First Annual Charter School Budget Boot Camp Stake Holders Accreditation Issues Rita Chase Division of Financial Audits Texas Education Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS LA VERNIA ISD’S State Financial Accountability Rating La Vernia ISD will hold a public meeting at 6:30 p.m. October.
Advertisements

OMB Circular A-133 (Single Audit) Heather Perry, CPA Amy Ring,
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Region 11 Education Service Center January 28, 2015.
Draft FIRST Indicators: Merging FIRST and Solvency Texas Education Agency Discussion About Concepts and Scores.
NJ Regulations on Dyslexia. CHAPTER 105 AN ACT concerning professional development for public school employees and supplementing chapter 6 of Title 18A.
College and University Auditors of Virginia Annual Conference May 22, 2012.
feature=youtu.be.
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Internal Audit Bob Franchini Paris June
1 The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Legislative Audit Bureau February 2004.
Reconstitution Planning and Guidance Overview
Child Abuse Child Abuse Reporting & Programs TEC Sexual Abuse Prevention Training TEC Clara Cáceres Contreras, B.S., M.Ed., ACPS, IPS Advanced.
Test Security. Texas Education Code (TEC) Sec SECURITY IN ADMINISTRATION OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. (a) The commissioner: (1) shall establish.
Chart of Accounts Overview ALASBO Power Lunch January 15, 2008 Presented by Elwin Blackwell, Internal Auditor Department of Education & Early Development.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Annual Report and Public Hearing Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
1 School FIRST Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas.
Bandera Independent School District An Overview of Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas Presented by: Tish Grill.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
NC CFW Expenditure reports How to complete and submit an expenditure report Expenditure reports How to complete and submit an expenditure report.
Presentation to the Oversight Board Santa Clara County Auditor-Controller 1.
1 Schools FIRST Denton Independent School District October 11, 2011.
New Charter School Training April 24, 2012 Presented by Iona Martin, Financial Specialist Financial Accounting / OCAS & Auditing.
1 Harlingen CISD Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas FIRST.
Financial Management Report Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas 2010 School FIRST Rating WYLIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Schools FIRST Denton Independent School District September 27, 2005.
1 Schools FIRST Denton Independent School District October 13, 2009.
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas. Originated by SB218 of the 77 th Texas Legislature in Expands the public education accountability system.
2011 Annual Financial Management Report Manara Academy Oct. 15 th, Annual Financial Report1.
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas. Originated by SB218 of the 77 th Texas Legislature in Amended in 2007, 2009 and 2011 Expands the public.
Chapter 7 Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas. Originated by SB218 of the 77 th Texas Legislature in Amended in 2007 and 2009 Expands the public education.
1 Brownsville Independent School District June 30, 2006 Presentation on the Texas Education Agency School FIRST F inancial F inancial I ntegrity I ntegrity.
Edgewood Independent School District DISTRICT STATUS DETAIL THE TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1701 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE – AUSTIN, TEXAS, – (512)
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Chapter 21 Internal, Operational, and Compliance Auditing McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
Financial Management  Subgrantees shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures to insure proper distribution of and accounting for Federal.
1.  Senate Bill No. 875  Developed by Commissioner together with Comptroller of Public Accounts  Proposal presented to Legislature December 2000 
MANARA ACADEMY NOV. 17 TH, Annual Financial Report Annual Financial Management Report.
DISTRICT STATUS DETAIL Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas.
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST) Report For Fiscal Year Ending 2014 Central Administration at Nellie Schunior Staff Development.
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas. Originated by SB218 of the 77 th Texas Legislature in Amended in 2007, 2009, 2011 and 2015 Expands the.
March 2010 – IAASB to consider issues paper and task force proposals June 2010 – IAASB first read of exposure draft (prior to next IESBA meeting) September.
Columbia-Brazoria ISD Schools FIRST Report Texas Education Agency’s Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas December 15, 2015.
Charter FIRST FINANCIAL INTEGRITY RATING SYSTEM OF TEXAS REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2014 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2015 CHUCK RAINEY, CHIEF FINANCIAL.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
F.I.R.S.T. Bandera Independent School District An Overview of Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas Presented by: Tish Grill.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM RESOURCE GUIDE (FASRG) AND CHARTER FIRST ROBIN ALDRIDGE AND YOLANDA WALKER TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©
Consolidated Plan Programs Universal Application Process Budget & Financial Analysis Mandatory Workshop March 24, :00 p.m. 1 Laura Stagner Director.
Summer Summit June 30 – July 1, We needed another acronym in education? TOP REASONS FOR A CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 4. Our assessment.
BASIC FISCAL REQUIREMENTS DAVID MARX TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©
1 Educational Accountability Act of 2009 (SB09-163) Colorado Department of Education February 6, 2012.
Subchapters 16 through 22 Readoption with Amendments
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST Report) 2005
COMPLETING THE AUDIT AND REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES
PRESENTATION OF THE ANNUAL AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT.
2017 Audit Presentation: Plum Borough School District
Gregory-Portland Independent
Allen Independent School District.
Chart of Accounts Overview
Financial Integrity Rating
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
State Accountability Rating
FinaNcial LEAdership LISD February 21, 2019
State Accountability Rating
Katherine Yuen, CPA Partner
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process
Presentation transcript:

First Annual Charter School Budget Boot Camp Stake Holders Accreditation Issues Rita Chase Division of Financial Audits Texas Education Agency

Texas Administrative Code § Accreditation Status. § Accreditation Status. (a)-(f)(No change.) (a)-(f)(No change.) (g)Charter school accreditation. In considering the financial performance of a charter operator during a fiscal year for which no financial accountability ratings were assigned to charter operators under § of this title, the commissioner shall apply the following substitute criteria. (g)Charter school accreditation. In considering the financial performance of a charter operator during a fiscal year for which no financial accountability ratings were assigned to charter operators under § of this title, the commissioner shall apply the following substitute criteria.

