Deanne Gannaway Facilitating Change in Higher Education Practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation. Overview and Discussion of: Objectives of evaluation Process evaluation Outcome evaluation Indicators & Measures Small group discussions.
Advertisements

The Power of Collaboration Models of Collective Impact
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
Presentation to HRPA Algoma January 29, My favourite saying… Fail to plan, Plan to Fail. 2.
Collaborative Assessment: A Strategy to Relate, Reflect, and React Leah Barrett, Assistant Vice President, Student Affairs Matt Barone, Assistant Director,
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Knowing What We Learn and Demonstrating Our Success: Assessment and Evaluation of FLCs Andrea L. Beach, Ph.D. Western Michigan University Presented at.
1 Council of Australian Law Deans Discipline Based Initiative in Law BACKGROUND INFORMATION “Learning and Teaching in the Discipline of Law: Achieving.
Michele Dupuis, Senior Officer Knowledge Integration SSHRC Knowledge Mobilization: An Overview of SSHRC’s policies and practices March 31, 2014.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Effective dissemination and evaluation
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
1 Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Dr. Jens Liebe, UNW-DPC.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Creating Value Learning resources for managers to deliver efficiencies whilst improving effectiveness Iain Springate, Project Manager & Researcher.
Canadian Cancer Society Manitoba Division: Knowledge Exchange Network (KEN) & CancerCare Manitoba Manitoba Integrated Chronic Disease Primary Prevention.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Chapter 9 Developing an Effective Knowledge Service
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
1 Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Dr. Jens Liebe, UNW-DPC.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Boston Geneva San Francisco Seattle Beginning the Evaluation Journey with FSG KCIC Boot Camp March 24, 2010 Prepared for:
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
A survey based analysis on training opportunities Dr. Jūratė Kuprienė Framing the digital curation curriculum International Conference Florence, Italy.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Student volunteers and the volunteer- involving community organisations vinspiredstudents research.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
LEADING LEARNING CONFERENCE 5 June Leading Learning 1November 2005Management of complex change. The Knoster model. Leading Learning 2April/May 2006Developing.
Presents: Information for participants: Your microphone will be muted for the formal presentation. If your audio portion the presentation is not working,
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Blueprints for RtI Implementation Coaches/Principals 10/8/09.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
The Australian Charter for the Professional Learning of Teachers and School Leaders Understanding the Charter.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
REGIONAL TRAINING UNIT Leading and Managing Achievements and Standards in the Special School and the Learning Community.
Dissemination in Canada CICAD Guidelines for School-based Prevention of Substance Abuse VII Meeting of the Expert Group on Demand Reduction September 13,
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework What you need to know and what you need to do.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
MY TIME, OUR PLACE Framework for School Age Care In Australia Prepared by: Children’s Services Central April 2012 Team Meeting Package.
Associate Professor Cathy Gunn The University of Auckland, NZ Learning analytics down under.
Grant Timms Senior Examiner Assignment brief December 2013 / March 2014 Marketing Leadership & Planning.
CATS Self Review and Planning Tool An Introduction and Overview Alison Poot and Melody West, CATS Project Team (University of Tasmania)
MUHC Innovation Model.
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
European Network on teacher Education Policies
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Be The Transformative Change
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Deanne Gannaway Facilitating Change in Higher Education Practices

Overview of Session Introductions Thinking about dissemination – The D-Cubed Project Developing a dissemination strategy

Who’s here? Introductions – What’s your background? – What’s your key objectives for being here today? – What’s your teaching and learning innovation/ idea?

Background 39 public universities, mainly located in capital cities Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) / Office of Learning and Teaching

Project Background An ALTC-funded project to evaluate dissemination of grants scheme outcomes between 2006 and 2009

Research Question, Scope, Focus To what extent have the promoted dissemination strategies adopted by ALTC led to the effective dissemination and consolidation of outcomes of completed ALTC Grants Scheme projects? All grant projects funded completed by December 23, Effectiveness of dissemination, not evaluating the impacts of project outcomes.

