1 From Ypres to Damascus: Lessons of Chemical Weapons Abolition Paul F. Walker, Ph.D. Director, Environmental Security & Sustainability Green Cross International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On the creation of a nuclear crisis in the ME. Luc Reychler On the creation of a nuclear crisis in the ME KU Leuven
Advertisements

Nuclear WeaponsChemical WeaponsBiological Weapons.
Nuclear Disarmament and Arms Control SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks)
Bulletin of atomic scientists
1 Syria and Chemical Weapons: Building a World Free of WMD Paul F. Walker, Ph.D. Director, Security & Sustainability Green Cross International Washington.
HISTORY OF MODERN SOUTHWEST ASIA
Dangers Big and Small Unconventional Threats to American Security.
INT 3131 The Activities of the United Nations 1.International Peace and Security 2.Economic and Social Development 3.Human Rights 4.Humanitarian Assistance.
Nuclear Treaties Dennis Silverman, U C Irvine Source:
The Power of Modern Weapons Although the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty was signed by 62 countries, nuclear weapons are still a threat and some countries.
Impacts of WW1 Environment and Human Cost. Human Cost  Casualties:  casualties
IRW FALL SEMESTER TOPIC1 MIRAI FUKUSHIMA What happened in Syria?
 Not been associated with any acts of terrorism since though pronoun for its influences of spreading communism North Koreans hijacked.
MONITORING AND COUNTERING THE ILLICIT ARMS TRADE.
Persian Gulf War/ War in Iraq. Who is Saddam Hussein? Name means “one who confronts” 5 th President of Iraq Hated Kuwait for their wealth and oil rights.
Syria -fertile plains, high mountains and deserts -home to diverse ethnic and religious groups, including Kurds, Armenians, Assyrians, Christians, Druze,
The 21 st Century Begins Present Chapter 32.
US CONFLICTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST (1991- Present)
The Nonproliferation Treaty. Atoms for Peace December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower spoke to the UN suggesting that peaceful uses of the atom be promoted.
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development Production, Stockpiling, and use of Chemical Weapons and their Destruction Emmy Bonagofski.
The Nuclear Club Who’s in? Who’s out? And where do we go from here?
Global Health Alert Pearson College February 7, 2006 Presented by Dr. Jay Aiken Hamish Millar Dan Ming International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear.
Nuclear Weapons During WWII. Background The war in Europe ended when Germany surrendered on May 8, 1945, but the war in the Pacific continued. The United.
Steps to Safety: Reducing the Danger of Nuclear Weapons.
Made by Doglyad Helen. We can't call today's world a safe world. Many dangers come from nature, I mean floods, earthquakes and so on. But people are also.
An Iranian Perspective on Humanitarian Consequences of Preemption: Lessons Learned from the Past Shahriar Khateri MD SCWVS Nuclear Weapons: The Final.
Outline for 10/3: Weapons of Mass Destruction Considerations in acquiring WMDs US nuclear force policy ABM Treaty Various WMD regimes with a focus on the.
Middle East and North Africa The Military Implications Sir Tim Garden.
Security threats in the Middle East and Northern Africa: the problem of weapons of mass destruction proliferation Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov President, PIR.
Towards Weapons of Mass Destruction-Free Zone in the Middle East Dr. Vladimir Orlov President, PIR Center April 19, 2013.
In the Shadow of the Bomb Jeffrey L. Richey, Ph.D. GSTR 221-O: Western Traditions II Berea College Spring 2004.
International Security Changes in the United States and the world.
1 Facilitation of Nonproliferation & Demilitarization: Green Cross and Civil Society Paul F. Walker, Ph.D. Green Cross International Washington DC, USA.
In Syria, Doctors Risk Life and Juggle Ethics SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and ANNE BARNARDSHERYL GAY STOLBERGANNE BARNARD Published: October 21, 2013
Section Outline 1 of 12 American Foreign Policy Section 3: Foreign Policy in Action I.Foreign Policy Through World War II II.The Cold War III.Today’s Challenges.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Counterterrorism: Aum Shinrikyo Initial Response Intelligence Weapons Laws.
Nuclear Weapons: The Final Pandemic Preventing Proliferation and Achieving Abolition Medicine and Nuclear War Victor W. Sidel Distinguished University.
Photo © Bas Bogaerts/Handicap International, March 2015.
U.S. Involvement in Iraq. Operation Desert Storm August 1990 Iraq invades Kuwait August 1990 Iraq invades Kuwait Gave Jan. 15, 1991 deadline to withdrew.
1. Which countries were a part of the Triple Alliance? Which were a part of the Triple Entente? 2. What was the spark that started WWI?
WWI: Weapons~ By: Denzel Soto Germany invades Belgium, beginning World War I The USA enters the war on the side of France and.
Lesson 1– The NPT.  Students will differentiate between nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.  Students will explain the history and purpose of.
How did World War II End? Germany Surrenders Japan Surrenders Restrictions Placed on both countries – Military Restrictions – Government Restrictions.
The President's State of the Union Address The United States Capitol Washington, D.C. 29 JANUARY 2002 | 9:15 P.M. EST ….Our second goal is to prevent regimes.
Content Objectives: Explain the outcomes of the Paris Peace Conference and the Treaty of Versailles.
Examining the United Nations’ role in disarmament for global security By : Professor Flowers Strayer University 6 April 2011 Keywords: international relations,
9/11 September 11, 2001 Cypress Woods High School.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
Antwon Dauzart Mr. Clawson Period 6 Though they give us a major advantage in the arms race, should we continue to use nuclear weapons or disarm them?
Independent Country Tensions between American colonists and the British led to the American Revolutionary War (1775 – 1781) Americans won, lead by George.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
Nuclear Proliferation Theo Farrell, CSI Lecture 4, 2011.
OUTCOME OF THE WAR War ended on March 3rd 1991 Hussein still in power.
Summary of Scientific Studies The environmental consequences of a “regional” nuclear war would cause massive global famineThe environmental consequences.
By: Iskandar Khabbaz, and Ranjit Zorawar Singh Virk
Syrian Genocide RAFY AGUILAR, BEN APRAHAMIAN, DAN MCHALE.
Session III: Prospects for Conventional Arms Control Daniel A. Pinkston International Crisis Group 8 November 2011.
Chemical Warfare.
Terrorism and War Maps Osama Bin Laden Timeline America at War
International Security and Peace
Russia and Iran’s Nuclear Program M.A. in Nonproliferation Studies
Terrorism Strikes the United States
Why has the United States become involved in Middle Eastern conflicts?
Director, Office of Special Projects
Political Challenges in the Modern World
Great Britain Toska Ymerhalili.
Europe at War
Missile Madness.
33.3: Threats to World Security
Presentation transcript:

