Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems of Large-Scale Professional Development Sean Smith Horizon Research, Inc.
Advertisements

District Roadmap Beginning Vision Statement Our vision is to be a model urban school district that values and celebrates diversity and is.
SCALING UP: Reform Lessons for Urban Comprehensive High Schools Celine Coggins, Ph.D.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Providing On-going Support for STEM Teachers Joan D. Pasley Horizon Research, Inc.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
An Introduction. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. HER A five-year National Science Foundation grant for the advancement.
Math in the Middle What are we learning about rural mathematics education? Ruth Heaton and Jim Lewis University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Scholarly Engagement Mission Pathway Partnership Pathway Epistemological Pathway Pedagogical Pathway Production of Knowledge Improvement of LearningConnection.
1 Higher Education Engagement with K-12: Partnerships, Possibilities, and Pitfalls Nancy S. Shapiro Office of Academic Affairs University System of Maryland.
Systematic Reform of Middle Grades Math in Chicago Stacy A. Wenzel Loyola University Chicago DRK-12 PI Meeting
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
In what ways do you contribute to students’ learning in mathematics? What do you think is the role of the district in improving math achievement?
Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
NASA LIFT OFF Overview Inquiry LIFT OFF Team ALAMEDA County Office of Education LOS ANGELES County Office of Education SANTA CLARA County Office.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Faculty Engagement in Partnership Work Nancy S. Shapiro University System of Maryland AACU 2007.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
CSU Math and Science Teacher Initiative and STEM CAP: Making it Work September 26, 2009 Dr. Joan Bissell Director, Teacher Education and Public School.
THINKING ABOUT MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION (TMI) A Study of Elementary and Middle School Principals’ Leadership Content Knowledge Education Development Center.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
The Ohio STEM Learning Network: A Study of Factors Affecting Implementation Spread and Sustainability.
Professional Development
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.
Asking the Right K-12 Questions How to Answer Them to Evaluate K-12 STEM Outreach and Engagement Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Research Scientist.
Orientation Meeting, October 26, 2015 M.S.G.A. Media Center.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Broadening Participation through K-12 and Community Partnerships
Board on science education
Types of Community Engagement Forms among Participating Institutions
Instructional Coaching in the Elementary Mathematics Classroom
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships

Goal: To synthesize knowledge generated through the Math and Science Partnerships and integrate it into the broader knowledge base for education reform –Deepening Teacher Content Knowledge –Teachers as Intellectual Leaders –Involvement of STEM faculty –Professional Learning Communities Co-PIs: Iris Weiss, Horizon Research and Barbara Miller, EDC MSP Knowledge Management and Dissemination Project

Toward sustainability: Strategies from four cases of teacher leadership in NSF Math and Science Partnerships (Schiavo and Miller, 2010) (under Cases) MSP Knowledge Management and Dissemination Project

Identify a program that you know of that has been sustained after external funding or after initial implementation. What contributed to that program being sustained? 1.Reflect individually, identifying at least two factors that you believe contributed to the program being sustained. 2.Share with no more than 3 colleagues at your table the two factors. (Note: this doesn’t mean sharing the full description of the program you have in mind.) What is sustainability?

Continuation of a program in its entirety from inception? Ongoing presence of key features of a program? What is sustainability?

Designing and implementing interventions Garnering support of key stakeholders Aligning policies Developing capacity and infrastructure to scale up Features that contribute to sustainability

Handbook for Enhancing Strategic Leadership in the Math and Science Partnerships (Weiss, Miller, Heck & Cress, 2004) (under Presentations and Papers) Features that contribute to sustainability

El Paso MSP –FT-release TLs in high schools and middle schools –In 3 urban and 9 rural districts Nebraska’s Math in the Middle MSP –Formal and informal TLs in grades 5-8 –In 1 urban and over 60 rural districts Vermont Mathematics Partnership –Formal and informal TLs across K-12 –In 7 districts Virginia MSP –FT- and PT-release TLs in elementary and middle schools –In 9 districts MSPs featured in cases

Two kinds of interventions were sustained developing knowledge and skills of teacher leaders supporting teacher leader practices, working with classroom teachers Advice: Begin with sustainability in mind, even in determining which interventions and how they are carried out Interventions

Look to other teacher leadership programs for possible models for sustainable interventions and adapt the model program to fit your particular context. Prepare teacher leaders to share their content expertise with classroom teachers. Align interventions to the selection of candidates for the teacher leader programs. Key ideas for designing and implementing interventions

Which of these key ideas have significance for teacher leader programs that you know? Key ideas for designing and implementing interventions

Different kinds of stakeholders were critical Those directly affected by teacher leader practice Those who shape the context Advice: Work early to garner and often to sustain the support of key stakeholders Stakeholders

Identify district and university leaders who can build long-term support for, and involvement in, teacher leadership programs among their colleagues. Establish a shared vision for the work of teacher leaders among key stakeholders prior to implementing teacher leader programs. Key ideas for garnering support of stakeholders

Which of these key ideas have significance for teacher leader programs that you know? Key ideas for garnering support of stakeholders

Policies at different levels were important School level policies around schedules, release time, collaboration District level policies around professional development, instruction, assistance Advice: Be aware, from the outset, of which policies are most supportive and most restrictive Policies

Leverage existing policies in designing and implementing teacher leader programs. Enact new policies to support ongoing collaboration within the partnership and the initial implementation of teacher leader positions. Key ideas for aligning policies

Which of these key ideas have significance for teacher leader programs that you know? Key ideas for aligning policies

Which of these key ideas about stakeholders and/or policies have significance for teacher leader programs that you know? Stakeholders and policies

Both capacity and infrastructure are essential Who can keep doing the work with quality What resources and structures are needed to support work at scale Advice: Be realistic about whether the program is able to be scaled up Scaling Up

Build the capacity of partner institutions to continue to prepare teacher leaders after the completion of grant funding. Use the grant period to implement changes to the infrastructure of the partner institutions to ensure that the teacher leadership work can be maintained over time. Key ideas for scaling up

Which of these key ideas have significance for teacher leader programs that you know? Key ideas for scaling up

1.Sustainability doesn’t mean continue in perpetuity 2.Sustainability needs to be a goal from the outset 3.Sustainability involves –Interventions –Stakeholders –Policies –Scaling up (usually) 4. Sustainability is a group effort Conclusions

More on sustainability (and other good resources) at