Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 ADM-Aeolus; Ground Station Options Lars Peter Riishojgaard.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

GEONETCast Initiative of GEO presented at the EC GEONETCast workshop 5 March 2006 GEO Secretariat.

Advertisements

The GEONETCast Alert Channel and CAP over GTS

NOAA Assessment of the Oceansat-2 Scatterometer Seubson (Golf) Soisuvarn, Zorana Jelenak and Paul S. Chang NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.

Building resilience to climate change Research at Tyndall-Southampton Geography What are the physical, technical and feasibility limits to adaptation?

SNPP VIIRS green vegetation fraction products and application in numerical weather prediction Zhangyan Jiang 1,2, Weizhong Zheng 3,4, Junchang Ju 1,2,

Meteorological Service of Canada – Update Meteorological Service of Canada – Update NOAA Satellite Proving Ground/User-Readiness June 2, 2014 David Bradley.

Astronomical Institute University of Bern 64 th International Astronautical Congress September 2013, Beijing, China Assessment of possible observation.

COPC Meeting at NCEP, October 2009 NOAA/NESDIS support of ESA’s ADM/Aeolus mission Lars Peter Riishojgaard Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation.

All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.

Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.

Lars Peter Riishojgaard Global Modeling and Assimilation Office/ Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center HIGH-LATITUDE WINDS FROM MOLNIYA ORBIT a mission.

ECMWF WMO Workshop19-21 May 2008: ECMWF OSEs Slide 1 The ADM-Aeolus mission Geneva, May 2008 Representing the ADM-Aeolus Mission Advisory Group,

WMO Space Programme, CBS Technical Conference1 Integrated Global Data Dissemination Service (IGDDS)

Tutorial on Local Polynomial Regression (LPR): An Alternative to Ordinary Lease Squares by John M. Clapp March 10, 2000 I. Motivation: What LPR does. II.

Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Oct , 2006 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California LCROSS Orbital.

Earth Observation, Navigation & Science Page 1 Capacity Final Presentation, , Estec, Noordwijk Report for WP 3300 WP 3300.

Update on the Restack of Digital Television Services Chris Hose Executive Manager, Technical Planning and Evaluation Branch, ACMA.

L ow R ate I nformation T ransmission Product Suite Satellite Direct Readout Conference for the Americas in Miami, Florida December 9-13, Charles.

Michiko Masutani NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC RSIS/Wyle Information Systems Introduction to OSSE and Summary of NCEP OSSEs

EUM/SIR/VWG/12/0375, v1, 10 July 2012 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS EUM/SIR/VWG/12/0375, v1, 10 July 2012 Coordination Group.

Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.

North America - Europe Data Exchange Group May 2004 Current Status of the Eumetsat Operational and Future Satellite Systems Ken Holmlund Meteorological.

CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.

Saros and Inex By Mike Frost. Types of Solar Eclipse.

WMO Space Programme Expert Team on WIS & GTS, Tokyo, April Integrated Global Data Dissemination Service (IGDDS)

© KONGSBERG WORLD CLASS – through people, technology and dedication.

US BENEFITS. It Addresses Priorities The US and Canada have common scientific, economic and strategic interests in arctic observing: marine and air transportation.

1 Global Wind Figures Global Wind Energy Outlook 2006 Source: GWEC The Scenarios – Main Assumptions “Reference” scenario: most conservative scenario,

Latitude and Longitude: Finding Locations on Planet Earth. With thanks and credit to Step.com.

Lars Peter Riishojgaard WIGOS Project Manager, WMO Chair, OPAG-IOS WMO Commission for Basic Systems 10th Symposium on Environmental Satellites 1.

POLAR MULTI-SENSOR AEROSOL PROPERTIES OVER LAND Michael Grzegorski, Rosemary Munro, Gabriele Poli, Andriy Holdak and Ruediger Lang.

Update on winds derived from MODIS Lars Peter Riishojgaard, John Wu, Meta Sienkiewicz Global Modeling and Assimilation Office.

Slide 1 Second GPS/RO Users Workshop, August , The EUMETSAT Polar System GRAS SAF and Data Products Martin B. Sorensen GRAS SAF Project Atmosphere.

And Their Affects on Temperature. Latitude and Longitude are imaginary lines that we use to identify places on a map or a globe.

Future Integrated Satellite Architecture Brief to Third GOES-R Users Workshop Broomfield, Colorado Michael Crison NOAA Satellites and Information Service.

Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.

Training Seminar on ICT for GTS (Bangkok, September 2002) - Slide 1 Organisation principles of the GTS.

LWG briefing to NESDIS/OSD and NWS/OST Lars Peter Riishojgaard, JCSDA Mike Hardesty, NOAA/OAR/ESRL Co-chairs, US Working Group on Space-Based Lidar Winds.

© GEO Secretariat Overall Concept GEO-II adopted the GEONETCast concept in principle, as presented by EUMETSAT and NOAA What? A near real-time system to.

Overview ABSTRACT As part of its Polar Satellite Program, NOAA operates the Jason-2 altimetry satellite and shares production of near real-time (NRT) products.

