Common Core State Standards Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Take a piece of pizza from the counter.
Advertisements

Spotlight on Reading and Writing Kit
High Interest Reading Kit Building Student Success in Reading Comprehension.
Just Read, Florida!. Step One Topic Question Before reading: Do we have the right to destroy other life forms that cause us harm? 3.
Listening Comprehension Instruction
Lesson Plan Grade 5 Subject: Language Arts Standard 7 Comprehension—Students understand, interpret, and analyze narrative and informational grade level.
Module 2 Text Comprehension
1 © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Using the content-focused Coaching® Model to Support Early childhood Literacy and Language Development How to Teach.
Common Core State Standards Session English Language Arts.
Key Ideas and Details Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding, referring to the text as the basis for the answers. Integration of knowledge.
Common Core State Standards Session English Language Arts.
Close Reading Preparing for the arrival of Common Core Standards in Social Studies.
ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Honing Your ESOL Strategies.
NETS Meets Common Core Teresa Knapp Gordon, NBCT
Jump to first page Information Management Process Information adapted from Prince William County Information Management Manual.
Guiding Reading Comprehension
Beginning Oral Language and Vocabulary Development
Facilitators: Libbie Drake, Erica Hilliker, & Debbie Schuitema.
Integration and Differentiation of Curriculum
Elementary Balanced Literacy: Read Alouds. Read Aloud minutes Research has found: The single most important activity for building knowledge for.
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS How Do I Write Them?. WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT CONCEPTS MY STUDENTS SHOULD LEARN FROM THIS LESSON/CHAPTER/UNIT?  Essential questions.
6th 6 Weeks U.S. History 8th Grade
Our First Steps! Sheltered Instruction Center for the Education and Study of Diverse Populations at New Mexico Highlands University.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Collaborative Strategic Reading: A Model for Content Area Reading
Session English Language Arts Common Core State Standards.
Engaging Students: Speaking and Listening Standards.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Join a6psrbwww.classroom.google.com Critical Reading Strategies Achieving Rigor through Reading, Writing, and Collaboration Mathew.
GOOD MONDAY MORNING WELCOME TO ACADEMIC REVIEW MONDAY September 25th, 2014 WMDMS MORNING ANNOUNCMENTS Lunch menu Upcoming events at MDSM CHANNEL ONE NEWS.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
UNDERSTANDING THE READING / ELA VOLUNTARY STATE CURRICULUM Kathy Volk
Essential Question What is literacy?. Assessment Liaison Spring Dates: April 19, 20.
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
Lesson Plan Project by Jill Keeve. Goal/Objective Goal : Students will use a reading excerpt to explore alternate background information on conic sections.
Maine Department of Education 2006 Maine Reading First Course Session #16 Comprehension Instruction.
CIS Adapted from Common Core State Standards Institute Summer 2013 Comprehension Instructional Sequence (C.I.S.) Elementary K-5 Science Student Version.
The Gardener Literacy Unit. Arizona State Standards Strand 1: Reading Process Concept 4: Vocabulary Acquire and use new vocabulary in relevant contexts.
ESL Teacher Networking Meeting Session - 2 Raynel Shepard, Ed.D.
Critical Reading in Science
Competent Teachers - Competent Students A Model for Designing Daily Literacy Lessons.
Close Reading.  Discuss Model for Text Complexity  Discuss Reader and Task  Define Close Reading  Model a Close Reading Lesson  Create a Close Reading.
Column #1 In the left column, they can write their predictions. Especially when you first use this organizer, have students focus on some of the basic.
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Connecting Texts to Common Core ELA Standards and Practices.
DOCUMENT BASED QUESTIONS HISTORY LEAD TEACHER MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2015.
If you want better answers, ask better questions.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Foundations of Research-Based Reading EPI Instructor Shannon Ayrish or
1 Bettina Loell-Hull Read Read 520 Integrating Technology Final Project.
Design Question 2 What will I do to help students effectively interact with new knowledge? 6. Identifying Critical Information 7. Organizing Students to.
Title III Access to Core Professional Development
LESSON PLANNING: Using SIOP and UDL strategies to differentiate instruction in a 5th grade reading class.
+ PSD, 11/5/15. + CELEBRATING WeBro SUCCESS! + WHAT DOES OUR DATA SHOW? Category % Score Curricular Areas to Build Capacity Key Ideas and Details74%Liberal.
Dr. Benjamin Lester Assistant Professor of TESOL Kennesaw State University Ms. Marilyn Braude Clinical Supervisor Kennesaw State University Ms. Gail Johnson.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
Topic: Applying the Steps to the Scientific Method Kerri Thomas Big Ideas: Scientific investigations involve collecting and recording evidence for explaining.
After School Workshops 17 Feb, 3, 17, 31 Mar, 26 May, 14, 9, 23 June, 28July, 11, 25 Aug. Presenter Sandra Pizaro Learning More about Teaching Students.
Preparing High School Students for a Bright Future OELMA Conference October 19, 2012 Ann Marie Smeraldi, M.L.I.S. Cleveland State University.
Brandy Meetze North East Florida Educational Consortium 1.
1. 2 Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Students at High School What is the cause of 60% of 10 th graders not achieving Level 3 on FCAT Reading?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 Using Comprehension Strategies to Guide Thinking Maureen McLaughlin This multimedia product and its.
Student Version Using Force and Motion By: Blue Planet Diaries.
Lesson Plan Design & Bloom’s Taxonomy EnhanceEdu.
Tutorial Welcome to Module 13
COMPREHENSION Tool Kit K-3 1 1
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Common Core State Standards Session English Language Arts

