Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
Advertisements

Dental Treatment Needs of Active Duty Military Personnel 1994 and 2003 Andrew K. York, CAPT, DC, USN Susan W. Mongeau, Lt Col, USAF, DC David L. Moss,
Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Resources: Developing an Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
Global Developments in Assessment: LibQUAL+ ® and Beyond… 6th International JISC/CNI Conference York, U.K. July 6-7, 2006 Duane Webster Executive Director.
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
Nancy Turner Syracuse University Library ARL Survey Coordinators and SPEC Liaisons January 19, 2007 E-Metrics Services and ARL Statistics.
Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Ontario University Library Consortia Activity Gwendolyn Ebbett Dean of the Library University of Windsor.
DigiQUAL™ Regrounding LibQUAL+® for the Digital Library Environment: An Analysis of the DigiQUAL® Data Presented at 9 th Northumbria by.
Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security Second Annual Research Symposium April 2002 The Changing.
Health Center Library Overview Evelyn Morgen, Director March 2007.
Academic Research Library Support of Sponsored Research in the United States Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries Qualitative.
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services: Developing Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
1 Types and Sources of Data UAPP 702 Research Methods for Urban & Public Policy Based on notes by Steven W. Peuquet, Ph.D.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.
ARL perspectives on accuracy in web analytics reporting on digital libraries CNI Fall 2013 Task Force Meeting Washington, DC December 9, 2013.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
Technical Implementation of the MINES Survey Methodology ACRL 2005 Minneapolis, MN April 7, 2005 Terry Plum Assistant Dean, Simmons GSLIS Association of.
The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Overview Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality APHA CEI Session  November 2006.
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
PLASC Member Survey: Who’s our crowd? Conducted by Stephanie Bennett and Adrienne Pruitt Presented at the PLASC annual business meeting, Friday, August.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.
Types of Assessment Satisfaction of the customer. Satisfaction of the worker. Workflow effectiveness and speed. Service delivery effectiveness and speed.
Comparable Health Data Between Canada and the U.S. n Many organizations such as the United Nations, World Health Organization and the Organization of Economic.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
Martha Kyrillidou Brinley Franklin Terry Plum MINES for Libraries TM ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Assessing the Value of Networked Electronic Services:
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
ACRL: Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future: MINES at OCUL Association of College and Research Libraries ACRL Conference 2005 Minneapolis.
Demonstrating Value and Creating Value: Evidence-Based Library Management through MINES for Libraries™
September 9, 2005 Washington, D.C. My.Medicare.gov - The Medicare Beneficiary Portal The Future of Beneficiary Self-Service.
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
Relais Express Implementation in OCUL libraries in Canada ILL Discussion Group meeting, ALA Mary Lehane June 23, 2012.
The Library Summit: the University of Texas Libraries Experience Jocelyn Duffy ALA Midwinter 2005 Boston, Massachusetts January.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Web-Based Usage Surveys MINES for Libraries TM Brinley Franklin University of Connecticut Terry Plum Simmons GSLIS
Single Copy Task Group TRLN Zari Kamarei University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill June 4, :30 PAM-Wide RT.
Dana Thomas, Ontario Council of University Libraries Alan Darnell, Ontario Council of University Libraries Understanding Use of Networked Information Content:
ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Effective, Sustainable and Practical Assessment Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Service Quality Programs.
Assessing the Scholars Portal Melody Burton, Queen’s University Toni Olshen, York University Ontario Library Association Superconference February 3, 2005.
TM Project web site: Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Mid-Winter January, 2006 “ 22 Items and a Box ” Qualitative.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
2014 Blood Shortage Mock Exercise Orientation Testing the Ontario Contingency Plan for the Management of Blood Shortages Version 2 Ministry of Health and.
Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.
LibQUAL+™ Canada 2007 a national survey project sponsored by the Canadian Association of Research Libraries.
Project Counter in brief Jim Self University of Virginia Library ARL Survey Coordinators Meeting Chicago, Illinois June 24, 2005.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory and Practice A Librarian’s Perspective ALA / ALCTS June 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Brinley Franklin Vice.
Project web site: old.libqual.org LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool ALA Midwinter Conference San Diego, California January.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries.
TM Project web site Report Meeting Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Martha Kyrillidou Jonathan Sousa June 21, 2003 ALA Toronto CANADA.
Midwest Business Group on Health The Source for Leading Health Benefits Professionals 2016 Community Oncology Conference – April 14, 2016.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Delivering the Goods: Health Librarianship by Distance (Rural Queensland, Australia) Jane Orbell-Smith AFALIA Presenter: Jane Orbell-Smith AFALIA Affiliation:
Greater Western Library Alliance 2006 Spring Membership Meeting Arizona State University, Tempe AZ February 27, 2006 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
Webmetrics Workshop American Library Association Chicago, IL June 24, 2004 Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Association.
Assessing the Value and Impact of Digital Content Brinley Franklin Vice Provost for University Libraries University of Connecticut March 1, 2007.
Brinley Franklin and Terry Plum August 18, 2005
ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Evaluating the Portal: The Story Behind the Numbers
Defining and Analyzing Financial Wellness
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
الأستاذ المساعد بقسم المناهج وطرق التدريس
Standards for Use Measures for Electronic Resources
MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’
Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making
Presentation transcript:

Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience

MINES is a research methodology consisting of a web- based survey form and a sampling plan. MINES measures who is using electronic resources, where users are located at the time of use, and their purpose of use. MINES was adopted by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) as part of the “New Measures” toolkit in May, MINES is different from other electronic resource usage measures that quantify total usage (e.g., COUNTER, EQUINOX, E-Metrics, ICOLC Guidelines, ISO and NISO standards) or measure how well a library makes electronic resources accessible (LibQual+ TM ). What is MINES?

Data was collected at 18 university libraries in Ontario, Canada (OCUL) between May, 2004 and April, Data was also collected at 14 university libraries in the United States between January, 2003 and April, Recent Data Collection Activities Main University LibrariesAcademic Medical Libraries University of ColoradoUniversity of Connecticut Health Center University of ConnecticutUniversity of North Carolina University of Texas Medical Branch Oregon State UniversityUniversity of Texas Southwestern University of Utah University of Virginia Washington University

More than 50,000 networked electronic services uses in the U.S. were surveyed. At each U.S. library, the MINES survey was one component of a comprehensive cost analysis study that assigned all library costs to sponsored research, instruction/education/non- sponsored research, patient care, other sponsored activities and other activities. Recent Data Collection Activities MINES was also conducted by the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) in in conjunction with ARL. More than 20,000 users were surveyed.

A representative sampling plan, including sample size, is determined at the outset. Typically, there are 48 hours of surveying over 12 months at a medical library and 24 hours a year at a main library. Random moment/web-based surveys are employed at each site. Participation is usually mandatory, negating non-respondent bias, and is based on actual use in real-time. Libraries with database-to-web gateways or proxy re-writers offer the most comprehensive networking solution for surveying all networked services users during survey periods. MINES Methodological Considerations

Library User Survey

Patron Status

Library User Survey Affiliation

Library User Survey Location

Library User Survey Purpose of Use

On-Campus, Not in the Library n = 15,948 In the Library n = 6,590 Purpose of Use By Location U.S. Medical Libraries 2003 – 2005 Off-Campus n = 4,852 *83% of sponsored research usage occurred outside the library. 92% of this use took place on-campus. Overall Use n = 27,390

On-Campus, Not in the Library n = 9,460 In the Library n = 9,733 Purpose of Use By Location U.S. Main Campus Libraries 2003 – 2005 Off-Campus n = 7,790 *72% of sponsored research usage of electronic resources occurred outside the library; 83% of this took place on-campus. All Usage n = 26,983

Location of Users U.S. Medical LibraryU.S. Main Library All Libraries 30% 36% 64% 70% 76% 24%

Demographics by Location of User U.S. Main Libraries On Campus, Not in the Library n = 6,391 Inside the Library n = 9,172 Off-Campus n = 4,953 Total Users n = 25,698

Off-Campus n = 5,133 Demographics by Location of User U.S. Medical Libraries Inside the Library n = 6,819 On Campus, Not in the Library n = 19,582 Total Users n = 31,883

Location of Users All U.S. Libraries 20% 52% 28% 72% 28%

Demographics of OCUL Users ( n=20,300)

OCUL Scholars Portal Users by Purpose of Use ( n=20,300)

Location of Networked Electronic Services Users- U.S. and Canadian University Libraries OCUL U.S.