Topographic maps. Features on a Topographic Map Relief: difference in elevation between any two points– hills, valleys, mountains Water Features: lakes,

12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences

NOAA/NESDIS support of ESA’s ADM/Aeolus mission Lars Peter Riishojgaard Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation.

Name three geographical factors that are relevant to this map.

COMPUTER NETWORKING 2 LECTURE 6: satellites technology.

Topology Issues in Inter-Domain Connection Services Jerry Sobieski (NORDUnet) The Cynic’s Perspective & Jeroen van der Ham (University of Amsterdam) The.

A SEMINAR ON “SATELLITE DIGITAL RADIO”

Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Astronomer Workshop Feb. 29, 2008 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California Mission Design & Observation.

OC/42 System Improvements page 1 42 nd Argos Operations Committee Meeting Assmannshausen, Germany June 3 rd to 5 th, 2008 G-1-5.

GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES

OVERVIEW EUMETSAT Background WAN links

ESA's Ground Station Network Prospects for operations of the Lagrange missions S. Kraft OPS-L , K.-J. Schulz OPS-GS 08/03/2017.

SNPP Regional Retransmission Service: Plans and Status of Implementation Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 1 session, agenda item 6.

Satellite Meteorology

HIGHLIGHTS 2 ARGOS satellites decommissioned (NOAA 12 and 14)

Operational Use of the Day-Night Band in Alaska

Presentation Summary How Beacons are Located Using Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellites Requires Highly accurate Orbit information and Very Stable Beacon Oscillator.

Scale: Kilometers.

Mapping Skills 101.

The WMO Information System

Secretariat 12 to 16 February 2017 Abu Dhabi, UAE

Secretariat 12 to 16 February 2017 Abu Dhabi, UAE

Global Map Skills Second Grade Common Assessment

Final Presentation Slides

Scenario Modeling in GoldSim

Location of Georgia Chapter 1 Section 1

(edited by Nadia Al-Ghreimil)

WIGOS Data Quality Monitoring System (WDQMS)

Scale: Kilometers.

First Polar Winds from AVHRR HRPT Data

Presentation transcript:

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 ADM-Aeolus; Ground Station Options Lars Peter Riishojgaard

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 Overview ADM/Aeolus data dissemination –Data policy –Baseline ground segment –Possibly alternative ground stations

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 Data availability Data will be available in “real time” to operational meteorological users –This is in contrast to normal ESA data dissemination policy WMO Global Telecommunication System used in principle for dissemination –GTS may or may not be most efficient vehicle for transmission

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009

Baseline ground segment Single receiving station at Svalbard –Full orbital dumps; 50 Mb of science data per orbit –110 s total visibility required for one orbit 30 s for antenna locking 80 s for data dump Any additional data may require additional time (e.g. QRT or stored orbits)

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 NRT stream –Near Real Time, defined as data (level 1B) having latency of 3 h or less for the end user –NRT is targeted for global NWP and should in principle be available for all orbits –Low ADM orbit height => blind orbits in spite of high latitude of Svalbard –WMO requirement for global NWP is 1 h

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 QRT stream Quasi Real Time data targeted at regional NWP and other applications –Latency of 30 min or less –Assuming 20 (or 15) minutes total processing time, the QRT stream will consist of the last 10 (or 15) minutes of the orbit dumped either at the beginning of the pass (“AEAP”) or at the end of the pass (“ALAP”) –No Southern Hemisphere QRT data in Svalbard only scenario

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 QRT “AEAP” Scenario using Svalbard and Troll, assuming 15 (red+blue) or 20 minutes (blue) total processing time (all figures courtesy of H. Nett, ESA/ESTEC)

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 QRT (II) QRT availability for Europe is guaranteed under combined Troll/Svalbard scenario QRT will not be available for North America under this scenario However, a receiving station at Troll now appears unlikely due to financial constraints On request from LPR, ESA has studied implications of adding either Wallops or Svalbard as additional ground receiving stations

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 ADM pass duration at Svalbard (red) and Fairbanks (green)

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 ADM pass duration (elevation > 2 deg) at Svalbard (red) and Wallops (blue)

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 ADM pass duration (elevation > 1 deg) at Svalbard (red) and Wallops (blue)

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 QRT “AEAP” Scenario using Svalbard and Wallops, assuming 15 (red+blue) or 20 minutes (blue) total processing time

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 QRT (III) Fairbanks adds relatively little to QRT scenario; sees basically the same orbits as Svalbard; adds robustness Due to near-perfect longitude, Wallops is a useful addition in spite of the low latitude Assuming 1 deg minimum elevation angle, Northern Hemishphere QRT will be available for all orbits under Svalbard/Wallops scenario

Lidar Working Group, Wintergreen, 06/16/2009 Potential NOAA involvement Advantages of Wallops/Svalbard scenario has been briefed to Kathy Kelly, Director of NESDIS/OSDPD –Positive initial reception OSDPD studying technical feasibility and financial implications Decision will be made at the NESDIS AA (Mary Kicza) level –LWG statement of support?