TAC § (1)Finding in lieu of rating. Any of the following findings, made after an opportunity for a record review under paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection, shall be deemed the equivalent of a financial accountability rating of Substandard Achievement or Suspended--Data Quality under § of this title: (1)Finding in lieu of rating. Any of the following findings, made after an opportunity for a record review under paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection, shall be deemed the equivalent of a financial accountability rating of Substandard Achievement or Suspended--Data Quality under § of this title: In place of a School FIRST rating In place of a School FIRST rating

TAC § (A)the Annual Audit Report required for that fiscal year by TEC, §44.008, and § of this title (relating to Accounting for State Funds) was received more than 180 days after the close of the entity's fiscal year; (A)the Annual Audit Report required for that fiscal year by TEC, §44.008, and § of this title (relating to Accounting for State Funds) was received more than 180 days after the close of the entity's fiscal year; June 30 fiscal year end – received after December 29 June 30 fiscal year end – received after December 29 August 31 fiscal year end – received after February 27 August 31 fiscal year end – received after February 27

TAC § (B)the Annual Audit Report required for that fiscal year by TEC, §44.008, and § of this title disclosed net assets of less than 80% of net liabilities; or (B)the Annual Audit Report required for that fiscal year by TEC, §44.008, and § of this title disclosed net assets of less than 80% of net liabilities; or Statement of Financial Position Statement of Financial Position Example 1: Example 1: Net Assets - $1,582,742 Net Assets - $1,582,742 Liabilities - $474,672 * 80% = $379, (Passed) Liabilities - $474,672 * 80% = $379, (Passed) Example 2: Example 2: Net Assets - $86,988 Net Assets - $86,988 Liabilities - $128,873 * 80% = $103, (Failed) Liabilities - $128,873 * 80% = $103, (Failed)

(C)the Annual Audit Report required for that fiscal year by TEC, §44.008, and § of this title contained: (C)the Annual Audit Report required for that fiscal year by TEC, §44.008, and § of this title contained: (i) an adverse opinion, including a going concern disclosure, or a disclaimer of opinion; and (i) an adverse opinion, including a going concern disclosure, or a disclaimer of opinion; and (ii) the adverse or disclaimed opinion that pertained to: (ii) the adverse or disclaimed opinion that pertained to: (I) financial resources or expenditures that were not properly documented; or (I) financial resources or expenditures that were not properly documented; or (II) a material weakness in internal controls that led to the misallocation of financial resources. (II) a material weakness in internal controls that led to the misallocation of financial resources.

(2)Provisions concerning finding. Whenever a provision of this section calls for consideration of the financial accountability rating of a charter operator for a fiscal year, a finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be deemed the financial accountability rating and applied as if such finding were issued under § of this title. (2)Provisions concerning finding. Whenever a provision of this section calls for consideration of the financial accountability rating of a charter operator for a fiscal year, a finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be deemed the financial accountability rating and applied as if such finding were issued under § of this title.

(A)If a provision of this section calls for consideration of the financial accountability rating of a charter operator for more than one fiscal year, and financial accountability ratings were assigned to charter operators under § of this title for at least one but fewer than all of the relevant fiscal years, a finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be deemed the financial accountability rating only for the fiscal year(s) for which no financial accountability ratings were assigned to charter operators. (A)If a provision of this section calls for consideration of the financial accountability rating of a charter operator for more than one fiscal year, and financial accountability ratings were assigned to charter operators under § of this title for at least one but fewer than all of the relevant fiscal years, a finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be deemed the financial accountability rating only for the fiscal year(s) for which no financial accountability ratings were assigned to charter operators.

(B)A finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be issued using the process provided by § of this title (relating to Procedures for Accreditation Sanctions) and shall be subject to a record review under § of this title (relating to Record Review of Certain Decisions). (B)A finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be issued using the process provided by § of this title (relating to Procedures for Accreditation Sanctions) and shall be subject to a record review under § of this title (relating to Record Review of Certain Decisions).

(C)A finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be issued pertaining to each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year. For the fiscal year, the TEA shall report the performance of each open-enrollment charter operator for informational purposes only. (C)A finding described by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be issued pertaining to each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year. For the fiscal year, the TEA shall report the performance of each open-enrollment charter operator for informational purposes only.

Ratings School YearAudit DueRating School YearAudit DueRating 06-07January January January January January

(h)Third-party accreditation. The commissioner may recognize a supplemental accreditation issued by a rating agency approved by the commissioner to a charter operator that meets the standards determined by the commissioner under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section. A charter operator that fails to meet the standards for accreditation under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section may not receive such recognition until the charter operator meets the standards for the Accredited status as determined by the commissioner. (h)Third-party accreditation. The commissioner may recognize a supplemental accreditation issued by a rating agency approved by the commissioner to a charter operator that meets the standards determined by the commissioner under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section. A charter operator that fails to meet the standards for accreditation under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section may not receive such recognition until the charter operator meets the standards for the Accredited status as determined by the commissioner.

Questions????? Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 97 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter dd-ee-ltrprop.html 7dd-ee-ltrprop.html 7dd-ee-ltrprop.html 7dd-ee-ltrprop.html Texas Education Code, Chapter Texas Education Code, Chapter