XXXIII International Conference of Theoretical Physics MATTER TO THE DEEPEST: Recent Developments in Physics of Fundamental Interactions, USTROŃ'09 Ustron,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lara De Nardo BNL October 8, 2007 QCD fits to the g 1 world data and uncertainties THE HERMES EXPERIENCE QCD fits to the g 1 world data and uncertainties.
Advertisements

Target Mass Correction for the Polarized Nucleon Structure Function By: Abolfazl Mirjalili In collaborating with S. Atashbar Tehrani & H.M Saffar IPM and.
1 The and -Z Exchange Corrections to Parity Violating Elastic Scattering 周海清 / 东南大学物理系 based on PRL99,262001(2007) in collaboration with C.W.Kao, S.N.Yang.
Low x meeting, Sinai Alice Valkárová on behalf of H1 collaboration LOW x meeting 2005, Sinaia H1 measurements of the structure of diffraction.
1cteq ss 11 B. Properties of the PDFs -- Definitions First, what are the Parton Distribution Functions? (PDFs) The PDFs are a set of 11 functions, f i.
The resummation of the low- φ * domain of Z production Lee Tomlinson The University of Manchester IOP Liverpool 8 – 10 April 2013 In collaboration with.
A Bayesian Analysis of Parton Distribution Uncertainties Clare Quarman Atlas UK Physics meeting – UCL 15 th Dec 2003.
May 2005CTEQ Summer School1 Global Analysis of QCD and Parton Distribution Functions Dan Stump Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University.
Precision Measurement of F 2 with H1 Workshop on DIS and QCD, Florence, Max Klein for the H1 Collaboration Towards today The Measurement Results.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
1 Ali. N. Khorramian (IPM), Institute for studies in theoretical Physics and Mathematics Physics Department, Semnan University Workshop on Low-x physics.
Resummation of Large Logs in DIS at x->1 Xiangdong Ji University of Maryland SCET workshop, University of Arizona, March 2-4, 2006.
Paul Laycock University of Liverpool BLOIS 2007 Diffractive PDFs.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #14.
Glauber shadowing at particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions within the framework of pQCD. Alexey Svyatkovskiy scientific advisor: M.A.Braun.
THE DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING ON THE POLARIZED NUCLEONS AT EIC E.S.Timoshin, S.I.Timoshin.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Lecture 11: Quarks inside the proton 9/10/ Idea: try to identify a kinematic regime in which the electrons scatter from pointlike constituents.
Measurement of α s at NNLO in e+e- annihilation Hasko Stenzel, JLU Giessen, DIS2008.
Jan, 2007M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference 1 Imposing the Froissart bound on DIS ---> New PDF's for the LHC Martin Block Northwestern University.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
1 Ali N. Khorramian (a,b), A. Mirjalili (a,c) and S. Atashbar Tehrani (d) (a) (IPM) Institute for studies in theoretical Physics and Mathematics (b) Physics.
MENU04 Beijing, Aug 29 -Sep. 4, 2004 Polarized parton distributions of the nucleon in improved valon model Ali Khorramian Institute for studies in theoretical.
Monday, Jan. 27, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino-Nucleon DIS 2.Formalism of -N DIS.
Jan., 2010Aspen Winter Physics Conference XXVI M. Block 1 Analytic LO Gluon Distributions from the proton structure function F 2 (x,Q 2 ) > New PDF's.
QCD analysis of the nucleon spin structure function data in next to leading order in α S The polarized gluon distribution in the nucleon Jechiel Lichtenstadt.
Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory QCD structure of the nucleon and spin physics Lecture 5 & 6: TMD factorization and phenomenology HUGS 2015,
Simona Malace University of South Carolina. Overview  Standard pQCD fits and their limitations (example => CTEQ6)  Another kind of QCD fits: extension.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Tobias Haas: Introduction to HERA An Introduction to HERA Physics DESY Summer Student Program 16/17 August, 2005 Tobias Haas DESY, Hamburg.
