OPTIMIZATION OF PROPELLANT TANKS SUPPORTED BY ONE OR TWO OPTIMIZED LAMINATED COMPOSITE SKIRTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8.6 Frictional Forces on Collar Bearings, Pivot Bearings and Disks
Advertisements

Mechanical Systems Analysis Branch/Code 542 Goddard Space Flight Center Analysis of Damping Treatments Applied to the MAP Spacecraft Scott Gordon Code.
Use of GENOPT and BIGBOSOR4 to optimize weld lands in axially compressed stiffened cylindrical shells and evaluation of the optimized designs by STAGS.
Buckling in aircraft structures
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
A.R. Zainal Abidin and B.A. Izzuddin Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
OPTIMIZATION OF AN AXIALLY COMPRESSED RING AND STRINGER STIFFENED CYLINDRICAL SHELL WITH A GENERAL BUCKLING MODAL IMPERFECTION AIAA Paper David.
The Effect of T-Stiffener Web and Flange Tilt on Frame Stress Evaluated using Finite Element Analysis by Dean Pasquerella MASTER OF ENGINEERING Major Subject:
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
Minimum weight design of an axially compressed isotropic prismatic panel consisting of a series of cylindrical segments and verification by STAGS David.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Molly Kane February 14, 2008 Structures Group Analysis of Unpressurized External Structure.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Mass Savings and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Preparation for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) 100 gram Case Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold]
BEARING OR CRUSHING Bearing Stresses (Compression Perpendicular to the Grain) Allowable stresses for compression perpendicular to the grain are available.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
Can Bottom Snap-through
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
ANALYSIS OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN ROOTS OF BOLT THREADS Gennady Aryassov, Andres Petritshenko Tallinn University of Technology Department of Mechatronics.
AE2302 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II
Beam Design for Geometric Nonlinearities
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
GENOPT A Program that Writes User-Friendly Optimization Code David Bushnell International Journal of Solids & Structures, Vol. 26, No. 9/10, pp ,
Geometrically Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of a Composite Reflector K.J. Lee, G.V. Clarke, S.W. Lee, and K. Segal FEMCI WORKSHOP May 17, 2001.
MINIMUM WEIGHT DESIGN OF IMPERFECT ISOGRID-STIFFENED ELLIPSOIDAL SHELLS UNDER UNIFORM EXTERNAL PRESSURE David Bushnell, Fellow, AIAA, Retired.
Reduced-order models for nonlinear vibrations, based on natural modes: the case of the circular cylindrical shell by Marco Amabili Philosophical Transactions.
Static Pushover Analysis
Ken YoussefiMechanical Engineering Dept. 1 Design Optimization Optimization is a component of design process The design of systems can be formulated as.
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS CONVERSION FACTORS FOR NATURAL VIBRATIONS OF BEAMS Austin Cosby and Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford.
LINEAR BUCKLING ANALYSIS
Ken YoussefiMechanical Engineering Dept. 1 Design Optimization Optimization is a component of design process The design of systems can be formulated as.
Effect of Structure Flexibility on Attitude Dynamics of Modernizated Microsatellite.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
STRENGTHS Chapter Intro Dealing with relationship between the external loads applied to an elastic body and the intensity of the internal forces.
Transformations of Stress and Strain
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
OPTIMIZATION OF PROPELLANT TANKS SUPPORTED BY OPTIMIZED LAMINATED COMPOSITE TUBULAR STRUTS.
Hertz Contact Stress Theory
A Study of the Effect of Imperfections on Buckling Capability in Thin Cylindrical Shells Under Axial Loading Lauren Kougias.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding axial.
1 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Steven Izzo March 27, 2008 Structures Tank Buckling & Final Stress Considerations.
Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department A New Scheme for The Optimum Design of Stiffened Composite Panels with Geometric Imperfections By M. A. Elseifi.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001 S7-1 MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001MAR120, Section 7, December 2001 SECTION 7 CHOICE OF ELEMENTS: TOPOLOGY AND RESTARTING.
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
3 Torsion.
Linear Buckling Analysis Chapter Seven. Training Manual Linear Buckling Analysis March 29, 2005 Inventory # Chapter Overview In this chapter,
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
7-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. February 23, 2009 Inventory # Workbench - Mechanical Introduction 12.0 Chapter.
COMBINED LOADING.  Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels  Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding.
General Analysis Procedure Chapter 4. Training Manual October 30, 2001 Inventory # Chapter 4 - General Analysis Procedure Overview The objective.
Minimum weight design by GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 of an externally pressurized circumferentially corrugated cylindrical shell and verification by STAGS David Bushnell,
Workshop 3 Various Workshops for SOLSH190 Solid-Shell Element
Flexural stiffness design by integer linear programming.
4. Local strength calculation
1. Two rods, one of nylon and one of steel, are rigidly connected as shown in Fig. P.1.2. Determine the stresses and axial deformations when an axial load.
HASMUKH GOSWAMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SEM. 5 Mechanical Engineering
Finite element method for structural dynamic and stability analyses
Buckling in aircraft structures
Transformations of Stress and Strain
Transformations of Stress and Strain
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Università di Roma La Sapienza, Rome Italy
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
AIAA Paper AIAA 38th SDM Meeting, 1997
AIAA Paper AIAA 38th SDM Meeting, 1997
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
3 Torsion.
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, All Rights Reserved
Presentation transcript:

