Prepared by Joseph S. Passanise July 19, 2013 DWI Law & Science Seminar Tan-Tar-A Resort Try Your Case In A Deposition.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The First 30 Seconds The Prosecutor’s Perspective

Advertisements

By David Burrows © 2014 David Burrows, Attorney at Law.

Chapter 8 Witnesses— Competency and Perjury.

Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.

I AM A FAIR PERSON. BUT IN A CASE INVOLVING ALCOHOL, I AM NOT “IMPARTIAL”.

Do Now Drinking Dilemma In your groups come up with: 3 reasons why the legal drinking age should remain at 21 3 reasons why the legal drinking age should.

Chapter 8 Trial Procedures. The Players Judge Appointed by government Full control of courtroom Decides question of guilt (when there is no jury) and.

RANDY T. LEAVITT AUSTIN, TEXAS. 1. Initial call and client interview 2. ALR Process-briefly 3. Cross examination of the arresting officer.

NJ DUI Law Firm Presentation New Jersey DWI, Motor Vehicle & Criminal Attorney Law Office of Bartholomew Baffuto Bartholomew.

R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.

Direct & Cross Examination in Criminal Cases Presented by Joseph Passanise Solo and Small Firm Conference June 11, 2010.

State of Texas v. (Your Defendant) Cause Number (your Cause number here)

 Take a Handout (Effects of Alcohol)  Using the Pages of the NJ Driver’s Manual answer the questions  We will be going over.

The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.

J oseph S. P assanise 2974 E. Battlefield Springfield, MO Phone: (417) Fax: (417) w w w. e n t r a p p e d. c o m - - w w w.

This program is funded by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration CROSS EXAMINATION.

RESPONDING TO THE RISING BA DEFENSE G. Stewart Hicks Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor 2220 Tulare Street, Suite 1000 Fresno, CA *(559) *

Police and the Rule of Law Chapter 7 In Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.

DUI/DWI Law in NY- All About Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Ph ,

DRUG & ALCOHOL EVIDENCE: PLEADINGS, PROOFS & PRACTICAL TIPS October 25, 2012.

Dangers of Alcohol and Driving

Handling Social Pressures

 Generates competition between Crown and defence  Aim of both is to seek justice  Crown- Burden of proof is on the Crown to “prove case beyond a reasonable.

Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.

Use it or lose it. Know the Rules  T.R.Cr.P. 5.1  Evidence- hearsay not allowed ( except proof of ownership or expert reports)  Defense right to cross.

Minnehaha County Sheriff’s Office Explorer Post #11.

Alcohol, Other Drugs, And Driving

Chapter 1 Introduction to forensic science and the law.

Courts and the Case Process. I. The Two Systems of Criminal Courts A. Federal and state courts (more trials take place in state courts) B. Federal Courts.

Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!

Criminal Trial Process “Innocent until proven guilty”

Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,

Lesson 7.3 TRAFFIC LAWS GOVERNING THE USE OF ALCOHOL In all 50 states, a person has to be 21 years of age to purchase or consume alcoholic beverages. All.

Handling Social Pressures Chapter 4. What are the Effects of Alcohol? Alcohol is a powerful and dangerous drug- it can change the way people act, think,

Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.

The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.

Unit 6 Seminar Rule of Law: Expounding the Constitution 4 th -5 th -6 th Amendments.

The Participants. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Crown must prove case beyond a reasonable doubt: a reasonable person would have no choice but to conclude.

Rights & the Constitution. Fourth Amendment Intended to limit overzealous behavior by the police Search and seizure Probable Cause –Standard for legal.

DWI Detection Phases  Vehicle in Motion Initial observation of vehicle Initial observation of vehicle Observation of stopping sequence Observation of.

YOU GOT THEM, NOW WHAT DO YOU DO?.  Facebook began in 2004  Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Snapchat, Kik, Instagram, Youtube, Tumbler, Text ‘em  Given.

Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.

The Law & Forensics Chapters 1-3 (Some information not found in textbook)

TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES. TESTIMONY The sworn statement given by a lay or expert witness who has personal knowledge of the facts being tried in court.

CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.

Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.

What Does Probable Cause Indicate Regarding A DWI Stop In New Jersey?

The Trial Chapter 9. Trials in the Early Modern Period Very often trial was by torture the Rack water torture other torture the Star Chamber a 15 th and.

Stages of Intoxication Factors affecting alcohol absorption – Body weight – How much alcohol is consumed – Over what time period – Amount of food in the.

Unit 4: Forensic Toxicology Mr. Ross Brown Brooklyn School for Law and Technology.

Drinking and Driving. PENALTIES – FIRST OFFENSE.08% BAC or “Under The Influence” Fine of not less than $250 nor more than $400 and a period of detainment.

Pretrial and Courtroom Procedures Principles of LPSCS.

Alcohol, other drugs, and driving

Session 3 The Legal Environment 1 Hour 10 Minutes

Standardized Field Sobriety Testing

Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.

TRIAL PROCEDURES.