The Role of Higher Twists in Determining Polarized Parton Densities E. Leader (London), A. Sidorov (Dubna), D. Stamenov (Sofia) 12th International Workshop.
The Role of Higher Twists in Determining Polarized Parton Densities E. Leader (London), A. Sidorov (Dubna), D. Stamenov (Sofia) 10th International Workshop.
Diffractive structure functions in e-A scattering Cyrille Marquet Columbia University based on C. Marquet, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) paper in preparation.
PV DIS: SUSY and Higher Twist M.J. Ramsey-Musolf Caltech Wisconsin-Madison S. Mantry, K. Lee, G. Sacco Caltech.
LISHEP Rio de Janeiro1 Factorization in diffraction Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
Inclusive Diffraction at HERA Marcella Capua – INFN and Calabria University Small X and Diffraction FNAL Chicago (USA) 17 – 20 September 2003 on behalf.
Sketching the pseudoscalar mesons’ valence-quark parton distribution functions Chen Chen University of Science and Technology of China November 16 th,
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 1 David Milstead Stockholm University.
HERMES による パートン helicity 分布関数の QCD 解析 Tokyo Inst. of Tech. 1. Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD) 2. Parton Helicity Distribution and Nucleon Spin Problem 3.
HERA Physics and Gustav Kramer Alice Valkárová, Charles University, Prague 2nd April 2013Festkolloquium - G.Kramer1.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
SWADHIN TANEJA (STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY) K. BOYLE, A. DESHPANDE, C. GAL, DSSV COLLABORATION 2/4/2016 S. Taneja- DIS 2011 Workshop 1 Uncertainty determination.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
A20121 Parton Distribution Functions, Part 1 Daniel Stump Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University A.Introduction B.Properties of.
The Importance of Higher Twist Corrections in Polarized DIS E. Leader, A. Sidorov, D. Stamenov, LSS 11th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering.
Results on Inclusive Diffraction From The ZEUS Experiment Data from the running period The last period with the ZEUS Forward Plug Calorimeter.
Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann DIS 2007 Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Isabell-Alissandra.
H1 and ZEUS Structure functions at HERA α s and PDFs Summary/Outlook Tomáš Laštovička (H1 collaboration) DESY Zeuthen, Charles University Prague at LLWI2003,
H1 QCD analysis of inclusive cross section data DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, April 2004 Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the H1 Collaboration.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
Tensor and Flavor-singlet Axial Charges and Their Scale Dependencies Hanxin He China Institute of Atomic Energy.
1. How to probe the quarks? Scatter high-energy electron off a proton: Deep-Inelastic Scattering (DIS) Highest energy e-p collider: HERA at DESY in Hamburg:
New Measurement of the EMC effect for Light Nuclei and Global Study of the A-Dependence Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory ECT 2008 Workshop.
Excited QCD 2014 Bjelasnica Mountain, Sarajevo. Outline Sara Taheri Monfared (IPM) 2.
Outline Motivation DDIS kinematics Introduction of different diffractive data sets Global fit procedure Results and conclusion Sara Taheri Monfared (Semnan.
N. RaicevicMoriond QCD Structure Functions and Extraction of PDFs at HERA Nataša Raičeviċ University of Montenegro On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
1 A M Cooper-Sarkar University of Oxford ICHEP 2014, Valencia.
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
Overview The Structure of the Proton Quark-Parton Model lecture-1
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Polarized Structure Function of Nucleon and Orbital Angular Momentum
Searching for intrinsic motion effects in SIDIS
Y.Kitadono (Hiroshima ),
Presentation transcript:

