ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Design, Prototyping, and Production PST Progress Update September 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCT End-Cap FDR1/11/01 C.J.Nelson 1 Inner Detector SCT End-Cap FDR Summary of Prototyping and FE Analysis C.J.Nelson Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, CLRC.
Advertisements

Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
HFT PXL Mechanical WBS 1.2 March 2010 Howard Wieman LBNL 1.
Fixturing operations for PXL 1 models: MSC.SLDASM MSC_fixtured.SLDASM rail_test_system.SLDASM 2/24/2010.
Beams and Frames.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2003 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube PRR: Assembly, Production, Schedule February 2003.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
Designing for Stiffness
FEA as an aid to Design Andrei Lozzi 2014
Team Flying Sheep Engineering Analysis Mark Berkobin John Nevin John Nott Christian Yaeger Michelle Rivero.
Progress on the MICE 201 MHz Cavity Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RF Working Group Fermilab August 22, 2007  automatic.
Structural Design. Introduction It is necessary to evaluate the structural reliability of a proposed design to ensure that the product will perform adequately.
ATLAS Pixel Detector October 2001 Pixel Week N. Hartman LBNL 1 PST Design Update PST CDR october 2001.
Outer Stave Prototype Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman, J. Silber LBNL W. Miller, W. Shih Allcomp, Inc ATLAS.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Recent Study Topics Full length model with wafers, hybrids and cable as dead weight.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 A. Das LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube Rails: Design and Prototyping September, Review.
Global Supports Update W.O. Miller October 2001 US ATLAS Pixel Detector Global Supports Status W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, G. Hayman, R. Baer HYTEC.
Carbon-Epoxy Composite Base Plates for the PHOBOS Spectrometer Arms J.Michalowski, M.Stodulski The H.Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube Interfaces LBNL Internal PST Review E. Anderssen, LBNL.
FEBRUARY 2003 Pixel Support Tube A. Smith LBNL 1 ATLAS Pixel Support Tube PRR: Parts Pixel Support Tube Production Readiness Review Parts Overview Alexis.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
IMPACT Phase II – 9/13/00 Activity Report Slide 1/20 University of Louisville IMPACT Architecture Team Glen Prater, Jr., Associate Professor Ellen G. Brehob,
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
PXL Mechanical Hinge rework in aluminum and carriage redesign Kinematic rework and analysis Insertion test - detailing and fabrication instructions Spatial.
ALCPG11-Peterson1 Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
ATLAS Pixel Detector JULY 2001 Pixel Support Tube N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube Concept and Design N. Hartman, E. Anderssen, G. Gilchriese, S. Dardin.
1 Advanced Endplate - mechanics: Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
ATLAS LBNL Pixel Support Study 1 W.O. Miller HYTEC ATLAS Pixel Detector Support Structure Status and Future Developments February 19, 1999 W. Miller HYTEC.
ATLAS Pixel Detector June 2002 PST FDR N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Design and Prototyping PST Final Design Review June 2002.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Project N. Hartman LBNL 1 Alexis Smith Intern Progress Report Neal Hartman, March 25, 2003.
M. Gilchriese - November 12, 1998 Status Report on Outer Support Frame W. Miller Hytec, Inc E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese LBNL.
Sag of ZTF components Callahan 9/4/2014. Corrector Trim Plate analysis.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
Engineering Division 1 Coupled Layer Prototype Update E Anderssen, M Cepeda, M Gilchriese, N Hartman, T Johnson, J Silber, LBNL W Miller Allcomp Inc ATLAS.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
L0 and L1 Structure Deflections During Installation of Silicon Sensors C H Daly 8/24/2003.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials Chapter 1 Basic Concepts.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2002 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report: LBNL Effort February, 2002 N. Hartman,
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
ECAL End Cap Dee Assembly, Transport, InstallationCERN January 2006AR / RJSG – 1 Alexandre Riabov (IHEP, Protvino) Justin Greenhalgh (RAL) Finite Element.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Two Pixel Configurations Under Study First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure –Axial array.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Services Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman, A Smith, LBNL S. Coelli,
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube and Related November 9, 2001 Pixel Day E. Anderssen, LBNL.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2003 SC Pixel Meeting N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube WBS Santa Cruz Cost Workshop July 9, 2003.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Cost and Production Schedule September 2002.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2003 Insertion Device Costs A. Smith, LBNL 1 Insertion Device Costs Overview US Pixel Meeting July 9, 2003.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube Interfaces Pixel Support Tube PRR CERN, Geneve E. Anderssen, LBNL.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
1 2S Module meeting, 24 September 2012 S tudies on module support inserts Refers to work by Riikka Häsä, Helsinki Institute of Physics, summer student.
Composite Joining Techniques: Bolted Joints LBNL Composites Workshop February 29-March 3, 2016.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support SCT TRT Side CSide A Services and Beampipe Support Frame Services and Beampipe Support Frame Pixel Detector Composite support.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support tube Supports October 17, 2001 E Anderssen, LBNL.
HCAL preliminary analysis and results
Are there better ways to build a stave?
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD
FEA Analysis of the LHCB Velo RF foil
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
1/10 prototype support tube
Vertical-flexure CCD module: Thermal and Dynamic FEA
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Design, Prototyping, and Production PST Progress Update September 2002

