€ Design | Measuring Design Value Berlin, October 2014 Design as factor of innovation/ creation of economic value Prof. Eusebi Nomen – Barcelona Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HR SCORECARD Presented By ADEEL TARIQ MOBASHIR ALI.
Advertisements

Pespectives for Engineering and Technology in Portugal” Lisbon, 22 November 1999 Giorgio Sirilli Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation.
National Intellectual Property Strategies, Some Examples and Their Significance June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique WIPO Intellectual Property and New Technologies.
Prof Parameshwar P Iyer Indian Institute of Science1 Entrepreneurship and Business Management Mega Bucks Workshop Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
SEEA: A progress report with an emphasis on EGSS Sokol Vako United Nations Statistics Division/DESA.
How to Enhance the Innovation Capability in New Member States? PhDr. Miroslava Kopicová National Training Fund European Innovating Minds,
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 9 -1 Chapter 9 Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control Strategic Management: Concepts.
University Miguel Hernández of Elche Some GlobalStart Tools PAXIS Workshop;Salamanca, June 2005.
Chapter Three Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
Chapter Three Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
Budgeting.
Farm Business Planning Dr. Laurence M. Crane
Discussion of Francisco Moris’ U.S. International Trade in R&D- Related Services and a Transactions-Based Profile of Business R&D’ Wolfgang Keller, University.
3 Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
Innovation Measurement
TAFTIE Policy Forum „Measuring innovation” New trends and challenges in innovation measurement Fred Gault UNU-MERIT.
Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability Chapter 3.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
The measurement of Innovation An historical perspective The “Frascati Manual” and the “Oslo Manual” S&T indicators Innovation indicators Some evidence.
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Chapter Three Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
Measuring Innovation and Smart Specialisation – What have we Learned? Dirk Pilat, OECD.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Economy PRESENTER: Erica K. Smith JIPO/WIPO Training for TrainersKingston, JamaicaJUNE 4-6, 2012.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation Jiyoung Park
THEORIES OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE Definitions and Concepts.
1 Supply Chain Driven Development José J. Villamil  Estudios Técnicos, Inc.  October 5, 2012.
The measurement of innovation Advanced Workshop “Science, Technology and Society” Lisbon, 24 November 1999 The measurement of innovation Giorgio Sirilli.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
COMPETING WITH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
©2003 Southwestern Publishing Company 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Robert E. Hoskisson Chapter 13.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Measuring Inbound Diffusion from Publicly Funded Research Organizations to Innovative Firms: A Statistical Perspective Frances Anderson Science, Innovation.
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
A pragmatic approach to sustainability Dr Robin Batterham Chief Scientist Australian Government International Conference on Sustainability Engineering.
Strategic Entrepreneurship
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Engaging Communities and the Workforce through Co-production Gerry Power National Lead – Coproduction and Community Capacity Building Shifting the Focus.
An R&D Manager’s Perspective TechExpo October 5, 2004 Presented by: Veena Rawat.
Identifying the Impacts of Technology Transfer Beyond Commercialization FPTT National Meeting, June 12, 2007.
Presentation CESAER seminar, Trondheim Eva Camerer Policy Officer, Industrial Innovation Policy Development DG Enterprise and Industry 15 October 2010.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Workgroup: Delivering and Accounting for Development Results
Measuring Sustainable development: Achievements and Challenges Enrico Giovannini OECD Chief Statistician June 2005.
Design, Development and Roll Out
1 EUROPEAN INNOVATION POLICY: Innovation policy: updating the Union’s approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy Thursday, 9 October 2003 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
 Introduction  Justification and objectives  Methodology (selection of countries)  Outputs and potential impacts.
Research and Development (Issue 9) 1 Gulab Singh UN STATISTICS DIVISION Economic Statistics Branch National Accounts Section.
Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Analysis Knowledge Economy – Challenges for Measurement Luxembourg, December 8-9, 2005 Innovation measurement:
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
ENERGY MARKET REFORMS, R&D & INNOVATION, AND CHALLENGES: TURKISH EXPERIENCE Selahattin Murat ŞİRİN Expert Energy Market Regulatory Authority TURKEY.
© ARVIR Balancing Funding Priorities for Innovation Projects; Does the South African Government Address the Issue of Portfolio Management?
Science, Technology, Technic
Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda
CHAPTER 13 Strategic Entrepreneurship
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Research and Development
Research and Development
Research and Development
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Eurostat Working Group Regional Statistics
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

€ Design | Measuring Design Value Berlin, October 2014 Design as factor of innovation/ creation of economic value Prof. Eusebi Nomen – Barcelona Design Center​

€ Design | Measuring Design Value Sao Paolo, October 2014 €Design | Measuring Design Value

? Is the role of Design relevant in innovation? Is the role of Design relevant in creating economic value?

It depends

Contribution of design as styling add-on in technology push innovation is marginal compared with the economic and social contribution of design in systemic innovation, as an integrator of emotions, performances and experiences.

Conceptual foundations for defining Design as an economic factor of production

Perceived Utilities (B) SOCIAL Utilities EMOTIONAL Utilities FUNCTIONAL Utilities Economic Cost (C) Economic Profit ( P-C) Consumer’s surplus (B-P) Price (P) One unit Creation of Economic Value

€Design | Measuring Design Value Thus, if design is to play a role in the creation of economic value, design shall have a role in satisfying better Functional utilities what functions can be performed Emotional utilities how does it make me feel Social utilities what does it say about me to others And/or to reduce costs

To design is [to focus on] the integration of functional, emotional and social utilities.

