Review of Settling AKA sedimentation – suspended solids removed from liquid phase by gravity Common applications in Wastewater Treatment – grit chamber,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Motion of particles trough fluids part 2
Advertisements

CE 370 Sedimentation.
CLARIFIERS Prepared By Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
CE 370 Filtration.
SEDIMENTATION.
Stoke’s Law and Settling Particles
1 CE 548 Physical Unit Operations. 2 3 Introduction   Physical unit operations : operations used for the treatment of wastewater in which change is.
Surface Water Treatment Plant
DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Motion of particles trough fluids part 2
SETTLING TANKS.
Sedimentation.
CHEE 370 Waste Treatment Processes
7/3/2015water treatment1 Solid-Liquid Separation in Water Treatment Settling and Flotation J(Hans) van Leeuwen, DEE.
Flotation Flotation involves separation of solids from the water phase by attaching the solids to fine air bubbles to decrease the density of the particles.
Surface Water Treatment Plant. Fig 4-8: Flow Diagram of conventional surface water treatment plant (“filtration plant”)
Water Treatment CE 326 Principles of Environmental Engineering Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Iowa State University March.
Why do we need to treat wastewater ?
CE 370 Grit Removal.
CTC 450 Review Water Quality Water Distribution Systems.
Environmental Engineering Lecture 6. Sources of Drinking Water  Rivers: upland and lowland  Lakes and reservoirs  Groundwater aquifers  Sea water.
Secondary Treatment : Process Sequence air or O 2 secondary (2 o ) effluent waste activated sludge (WAS) recycle secondary (2 o ) sedimentation activated.
DAF System Air Supply Pressurizing Pump Retention Tank
CLARIFICATION REACTOR THICKENING
DECENTRALISED WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND REUSE Components and Designing
E NVIRONMENTAL E NGINEERING 441 Lecture 5: Water Treatment (3) Sedimentation & filtration Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering Department of.
Water Treatment CE 326 Principles of Environmental Engineering
Figure: Figure: When terminal velocity is reached, vs is constant (vterm), and Fnet = 0: If Re is less than ~100, CD  24/Re, and:
Sedimentation.
5.6 SEDIMENTATION Objective
Secondary Clarifier 1.
Water Treatment Plants. Removes pathogens and toxic elements to prepare water for use in homes and businesses Makes water potable (drinkable)
CUMHURİYET WTP Process Calculations Dr. A. Saatci.
University of Wyoming Environmental Engineering Senior Design Team Leah Birgen Brent Brouillard.
CE 356 Fundamental of Environmental Engineering
SETTLING AND SEDIMENTATION.
Engineered systems for wastewater treatment and disposal.
CTC 450 Review WW Collection Systems Types of pipes Installation.
Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-2 Lecture -13.
Mechanical Operation ( ) Prepared By, Hardev Jadav ( ) Sanjay k Prajapati ( ) Ravina Solanki ( )
Chemical Engineering Department Government Engineering College Bhuj Prepared by: Kumar Satyam Guided By: Prof. Sejal J. Solanki Chemical.
Conventional Sewage Treatment Plants:
TUTORIAL 3.
Sedimentation.
Lecture (8): liquid wastes treatment (primary, vital, advanced).
CTC 450 Review Preliminary & Primary Treatment Measure flow Screen
எனது நகரத்திற்கு வேண்டிய நீர்
Settling and Flotation
CTC 450 Review Water Quality Water Distribution Systems.
Sedimentation.
Sedimentation Text book, Chapter 3 Reading Materials:
III. Water Treatment Topic III. 4
Sedimentation Tank Configurations
ENG421 (6abc) – Screens and Grit Removal
ENG421 (8ab) – Sedimentation
Maximum daily demand = 1.8 x average daily demand
Sedimentation Text book, Chapter 3 Reading Materials:
Many impurities in water are in the form of suspended particles which have a density greater than that of water. They remain in suspension due to the turbulent.
SETTLING COLUMN ANALYSIS FOR FLOCCULATING PARTICLES (Type II settling)
6.1 Configuration of sedimentation tank
Demonstration of the sedimentation tank removal efficiency evaluation (coursework 1)
Maximum daily demand = 1.8 x average daily demand
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
Clarifier Calculations Prepared By Debremarkos Department of HWRE Water treatment unit.
SEDIMENTATION Aim - rapid removal of solid material by gravitational settling Drawbacks – colloidal material is slow settling Mustafa Nasser 2012.
SETTLING AND SEDIMENTATION.
Wastewater Treatment: Characteristics and Systems
Physical/Chemical Waste Treatment
6.3 Types of Settling With such heterogeneous wastewaters/water and variable flows during the settling process in a sedimentation tank it is possible that.
Presentation transcript:

