Solving the B  K  Puzzle Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X IN L IU ( 劉新 ) Collaborated with Wei Wang and Yuehong Xie Department of Physics, Jiangsu Normal University 17 th Sep.,
Advertisements

Search for New Physics in B decays Tadashi Yoshikawa Nagoya U. KEKPH07 3/1 – 3/3.
Direct CP Asymmetries in hadronic D decays Cai-Dian Lü ( 吕才典 ) IHEP, Beijing Based on work collaborated with Hsiang-nan Li, Fu-Sheng Yu, arXiv: ,
Phenomenology of Charmless Hadronic B Decays Denis Suprun University of Chicago Thanks to C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner for enjoyable collaborations.
Hadronic B decays involving tensor mesons Hai-Yang Cheng ( 鄭海揚 ) Academia Sinica Properties of tensor mesons QCD factorization Comparison with experiment.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Rumin Wang G. R.. Lu& Y. D. Yang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu & Y. D. Yang Huazhong Normal University Henan Normal University November 15,
Puzzles in B physics Recent development in PQCD, QCDF, SCET Hsiang-nan Li Academia Sinica, Taiwan presented at Whepp9 Bhubaneswar Jan. 07, 2006.
Hep-ph/ , with M. Carena (FNAL), E. Pontón (Columbia) and C. Wagner (ANL) New Ideas in Randall-Sundrum Models José Santiago Theory Group (FNAL)
Rare B decays in Warped Extra Dimension Model with Custodial Symmetry Cheng Li Theory Division, IHEP Collaborate with Cai-Dian Lϋ 1.
FCNC Z 0 Model and Effects in B Physics Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia.
Low-Energy Phenomenologies of FCNC Z 0 Cheng-Wei Chiang ( 蔣正偉 ) National Central University & Academia Sinica Cheng-Wei Chiang ( 蔣正偉 ) National Central.
Andreas Crivellin Overview of Flavor Physics with focus on the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and two-Higgs-doublet models Supported by a Marie.
Branching Ratios of B c Meson Decaying to Vector and Axial-Vector Mesons Rohit Dhir Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. Dated:21-Sept-2012.
New Physics in B decays 3 rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Oct.3-8, 2005 National Central University, Taiwan Tadashi Yoshikawa (Nagoya U.
B. Dutta Texas A&M University Phys.Rev.Lett.100:181801,2008; arXiv: ; To appear Grand Unified Models, Proton Decay and Phase of Collaborator: Yukihiro.
C.D. LuICFP31 Some progress in PQCD approach Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Formalism of Perturbative QCD (PQCD) Direct CP asymmetry Polarization in B 
1 Resolving B-CP puzzles in QCD factorization - An overview of charmless hadronic B decays - Hai-Yang Cheng Academia Sinica Based on 3 papers with Chun-Khiang.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
CP VIOLATION in b → s l + l - Transition. Direct CP-Violation CP non-conservation shows up as a rate difference between two processes that are the CP.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Constraints on  from Charmless Two- Body B Decays: Status and Perspectives James D. Olsen Princeton University Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle.
2-nd Vienna Central European Seminar, Nov 25-27, Rare Meson Decays in Theories Beyond the Standard Model A. Ali (DESY), A. V. Borisov, M. V. Sidorova.
Large electroweak penguin contribution in B decays T. Yoshikawa ( Nagoya ) 基研研究会「CPの破れと物質生成」 2005年 1月1 2日~14日 This talk is based on S. Mishima and T.Y.
ICFP05, NCU1 B → Kπ decays and new physics in the EW-penguin sector Yu, Chaehyun ( Yonsei University) October 6, 2005 In Collaboration with C.S. Kim, S.
New Physics in Bs-Bsbar Mixing Seungwon Baek (Korea U) KISTI Sep 29, 2010 Work in progress with A. Alok, D. London.
Run-Hui Li Yonsei University Mainly based on R.H. Li, C.D. Lu, and W. Wang, PRD83:
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
1 CP Violation and Final State Interactions in Hadronic Charmless B Decays Hai-Yang Cheng Academia Sinica FSIs DCPV in B  K , ,  Polarization anomaly.
Test Z’ Model in Annihilation Type Radiative B Decays Ying Li Yonsei University, Korea Yantai University, China Based on J. Hua, C.S Kim, Y. Li, arxiv:
Large Electroweak Penguin Effects in B and K physics Makiko Nagashima Dept. of Physics, NTU Dept. of Physics, NTU Collider and New physics Mini-Workshop.
1 Search for the Effects of the QCD Color Factor in High-Energy Collisions at RHIC Bedanga Mohanty LBNL  Motivation  Color Factors  Search for Color.
Some Issues in Charmonium Physics Some Issues in Charmonium Physics K-T Chao Peking University.
Lecture II Factorization Approaches QCDF and PQCD.
Dian-Yong Chen Institute of Modern Physics, CAS FHNP’15 Beijing Hadronic Loop Contributions to Heavy Quarkonium Decay
Charmless B  VP Decays using Flavor SU(3) Symmetry hep-ph/ C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner, DS Denis Suprun University of Chicago.
Electroweak B Decays T. Yoshikawa ( Nagoya ) Possibility of Large EW Penguin contribution FPCP2004 Oct. 4 – 9, EXCO, Daegu, Korea This talk is based on.
1 A New Physics Study in B  K  & B  K*  Decays National Tsing Hua University, October 23, 2008 Sechul OH ( 吳世哲 ) ( 오세철 ) C.S. Kim, S.O., Y.W. Yoon,
Flavor Diagram Approach to Hadronic B Decays
Theories of exclusive B meson decays Hsiang-nan Li Academia Sinica (Taiwan) Presented at Beijing Aug , 2005.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
A.I. Sanda Nagoya University Nagoya Japan FPCP2004 Daegu, KOREA.
Theoretical tools for non-leptonic B decays
1 Effects of New Physics on CP violation in B decays July 17, 2003 HEP2003, Aachen.
Learning  ( 0 ) from B decays Chuan-Hung Chen Department of Physics, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan  Introduction & Our question  
BEYOND MFV IN FAMILY SYMMETRY THEORIES OF FERMION MASSES Work done with Zygmunt Lalak and Graham Ross Based on existing ideas but, hopefully, contributing.

Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
End User's View of Lattice QCD Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Lattice QCD Journal Club March 9, NTU.
Final state interactions in heavy mesons decays. A.B.Kaidalov and M.I. Vysotsky ITEP, Moscow.
B s Mixing Parameters and the Search for CP Violation at CDF/D0 H. Eugene Fisk Fermilab 14th Lomonosov Conference Moscow State University August ,
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model Enrico Lunghi References: The BaBar physics book,
Nita Sinha The Institute of Mathematical Sciences Chennai.
Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.
Charmless Two-Body B Decays Involving a Tensor Meson Kwei-Chou Yang Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan The 36th International Conference on High Energy.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 15 Extending the Higgs Sector => 2 Higgs Doublet Models (2HDM). I am using the following for today’s lecture: – “Higgs.
1 Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Fulvia De Fazio.
B Decays Beyond the Standard Model Xiao-Gang He NTU 1.Introduction 2.B to K pi and pi pi 3.B to phi Ks and B to K* gamma decays 4.Same sign diplepton decays.
CKM06 A. Soni Φ 3 (γ) from charmless modes using U-spin Amarjit Soni HET, BNL
C.D. LuCKM1  /  3 from Charmless B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks A.Ali, G.Kramer and Li, Wang... Testing Uncertainty of.
C.D. LuMoriond1 Charmless hadronic B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks Ali, Kramer and Li, Shen,Wang The study of hep-ph/
seminar at Academia Sinica
Polarization in charmless B VV decays
Selected topics in B physics
Resolving B-CP puzzles in QCD factorization
A like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry induced by the anomalous top quark couplings 이 강 영 연세대학교, 서울
with C.S. Kim and Seungwon Baek
Run-Hui Li Yonsei University
Higgs phenomena in economical models
Presentation transcript:

Solving the B  K  Puzzle Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Based upon following works: PRD 69, (2004) [hep-ph/ ]; PLB 580, 186 (2004) [hep-ph/ ]; PRD 70, (2004) [hep-ph/ ]; PLB 598, 218 (2004) [hep-ph/ ]; hep-ph/ Third International Conference on Flavor Physics October 3- 8, 2005

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)2 Outline  The problem  Large color-suppressed amplitude solution  Large electroweak penguin solution --- FCNC Z 0 boson  The  K and K *  modes  Summary and outlook

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)3  The amplitudes of the four K  modes can be decomposed according to the flavor flow topology as follows (ignoring smaller amplitudes): Flavor Amplitudes of K  Modes

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)4  Two ratios of the BR’s of K  modes (charged and neutral):  To the leading order, R c and R n should be the same in the SM; corrections should be ~ O([(C 0 + P 0 EW ) / P 0 ] 2 ) ~ O(  2 ). K  Puzzle – Phase I 2.4  1.9  1.5  2.4  1.9   1.5 