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 2 September 17 th Review Schedule 9:00PST Design Update 9:30 Shell Prototyping 9:45 Rail Prototyping 10:00 Mounts and Interfaces 10:30 Break 10:50Heater Testing 11:05 Heater Design and Fabrication 11:25Production Planning, Costs, Schedules 12:15Questions/Comments

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 3 Pixel Support Tube (PST) Overview Design Updates –Flange design Reduced from 26 pieces to 2 Length Shortened –Rail design Impact on stiffness of forward shell calculated Reduced from 2 pieces per rail to 1 Shell design augmented Local stiffness analyzed Prototyping –Material test results received –Shell and rail prototypes fabricated (covered in subsequent presentations) Shell produced with heaters, and in hybrid form Short rails produced and measured Production covered later

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 4 PST Overview

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 5 Support Condition of Pixel Support Tube in Inner Detector SCT TRT Fixed XYZ Fixed YZ (N/A) Fixed XY Fixed Y ID Vee Rail (float Z/dogged Z) (constrained XY) ID Flat Rail (float XZ) (constrained Y) +Z +X Side CSide A +Y Vertical SCT Vee Rail (float Z/dogged Z) (constrained XY) SCT Flat Rail (float XZ) (constrained Y) View from top—all Tube Supports are Horizontal and Co-planar Properties TBD Constraint TBD Flexure Mounts

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 6 PST Key Structures Forward A Forward C Barrel PST Flanges SCT Flexures and mount pads Mount Pad Flexure Forward End flange and Flexure, installation rail

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 7 Rail Overview DETAIL Flat Rail DETAIL V Rail Vee and Flat rails were chosen to provide pseudo-kinematic support for the detector during delivery to the support points. Rails are used only for delivery, not support.

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 8 Flange Design

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 9 Flange Face (machined layup) Flange base (Layup) Stiffeners (layups) Flange bolts Initial Flange Concept Base Piece –½ mm thick –Laid up as hoop, sized to fit shell Face Piece –Laid up as plate –Machined to size Reinforcements –Laid up individually –½ mm thick –24 parts Assembly –26 pieces bonded simultaneously as one assembly –Flange assembly bonded to PST Shell

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 10 Revised Flange Concept Stiffeners eliminated –Not required for stiffness –Reduces part count by 90% Flange shortened –From 40 mm long to 25 mm –Allows thicker “skirt” in order to machine ID, while approximately conserving material amount from old design –Still extremely conservative bond stresses Two piece design –Single piece skirt and flange face, provides good shear coupling to shell –ID of skirt machined, but face is not –Backing piece provides extra thickness for required stiffness Flange Cross Section Single piece skirt and face (“L” shape) Backing Ring

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 11 Revised Flange Analysis ANSYS analysis –Stiffening ribs removed –Flange constrained over bolt stress areas only (~2.5*Bolt Dia.) –Bolts omitted on diameter (planned pin locations) –2 mm forward end offset used (worst case) Results –Sub-micron displacement in flange –Max bolt load ~100 N (at topmost bolt) Glue Stress Calculations –Simple shear stress calculated (Shear = Axial Force/Area) –Max bolt load used and area assumed to be ½ of 1 stiffening unit (1/48 th of flange circumference) –Max stress assumed of 21 Mpa (Hysol Adhesive) –Factor of Safety = 140 for 25 mm long flange Glue Shear Stress Calculation Area Max Bolt Force

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 12 Rail Design

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 13 Rail Design Summary So far, the PST has been modeled without considering the effect of rails in the bending stiffness of the shell –Provided for faster/easier modeling –Will result in higher displacements in the SCT when rails are added Rails have conflicting design demands –Rail deflection must be minimal, to assure installation of detector –Rail stiffness must also be minimal, to reduce impact on SCT Initial analysis showed problems –Rail deflections were perhaps acceptable (~ microns) –However, impact on stiffness unacceptable (increase of 85%) Design shifted to one piece rail –Goal to increase local section modulus of rail, but with lowest cross sectional area possible “Hollow” shape more efficient However takes up more space in PST –Fiber changed to high strength carbon (rather than high modulus) in order to lower contribution to overall shell stiffness

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 14 Evolution of Rail Design Initial rail shape designed to use as little space as possible inside PST, and to allow placement of sliders anywhere along frame One piece design chosen to fill maximum volume (and increase bending stiffness of rail itself). This was made possible by decision to place sliders/rollers at end of frame, freeing up space for rail inside. V-rail changed to “inverted” v shape. Increases inertia of section, and can be used either as v or inverted v.

