MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality Chris George, RN MS Project Manager, MHA Keystone Center 517-886-8404

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Team Check-up Tool. Slide 2 Learning Objectives To understand the tool we use to: – Describe the anticipated activities of your ICU quality improvement.
Advertisements

Creating and Submitting a Necessary Wayleave Application
StaffOnline The New Look & Feel January StaffOnline Introduction In keeping up with new technology the StaffOnline has a new look and feel. This.
1 Changes to the MTCT & Discussion of the Impacts on Submission Jill Marsteller PhD, MPP Christine George, RN, MS Kelly Gardner, MA On the CUSP: Stop BSI.
Procurement Card Training Strategic Account Management (SAM)
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Physician Engagement. Immersion Call Overview 1.Project overview 2.Science of Improving Patient Safety 3.Eliminating CLABSI 4.The.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Team Leadership Behaviors Michael A. Rosen, PhD Assistant Professor,
Form Builder Iteration 2 User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Denise Warzel Semantic Infrastructure Operations Team Presented to caDSR Curation Team March.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Audit Your Care A Closer Look at CLABSI and SSI Audit Forms Armstrong.
The Role of Management Support in Implementing Innovative Clinical Practices Carol VanDeusen Lukas, EdD Mark M. Meterko, PhD David Mohr, PhD Marjorie Nealon.
SUSP: Improving Surgical Care through TRIP and CUSP
On the CUSP: Stop BSI National Content Call Chris George, RN MS Director, National Projects MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality Monthly Team.
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
HSOPS Survey Process Overview of registration process Who should take the survey? Defining your target respondents Staff notification and reminders Survey.
The Cardiac Surgery Translational Study (“CSTS”) The Quality And Safety Research Group Data We Can Count On Lisa H. Lubomski, PhD April 8, 2011 Immersion.
NICU CLABSI Affinity Group Meeting May 9, 2012
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Using the Online HSOPS & RC Apps for CSTS Armstrong Institute for.
1 Quality Health Indicators Brought to you by… Hosted by Sally Perkins.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP Adaptive CUSP Sustainability Sustainment and Spread David.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Implementation Assessment Kisha Ali, MS May 13, 2015 ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Toward Eliminating Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections.
1 Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI): Barriers and Challenges MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety and Quality (MHA Keystone) Chris George,
Improving ICU Care Through Teamwork
Physician Engagement. Learning Objectives To relate what is meant by physician engagement To discuss strategies at management and staff levels to enhance.
Building Your SUSP Team Part I Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Jill A. Marsteller,
Who We Are ~Where We are Going. Slide 2 Workshop Objectives Describe the purpose and vision of the ICU Safe Care Initiative/Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety.
11/10/20111 On The Cusp Journey: Sentara CarePlex Hospital Gail J. Rudder RN, CRNI Infection Preventionist November 10 th, 2011.
CSTS Data Entry The Cardiovascular Surgery Translation Study (CSTS) JHU Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety & Quality.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s.
Improving Care Through Technical & Adaptive Work Chris Goeschel RN MPA Director, Patient Safety &Quality Initiatives JHU Quality & Safety Research Group.
0 eCPIC Admin Training: Automating User Account Management These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or modified only.
Quality Health Indicator Demonstration April 28, 2005.
Comprehensive Unit based Patient Safety Program Deepa Jose,RN,CCRN.
Explorer Renewal 1/2010 Explorer Renewal Updated 9/29/14.
Disclosures  Nothing to disclose  No discussion of “off-label” use of medications.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Taking Patient Safety to the Next Level Peter Pronovost, MD, PhD 1.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Data We Can Count On.
Getting to Zero and Sustaining Success: The Virginia Experience Barbara Brown, Vice President Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association May 8, 2012.
Engaging Residents and Families in CAUTI Prevention
DEMONSTRATION OF BENCHMARKS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT SELF- ASSESSMENT TOOL Sheri Fischer, TA Specialist, Office of Child Care’s National Center on Child.
Small Rural/CAH Learning Community Meeting May 23, 2012 Denise Flook, RN, MPH, CIC HAI Collaborative Lead Vice President, Infection Prevention/Staff Engagement.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Data Entry Training Welcome to our new CECity platform! Armstrong.
Introduction to KE EMu Unit objectives: Introduction to Windows Use the keyboard and mouse Use the desktop Open, move and resize a.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Quantitative Implementation Assessment 1: Aggregated Results Kisha Ali, MS Mayo Levering, BS September 2, 2014.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Auditing Your Care Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality.
Staff Safety Assessment 1. Learning Objectives To understand Step 2 of CUSP:Identify Defects To understand how to Implement the Staff Safety Assessment.
Results of Quarterly Team Update Interviews Kisha Ali, MS Donna Farley, PhD, MPH August 8, 2013.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Early Mobility: Data Feedback and Team Presentations ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Data We Can Count On.
Data…Data…Data December 8, 2010 On the CUSP: Stop CAUTI 1.
Identifying Defects Chris Goeschel June Identifying Defects What DO you know? What SHOULD you know?
The Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program: How Will This Work?
An Intervention to Learn from Mistakes and Improve Safety Culture
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Online Testing System Assessment Viewing Application (AVA)
South Carolina CAUTI Midcourse Meeting August 22, 2012
How to Create and Start a Test Session
ICU Safe Care Initiative/CUSP November 16, :30 am – 3:30 pm
Meeting Objectives Build skills among care team members that will improve teamwork, communication, and create a patient safety culture in your unit Hear.
Online Testing System Assessment Viewing Application (AVA)
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) 2010.
On the CUSP: Stop BSI.
Using the MTCT to Your Advantage
Unit-Based Safety Program (CUSP)
Presentation transcript:

MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality Chris George, RN MS Project Manager, MHA Keystone Center Jill A. Marsteller, PhD, MPP Assistant Professor, Dept. of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Session Objectives At the conclusion of the webinar, participants will: – Understand the purpose of completing the Monthly Team Check-up Tool (MTCT) – Understand how to enter the MTCT into Care Counts – Have an awareness of reports that are available to them in Care Counts – Know how to access help using the system

Purpose of MTCT Purpose Helps to monitor progress of CUSP steps and CLABSI reduction steps Identifies activities of teams and elements of team context that influence performance Helps identify barriers in teamwork and communication to guide corrective action

Why do we use the MTCT? Variability in site performance Need for information about what’s going on onsite Have/how have other collaboratives monitored progress and context? Testing the MTCT – Good reliability (temporal stability); good responsiveness; construct validity was demonstrated; tool demonstrated convergent and divergent validity of the MTCT barriers Focus groups about the MTCT

TCT and Successful CQI Implementation  Five months of Keystone data, Mar-Jul 05  More frequent senior executive meeting was associated with lower CLABSI rates (IRR=0.76, p<0.001).  Not enough leadership support from executives was associated high CLABSI rates (IRR=2.84, p=0.001)  Inability to work together was associated with higher CLABSI rates (IRR=3.11, p=0.037)

TCT and Successful CQI Implementation  Adventist data, Mar 07 - Feb 08  Educational activity “infection control visit/talk” was associated with higher CLASBI rates (IRR=2.44, p=0.012)  Appropriate hand hygiene was associated with lower CLABSI rates (IRR=0.41, p=0.019)

TCT and Successful CQI Implementation  Adventist data, Mar 07 - Sep 08  ICU teams with a majority of TCTs reporting work distractions were less likely to perform full-barrier precautions (coef.=-0.13, p=0.034) and remove unnecessary lines (coef.=-0.14, p=0.009)

Key Points: MTCT Completion The team leader completes the tool monthly ideally with input from the team at a team meeting or individual conversations with team members Answers to MTCT questions are based on previous month’s experience Use a separate MTCT for each unit participating in the hospital

Care Counts Log-In Screen If you forget your password, click on Forgot your Password. You will need to know your username. If you need help, contact Nicole Smith or 517-

Change Password and Data Entry

ICU Home Page

Select Team Check-Up National

Select Correct Unit

Verify Month and Year

Select Team Activities

Compliance with Checklist

Learning from Defect Activity

Barriers and Spread

Team Cohesiveness

Error Messages You must answer the questions marked with an error icon before the data will be accepted. Click Save when you have answered the questions marked with an error icon.

Data Successfully Saved If data is saved successfully, you will automatically be returned to the data entry screen.

Running Reports

Select Unit

Select Timeframe

Some Reports Allow Roll-up Feature

Reports Are Exportable Exporting to excel allows you to work with the data. PDF creates a printer friendly view

Monthly Team Check-Up Tool Common Barrier and Team Activity Report Examples and Descriptions Note: Common Barriers are included in these reports when teams answer “yes” or “to some extent” as to whether those issues were a barrier that month Report Name: Common Barriers Description: Reports the percentage of time each category was seen as a barrier to team progress Use this report to: – View barriers for a specific time period (e.g. last quarter of 2009) – View barriers by individual unit or select specific units and roll-up data

Common Barrier Report

Barriers Over Time Description Report Name: Common Barriers to Team Progress Over Time Description: Reports the percentage of time each category was seen as a barrier to team progress with comparison to the sponsor (state collaborative) or peer group Use this report to: – View barriers for an individual unit over several months – Compare barriers to those reported by a peer group or your sponsor (state collaborative)

Barriers Over Time Report

Barriers to Progress One Time Period Report Name: Common Barriers to Team Progress One Time Period Description: Reports the percentage of time each category was seen as a barrier to team progress with comparisons to a peer group or sponsor (state collaborative) data during a specified timeframe Use this report to: – View barriers for an individual unit for multiple months at a time (example: view one quarter as a single data point) – Compare barriers to those reported by a peer group or your sponsor (state collaborative) data for the same time period

Barriers One Time Period

Team Activities Report Desc. Report Name: Team Activities Description: Reports monthly team check-up data, can be rolled up for multiple months at a time and can be rolled-up for multiple units at a time Use this report to: – View several months of completed Monthly Team Check-Up Tools by individual units at one time to see progressions in activities, how often meetings are being held, and data is being shared etc. – View roll-up information for multiple units over several months to see a summary of activities taking place. In a roll-up of units, you will see a percentage of how many units reported each individual barrier to be an issue. Roll-up data can be useful for situations where there are multiple units participating, but should be used with caution as there can be tremendous variation between unit activities even with the same executive sponsor.

Team Activities Report

Team Activities, cont’d

Team Dynamics

Viewing Multiple Units Description Report Name: Team Activities-One Month-Multiple Units Description: Shows data for multiple units for a one month timeframe Use this report to: – View multiple units in a hospital or system on a monthly basis instead of viewing each individual report in Care Counts

Viewing Multiple Units Report

Questions?