CIS Demonstration Lesson - Admetus and Alcestis 2

3 STEP ONE Final Written Response to the Reading of the Text Students compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time. Whole Group Categorizing of Questions Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students evaluate source/text information:  identify bias  determine credibility & validity  corroboration across sources post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question (Efferent Discussion) Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies Directed Note- Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text information Follow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent) Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinking Follow-up Text- Based Discussion (Efferent discussion) Topic Question and Strategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest Predictive Writing Before reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed. Vocabulary Instruction: Morphemic analysis Contextual analysis Both Student Question Generation during Reading #3 All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster Ongoing Collaborative Inquiry Ongoing Question & Answer Concept Board Written Response to Reading Students use what they have learned from their first and second text-reading, text- based discussions, & note- taking to write a response to the question: Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response STEP TWOSTEP THREE

4 STEP ONE Final Written Response to the Reading of the Text Students compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time. Whole Group Categorizing of Questions Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students evaluate source/text information:  identify bias  determine credibility & validity  corroboration across sources post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question (Efferent Discussion) Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies Directed Note- Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text information Follow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent) Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinking Follow-up Text- Based Discussion (Efferent discussion) Topic Question and Strategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest Predictive Writing Before reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed. Vocabulary Instruction: Morphemic analysis Contextual analysis Both Student Question Generation during Reading #3 All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster Ongoing Collaborative Inquiry Ongoing Question & Answer Concept Board Written Response to Reading Students use what they have learned from their first and second text- reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question: Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response STEP TWOSTEP THREE

Step One 5

Topic Question Before reading: What does the phrase, “Nice guys finish last” mean? Do you think it is true? 6

Predictive Writing Before text reading: Use the Handout to record your answer to this question: Describe the characteristics of a selfish person versus a selfless person. Who do you think would be more successful and why? 7

Vocabulary Front Loading Words for Vocabulary Word Wall: Words introduced in this text: Fleet- footed, kindred, lyre, thicket 8

Text Marking The following codes will be used to mark the text: S – Statements in the text that represent selfishness L – Statements in the text that represent selflessness N – Information provided – no connection to selfishness or selflessness Listen as the facilitator reads a portion of the story of Admetus and Alcestis and models how the text will be marked. 9

Text Marking After text marking: In small groups, compare and discuss differences in text coding. Support your suggested answers from the text. 10

First Writing Response After Reading After the initial reading, answer the following question on your handout: According to the text, what are the characteristics of selflessness and the results of exhibiting these characteristics? 11

Directed Note-taking Guiding Question: What examples of selflessness are exhibited by the following characters in the text? Admetus Alcestis Apollo Proserpine Be sure to utilize the text features such as charts, graphs, photographs, and illustrations as you take notes. 12

