Assessment 2.0: The Next Frontier Dr. Nathan Lindsay Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment October 28, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcomes and Standards. Outcome Curricular statements describing how students will integrate knowledge, skills, and values into a complex role performance.
Advertisements

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Using WEAVE Online Nathan Lindsay & Dan Stroud September 4, 2013.
Finding Your Way to More Intentional and Coherent Learning Outcomes Nathan Lindsay April 23, 2014.
Erica Schurter and Molly Mead Department of Information Access.
Writing Outcomes & Measures Adapted from Susan Hatfield Presented to DC faculty InterCampus Day Spring 2012.
Creating an SLO or PLO Statement Presented by ORIE Team Summer 2013 Academy for Planning, Assessment, and Research.
The Missing Link: Development of Programmatic Outcomes Christopher Meseke,Ph.D. Park University.
Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning (Cognitive domain)
Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Development
Nathan Lindsay, UM Associate Provost MUS Assessment Workshop
OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Learning Outcomes at the University of North Alabama Dr. Andrew L. Luna Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment.
RUST COLLEGE MODEL FOR DEMONSTRATING INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Writing Objectives Given proper instruction teachers will be able to write one objective within their curricular area.
From Learning Goals to Assessment Plans University of Wisconsin Parkside January 20, 2012 Susan Hatfield Winona State University
Youngstown State University September 2011 Susan Hatfield Winona State University Winona, MN Assessing your Assessment Plan.
College of Sciences & Arts Program Learning Goals  What is a learning goal?  How is it used for assessment?  What is a good program goal?  What not.
FaCET Workshop on Assessment Basics Nathan Lindsay September 18, 2013.
Writing Is a Great Tool for Learning!
TTE 350 Lecture Notes for 1/24/01. Review What is Distance Ed? –Teaching and learning opportunities where students are physically Separated and technology.
Assessment 101: The Core Curriculum Susan Hatfield - Winona State UNC Wilmington November 2005
Agenda Peer Assessment Roundtables – Student Learning 10: :10 – Welcome and Explain Process 10: :30 – Full Group: Coaching Assessment – SLOs.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
Northern Illinois University March 2009 Susan Hatfield Winona State University Leave No Outcome Behind: Teaching, Learning & Assessment.
1 Assessment Gary Beasley Stephen L. Athans Central Carolina Community College Spring 2008.
Human Learning Asma Marghalani.
DAU Curriculum Process: Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy and Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation Judith Hall Bayliss, DAU November 2, 2007.
Student Learning Outcomes
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Assessing Program Level Student Learning Outcomes: What you need to know University of Wisconsin Parkside January 20, 2012 Susan Hatfield Winona State.
Bloom’s Taxonomy And we don’t mean Evan Bloom!. Have you ever wondered… How do we really learn information? What is the goal of learning? What do our.
A Decision-Making Tool.  Goal  Educational Objectives  Student Learning Outcomes  Performance Indicators or Criteria  Learning Activities or Strategies.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
CREDIT REQUESTS.  Credit Requests  Learning Statement Recap  Importance of Verbs  Creating Credit Requests in PDAS  Technical Support  Questions.
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF THE COGNITIVE DOMAIN. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Benjamin Bloom (et al.) created this taxonomy for categorizing levels of abstraction of questions.
Developing Meaningful, Measurable Student Learning Outcomes Tulsa Community College January 2013 Susan Hatfield Professor, Winona State University
Higher Order Thinking Skills
1xx K K K Program Level Student Learning Outcomes K= Knowledge/Comprehension; A= Application / Analysis; S= Synthesis /Evaluation 1xx S K.
COMPREHENSION ANALYSIS EVALUATION APPLICATION SYNTHESIS KNOWLEDGE
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING Unit 5 Seminar. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Understanding Assessment The Basics Office for Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment.
The Goals of Educations Process Courtney Abarr 10/12/2015 EDU / 200 Theresa Melenas.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.
TEMPUS-ELFRUS - Project Meeting, Apri 7-9, Vienna Learning Outcomes I MANSBERGER TEMPUS-ELFRUS Learning Outcomes Reinfried MANSBERGER.
Five Mistakes in Developing eLearning (and How to Avoid Them) by Joe Ganci The Top Five Mistakes in Developing eLearning (and How to Avoid Them) by Joe.
1. OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP May 16, JRCERT Mission 3 The JRCERT promotes excellence in education and elevates quality and safety of patient.
Higher Order Thinking Overview. What to Expect in this Course This course may be different than others by: Incorporating instructional strategies that.
Learning Goals, Objectives, & Curriculum Mapping Linking curriculum & pedagogy to demonstrations of knowledge, skills, and abilities Dr. Marjorie Dorimé-Williams.
Making Assessment Meaningful
Assessment.
Setting SMART Objectives
Assessment.
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Making critical judgments
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Making critical judgments
What you assess makes a statement about what you value
Higher Order Thinking Skills
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Our goal is to be thinking at a higher level.
? INQUIRY to question is to learn.
Program Assessment Core Assessment Course Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Assessment 2.0: The Next Frontier Dr. Nathan Lindsay Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment October 28, 2011

