Www.sonomacountywater.org Sonoma Clean Power Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer Steve Shupe Deputy County Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sonoma County AB 811 Rod Dole – ACTTC SONOMA COUNTY – ENERGY INDEPENDENCE PROGRAM.
Advertisements

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT I AND II
A tax on the energy utility for excessive residential electricity use.
Community Choice Aggregation Renewable Energy for your Home and Business July 16, 2013.
Community Choice Aggregation In San Mateo County San Mateo County Board of Supervisors February 24, 2015.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
 PACE & RECAP: Financing Renewable Energy Michelle Hickey, ISEA Program Coordinator Illinois Solar Energy Association 1.
4 “Buckets” -- Political, Community, Technical, Financial
COOPERATIVE Border To Border Broadband Conference February 5 th, 2014 Fiber to Homes, Farms and Businesses.
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
Investing in our Community Using Stimulus Funds to Develop a Home Energy Retrofit Program May 2009.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
California’s Energy Efficiency Shareholder Incentive Mechanism CSEM Policy Conference December 9, 2008 Tom Roberts, Regulatory Analyst
Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide Customer Choice and Boost Local Economies April 26, 2015 Presented by: Jim Eggemeyer.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
OGT SESSION 1 ECONOMICS.
Q1 UPDATE Local Energy Cooperative Formation {Ambassador} | {Phone Number}
Greening The Grid Through Community Choice Aggregation US EPA Webinar March 6, 2012.
Community Choice Energy In San Mateo County County CCE Advisory Committee May 28, 2015.
Sonoma County CCA Feasibility Study Summary Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer.
Presented By: Matt Bell Partner, Viridian. Buildings and the Environment Buildings account for 36% of greenhouse gas emissions Buildings account for 72%
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
Solar Energy Services: Delivering Cost Effective Solar Power March 18, 2004 Claire Broido SunEdison, LLC (443) 226.
Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide Customer Choice and Boost Local Economies [Date] [Location/Organization] Presented.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (c) 2013 New Jersey Government Energy Aggregation P.L c. 24 “GEA Act” Gary E Finger Ombudsman New Jersey Board.
Citizens’ Academy Kathy Viehe GRU Interim General Manager November 12, 2014.
KATHRYN E. MEOLA, CHIEF DEPUTY SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE SHAWN MARSHALL, DIRECTOR LEAN ENERGY PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY.
July 9, 2010, AB 920 Workshop Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
HOUSING INCENTIVE POLICY February 20, 2010 Presentation to Area Banks.
Limitations of One University Place TIF Plan City Council Meeting July 14, 2015.
CCA For Monterey Bay Powering your future through Community Choice Aggregation.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: , FX:
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Community Choice Energy as a Community Development Strategy for Oakland March 30, 2010.
KATIE SCHWAB SVP MICHAEL SCHRADER BOND COUNSEL Facility Funding Regional Workshop Funding Best Practices October 31, 2013.
Town of Burlington Community Choice Aggregation Program: Overview Burlington Board of Selectmen January 12, 2015.
Energy in a Megacity Future: Role of Financing Dr. Mark Bernstein Managing Director USC Energy Institute University of Southern California.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
Business Understanding the Big Picture. A Note on Advertising.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
What is proposed, what we know, what we don’t know. Veneta City Council Worksession November
CONSUMER CHOICE AGGREGATE Presented to the Counties General Services Association - August 13, 2015.
Community Choice Energy (CCE) In San Mateo County
Energy Efficiency Forum State of California/Investor Owned Utility Partnership Program Date: September 27, Partnership. A Unique Opportunity.
Marin Clean Energy Choice and Competition - Driving Innovation towards Environmental Goals May 2015.
Community Choice Energy (CCE) In Contra Costa County Public Workshops December 10, 14 and 16 7:00 -9:00 pm.
Community Choice Aggregation in Marin. Marin Clean Energy Basics Local governments purchase power for their communities Local governments purchase power.
PRESENTER’S NAME TITLE AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION Data from the Energy Information Administration, 2014 and Public Power Statistical Report, 2015.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Community Choice Energy In California May 24 and June 9, 2016.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
T E F R A H E A R I N G T E F R A H E A R I N G CITY OF STOCKTON TAX-EXEMPT CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION SERIES 2003 (UNITED CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS) Presented.
Village of La Grange Municipal Aggregation Hearing January 28, 2013 and February 11, 2013 What is Electricity Aggregation?
June 22, 2006 Development of the Marin County Community Choice Aggregation Project Agenda Background Project Overview Schedule.
PARTNERSHIP INTRODUCTION | 1 Introducing the Silicon Valley Community Choice Energy Partnership Saratoga City Council Wednesday, November 4, 2015 Melody.
California Energy Efficiency Policy and Goals Beena Morar Southern California Edison June 14, 2016.
PCE Program Debrief Jim Eggemeyer, Director, Office of Sustainability Shawn Marshall, LEAN Energy US March 24, 2016.
Community Choice Aggregation Update
San Francisco’s Community Choice Program
Western Riverside Council of Governments
Peninsula Clean Energy Board of Directors Meeting
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
THE FUTURE IS CARBON-FREE ENERGY
City Council February 4, 2019 Item No. 2
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

Sonoma Clean Power Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer Steve Shupe Deputy County Council

2 What are SCP’s Benefits? Gives customers a choice of power providers Local control of rates and programs Allows generation revenues to be used for local investment Permanent source of funding to support local jobs New renewable energy programs New energy efficiency programs Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions

3 The big questions we’ve heard How do we benefit from SCP? How is SCP different from the way things work now? How does the opt-out choice work? How will SCP be governed? What are the risks? How will it be financed? What will it cost?