1 From Ypres to Damascus: Lessons of Chemical Weapons Abolition Paul F. Walker, Ph.D. Director, Environmental Security & Sustainability Green Cross International Washington DC, USA Facing the Dangers of 21 st Century Great Power War New York City May 3, 2014

World War I 2

Ypres, Belgium, April/May ,000 killed, 1 million injured by chemical weapons in WWI 190,000 tons of chemical agents produced by Germany, France, Britain, and US April 22, 1915 – 5,700 canisters of chlorine used by Germany 3

1925 Geneva Protocol For the Prohibition of Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or Other Gases, and Bacteriological Methods of Warfare Banned use of chemical and biological weapons, but not RDT&E US President Roosevelt (1943) – “use of such [gas] weapons has been outlawed by the general opinion of civilized mankind.” 4

Chemical Weapons Threats Iran-Iraq War 1980s Iraq attack in Halabja Gulf War 1995 Tokyo attack by Aum Shinrikyo Ongoing terrorist threats to obtain WMD Syria

Chemical Weapons Convention Over 12 years in negotiations Opened for signature in 1993 Entered into force in 1997 US and Russia both ratified in States Parties today 6 countries still outside of CWC 8 countries declared CW stockpiles 6

7 8 Declared CW Stockpiles Russia40,000 metric tons USA28,600 metric tons India 1,000+ metric tons (est) South Korea 1,000+ metric tons (est) Libya 26+ metric tons Albania 16 metric tons Iraq na Syria 1,300+ metric tons (est) TOTAL72,500 +/- metric tons

8 CW Destruction in US 1990 – present 25,650 MT destroyed (90%) 7 stockpiles closed $30 billion+ spent to date 9-10 more years to go 2 facilities under construction

9 CW Destruction in Russia 2002 – present 30,400 MT destroyed (76%) 2 stockpiles neutralized $8+ billion spent to date 3-6+ years to go

10 Other CWD Progress Albania – 16 MT destroyed (100%) 2007 South Korea – 1,000+ MT destroyed (100%) 2008 India – 1,000+ MT destroyed (100%) 2009 Libya – 26 +/- MT destroyed (100%) 2013 Iraq – Declared 2009 Syria – Declared 2013

Alleged CW Use in Syria July 23, 2012 – Syria confirms CW December 23 – Homs attack, 7 killed March 19, 2013 – Aleppo & Damascus March 24 – Adra April 13 – Aleppo April 29 – Saraqeb 11

Syria’s CWC Accession August 21, 2013 – Large scale CW attack in Ghouta region. 1,400+ killed, including 400 children. September 14 – Syria accedes to CWC October 14 – CWC enters into force for Syria as 190 th State Party 12

Syrian Chemical Weapons 1,335 MTs declared of precursor chemicals 23 MTs of mustard agent 92.5% removed to date from Syria Remainder removed in May? Complete destruction in

CW Destruction Process 560 MTs hydrolyzed on MV Cape Ray 154 MTs burned in UK 122 MTs treated in Syria 500 MTs treated in US & Finland 6,000 MTs toxic effluent treated in US, Finland, & Germany (Munster) 14

15 Conclusions Chemical agents are no longer viable military weapons, and have become “taboo,” morally reprehensible, and a dangerous burden. All possessor states must complete safe elimination of CW stockpiles in the near term – Russia, US, Iraq, and Syria. All non-member states must join the CWC – Angola, Egypt, Israel, Myanmar, North Korea, and South Sudan.

Conclusions (2) Protection of the environment, public health, and worker safety in weapons demilitarization processes is an absolute necessity, trumping deadlines and budget limits. Transparency, stakeholder involvement, public dialogue, and consensus-building are essential to program success. Abolition of a whole class of weapons of mass destruction is an historic achievement. 16

Conclusions (3) Arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, and abolition regimes are most successful if they are nondiscriminatory – all States Parties have the same benefits and obligations An intrusive inspection and verification regime is absolutely necessary, with challenge inspections available on short notice Adequate staffing, funding, and skilled leadership for the multilateral regime are essential 17

Congratulations OPCW! 18

19 Green Cross International (Washington DC office) th Street, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005, USA tel