A Time for Celebration Over 95% of programs submitted their assessment plans by October 1, 2011 The vast majority of these submitted the narrative of their “Assessment Process” as well The quality of the reports was quite good, often the result of the multiple iterations that were drafted in response to feedback provided. Assessment process/findings/action steps should be shared with faculty, students, and other stakeholders. Is this happening in your department?

Recognition by Provost, Deans, and Accreditors Please refer to the note of thanks sent by the Provost on her blog: Assessment progress discussed by the Dean’s Council, and several Deans followed up with their departments HLC Accreditation Mentor Susan Hatfield and Jim Sherohman were very impressed with our recent headway

The Tasks for (before October 1, 2012) Implement the Action Plans identified in (e.g., develop and implement rubrics) As needed (based upon findings or feedback), update your mission statement, goals, learning outcomes, measurements, and achievement targets Make sure you collect data during Fall 2011 or Spring 2012 (we need 100% of programs to do this) Document your findings, and then update your action plans Similar to this past year, provide a 2-3 page narrative of your process (submitted in the Document Repository)

Other Tasks for (cont.) Develop assessment plans for free-standing minors and certificate programs Use the major field exams, WEPT, and ETS- Proficiency Profile to inform practices across the campus Develop pilot assessments for General Education

Goals for Here’s what we hope to see in the WEAVE reports and narratives More faculty/staff involvement within each department Additional learning outcomes measured (so that all outcomes are measured in a three-year cycle) Data showing that changes made to curriculum, pedagogy, advising, services, etc. were related to higher student learning outcomes. In other words, if scores from are significantly higher than the previous year, please highlight these. Again, we need to have assessment findings from 100% of departments for our Higher Learning Commission requirements

Using WEAVE for the Assessment Cycle Changes made in WEAVE are not retroactive, but they do carry over into future years Everything from has carried over into the assessment cycle, except for the findings and documents that have been uploaded in WEAVE If you are creating entirely new goals, learning outcomes, etc., don’t write these over the top of old items (this will mess up your linked associations in WEAVE). Create new ones. If you need to delete something in WEAVE, please contact me, and I will do it for you

Sharing Assessment Plans: Printing Reports from WEAVE Click on the “Reports” tab Under “Select cycle,” choose your cycle (the cycle should be chosen if you’d like your findings listed) Under “Select a report,” there is a button you can select for “Assessment Data by Section” to make your report a little shorter Under “Select report entities,” choose the areas you would like to report

Printing Reports from WEAVE (cont.) Click on “Next” (on the right side of the page) On the second page, under “Report-Specific Parameters,” click on “Keep user-inserted formatting.” Click on “Run” (on the right side of the page) The Report will come up in a new window, and this can be copied and pasted into a Word document.

Faculty Involvement in Assessment What are some ways to involve more faculty from your department in the assessment process? What has worked well? What has not worked? What are some other strategies you might try?

