 2013 Visit: to register your school and to receive course details. For more information, please contact: with the AnTS training team

Additional “crucial conversations” training will take place (all are from 4:00p – 5:30p): – April 8 th – April 11 th – April 15 th – April 18 th LEAP More Resources

THANK YOU!