4 The difference from today PG&E Purchases Power PG&E Delivers Power and Maintains Lines PG&E Provides Customers Service and Billing PG&E Provides Efficiency Programs Today Without SCP In 2014 With SCP SCP Purchases Power PG&E Delivers Power and Maintains Lines PG&E Provides Customers Service and Billing PG&E Provides Efficiency Programs New Services To be Planned by SCP + Additional efficiency programs beyond those offered by PG&E + Community Solar + Feed in Tariff + Local power projects

5 How choosing SCP or PG&E works Major outreach campaign to inform public All customers will receive a minimum of 4 notices, 2 before service starts and 2 after Anyone wanting power from SCP does nothing Anyone wanting power from PG&E can opt out SCP service will automatically start for all customers not opting out Customers can continue to opt out after this period, but would pay a small termination fee

6 Why Now? Detailed feasibility study conducted – showed SCP would be competitive with PG&E at outset and better over time Natural gas/power prices at low levels, means that we can lock in lower rates by starting now Interest rates at historic lows, means that financing costs are low, leading to lower rates As economy improves, prices and interest rates will rise Time to act is now

7 SCP Based on Solid Business Model At core SCP based upon a simple model – buying a product at wholesale, selling it at retail Business plan created, shows month-by-month cash flow projections for first years of operation Plan also reviewed by bank offering financing to SCP – offer to make loans is a vote of confidence in the business plan by an independent third party Business plan modeled on successful MEA plan $20 million net revenue in first 4 years

8 What are the Risks? Matching Supply and Demand – “Volumetric risk” Market Risk – Can be managed through hedging strategies and mixing lengths of contracts; PG&E also subject to this risk Regulatory Risks – FERC and CPUC have impact on SCP and PG&E rates – Will coordinate with MEA and other CCAs to actively participate in relevant proceedings to ensure regulatory system not “gamed” against SCP

9 What are the Risks? Worst-Case Scenario? – SCP cost of power becomes too high, rates increase, and so many customers return to PG&E that SCP does not have the revenues to pay its power bills – Even in worst case, no interruption of power supply to customers would occur; customers returned to PG&E (SCP has to file a bond to cover costs relating to this) – Tax dollars and general funds of Cities and Counties not at risk; JPA structure acts as a shield No monetary risk to cities No service interruption risk to customers

10 How Likely is the Worst Case? Worst Case extremely unlikely to occur – PG&E subject to same risks as SCP – Power providers have incentive to ensure SCP does not fail Represents opportunity for them to break into the huge California market, which has been closed since “direct access” was taken away in the early ‘00s – Business plan based on conservative assumptions – Marin Energy Authority experience shows CCA programs are financially viable

11 SCP not Controlled by the County Joint Powers Agreement creates a separate legal entity, Sonoma Clean Power Authority Designed to be an entity free of County control, with an independent Board of Directors Each city choosing to participate will appoint a member to the SCP Board and have input into SCP policies and operations – County Board members drop off as cities join, after 6 cities join County will have just one seat Staff will answer to the Authority, not the County

12 SCP Board and Committees Each Board member has 1 vote, but can call for “weighted” vote based on electric load in each jurisdiction – then majority of votes & load required JPA creates a “Business Operations Committee” appointed by Board to work more closely with SCP staff on business issues JPA creates a “Ratepayer Advisory Committee” to provide input to staff and Board on issues of interest to SCP ratepayers Compare this to current level of control over power matters in Sonoma County

13 Financing Start-up Financing – Funds first 6 months of operation – Conservative estimate is $2.5 million Bridge Financing – Covers 60-day gap between the purchase of and payment for wholesale energy and the collection of retail bills – Available amount is $7.5 Million – Energy costs only

14 Financing – First Community Bank Two lines of credit: Startup Loan $2.5 million 4.00% interest Guaranty required 5-year term Interest only for first 24 months No pre-payment penalty or minimum draw Guaranty releases with performance Bridge Loan $7.5 million ~4.20% interest (sets at first draw) No guaranty needed 5-year term Interest only for first 12 months No pre-payment penalty or minimum draw

15 Residential Rates Estimated 2014

16 Commercial Rates Estimated 2014

17 Draft Implementation Plan & Peer Review of Draft Implementation Plan Feasibility Study & Peer Review of Feasibility Study Focus Groups to determine public interest JPA Formation Ongoing outreach to cities Negotiation on energy and services are underway Thorough Analysis

18 Calendar: May-Dec. Negotiate final terms of startup financing Cities vote on participating by June 30 – Resolution by June 30 th, Ordinance by July 31 st Contract for an interim CEO Negotiate and execute final energy supply contract and ancillary contracts (e.g., call center) Finalize and file Implementation Plan with PUC Public outreach effort to inform public of benefits of SCP, rates and ability to opt-out

19 Calendar: January 2014 Begin providing service Continue public outreach effort

20 What Are Risks To Cities? No financial risk – JPA insulates City funds from SCP debts and liabilities No service interruption risk – If SCP fails, customers returned to PG&E with no interruption of service Your Citizens Get A Choice Where They Have None Now

21 What Next If you would like your citizens to have a local clean energy choice: 1.Deadline for a Resolution June 30 th 2.Deadline to Adopt an Ordinance June 30 th – First Reading July 31 th - Adopt Ordinance

Thank you Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer Steve Shupe Deputy County Council