XXXIII International Conference of Theoretical Physics MATTER TO THE DEEPEST: Recent Developments in Physics of Fundamental Interactions, USTROŃ'09 Ustron, Poland September 11-16, 2009

Hamzeh Khanpour In collaboration with: Ali Khorramian, Shahin Atashbar Tehrani Semnan University and School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM (Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics), Tehran, IRAN Determination of valence quark densities up to higher order of perturbative QCD Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Outline Abstract Introduction DIS Kinematics Parton distributions and hard processes (1,2) What we need for 4-loop calculations? Splitting functions and Coefficient functions Pade’ approximate The method of the QCD analysis of Structure Function The procedure of the QCD fits of F 2 data Results and Conclusion Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Abstract We present the results of our QCD analysis for non-singlet unpolarized quark distributions and structure function F 2 (x,Q 2 ) up to N 3 LO. The analysis is based on the Jacobi polynomials technique of reconstruction of the structure functions from its Mellin moments. The fit results for the non-singlet parton distribution function, their correlated errors and evolution are presented. Our results on and strong coupling constant up to N 3 LO are presented and compared with those obtained from deep inelastic scattering processes. In the N 3 LO analysis, the QCD scale and the strong coupling constant were determined with the help of Pade-approximation. Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Introduction Complete knowledge of the parton distributions in the nucleon is essential for calculating deep inelastic processes at high energies. All calculations of high energy processes with initial hadrons, whether within the standard model or exploring new physics, require parton distribution functions (PDF's) as an essential input. The assessment of PDF's, their uncertainties and extrapolation to the kinematics relevant for future colliders such as the LHC is an important challenge to high energy physics in recent years. Parton distributions form indispensable ingredients for the analysis of all hard-scattering processes involving initial-state hadrons. Presently the next-to-leading order is the standard approximation for most important processes but the N 2 LO and N 3 LO corrections need to be included, however, in order to arrive at quantitatively reliable predictions for hard processes at present and future high-energy colliders. For quantitatively reliable predictions of DIS and hard hadronic scattering processes, perturbative QCD corrections beyond the next-to-leading order, N 2 LO and N 3 LO, need to be taken into account. For at least the next ten years, proton (anti-) proton colliders will continue to form the high- energy frontier in particle physics. At such machines, many quantitative studies of hard (high mass/scale) standard-model and new-physics processes require a precise understanding of the parton structure of the proton. Complete knowledge of the parton distributions in the nucleon is essential for calculating deep inelastic processes at high energies. All calculations of high energy processes with initial hadrons, whether within the standard model or exploring new physics, require parton distribution functions (PDF's) as an essential input. The assessment of PDF's, their uncertainties and extrapolation to the kinematics relevant for future colliders such as the LHC is an important challenge to high energy physics in recent years. Parton distributions form indispensable ingredients for the analysis of all hard-scattering processes involving initial-state hadrons. Presently the next-to-leading order is the standard approximation for most important processes but the N 2 LO and N 3 LO corrections need to be included, however, in order to arrive at quantitatively reliable predictions for hard processes at present and future high-energy colliders. For quantitatively reliable predictions of DIS and hard hadronic scattering processes, perturbative QCD corrections beyond the next-to-leading order, N 2 LO and N 3 LO, need to be taken into account. For at least the next ten years, proton (anti-) proton colliders will continue to form the high- energy frontier in particle physics. At such machines, many quantitative studies of hard (high mass/scale) standard-model and new-physics processes require a precise understanding of the parton structure of the proton. Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The deep-inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering is the source of important information about the nucleons structure. DIS Kinematics Deep inelastic scattering in the quark parton model. The negative four momentum transfer squared at the electron vertex The Bjorken scale variable x and the inelasticity y Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Parton distributions and hard processes (1) inclusive photon-exchange deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) At zeroth order in the strong coupling constant the hard coefficient functions c a,i are trivial, and the momentum fraction carried by the struck quark i is equal to Bjorken- x if mass effects are neglected. In general, the structure functions are given by Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Parton distributions and hard processes (2) Parton distributions f i : evolution equations ( ⊗ = Mellin convolution) The initial conditions are not calculable in perturbative QCD. The task of determining these distributions can be divided in two steps. The first is the determination of the non-perturbative initial distributions at some (usually rather low) scale Q 0. The second is the perturbative calculation of their scale dependence (evolution) to obtain the results at the hard scales Q. The initial distributions have to be fitted using a suitable set of hard- scattering observables. Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Determination of the parton density functions from experimental data is according to the following procedure: The parton density functions are parameterised by smooth analytical functions at a low starting scale Q 0 2 as a function of x with a certain number of free parameters. They are evolved in Q 2 using the DGLAP equations. Afterwards predictions for structure functions and cross-sections are calculated. The free parameters are determined by performing a fit to the data. Several constraints are imposed during this procedure. For an accurate determination of the parton density functions the coefficient and splitting functions have to be precisely known as they govern the calculation of the structure functions and the evolution, respectively. Since 2005 all of them are known to next-to-next-to-leading order (N 2 LO). Procedure Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

what we need for 4-loop calculations? The splitting functions P (n) and the process-dependent hard coefficient functions c a admit expansions in powers of strong coupling constant The first n+1 terms define the N n LO approximation. N 2 LO: N 3 LO: Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

In spite of the unknown 4–loop splitting functions one may wonder whether any statement can be made on the non–singlet parton distributions and at the 4–loop level !!!!!!! Splitting functions and Coefficient functions The complete NNLO splitting functions and coefficient functions are known [J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt and S. Moch, Nucl. Phys. B 724 (2005) 3] [S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B 688 (2004) 101] [J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt and S. Moch, Nucl. Phys. B 724 (2005) 3] The 3-loop coefficient functions are known Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The answer is: Pade’- approximate Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009 [J. Ellis, E. Gardi, M. Karliner and M.A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) ] [J. Ellis, E. Gardi, M. Karliner and M.A. Samuel, Phys. Lett. B366 (1996) 268. ] [M.A. Samuel, J. Ellis and M. Karliner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) ]

