Project activity and research culture: the case of the NET project in Iceland M. Allyson Macdonald Þuríður Jóhannsdóttir Iceland University of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO FORM A PARTNERSHIP Training Unit 3.2 National, transnational and local networks.
Advertisements

Autonomy and Accountability – New Models of Institutional Autonomy
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Putting Research Evidence to Work Research Seminar 14 th January 2009.
HANSA NOVA: Managing a multicultural workforce in the Baltic Sea Region Co-financed by:
Vygotsky Additional Guided Participation. Sociocultural Activity Guided participation is a particular type of scaffolding studied by Rogoff et al. (1995).
‘Real World’ Problem / Data Set an overall real world problem, supported by real world data Purely academic learning might require a theoretical problem.
Communities of Practice in UK Higher Education: A case study on networks and group effectiveness Alison DeanDanielle Tucker Pamela YeowLinda Pomeroy Kent.
TRANSLINK Training Effective Management and Supervision of PhD Candidates University of Indonesia, 9-10 May 2006 Postgraduate Supervision Dr. Paul Timms.
Presentation of the course in project-work: “Co-operation, learning and projectmanagement”
“Please don´t talk while I am interrupting!” Voices heard in the construction of the ICT curriculum in Iceland Allyson Macdonald LearnICT project Iceland.
Collaboration: Software Development, Learning James Chisan February, 2003.
Learning to be a teacher in the distance learning program at the Iceland University of Education; The individual, the school and the community Þuríður.
Business Communication Research Class 1 : What is Research? Leena Louhiala-Salminen, Spring 2013.
History–Social Science: Unit 2, Key Topic 4http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Teachers’ role and responsibilities Cohen, Manion &Morrison Ch. 11 Arthur & Cremin Ch. 1.1.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
The evaluation of research units at HCERES
Unit 250 Developing Yourself as a Team Leader
University of Gdańsk1 Strategic Investment Decisions Dr Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska Katedra Inwestycji
CCIRN meeting, Cairns, 3 July 2004 Computer security co-operation in Europe Karel Vietsch Based on materials provided by TERENA TF-CSIRT.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
ORGANISING THE CREATIVITY AND MAKING THE ORGANISATION CREATIVE Nathalie Droyer 1.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Techniques For Leading Group Discussions.
Welcome! Special Education Collaborating Teacher Orientation Spring 2008 Welcome! Special Education Collaborating Teacher Orientation Spring 2008.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Research leadership: Productive research communities and the integration of research fellows - mediation – as core – mediation and objects – emotions …..
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Motivation: a construct used to explain the initiation, direction, & intensity of an individual’s behavior in a particular situation Theories of Motivation.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Cooperative Language Learning (CLL) Collaborative Learning (CL)
The NEKIA Knowledge Utilization Initiative Board of Directors Meeting Monday April 11, 2005 Montreal.
Expansive learning actions and expressions of transformative agency - A Change Laboratory intervention in a academic Library.
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
The Ad Hoc Task Force on Internal Funding Fred Beard (Journalism), Bob Houser (Chemistry), & Joe Rodgers (Psychology) May, 2010 Internal Funding Recommendations.
THE SIX Cs OF MOTIVATION What are they and how do you use them in the classroom?
29 November 2005 Educational quality at the K.U.Leuven Quality assurance and enhancement at the K.U.Leuven Veerle Hulpiau.
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
Independent evaluation: the experience of undertaking policy evaluations commissioned by the Department of Health in England Nicholas Mays Director, Policy.
FITNES The Future of IndonesianTeachers in National Education System A COLLECTION OF DREAMS Of TEACHER EDUCATION As WORK-BASED EDUCATION.
Week 2 – Approaches to Organizations Management
School Based Teams. Basic Assumptions  All teachers have responsibility for students with special learning needs  All students can be helped by regular.
School-Based management: Will It Blossom?. SchoolRestructuring Parents Educators Business Sector Government Tertiary Institutes.
NEW STUDENT AFFAIRS PROFESSIONALS: I GOT MY DREAM JOB….NOW WHAT?? Erin Bentrim-Tapio University of North Carolina at Greensboro Ted Elling University of.
BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER Use of Rich Tasks. What is a Rich Task? Accessible to all levels Provides an opportunity to explore mathematics Involves testing,
Directing Definition of directing: Directing is the fourth element of the management process. It refers to a continuous task of making contacts with subordinates,
Managing Classrooms for Constructive Conflict Presentation to the Family and Consumer Sciences Academy, Temple University August 3, 2005 Tricia S. Jones,
Comenius: Future School Leaders Evidence-informed Practice Raphael Wilkins Sub-brand to go here.
Reading Take-Aways 1.Which of the four C’s do you think is most critical for student preparation for PJL? Why? 2.How does a driving question facilitate.
Developing Collaborative Skills with Web 2.0 in the World Language CLassroom Cristy Vogel French Teacher Hammond
2007. Faculty of Education ► Staff 300 (incl.100 in Teacher training school) ► 20 professorships ► 80 lecturers ► 9 senior assistants ► 12 assistants.
Standards & Competencies MA in Social Work Nevenka Zegarac, Full professor, FPN, BU.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Teams Kevin Posalski David Shin. What are Teams Teams are groups of two or more people who interact and influence each other, are mutually accountable.
Studying at a Danish University JANUARY 2011 Henrik Bødker, Phd. Associate Professor, Director Department of Information and Media Studies & Centre for.
Principles of Good Governance
‘There is somebody wiser than any of us, and that is everybody.’
Designing and Implementing Local Faculty Development Programs
THE SIX Cs OF MOTIVATION
Remaking a policy instrument in the educational field
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Kagan Basic Principles (PIES)
Cooperative Learning                          .
Cooperative Learning                          .
Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca
Presentation transcript:

Project activity and research culture: the case of the NET project in Iceland M. Allyson Macdonald Þuríður Jóhannsdóttir Iceland University of Education ISCAR conference, Copenhagen, Sept 2004

The context - the NET project Three year project, externally-funded Project based at one university, all but one of the team either a staff member or a student at the outset –17 researchers originally, in five groups, varying in size; –Two work at other universities –Some in the group were graduate students (M.Ed.) –Two of the group with a Ph.D. –Some students joined the project through senior researchers Several critical incidents

Mid-term review Assessment of project during preparation of application for a third year of funding –Internal assessment by project director and project coordinator –Used an activity theory framework to build up the assessment Director had recently considered the research culture at the host university at the time of the assessment; teacher education is the main task of the university in question (Macdonald 2003, 2004) (Discussed later at a meeting of participants)

Mid-term review Had proved useful in the earlier work to consider contradictions in the tools-rules-roles triad: –Roles: teaching/research (incl. student motivation) –Tools: methods used, e-references –Rules: assessment of productivity Many project participants part of the evolving research culture where rules and the division of labour seemed in particular to be areas of conflict that were difficult for the individual and perhaps even destructive for the university

Mid-term review Decided to compare aspects of the activity system of researchers within the evolving research culture with aspects of the activity system emerging in a large-scale externally funded research project Rationale/value –Several other such projects are underway; also professional groups are being formed around subject areas and research areas –Need to understand better tensions that arise in order to learn and develop from them –External research environment in Iceland is calling for competition and cooperation

Culture (Ratner 2000) Cultural phenomena –Socially constructed but not necessarily democratic –Facets of culture include interactions, values, physical artifacts, psychological phenomena and agency –Factors are “interdependent and interlocking as well as distinctive. None of them is reducible to others yet neither does any of them stand alone outside the others” (Ratner 2000)

Working definitions University-based traditional research activity –Researcher independence, can work alone or can choose when, where and who to work with someone else; no formal accountability to the university (as yet); academic freedom Externally funded project activity –Preplanned, goal oriented activities, fixed time scale, external resources; tacit commitment to the project goal and based on an assumption of shared responsibility; internal/external control

Activities - rules  Project activities take place according to a set of rules (e.g. timetable, manage- ment structure), both written and unwritten, some of which emerge as the project develops. Research activities take place according to a set of rules drawing largely on the academic tradition but also arising from modern management, especially quality management.

Activities - rules Project activities  Progress reports and accountability to the project  Reciprocal responsibility Research activities Allocation of research funds Research - annual reports of published work Assessment schemes and income The culture of graduate studies

Activities – division of labour  There is a division of labour within the project group, where individuals have different roles, some of which may change with time or vary with the task.  We can identify the roles of senior researchers, (junior) researchers, graduate students and project assistants but the hierarchy is not distinct. There is a division of labour within the research community, where individuals have different roles, and the hierarchy system is reasonably well defined by university appointments.

Division of labour as a mediator Issues of ability, credibility and responsibility Interactions within groups Graduate students – notions of apprenticeship and legitimate participation Leadership/management Independence and control Own choice of collaborators Teacher/researcher roles Involvement of students Supervision of graduate students

Activities - tools  Instruments/tools such as web-sites, conferences, team meetings, publications are used to mediate project activities. Instruments/tools such as conferences, talks, journals/papers are used to mediate research activities.

Tools as mediators  Project proposals, meetings and progress reports  Accountability (to others), shared responsibility Informal interactions Seminars, meetings, written papers, conference papers, talks Choice of research method

Community as mediator  A common interest in the research topic; may be a conflict of interest  Staff and/or students Separate interests Staff supervising students

Discussion  Assessment scheme  Role of students  Accountability  Mediation of tasks  Writing up research  Co-authorship  Who owns ideas  Shared responsibility  Peer review

Conclusion  We have suggested that some difficulties in the implementation of the project can be attributed to the clash between the traditional research culture where the researcher can decide his own agenda and is not fettered by accountability to others and a project culture where activity requires consultation, collaboration and a high degree of accountability to others in the project.

What next?  Expansive learning, a concept put forward by Engestrom (1987) is initiated when some individuals involved in collective activity take the action of questioning existing practice, which can then lead to a debate and analysis of the contradictions in the current state of affair, which might again lead to new forms of the activity solving the contradictions (Terttu Tuomi-Gröhn and Yrjö Engeström, 2003).