Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Advertisements

Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
National Intellectual Property Strategies, Some Examples and Their Significance June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique WIPO Intellectual Property and New Technologies.
Principal Patent Analyst
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Marice Cumber Director. Getting Out of Bed Knowledge transfer for the creative industries.
Towards Better Exploitation and Economic Impact: Developing the EPSRC Partnership with the University Vince Osgood Associate Director, Economic Impact.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A STRATEGIC TOOL Alison Campbell OBE PhD RTTP Belgrade 30 October 2012.
Dr Neil Bradshaw Director of Enterprise The role of IPR as seen by the academic community LES Annual Conference, Bristol, June 24, 2004.
23 rd November 2011 MCST Conference: Amplifying the Competitiveness of Manufacturing in Malta Industry’s views of Research for Competitiveness Ing. Ray.
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
Iberian Universities technology transfer conference Technology Licensing SMBR and Walkinsense 29th November 2010, Ayamonte.
Money Spinner YES Consultancy to Spin out Company Bruce Venning.
Revenue Generation: Building Social Opportunity Third Sector Innovation: Sustainability and Social Impact August
Expression of Interest UNICA Science Parks and Incubator Network.
IP Management at Massey 1.national collaborative infrastructure.
Main Legal Aspects of the Choice of TTO Model N.Romanova Saratov State University named after N.G.Chernyshevsky.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
IP management in knowledge transfer Dr Alun Tlusty-Sheen MInstKT AURIL Council University of Westminster
University Intellectual Property Transfer Mechanisms: Adaptation and Learning Maryann P. Feldman Johns Hopkins University.
IP Policy and its linkages with Economic, Science & Technology Policies Muhammad Ismail Deputy Director IPO-Pakistan October 09, 2013 IN THE NAME OF ALLAH,
Commercialisation at Griffith Dorina Caccamo Manager, Contracts and Administration Griffith Enterprise Value through.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Necessary conditions for effective technology transfer and commercialisation of intellectual property We value Talents, Technologies and Tolerance dr.
Public and Corporate Economic Consultants PACEC 1 © Tomas Ulrichsen The Role of Government Policy in Supporting Knowledge Exchange in English Higher Education.
Integrating Innovation
1 Promoting Science and Research for developing Innovations and Entrepreneurs OGADA Tom WIPO National Roving Workshops on Intellectual Property Strategy,
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 3rd October 2013 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2013.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
USC Stevens at a Glance Navigating the University August 19, 2014.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
An Integrated Approach to Commercialization : From Disclosure to Market Presentation to FPTT Annual Meeting June 18, 2004 Janet E. Scholz University of.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.
University Technology Transfer and Commercialisation of Research: Some Evidence from International Best Practice Brian Harney CISC Seminar Programme.
An introduction to The University of Auckland’s Knowledge Transfer Company Dr Peter Lee, CEO.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.
Commercialization of IP - National Perspective 1 © 2009 Nikola Radovanovic Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Who, what, where and when. UCC Office of Technology Transfer.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Intellectual Property Valorization
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
Shared Intellectual Property CHALLENGES OF ACADEMIA COLLABORATING WITH INDUSTRY Per Mercke and Sara Ljung.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
The Innovation Incubator
Annex: Berlin Contract
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Universities and the Commercial World
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Core Business Canadian University Business Model Industry, Society
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Maribor, November 5 to 7, 2012 Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain.
Universities of the future: the challenges of digitalization
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London

Intellectual property Intellectual property (IP) refers to the legal form of protection for invention, brands, designs and creative works. There are four main types of IP rights: (a)Patents (b)Copyright (c)Designs (d)Trademarks

The role of universities Education Research Third stream – commercialisation of IP

The university science base and IP Universities have a strong science base which is highly productive in creating “pure” research outputs such as publications and citations There is significant potential to transfer this knowledge to industry through IP Commercialising university research through technology transfer has significant potential to stimulate world-class innovation output

How universities commercialise their IP Collaborating with business on research projects Depends on experienced negotiators from both parties agreeing terms and conditions for IP within an adequate framework Making agreements with companies to exploit IP already developed in university research Requires dedicated expertise in licensing, spin-out creation, venture capital, market research, marketing and IP management

The challenges: barriers to the commercialisation of university IP Lack of clarity over ownership of IP in research collaborations Time and cost involved in negotiating research collaborations, even preventing some deals from being completed Business concern that some universities overvalue their IP, underestimating the cost of bringing the technology to the market Generating income from IP takes time and success is not guaranteed

Possible solutions: facilitating the commercialisation of university IP Define at the outset who owns what at the outset of negotiations – and be flexible in negotiations Ownership of IP should be proportionate – the party that makes the biggest contribution (intellectual as well as financial) should have rights on IP ownership Public funding to universities is intended to promote the public good rather than to raise revenues Academics should receive incentives from universities to produce commercial IP - recruitment, retention and enabling research

Evidence of an IP culture in universities Technology transfer offices Innovation clusters Spin-out companies IP administration IP education

Creating an IP culture in universities Top-down university support and investment Bottom-up involvement and participation by academic staff Understanding pressures on and motivation of academic staff Building IP awareness amongst university faculty members Facilitating IP teaching and learning activities and integrating IP teaching into the curricula

Conclusion Before an “IP culture” can exist “IP awareness” is needed