Project approach Document analysis, narrative enquiry – mapping the territory Interviews with innovators and implementers Surveys Resource development Engaged professional development Final report, evidence-based guidelines and resources, proposed revisions to dissemination framework Illuminative evaluation Illuminative evaluation (Perlett & Hamilton, 1977) = Observe + Inquire further + Seek to explain

Activity 1: Common understandings What do you understand dissemination to be? – What activities would you anticipate? How would you know when dissemination is successful or effective?

Project Findings Dissemination activities – Most popular methods of communication of project outcomes remain traditional academic modes (conference presentations, book publications, publication in academic journals and conference presentations). – A web presence is a common dissemination activity, but its potential impact is limited due to maintenance issues after the project concludes. Timing – Project leaders generally talk about dissemination activities occurring across the life of the project, rather than at the end – Dissemination is commonly described as a collection of atomistic activities, rather than as a clearly planned strategy designed to achieve a particular purpose.

Project Findings Sustainability – ALTC grant holders tend to equate the end of the grant with an end of their involvement in that topic. – It is not possible to accurately measure or determine evidence of long-term changes that may have occurred as a result of the project based on the current reporting mechanisms. – ALTC is perceived as having an obligation to support the dissemination of project outcomes through providing a searchable repository for project deliverables and facilitating opportunities for making links between projects. Importance of people – Projects that have successfully embedded and upscaled have identified and engaged with potential adopters from the outset. – Successful dissemination strategies have multiple layers of change enablers who facilitate dissemination. Challenges of nomenclature – Clearer definition of key terms is required – Project leaders grapple with identifying, articulating, and responding to or developing a climate of readiness for change.

Engage Interacting with targeted potential adopters on an ongoing basis Planning for interaction – Responding to changes and opportunities Building credibility and familiarity Cultivating readiness for change – Building empowerment and ownership in adopters and institutions ENGAGE

TRANSFER Facilitating the commitment to change of the target audience ENGAGE Building both awareness and knowledge in the target audience throughout the project ASSESS CLIMATE Ascertaining the climate of readiness for change among the target audience Understandings of Dissemination

Assess Climate Characteristics of the project – Understanding the intended impacts and perceived benefits – Addressing a perceived need – Ensuring the project is grounded in existing knowledge – Ensuring the feasibility of project implementation Characteristics of the targeted potential adopters – Identifying targeted potential adopters Characteristics of the systems in which change will occur – Identifying potential enablers of change – Understanding the culture and structures of the target institution – Ascertaining a willingness and ability to change at target audience institution – Assessing readiness of leadership to bear costs related to resourcing ASSESS CLIMATE

Transfer Characteristics of the project – Making the outcomes adaptable – Making the outcomes findable – Capacity of the project to provide ongoing support Characteristics of adopters – Articulating the value of the project outcomes Ownership Capacity to adopt Characteristics of system – Nurture ongoing commitment – Capacity for provision of resources TRANSFER

Dissemination is most effective when all three elements are in place, resulting in the greatest possibility of uptake, upscaling and sustainability. Dissemination effectiveness may be limited if the target audience hasn’t been engaged during the project ENGAGE Building both awareness and knowledge in the target audience throughout the project ASSESS CLIMATE Ascertaining the climate of readiness for change among the target audience TRANSFER Facilitating the commitment to change of the target audience Dissemination effectiveness may be limited if the climate is not ready for change Dissemination effectiveness may be limited if commitment to change is not facilitated Dissemination Framework

D-Cubed Definition The planned process of understanding potential adopters and engaging with them throughout the life of the project, to facilitate commitment to sustained change.

Exploring the Resources The Dissemination Framework The Dissemination Guide which includes examples of effective practice Project planning tools – Identify target groups Helps clarify the different roles people will play in your project. – Assess the climate of readiness for change Helps assess whether the climate is ready for change or do you need to change the climate? – Plan a dissemination budget Helps identify considerations when budgeting for dissemination. – Sustainable dissemination Helps thinking about the sustainability of your dissemination strategy. – Plan a dissemination strategy Helps design a dissemination strategy – Dissemination literature provides a summarised collection of useful articles about dissemination.

Activity 2: Developing a Dissemination Strategy Cirque example 1.Is the climate ready for change? 2.Is there a plan for engagement with the target audience throughout the project? 3.How is transfer described or conceptualised? 4.How will you gather evidence that uptake has occurred?

Please stay in touch!