Padé estimates for the large-N behaviour of the three-loop contributions to the non-singlet coefficient function C 2,ns (N). The three-loop approximants are compared with exact results. Coefficient functions Pade’ [0/2] Pade’ [1/1] Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The perturbative expansion of the non-singlet N-space coefficient functions Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

4-loop Splitting functions Pade’ [0/2] Pade’ [1/1] Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The perturbative expansion of the anomalous dimension Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The method of the QCD analysis of SF One of the simplest and fastest possibilities in the structure function reconstruction from the QCD predictions for its Mellin moments is Jacobi polynomials expansion. [ A. N. Khorramian and S. A. Tehrani, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) ] Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009 [ S. Atashbar Tehrani and A. N. Khorramian, JHEP 0707 (2007) 048 ]

Structure function in x space F 2 Structure function as extracted from the DIS ep process can be, up to N 3 LO written as The combinations of parton densities in the non-singlet regime and the valence region x>0.3 for F 2 p and F 2 d in LO is In the region x<0.3 for the difference of the proton and deuteron data we use Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The evolution equations are solved in Mellin-N space and the Mellin transforms of the above distributions are denoted by respectively. The non–singlet structure functions are given by Here denotes the strong coupling constant and are the non–singlet Wilson coefficients in Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The solution of the non–singlet evolution equation for the parton densities to 4–loop order reads Here, denote the Mellin transforms of the (k + 1)–loop splitting functions. [J. Blumlein, H. Bottcher and A. Guffanti, Nucl. Phys. B 774, 182 (2007)] [ A. N. Khorramian and S. A. Tehrani, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) ]

The procedure of the QCD fits of F 2 data In the present analysis we choose the following parameterization for the valence quark densities By QCD fits of the world data for, we can extract valence quark densities using the Jacobi polynomials method. For the non-singlet QCD analysis presented here we use the structure function data measured in charged lepton proton and deuteron deep-inelastic scattering. [J. Blumlein, H. Bottcher and A. Guffanti, Nucl. Phys. B 774, 182 (2007)] [ A. N. Khorramian and S. A. Tehrani, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) ] Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Results

[J. Blumlein, H. Bottcher and A. Guffanti, Nucl. Phys. B 774, 182 (2007)] [ A. N. Khorramian and S. A. Tehrani, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) ] Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Table: Parameters values of the LO, NLO, NNLO and N 3 LO non-singlet QCD fit at Q 0 2 = 4 GeV 2 Fit results Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Comparison of the parton densities xu v and xd v at the input scale Q 0 2 = 4 GeV 2 and at different orders in QCD as resulting from the present analysis. Parton densities at the input scale Q 0 2 = 4 GeV 2 Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

The parton densities xu v and xd v at the input scale Q 0 2 = 4 GeV 2 (solid line) compared to results obtained from N 3 LO analysis by BBG (dashed line). Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009 [J. Blumlein, H. Bottcher and A. Guffanti, Nucl. Phys. B 774, 182 (2007)]

Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009 The parton densities xu v (x,Q 2 ) and xd v (x,Q 2 ) at N 3 LO evolved up to Q 2 = GeV 2 (solid line) compared to results obtained by BBG (dashed line).

The structure functions F 2 p and F 2 d as function of Q 2 i n intervals of x. Shown are the pure QCD fit in N 3 LO (solid line) and the contributions from target mass corrections TMC (dashed line) and higher twist HT (dashed–dotted line). The arrows indicate the regions with W 2 >12.5 GeV 2. The shaded areas represent the fully correlated 1σ statistical error bands.

The structure function F 2 NS as function of Q 2 in intervals of x. Shown is the pure QCD fit in N 3 LO (solid line).

Conclusion We performed a QCD analysis of the non–singlet world data up to N 3 LO and determined the valence quark densities xu v (x,Q 2 ) and xd v (x,Q 2 ) with correlated errors. Parameterizations of these parton distribution functions and their errors were derived in a wide range of x and Q 2 as fit results at LO, NLO, NNLO, and N 3 LO. In the analysis the QCD scale and the strong coupling constant α s (M 2 Z ), were determined up to N 3 LO. In spite of the unknown 4–loop splitting functions we applied Pade’- approximate for determination of non–singlet parton distributions and QCD at the 4–loop level. Our calculations for non-singlet unpolarized quark distribution functions based on the Jacobi polynomials method are in good agreement with the other theoretical models. Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009

Thanks to attention !! Hamzeh Khanpour (IPM & Semnan University) USTRON 2009