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)5  Now the bigger puzzle is in two CPA’s of the K  modes:  In the SM, T 0 and C 0 have the same weak phase (  ) and a small relative strong phase  A CP (K +   ) and A CP (K ±  0 ) are expected to at least have the same sign. K  Puzzle – Phase II 3.6  ! establishing direct CPV in B system at 5.7  level

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)6  For puzzle phase-I only: underestimate of  0 detection efficiency, thus overestimating the BR’s of those corresponding modes. [Gronau and Rosner, PLB 572, 43 (2003)]  New mechanism in SM: large color-suppressed amplitude C from NLO vertex corrections. [Charng & Li, PRD 71, (2005); He & McKellar, hep-ph/ ]  Beyond SM: large electroweak penguin amplitude P EW from new physics. [Yoshikawa, JKPS 45, S479 (2004); Buras et al, PRL 92, (2004); NPB 697, 133 (2004); Baek, Hamel, London, Datta and Suprun, PRD 71, (2005); Hou, Nagashima and Soddu, hep-ph/ ] [see also talks by Baek, Kim, Nagashima, Oh, Yoshikawa and Yu] Possible Explanations

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)7 Large Color-Suppressed Amplitude

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)8  charmless V P modes,  。  。 ; charmless P P modes,  。   。 ; both consistent with constraints from other observables. Global Fits to VP and PP Modes VP PP [CWC, Gronau, Luo, Rosner, and Suprun, PRD 69, (2004); PRD 70, (2004)]

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)9  charmless V P modes,  。 ; charmless P P modes,  ~  。 ; both still consistent with constraints from other observables. Updated Global Fits PPVP

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)10  The ratio of | C / T | in  2 fits to available data in the   and K  modes ranges from 0.5 to >1.  In a fit to all the available PP data, the ratio is 0.89 (old)  0.77 (new).  They are larger than the naïve expectation (~ 0.25 – 0.3) in SM.  There is a large relative strong phase: arg[C / T ] ~ 90 。.  Mainly driven by the mysteriously large BR(  0  0 ). Large C ( T+C ) exp(i  ) ( T+C ) exp(-i  ) T exp(i  ) P Br ¼ Br

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)11 [Li, Mishima and Sanda, hep-ph/ ] [Li, Mishima and Sanda, hep-ph/ ]  | C | or | C 0 | is enhanced by a factor of 2 to 3 after including the vertex corrections at NLO.  Strong phase changes a lot. NLO Vertex Correction

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)12 PQCD Predictions

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)13 Large Electroweak Penguin Amplitude

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)14 [see also Valencia’s talk] [see also Valencia’s talk]  In most extensions beyond the SM, there are always extra heavy neutral Z 0 gauge bosons.  Properties of the new gauge boson, such as the mass and couplings, are model dependent.  In the gauge eigenbasis, the general Z 0 neutral-current Lagrangian is given by  In string models, it is possible to have family- nonuniversal Z 0 couplings to fermion fields due to different constructions for the three families. [Chaudhuri et al, NPB 456, 89 (1995)] Z 0 Boson

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)15  After flavor mixing, one obtains FCNC Z 0 interactions (non-diagonal) in the fermion mass eigenstates, which may lead to new CP-violating effects:  This may induce flavor-violating Z couplings if there is Z-Z 0 mixing.  In view of the fact that the  K data can be explained with a new EW penguin amplitude, we assume that the Z 0 mainly contributes to these operators and obtain  This is possible through an O(10 -3 ) mixing angle between Z and Z 0.  Here we only include the LH coupling for the Z 0 -b-s coupling. RH coupling can be included as well, at the price of more free parameters. Z 0 -Induced FCNC

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)16  The effective Hamiltonian of the anti-b → anti-s q anti-q transitions mediated by the Z ' is  Even though the operator is suppressed by the heavy Z 0 mass, they can compete with SM loop processes because of their tree-level nature. Low-Energy Effective Hamiltonian s s Z 0Z 0 Z 0Z 0 [Barger, CWC, Langacker and Lee, PLB 580, 186 (2004); 598, 218 (2004)]

