Stimulating Transformative Change for Student Achievement September, 2011 Andy Calkins, Deputy Director Elina Alayeva, Program Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College, Credential & Career Ready Summer Initiative 2015 Grant Competition Info Session.
Advertisements

A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Carnegie Schools for a New Society: Reflections on a National, Districtwide High School Reform Initiative ROCHELLE NICHOLS-SOLOMON & MICHELLE FEIST Academy.
California Career Pathways Trust
Understanding your District’s Plan Colleen Miller, Director of Leadership Development.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
Association of American Universities October 2010.
Wave IIIb Program Officer Chat Today’s webinar will begin at 3 p.m. ET. You can participate and ask questions in two ways: Online: Receive audio through.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
How Institutions Can Leverage Change as an Opportunity for Educator Preparation The Missouri Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Fall 2009 Meeting.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education. Overview Program Objective Program Requirements Program Format Admissions Process Note: This program is.
The Six Dimensions of Next Generation Learning September 10, 2012 Andy Calkins and Nancy Millichap.
New Leaders for New Schools. Vision & Mission To ensure high academic achievement for every student by attracting and preparing outstanding leaders and.
Portland State University Report to the Oregon State Board of Higher Education.
Shape the future George Randelov, Country Manager Microsoft Bulgaria.
Tennessee Promise Forward Mini- Grant Competition Tennessee Higher Education Commission Informational Webinar.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
SCIC 2014 Information Session #sustainableCIC. Welcome & Introductions Launch video.
2008/2009 Title II D Competitive Grant Models of Demonstrated Proficiency Webinar,September 27, 2008 Barbara Fardell, Educational Technology Manager.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Stabilization, Recovery and Renewal A plan for educating Oakland’s children within, through and beyond financial crisis October 2003.
TODAY AND TOMORROW University of Houston- Downtown Strategic Plan Highlights.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
The Blended Learning Context. Definitions Common Language BLI at Penn State Overview  Why Blend?  Present & Future Blended Learning at Other Institutions.
Steve Graham University of Missouri System.  Attainment  Academic Program Review  Cooperation  Funding  Changing Nature of Students (e.g., Vision.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Summary of the U.S. Task Force on United Way’s Economic Model & Growth.
An America Built to Last Martha Kanter, Under Secretary Illinois Board of Higher Education February 5, 2013.
Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Preparing Leaders for Florida’s Most Challenging Schools Florida Department of Education.
Presented by Nicole Dalton HB 3233—STUDENT- CENTERED TEACHING AND LEARNING MODELS PROFICIENCY-BASED TEACHING AND LEARNING GRANT THE WEBINAR WILL BEGIN.
The Kentucky Career Pathways Initiative Oregon Pathways Academy II April 12, 2007 Shauna King-Simms Director, College and Career Transitions Kentucky Community.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
MEETING NEXT GENERATION LEARNING CHALLENGES September 30, 2011 North Island College An EDUCAUSE Initiative for College Readiness and Completion.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
An Equal Opportunity University Overview: eLearning Innovation Initiative (eLII) Patsy Carruthers, MA Ed. Director, Academic Technology Group UK Analytics.
Affordable Learning Solutions and a Taste of MERLOT Gerry Hanley, Ph.D. California State University Office of the Chancellor Academic Technology Services.
Oregon’s Approach: Policies and Practices that Link Economic and Workforce Development NGA Policy Advisors Institute September 19, 2005.
Transforming Michigan’s Adult Learning Infrastructure.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
A National Perspective of Online Learning: New Trends and Initiatives Susan Patrick President & CEO International Association for K-12 Online Learning.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
STEM Innovation Grant (RFA) Math in Real Life December 7, 2015.
FLEXIBILITY and the DENVER PLAN Objectives for today: Understand DPS’ future direction related to academic supports. Understand DPS’ approach to.
Kenneth Grover Principal Innovations High School.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
SIF II Briefing Session 21 st September Briefing Session Content SIF Cycle I – overview Funding and arising issues SIF Cycle II – Process for evaluation.
Personalized Learning: HISD’s Path to College and Career Readiness.
Local Station Grant Program Goals and Requirements.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
The Future of CTE February 18, Career Readiness Career Ready is Postsecondary Ready! 2/3 of all jobs will soon require postsecondary education or.
Southwest Minnesota State University and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Charting the Future for a Prosperous Minnesota.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
State Board of Education Presentation November 17, 2015.
ACCEL 1 ESL Providers Network (EPN) Adult English Language Acquisition Cohort March 13, 2015.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
FAQ Webinar Call for Proposals Call toll-free: (local: ) Participant code: # Webinar Dates: August 11 – August.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
District of Innovation Update: International School Development
Dallas Integrated Higher Education Network
Vision for Personalized Learning
School Redesign: Cohort 19
Eden Collegiate High School Eden CISD School Board Presentation
Advancing Online Learning for Tomorrow
Presentation transcript:

Stimulating Transformative Change for Student Achievement September, 2011 Andy Calkins, Deputy Director Elina Alayeva, Program Officer

A Unique Partnership

Our Mission: Dramatically improve college readiness and completion in the United States by tapping the potential of technology-enabled innovation.