Review of Settling AKA sedimentation – suspended solids removed from liquid phase by gravity Common applications in Wastewater Treatment – grit chamber, primary settling basin, secondary settling basin Common applications in Water Treatment – settling after coagulation/flocculation, settling after lime-softening precipitation, settling after iron and manganese removal

4 Settling Categories Type I - discrete settling in dilute suspensions, grit chamber good example Type II – flocculent materials in dilute suspensions, primary settling basin good example Type III (Zone or hindered settling) – high concentrations (>1000 mg/L), particles interfere with each other’s settling, secondary settling basin Type IV (Compression settling) – weight of particles cause more settling, sludge zone in 1 o or 2 o clarifiers

What is overflow rate, v o,v L ? This is our design parameter. Overflow rate, v o, is also the velocity of the liquid, v L. Units (gal/ft 2 d or m 3 /m 2 d), Q/A, but this is a velocity (m/d). All particles with v s > v o will settle (be removed). Particles in water are a range of sizes with a range of v s. Our objective is to design a system to settle as many particles as we can in a reasonable time.

Upflow Clarifiers For v s > v o all particles will settle. For v s < v o no particles will be removed (settle). For v s = v o all particles suspended (fluidized bed). Note various zones of a clarifier.

Note the influent comes into the center ring, flows under a skirt and then upwards to outer weirs. How is this different from Essex Junction?

Horizontal Settling Basins

Horizontal Settling Basin H is depth of settling zone For v s > v L all particles will settle For v s < v L particles will be removed at ratio (v s /v L ) The reason is that some particles enter at a depth below the water level so settle in a height < H

Note the configuration of the weirs. This provides more weir length to minimize scouring.

Nonideal Basins This is like the one as Essex Junction. Wiers in the center. Why? Somewhat like an upflow but not exactly. Essex Junction had short-circuiting problems in their clarifiers. Why?

Type I – Discrete Settling Force balance applied to particle (theoretical analysis). Assume spherical particles. Terminal settling velocity (v s ) is constant. Stoke’s Law for laminar flow: v s = g(ρ p – ρ w )d p 2 /18μ Check N R, if not laminar use: N R =d p v/μ

Grit Chambers – Type I Typical configurations are horizontal, aerated, or vortex type. Design based on removal of grit particles (ρ p = 2.65 g/cm 3 ) Typical dimensions range from 2-5 m in depth, m in length, m in width. Width:depth ratios, 2:1 typical Detention times, 3 min typical. Use peak hourly flow for design. See Metcalf and Eddy for more design information

Type II – Dilute suspension of flocculating particles Particle size changes due to flocculation (sticking together) of particles, therefore v s changes. Need to use empirical data or perform column experiment. Typical column experiment and data on right. Primary Settling Basin good example. Particles are sticky.

Type II - Use Tables for typical WW and Water Treatment Floc particles instead of column tests Typical detention times, 2 hours. Overflow rate, v o, for average flow use range (32-48 m 3 /m 2 d) for peak flow use ( m 3 /m 2 d). Weir loading ( m 3 /md). Typical depths, 3-5 m Typical diameter, 12-45m Typical length, m

Type III – Hindered Settling Concentrated suspension settles as a zone Secondary clarifiers To determine the rate of settling of the zone, measure the height of the interface at different times in a column [dh/dt = settling velocity of the blanket]

Type III Design Considerations Overflow rates based on a) area needed for clarification, b) area for sludge thickening, c) rate of sludge withdrawal. Often use tables of empirical data for design of known systems. Typical values for conventional activate sludge (16-33 m 3 /m 2 d). Alum or iron floc ( m 3 /m 2 d). Lime-softening floc (22-82 m 3 /m 2 d).

Type IV – Compression Settling Bottom of clarifier, sludge zone is good example. Stirring serves to break up floc, and allows water to escape. Use sludge rakes. Weight of sludge allows for compaction. Sloped bottom of clarifiers allows for collection of sludge.

Weir Loading Rates Common design parameter but not as critical as overflow rate. Avoid high velocities of water at outlet which can cause carry over of solids at outlet Use tables for typical loading rates Small WWTP (<0.04 m 3 /s) weir loading < 120 m 3 /md Light alum floc weir OFR m 3 /md Heavy floc (lime softening) m 3 /md