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)17  To study the K  puzzle Buras et al introduce the ratio [Buras et al, PRL 92, (2004] [Buras et al, PRL 92, (2004)]  One should note that although c 7,8 play a less important role compared to c 9,10 within the SM, they can receive contributions from the Z ' such that we cannot neglect them.  In the analysis of Buras et al, it was implicitly assumed that new physics contributes dominantly to the (V – A) ­ (V–A) EW penguins.  In the analysis of Buras et al, it was implicitly assumed that new physics contributes dominantly to the (V – A) ­ (V – A) EW penguins.  As one of their conclusions under this assumption, S  K S will be greater than S  K S or even close to unity if one wants to explain the K  anomaly. Some Notations

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)18  Using the same hadronic inputs from   modes as given by Buras et al, we get two sets of solutions: (q,  ) = (1.61, –84 。 ) and (3.04, 83 。 )  (0.94, –85 。 ) and (2.37, 85 。 ), whereas they only take the small q solution. Solutions

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)19  Use the following variables to parameterize our model:  We obtain the solutions  It is possible to find solutions (except for (A L )) that account for both the K  and S  K S data because the contributions from the O 7,8 (from RH couplings at the Z 0 -q-qbar vertices) and O 9,10 operators interfered differently in these two sets of decay modes. Fitting S  K S Too

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)20 K *  and  K Decays

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)21  A distinction between the V P system and the P P system is that there are two types of amplitudes for each topology in the former case, depending upon whether the spectator quark in B ends up in the P or V meson in the final state.  If new physics appears in the P P system, it is likely to show up in the V P system too.  The flavor amplitude decompositions and data are given below: K *  and  K Modes [CWC, hep-ph/ ]

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)22  With r 1 ≡ |T 0 P / P 0 P | and r 2 ≡ |T 0 V / P 0 V |, we have:  With particular choices of r 1 and r 2, one may constrain the weak phase  without knowing the relative strong phase. Another Method for Constraining 

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)23  Hopefully, higher statistics in data can improve the bounds. (BR’s are measured at (5~10)% for K  and (10~20)% for K *  and  K. ) Result r 1 = 0.37:  ≥ 76  or   22 

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)24  Instead of treating r 1 and r 2 independently, one may employ the factorization assumption and get  This number can be compared with the result of 0.7 ± 0.1 obtained from a global fit. [CWC, Gronau, Luo, Rosner and Suprun, PRD 69, (2004)]  There are four parameters ( , r 1,  P, and  V ) for the four observables in the above-mentioned equations. Solving them exactly is possible and gives (up to discrete ambiguities of the phases and central values only)  = 69 。, r 1 = 0.19,  P = 170 。, and  V = 128 。.  (The above results are obtained by cheating because of the assumption |P 0 P | = |P 0 V |  (The above results are obtained by cheating because of the assumption |P 0 P | = |P 0 V |.) Combining the K *+  – and  – K + Modes

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)25  One can further consider the following observables:  As in the case of the K  system, each pair of R c and R n should be equal as long as the color-suppressed and electroweak penguin amplitudes are negligible, as expected in the SM. R c and R n Again

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)26  Note that we have the following two approximate sum rules: which are held only when the terms |C ' V(P) + P ' EW,V(P) | Re[T 0 * P(V) (C ' V(P) + P ' EW,V(P) )] are negligible in comparison with the dominant penguin contributions.  The first sum rule is satisfied by current data.  Using the second sum rule, one can deduce from current data that BR(  + K 0 ) = (8.8 ± 4.1) £ 10 -6, consistent with the current upper bounds.  In particular, BR(  + K 0 ) thus obtained and the measured BR(K * 0  + ) are about the same, which is an indication of the equality |P ' P | = |P ' V |. Sum Rules

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)27  1.5  discrepancy between R c and R n ; 3.6  discrepancy between the CPA’s of K +   and K +  0.  Nonuniversal Z’FCNC and provide new CP-violating sources for low-energy physics.  Nonuniversal Z’ can induce FCNC and provide new CP-violating sources for low-energy physics.  BR’s and CPA’s of K  and  K S modes can be explained in this model.  R c and R n for K*  agree, but with a large uncertainty. For the  K mode, a direct experimental comparison is not yet available because there is no data for BR(  + K 0 ). Employing the relation |P 0 P | = |P 0 V | for the  + K 0 mode, the current data show an approximate agreement between R c and R n.  If the puzzles in the K  system is due to new (short-distance) physics, we also expect deviations in the K*  and  K systems. This does not seem to be the case according to the current data.  A precise determination of the rates of the  + K 0 decay will be very helpful in checking the R c -R n relations and the |P’ P |-|P’ V | equality. Summary and Outlook - I

C.W. ChiangSolving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)28  A true solution to the puzzle is still in the hand of experimentalists. Summary and Outlook - II