After Directed Note-taking Compare notes in pairs or small groups. Place a star next to the most significant note for each character: Admetus Alcestis Apollo Proserpine 13

14 STEP ONE Final Written Response to the Reading of the Text Students compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time. Whole Group Categorizing of Questions Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students evaluate source/text information:  identify bias  determine credibility & validity  corroboration across sources post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question (Efferent Discussion) Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies Directed Note- Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text information Follow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent) Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinking Follow-up Text- Based Discussion (Efferent discussion) Topic Question and Strategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest Predictive Writing Before reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed. Vocabulary Instruction: Morphemic analysis Contextual analysis Both Student Question Generation during Reading #3 All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster Ongoing Collaborative Inquiry Ongoing Question & Answer Concept Board Written Response to Reading Students use what they have learned from their first and second text- reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question: Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response STEP TWO STEP THREE

Step Two

Question Generation Example: Why did Apollo’s father demand that he not return home until he served for a year as someone’s slave? Generate questions unanswered from your first text reading. Record your questions on your Student Question Generation paper as you work in pairs or small groups. 16 Handout 5

Question Generation NEXT: Classify and post your questions Place the most significant and relevant questions in the appropriate column on the Class Question Generation Poster. CLASS QUESTION GENERATION POSTER Admits and Alcestis AdmetisAlcestisApolloProserpineOther

18 STEP ONE Final Written Response to the Reading of the Text Students compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time. Whole Group Categorizing of Questions Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students evaluate source/text information:  identify bias  determine credibility & validity  corroboration across sources post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question (Efferent Discussion) Model Question Generation Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies Directed Note- Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text information Follow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent) Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinking Follow-up Text- Based Discussion (Efferent discussion) Topic Question and Strategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest Predictive Writing Before reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed. Vocabulary Instruction: Morphemic analysis Contextual analysis Both Student Question Generation during Reading #3 All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster Ongoing Collaborative Inquiry Ongoing Question & Answer Concept Board Written Response to Reading Students use what they have learned from their first and second text- reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question: Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response STEP TWO STEP THREE

From Question Generation to Research OVER TIME: Refer to Question Generation Poster to engage in collaborative inquiry 19 CLASS TEXT: Which sections of text contain answers to posted questions? CLASS TEXT: Which sections of text contain answers to posted questions? ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:  Do the resources we have located answer the questions partially or fully?  Is a diverse collection of media resources needed to locate information sufficient for developing answers that are more complete?

20 STEP ONE Final Written Response to the Reading of the Text Students compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time. Whole Group Categorizing of Questions Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students evaluate source/text information:  identify bias  determine credibility & validity  corroboration across sources post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question (Efferent Discussion) Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies Directed Note- Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text information Follow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent) Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinking Follow-up Text- Based Discussion (Efferent discussion) Topic Question and Strategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest Predictive Writing Before reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed. Vocabulary Instruction: Morphemic analysis Contextual analysis Both Student Question Generation during Reading #3 All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster Ongoing Collaborative Inquiry Ongoing Question & Answer Concept Board Written Response to Reading Students use what they have learned from their first and second text- reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question: Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response STEP TWO STEP THREE

Step Three

Extended Text Discussion Discuss the following question: According to the text, which character was the most selfless? Use text to justify all positions. Admetus Alcestis Apollo Proserpine Share answers in small groups. As part of whole class discussion, record responses to the question in multiple choice format. Groups take positions and justify their response to the whole class. 22

Final Writing: Complex Text-Based Question According to the text, which character was the most selfless and what was the result? Use information from notes to help write final response on the Essential Question Handout. Share answers in small groups. As part of whole class discussion, record responses to the essential question in multiple choice format. 23

The Comprehension Instructional Sequence Facilitates Students: Using background knowledge, i.e., predicting, inferring Identifying key ideas from text Learning and using text structures Monitoring comprehension and employing fix-up strategies Using a variety of reading strategies effectively Paraphrasing, explaining, and summarizing information to construct conclusions Engaging in question generation Extended text discussion and writing 24