Accreditation Reporting Number & Amount Quality & Utility Interpreting Learning Internal QuestionsExternal Questions Collecting itUsing it Compliance Commitment Assessing Our University’s (& Your Department’s) Assessment Efforts

Support/Resources for Assessment The University Assessment Committee (UAC) will provide feedback on your assessment plan by December The Assessment Website is now online: emic-assessment/default.asp emic-assessment/default.asp The Assessment Handbook will be updated in the next few months

FaCET Sessions with Dr. Bergerson Mentoring will be provided on Tuesdays in one hour sessions from 12-3pm throughout the fall and spring semesters in the FaCET space Please contact FaCET graduate student Katie Kenslow at or to schedule these Departments who especially should be signing up:  Those who have outlined an assessment plan, but are still developing their measurements (e.g., rubrics)  Faculty who are developing the assessment plans for free-standing minors and certificate programs

Enhancing our assessment plans with rubrics CriteriaExceedsMeetsDoes Not Meet Sources and Evidence Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in writing. Most rubrics are on a three to four point scale

How to build a rubric Answer the following questions: Given your broad course goals, what determines the extent of student understanding? What criterion counts as EVIDENCE of student learning? What specific characteristics in student responses, products or performances should be examined as evidence of student learning?

volume poise conclusion eye contact style appearance gestures rate evidence sources examples organization transitions verbal variety attention getter Developing a rubric helps you to clarify the characteristics/components of your Learning Outcomes: For example: Can our students deliver an effective Public Speech?

Rubrics Resources at UMKC Two new pages discussing rubrics are available on UMKC’s Blackboard Support Site. culty/rubrics.asp culty/rubrics.asp culty/rubrics-bb.asp culty/rubrics-bb.asp Upcoming Rubric Workshop: November 9 th (see

More rubric help AACU Rubrics Rubrics from Susan Hatfield (HLC Mentor Rubistar

A Few More Areas for Future Development Encouraging higher order thinking as students progress through the curriculum Making sure that the curriculum and pedagogy is more directly tied to your learning outcomes (i.e., curriculum mapping) Using multiple types of assessments Assessing students’ learning in high impact experiences (internships, undergraduate research, service learning, study abroad) Student surveys gauging their learning/satisfaction in the department

KNOWLEDGE COMPREHENSION APPLICATION ANALYSIS SYNTHESIS EVALUATION Cite Count Define Draw Identify List Name Point Quote Read Recite Record Repeat Select State Tabulate Tell Trace Underline Associate Classify Compare Compute Contrast Differentiate Discuss Distinguish Estimate Explain Express Extrapolate Interpolate Locate Predict Report Restate Review Tell Translate Apply Calculate Classify Demonstrate Determine Dramatize Employ Examine Illustrate Interpret Locate Operate Order Practice Report Restructure Schedule Sketch Solve Translate Use Write Analyze Appraise Calculate Categorize Classify Compare Debate Diagram Differentiate Distinguish Examine Experiment Inspect Inventory Question Separate Su rize Test Arrange Assemble Collect Compose Construct Create Design Formulate Integrate Manage Organize Plan Prepare Prescribe Produce Propose Specify Synthesize Write Appraise Assess Choose Compare Criticize Determine Estimate Evaluate Grade Judge Measure Rank Rate Recommend Revise Score Select Standardize Test Validate Lower level course outcomes

KNOWLEDGE COMPREHENSION APPLICATION ANALYSIS SYNTHESIS EVALUATION Cite Count Define Draw Identify List Name Point Quote Read Recite Record Repeat Select State Tabulate Tell Trace Underline Associate Classify Compare Compute Contrast Differentiate Discuss Distinguish Estimate Explain Express Extrapolate Interpolate Locate Predict Report Restate Review Tell Translate Apply Calculate Classify Demonstrate Determine Dramatize Employ Examine Illustrate Interpret Locate Operate Order Practice Report Restructure Schedule Sketch Solve Translate Use Write Analyze Appraise Calculate Categorize Classify Compare Debate Diagram Differentiate Distinguish Examine Experiment Inspect Inventory Question Separate Summarize Test Arrange Assemble Collect Compose Construct Create Design Formulate Integrate Manage Organize Plan Prepare Prescribe Produce Propose Specify Synthesize Write Appraise Assess Choose Compare Criticize Determine Estimate Evaluate Grade Judge Measure Rank Rate Recommend Revise Score Select Standardize Test Validate Advanced Course / Program outcomes

1xx K K K Program Level Student Learning Outcomes K= Knowledge/Comprehension; A= Application / Analysis; S= Synthesis /Evaluation 1xx S K K 2xx A A S A A K 3xx A K A A K A 4xx S A K S Capstone S S

Feedback about the Assessment Process? Questions? Concerns? Compliments? Complaints?

Contact Information For assistance with assessment, please contact: Nathan Lindsay, Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment at or Drew Bergerson, FaCET Faculty Fellow for Assessment at or