50 Minutes Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance.

Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance 50 Minutes

UNDER THE INFLUENCE DEFINED

Courts and the Case Process

Jury Selection.

Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause.

The Litigation Process

Session 16 Written Examination and Program Conclusion

It’s a murder trial. Get ready.

Criminal Trial Process

Section 5: Knowing Your Rights

Presentation transcript:

Prepared by Joseph S. Passanise July 19, 2013 DWI Law & Science Seminar Tan-Tar-A Resort Try Your Case In A Deposition

1.Presumptions 2.Some Rules Of The Road 3.Defense Strategies  Credibility Curve  Built in Bias  SFT’s Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

4.Depositions  Bring Out Bias 5.Use Of Experts Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.Usually Two People Involved In A DWI Case -1 Of Which Was Drinking! 2.Of The Two, 1 Of Which Is More Pre-disposed To Lie. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.RSMo § A Person Commits The Crime Of Driving While Intoxicated If He Operates A Motor Vehicle While In A Intoxicated Or Drugged Condition. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

2.State v Schroeder 330 SW 3d.408 (Mo Banc. 2011) A Person Is In An Intoxicated Condition When “His Use Of Alcohol Impairs His Ability To Operate An Automobile. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

3.State v Adams 163 SW 3d 35 (Mo App SD 2005) Prosecutor’s Dream BAC.06 Reaffirms Principle NO # In DWI Law Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

4.State v Seitz 384 SW 3d 384 (MO Ap SD 2012)  In Absence Of Chemical Test Gov Meets Burden From Witness Based On Observations. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

5.State v Edwards 280 SW 3d 184 (MO App ED 2009)  It Is The FACT Not The Degree Of Intoxication  RSMO § (3)  Substantial Evidence Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

RSMo § (3) There Is Substantial Evidence Of Intoxication From Physical Observations Of Witnesses Or Admissions Of The Defendant. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

 The Credibility Curve  Built In Bias  SFT’s – Probable Cause/Doubt?  Use Of Experts  Depositions Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.Timeline – The DWI Incident Does It Make Sense!  Contact  Arrest  Implied Consent  Miranda Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

 15 min  AIR Questions  BAC Ticket  Report Writing 2.Breakdown The Officer Observations Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

 Driving  Observations Outside FST’s  FST Performance  After Arrest Observations Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.The Verbs - Crossed 2.The Adjectives – Slightly Slurred 3.The Conclusory Words 4.The Legal Terms  Indicators of Impairment  Totality Of The Circumstances 5.Patterned Report Writing Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.Admissibility/Sufficiency 2.Weight Assigned Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013 Dueling Battle

1.Officer Knowledge  Directions  Demonstration  Tone/Speed of Voice 2.Admissibility In Court  Challenge - Sufficiency Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

 Weight Assigned 3.Weight  Brown v Director, 85 SW 3d 1 (MO Supreme Ct 2002) “ A Court Can Disregard Improper SFT’s When Making A Probable Cause Decision”. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

Focus on the 3 Components  The Stop  The Roadside Interaction  Post – Arrest Bring out The BIAS! Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.BIAS  Focus On What Client Did Right  Officers Have A Hard Time Understanding The Difference Between PC/Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

2.Officers Use Legal Terms  Totality Of The Circumstances  Indicators Of Impairment Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.You Can Read AIR  How Does Officer Testify 2.Officers Memorize SFT’s Directions 3.Officers Take Classes To Testify 4.Officers Read Reports Under Oath Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

5.Officers Get Nervous Like Our Clients – Pressure 6.Conclusionary Words 7.Learn How Officer Thinks  AIR – Complete The Paperwork Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

8.Conclusionary Words  Slurred Speech  Swaying  Blood Shot Eyes Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

DRUNK CHART Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013 INDICATORS OF IMPAIRMENTINDICATORS OF NON-IMPAIRMENT Bloodshot EyesHanded ID/Insurance OdorExit Vehicle Properly Slurred SpeechNo Swaying HGN - FailureNo Stumbling Performance of the Walk & Turn Performance 1 Leg

Weigh The Indicators Officers Assign  Some Indicators Carry More Weight BIAS Is Never Collateral! Davis v Alaska (1974) 94 S.Ct. 110J Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

1.Back Up Officer 2.Video – Contradicts AIR  Speech  FST’s 3.Refute The DWI Officer Expert Testimony – Show BIAS. Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

 Experience  Arrests  Testimony 4.No Chronological Order Move Around 5.Focus On Specific Facts And Observations Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

 “I Don’t Know”  “I Don’t Remember”  “I Don’t Recall” 6.Balance the Facts  Officer Good and Bad  Get Officer to Assign Percentages - Weight Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

7.Different Types Of DWI Officers Require Different Tactics  Rookie  Middle Reliever  The Closer Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

7.Review Reports 8.Prepare For Deposition 9.FST Expert 10.BAC Expert 11.Toxicologist Law Offices of Dee Wampler & Joseph S. Passanise DWI Law & Science Seminar – July 2013

Joseph S. Passanise Entrapped.com