Our Vision:  To leverage the power of technology to transform education to meet students’ and society’s needs in the 21 st century  Commitment to seeking, finding, and supporting innovative working models  … Helping to catalyze a broad and fundamental transformation of education practices, policies, and structures

Invest in Innovation Multiply Impact Accelerate Adoption Build an evidence base and create communities of practice. What NGLC Does

Education should be learner-centered. Active, situated, and experiential learning, best measured by mastery, improves engagement, problem solving, and achievement. Information technology can enable learners, learning, and educational systems – but is not an end, in and of itself. Evidence and data should drive decision-making. Change requires that scale be built into innovation design. We Believe

Today’s Reality: Depersonalized one-size-fits-all approaches Lack of relevance to the real world Lack of deeper learning skills Focus on seat time, not competency Inequity Escalating costs Innovation in silos

Where We’ve Been Wave I: Scaling innovations in blended learning, deeper learning and engagement, learner analytics, and open core courseware. Wave II: Development of interactive course modules to meet the Common Core and deeper learning competencies.

TO DATE: $17 million distributed 48 grantees 280 partner institutions Nearly 300,000 students being served at projects’ outset

Where We’ve Been Read all the winner abstracts: Wave I: winnershttp://nextgenlearning.org/the-grants/wave-i- winners Wave II: winnershttp://nextgenlearning.org/the-grants/wave-ii- winners

The Call: Accelerate the development of next generation school and college models that leverage technology to significantly increase student success at equal or lower costs than current norms.

Wave IIIa RFP The call: Our vision for Wave IIIa is to identify and scale fundamentally redesigned, whole school models that combine the best aspects of brick and mortar and online learning and result in more personalized, mastery based learning.

Wave IIIb RFP The call: To spotlight innovative delivery models that generate high-quality student outcomes at an affordable cost. Grants will stimulate the development of new, next generation online and blended programs that lead to associate's or bachelor’s degrees.

Convictions underlying Wave III: Personalized learning helps students learn more deeply and rapidly Technology-enabled, interactive learning makes personalized, mastery-based learning possible Blended models offer both personalization and other key scaffolding students may need Starting schools from scratch provides maximum flexibility to create genuinely new models

Wave IIIa RFP Our goal: A strong and diverse portfolio of 20 funded projects that are on target to open new whole-school, breakthrough learning models with sustainable business plans in either fall 2012 or fall $150,000 planning grant Up to $300,000 in matching funds

Wave IIIa RFP What is a breakthrough model? Personalized, mastery- based school model that leverages technology to deliver high student outcomes and support rapid, effective scale-up. A new district school A district turnaround school A new charter school A partnership between an urban district and community college

Design Parameters Deeper learning competencies and the Common Core At least 25% of learning time with high-quality digital content Personalized learning Mastery-based learning At least 50% of instruction in brick-and-mortar setting Financial sustainability by year 4

Intended Outcomes 1.5 years of growth on Common Core Standards 90% cohort graduation rate for retained students 80% postsecondary matriculation rate Financial sustainability Models that are intentional about preparing students for college and career success standards, such as deeper learning competencies

Eligibility District and charter Only new models, starting fresh School must open in Fall 2012 or Fall 2013 Must serve students in grades % of students eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Partnerships with vendors, higher ed institutions, agencies encouraged

Successful Applicants Will: Be innovative – dramatically rethinking instructional strategies and content delivery Be focused on driving college readiness and completion Leverage technology to support student mastery and interactivity Focus on sustainability

Application Process Initial applications accepted on a rolling basis Selected finalists will be asked to submit final proposal materials Proposal CutoffFinalist Notification Winner Notification Models should open in: Nov. 11, 2011Nov. 23, 2011February 2012Fall 2012 Feb. 9, 2012March 9, 2012May 2012Fall 2013 June 8, 2012July 8, 2012August 2012Fall 2013

Application Process Initially: 2-minute video Abbreviated financial model Narrated slide deck Finalists: Questions from challenge panel Financial model and budget Opportunity to interact with reviewers

Some Common Questions What defines a “new” school model? Are new programs within existing schools eligible? Are school conversions allowed? Who must be the lead applicant? Can a district or charter network submit two applications? What kinds of activities do grant funds support?

… and Some Answers A “new” school is one that is opening its doors for the first time in Fall 2012 or Fall 2013 with a dedicated budget and new staff, leadership, academic and financial model New programs within existing schools are not eligible Turnaround schools that have complete autonomy to alter all aspects of the previous model, including staffing, are eligible. Applicants may partner with one or more entities, but the district or charter must be the primary applicant. One organization may submit two separate applications as long as each is for a different school model Initial grant funds support all activities that lead to opening of school

Wave IIIa winners will have access to: Up to $300,000 in 1:1 matching funds, available immediately until August 2013 Total pool of $3M in matching funds given on first-come, first- served basis until funds are spent May be raised from public or private sources; cannot originate from applying organization Must be newly committed and specifically earmarked for the new model and received after the announcement Must be cash only (no in-kind)

More information: NGLC Website: Program Officer Elina Alayeva: Wave IIIa Instructions: the-grants/wave-iiia-challenges the-grants/wave-iiia-challenges