OPTIMIZATION OF PROPELLANT TANKS SUPPORTED BY ONE OR TWO OPTIMIZED LAMINATED COMPOSITE SKIRTS

David Bushnell, AIAA Fellow, 775 Northampton Drive, Palo Alto, California Michael S. Jacoby, AIAA Member, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space, Palo Alto, California Charles C. Rankin, AIAA Associate Fellow, Rhombus Consultants Group, Inc., 1121 San Antonio Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303

Summary Formulation of optimization problem (Slides 5 and 6 and 7) Geometry (Slides 4 and ) “oneskirt” case (Slides 4 and ) “twoskirt” case (Slides ) Conclusions (Slide 44)

Discretized BIGBOSOR4 “oneskirt” model

The propellant tank2/skirt system is optimized subject to: the minimum modal vibration frequency must be greater than a given value five stress components in each ply of the laminated composite wall(s) of the skirt(s) shall not exceed five specified allowables The skirt(s) shall not buckle as a thin conical shell(s) the maximum effective (vonMises) stress in the tank wall shall not exceed a specified value the tank wall shall not buckle

The objective is: Objective= W x (normalized empty tank mass) + (1-W) x (normalized skirt(s) conductance), in which W is a user-selected weight between 0.0 and 1.0

Optimization in the presence of two load cases: Load Case 1: 10g axial acceleration plus 25 psi internal ullage pressure plus 200-degree cool-down of the propellant tank Load Case 2: 10g lateral acceleration plus 25 psi internal ullage pressure plus 200- degree cool-down of the propellant tank

Sketch of propellant tank strut support ring and tapered doubler

Sketch of the configuration of the skirt support

Names of decision variables pertaining to the ends of the skirt

Diagram of the aft skirt support

Skirt segment 4 with tapered “prongs” that enclose the composite laminate

Objective versus design iterations during 1st SUPEROPT

Objective versus design iterations during 2nd SUPEROPT

Two axisymmetric vibration modes from BIGBOSOR4 for the optimized “oneskirt” case

Two lateral/pitching vibration modes from BIGBOSOR4 for the optimized “oneskirt” case

Two shell deformation vibration modes from BIGBOSOR4 for the optimized “oneskirt” case

Deformed pre-buckled state of the shell meridian at theta=0, (A) axial acceleration, (B) lateral acceleration

Buckling modes and load factors under axial acceleration

Buckling modes and load factors under lateral acceleration

PANDA-type model of critical buckling at theta = 90 degrees corresponding to Load Case 2 (lateral acceleration)

PANDA-type model of buckling

BIGBOSOR4 shell segment numbering in the “twoskirt” case

"twoskirt" case, Evolution of the objective during the first execution of the GENOPT processor called "SUPEROPT”

“twoskirt” case: GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 axisymmetric vibration modes: (A) Tank rolling and (B) tank axial motion

“twoskirt” case: GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 lateral-pitching vibration modes: (C) Primarily lateral tank motion and (D) primarily tilting tank motion

GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 vibration modes in which shell deformation predominates

Deformed pre-buckled state of the shell meridian and skirts at theta=0, (A) axial acceleration, (B) lateral acceleration

From Table 6: Buckling prediction from PANDA model 1, Load Case 2: Lateral acceleration, theta = 90 degrees

Prebuckling deformation under Load Case 2 of the forward part of the propellant tank with (A) tapered and (B) constant-thickness external doubler. Model (B) simulates the STAGS model.

Buckling modes and load factors under axial acceleration

STAGS finite element model of the "twoskirt" case

“twoskirt” case: STAGS vibration modes analogous to the GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 modes displayed 3 and 4 slides ago

Prebuckling stress in the skin of the propellant tank predicted by STAGS for Load Case 1: axial acceleration + internal pressure + thermal loading

Prebuckling stress at the tips of the stringers in the internal orthogrid of the propellant tank predicted by STAGS for Load Case 1: axial acceleration + internal pressure + thermal loading

Prebuckling stress in the skin of the propellant tank predicted by STAGS for Load Case 2: lateral acceleration + internal pressure + thermal loading

Prebuckling stress at the tips of the stringers in the internal orthogrid of the propellant tank predicted by STAGS for Load Case 2: lateral acceleration + internal pressure + thermal loading

Spurious buckling mode from the STAGS model of the aft conical support analyzed by itself

Nonlinear equilibrium states of the aft skirt predicted by STAGS: axial compression

Maximum in-plane shear resultant in the aft skirt from the STAGS nonlinear equilibrium analysis: axial compression

Nonlinear bifurcation buckling mode from the STAGS model of the aft conical support under uniform axial compression

Buckling mode and load factors under axial acceleration corresponding to the prebuckling state at theta = 0

Buckling of the tank/skirt system under lateral acceleration as predicted by STAGS

Conclusions The GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 "tank2" model seems to work. Comparisons of predictions from STAGS and GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 demonstrate that this application of GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 can be used for PRELIMINARY design. The GENOPT software in the directory../genopt/sources was significantly modified to permit more than 50 decision variable candidates. The maximum number of decision variable candidates has been raised from 50 to 98. BIGBOSOR4 does not handle the effect of buckling under in-plane shear loading, which is present especially at the circumferential coordinate, theta = 90 degrees in the supporting skirt in Load Case 2 (10g lateral acceleration). In order to compensate for this an approximate PANDA-type model [4] has been introduced into the “tank2” software in order to predict with reasonable accuracy buckling of the laminated composite skirt(s) under both Load Case 1 and Load Case 2. STAGS models with tapered doubler thicknesses should be constructed in order to obtain accurate predictions of maximum compressive stress at the tips of the stringers in the internal orthogrid. The reader should read [1] in order to obtain much background information required for a fuller understanding of how GENOPT/BIGBOSOR4 works.