ATLAS Pixel Detector Rail FEA Model Model simulates prototype of rails and 300 mm long shell (initial two-piece rail shape). Pixel Mass (1/4 of 35 kg) applied to PEEK slider. Slider impacts rail through contact elements. Shell is constrained along edges (where flanges or stiffeners would be). Shell modeled as both quasi-isotropic glass laminate and composite hybrid laminate of carbon and glass. 300 mm rail slider shell constrained on edges Cross section of v-rail and slider Prototype PEEK slider center bearing Section (R = 10 mm, L = 20) tapers on ends for rail misalignment slider shell

ATLAS Pixel Detector Rail Analyses Quasi-isotropic Glass Shell E = 19 GPa Slider made from PEEK E = 3.5 GPa Rail Quasi-isotropic CN60 E = 126 GPa Load Applied = 8.75 kg Dmax = 185 microns Composite Carbon/Glass Shell (Carbon in Hoop Direction) E axial = 21 GPa; E hoop = 147 GPa Slider made from PEEK E = 3.5 GPa Rail Quasi-isotropic CN60 E = 126 GPa Load Applied = 8.75 kg Dmax = 154 microns Hybrid Shell reduces rail displacement by 20%

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 17 Expected Rail Performance Rails displace more in beam mode than shell mode (displacements are primarily not in the cross sectional plane) –Deflection scales by stiffness (EI) of rail itself (to first order) –However, adding additional hoop plies of YSH80 (in the forward) does help by about 20% Different rail designs were compared for optimization –FEA results used as a starting point and comparison –Different designs compared by calculating EI, and then scaling to find expected stiffness and deflection implications Deflection in final rail shape is anticipated to be on the order of 125 microns (5 mil).

ATLAS Pixel Detector Anticipated Loads/Displacements Induced in SCT With Stiffer Forward PST Shells, Due to Installation Rails Z constrained flexure is located on side C, negative X (in this coordinate system). Highest Displacements and Forces Still Arise from Gravity and CTE Loading, Which are not affected by an increase in the Forward Shell Stiffness.

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 19 Prototyping

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 20 Prototyping Plan Material Testing –First test completed –Results are fairly consistent, but disagree with calculations Shells – presented seperately –Completed –Successfully demonstrate ability to reliably make tubes of given size Rails – presented seperately –Partially Complete – foot long rails have been made –Successful so far, but issues remain –Rail Sliders and/or rollers need to be fabricated and tested Flanges –To be outsourced, not yet complete Hoop Stiffeners –May not be prototyped (fabricate during production phase only) Mount Pads/Flexures – presented seperately –To be fabricated in-house, not yet complete PST Assembly (bonding) –Not yet complete –To be fabricated in-house and/or outsourced –Design yet to be completed

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 21 Material Test Results Calculations Differ substantially from results attained –Modulus of YSH80 samples is almost 40% low in cases (this modulus would be expected with CN60 type fiber) –Modulus of CN60 sample is approximately 20% low –Fiber volume from one sample is low (other samples not tested) However, measurements are fairly consistent –YSH80 samples are both very low –E1 and E2 directions are similar (quasi-iso layups) –Spread in test data (from multiple coupons) is not extreme –Void content in one sample is fairly low (other samples not tested)

ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 22 Major Outstanding Items Design –Rail Riders Conservative choice is a rolling mechanism for detector –Space available at end of frame –Detector is more than half of sliding mass (on four support points) Sliders will be retained for service structure –Space for rollers is probably not available –Each support sustains lower load –Rails Is 35% increase in bending stiffness of forward tube acceptable? Rigorous FEA model of new rail design must be completed, along with tests to validate stiffness –Flange/Mount Pads Design must be modified for new flange (without ribs) Prototyping –Material Properties Discrepancies must be reconciled (Test accuracy or fabrication?) –Hoop Stiffeners Layup separately or incorporate in shell layup (this would require prototyping) –Bond Tooling All design must be completed in order to finish prototype phase