Oslo Manual 2005 addresses the systemic dimension of innovation, the importance of linkages and their measurement. No longer perceives innovation as a linear phenomenon beginning with technology development, but as a complex and systemic phenomenon. Under this perception, the focus shifts towards an emphasis on linkages and integration. EC Staff Working Document ‘Design as a driver of user-centered innovation’ 2009 addresses the view of design as a strategic, cross- functional and multidisciplinary innovation activity. Accordingly, in €Design framework: to design is to integrate functional, emotional and social utilities as a complex and systemic phenomenon.

Perceived Utilities (B) Oslo Manual 2005 Design as Marketing innovation if changes in product form and appearance (par. 172) Product innovation if functional changes (par. 162) Integration of: SOCIAL Utilities EMOTIONAL Utilities FUNCTIONAL Utilities Economic Cost (C) Economic Profit ( P-C) Consumer’s surplus (B-P) Price (P) One unit Creation of Economic Value Frascati Manual 2002 Design as plans or drawings to define functional issues (par. 124, 125) €Design 2013 Design as integrator, at the very outset of systemic innovation Design as integrator

The complex relationship between economic value creation and design

Input /intermediate parameters There is no evidence of causality between the cost to generate an intangible asset and its resulting economic value. There is currently no empirical evidence that the economic value creation by design may be a linear system where outcomes are directly proportional to inputs The 2005 Oslo Manual (§253) raises the importance of innovation linkages … The importance of government programs to encourage greater knowledge sharing or diffusion.

a small change in a flow or stock within a non-linear system may cause an important impact in the output result a small design effort may cause an important increase in economic value creation

€Design hypothesis Design, understood as an integrator of functional, emotional and social utilities at the very outset of systemic innovation, may be a key factor enabling important non-linear efficiencies in the economic and social value creation of firms and GDP growth of nations.

Is design relevant in innovation?

Contribution of design as styling add-on in technology push innovation is marginal compared with the economic and social contribution of design in systemic innovation, as an integrator of emotions, performances and experiences.

1-Technology based innovation Technology push innovation model

Research Creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge Development Use of stock of knowledge to devise new applications, prior to commercialization Innovation Implementation of a new or significantly improved product, process, marketing method, or new organizational method ResearchIndustry User 00’s / 000’s New technologies, inventions, discoveries Short distance between invention and product

According to the final report dated June 2013 of the European Commission “Knowledge Transfer Study ”(page 127): Biomedical IP is the largest generator of license revenue, accounting for 87.0% of the total license revenue for 2011

Research Creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge Development Use of stock of knowledge to devise new applications, prior to commercialization Innovation Implementation of a new or significantly improved product, process, marketing method, or new organizational method ResearchIndustry Δ GDP 00’s / 000’s New technologies, inventions, discoveries Distance too large for TTO capabilities

Final report dated June 2013 of the European Commission “Knowledge Transfer Study ”(pages 122 and 127): … it costs universities on average €84.8 million research expenditures to earn €1 million euro of license income in 2010 and €91.8 million in 2011.

Investment in research is an important priority to increase the stock of knowledge of mankind. But when the distance is too complex between invention and product demanded by the market, then the results of technological research directly reaching industry are marginal. The economical contribution of research outputs is via knowledge spillovers, although they are hard to monitor and to evaluate. Technology push is fundamental for innovations focusing on new or better technological functions or performances and when the distance is short between the new invention and the new good, service or experience desired or needed by the user/customer/buyer Technology push is fundamental for technology based innovations.

2-User based innovation Systemic innovation model

HE-MED 1/3rd – 1/10th Current energy needs From a patent to a new fresh water paradigm

New better emotional utilities New better functional utilities New Communication New vaccine New mobile experience Integration

Research Creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge Development Use of stock of knowledge to devise new applications, prior to commercialization Innovation Implementation of a new or significantly improved product, process, marketing method, or new organizational method Δ GDP Technological research Creation Social research Users observatory Alternative research …. Integration of functions and emotions (experiences) State of the art “CO” Open innovation, co-innovation, co-society, Collaborative Innovation network (COIN), ….

C4VI Network Barcelona Stockholm Vienna -Communication -Training -Implementation Sao Paulo …

Fit between public /business policies and innovation models

Mapping industries. 1- Prevailing emotional/social needs and wants Average margins Low margins Superior margins little increase in economic value creation. disproportionately large increase in economic value creation. Emotional & social utilities Functional utilities Fashion, tourism, entertainment

Mapping industries 2- Prevailing functional needs and wants Average margins Low margins Superior margins area Emotional & social utilities Functional utilities Pharma Aero Engines DESIGN

Mapping industries 3- Balance between emotions and performance needs and wants Average margins Low margins Superior margins Emotional & social utilities Functional utilities Consumer electronics

Mapping... Emotion driven Performance driven Emotion and performance driven

Aligning public policy... Emotion driven Performance driven Emotion and performance driven

Aligning public policy... Public effort in technology push Public effort in systemic innovation

Aligning public policy... Emotion driven Performance driven Emotion and performance driven

Aligning public policy... Public effort in technology push Public effort in systemic innovation

Conclusion Design as styling add on in a technology push model of innovation Design follows innovation needs, that follows R&D breakthroughs Legal protection of appearances Frascati 2002 Oslo 2005 CIS questions focusing in input factors, linear system Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation and R&D data Lack of data for policy makers on systemic innovation… lack of alignments Design as an integrator of F/S/E utilities at the very outset of systemic innovation Applied R&D follows innovation to provide answers to user’s needs. Design at the very outset of systemic innovations New/complex approach to legal protection Frascati /Oslo aligned with systemic innovation reality CIS questions focusing on linkages / flows /stocks non-linear system Guidelines for collecting and interpreting design data Data on the role/contribution of design in systemic innovation… alignment