Campus LAN Overview
Objectives Identify the technical considerations in campus LAN design Identify the business considerations in campus LAN design Describe the evolutionary approach to campus LAN design
Campus LAN Technical Issues Campus Floor Building Floor Client end stations Server end stations Network infrastructure Network management
Client End-Station Issues Application support issues – Bandwidth demand – Quality of service Platform upgrades Network interface cards (NICs) Cable connectors Wiring Closet Wall plate Wall NIC
High-performance medium NIC Server End-Station Issues Application support issues – Bandwidth demand – Performance requirements Server placement Network interface card Cable connectors
Network Infrastructure Issues Backbone strategy – distributed or collapsed Bandwidth requirements Technology – Fast Ethernet / FDDI/ ATM/ Metro Ethernet Bridging (switching) vs routing
Campus LAN Design Evolution: Bridges and Routers Flat model for small workgroups Routers for large and mixed-media workgroups FDDI backbone with dual-homed routers for fault tolerance
Cable Plant Type Electrical – Coaxial – Twisted-pair Fiber-optic – Multimode – Single-mode Wiring configuration – Home run – Zoned – Distance limitations
Hub Hubs and Structured Cabling Category 5 to the desk Multimode fiber in the riser Hub
Network Management Issues Models – Centralized – Distributed Network management stations User administration –Moves, adds, and changes – Virtual LANs (VLANs) Network management tools – Capabilities – Bandwidth demands – RMON – Scope of support LAN WAN
Business Issues Budget -Preserving current investment -Cost of purchase -Cost of ownership Adhering to standards -Coporate -Industry Planning for growth
Client/Client Bandwidth Time Terminal/Host Alphanumeric Client/Server Graphical Video Campus LAN Design Evolution: New Network Applications
What’s potential problems Media contention Excessive broadcasts Protocols that do not scale well Need to transport new payloads Need for more bandwidth Overloaded backbone Network layer addressing issues Security concerns
Protocols MediaTransport Solving Network Problems
Media contention solved by lan switching Excessive broadcast (protocol related) solved by routing Payload require high bandwidth and predictable low latency, use ATM
Use Switches to Reduce Congestion Avoid congestion on a LAN by using microsegmentation Cascade switches and hubs Tailor availability to the needs of the device
Ethernet collision domain shared bandwidth Broadcasts are visible across subnets Bandwidth Domain versus Broadcast Domain
Broadcast Radiation Shared Multicast and Broadcast Bus Shared Data Bus Point-to-Point Data Bus Shared Multicast and Broadcast Bus Hub Switch Broadcast Filter
Use Routers for Scalable Internetworks Routers serve as broadcast firewalls Routers make clean media conversions Routers consolidate for scalable internetworks
Use Routers to Impose Logical Structure One router divides subnets and networks One router structures an internetwork
LAN switch LAN switch serves 2 functions : dedicated full LAN speed per port; support multiple concurrent transmission paths support bridging (now called layer 2 switching) ASIC based; frame switching by hardware high speed some switches can support layer 3 switching Store-and-forward or Cut-through modes
Layer 3 switch basically a high end LAN switch that can switch at L2 and route at L3 2 types of L3 switches packet by packet cut-through packet by packet L3 switch is essentially a trimmed down router; usually IP based only work like traditional software router
Virtual LAN (VLAN) logical groupings of workgroups in a switch work like physically separate LANs; collision and broadcast is contained within each VLAN simplify move, change and relocate need to internetwork through routers policy based : can be based on physical ports, MAC address or IP subnet can span across multiple switches proprietary; future standard 802.1Q tagging