Wendigo 2014 – An Arctic and Antarctic Snowmobile Presented by Cyrille Goldstein Dante Filice March 6, 2014 McGill Electric Snowmobile Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Www. otis.com. An Innovation for the New Millennium.
Advertisements

2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Michigan Tech’s E-Rush Presented by: Terry Gregoricka Adrienne Piron.
Commander Electric. 2 Commander Electric platform objectives The E SSV is a side by side vehicle, design and built on the Commander platform, having.
NEXT GENERATION LITHIUM ENERGY STORAGE.. COMPANY OVERVIEW Research & Development/Sales/Distribution/Manufacturing Product Development Auxiliary power.
SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE (CSC) 2015 Team IUPUI
UAF Bristol Bay Campus Design of a meaningful Snuukuuq Frank Nicholson, Ryan Giordano, Tiarna Bartman, University Alaska Fairbanks - Bristol Bay Campus.
Jonathan Chiew AA253 – Spring  Develop a top-level public transportation system capable of moving 1.5 million passengers per year between two cities.
Hybrid-Electric HMMWV: Platform for Advanced Lead Acid Battery Testing Future Work Dr. Herb Hess Adapt the thermal management system to the advanced lead.
Motor Coupling Design Review The 2004 Idaho Future Truck needs a system to couple the AC induction motor to the power train. + = Motor Future Truck Happy.
Design of Electric Snowmobile
To develop a small scale solar powered system that will power a DC load, which incorporates power management techniques, DC-DC conversion and a user interface.
There are four symbols that every competent EE must be able to manipulate with Consummate Skill: e j  $ Energy = $ Power = “Cash Flow” =
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Electric Snowmobile Team 2015.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Design Proposal.  Project Goals ◦ Competition ◦ Overall System Design  Accumulator  Motor & Motor Controller  Battery Monitoring System (BMS)  System.
Technical Data Electric engine, reduction belt and complete electronics only 5kg Paramotor weight without batteries: 12,5kg One-piece easy assemble (kit.
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
2015 World Forum on Energy Regulation May 25, 2015
Wobel Paper Company Delivery Car Possibilities. The Environmentally Efficient Choice.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
Chevy Volt. Volt Overview Extended-Range Electric Vehicle Available for mass purchase in 2010 as a 2011 model year Designed to meet the needs of 75% of.
Nissan’s Zero Emissions Future Nancy Mansfield EV Regional Manager, Nissan North America, Inc. December 8, 2010.
Solar Powered Charging Station: Final Presentation Design Team: Ben Hemp Jahmai Turner Rob Wolf, PE Sponsors: Conn Center for Renewable Energy Dr. James.
Page 1 May 2010 © Siemens AG 2010 Industry / Drive Technologies Innovative Hybrid Drive Systems for Commercial Vehicles Industry – Drive Technologies Innovative.
Presented by: Ashley Kelly Nathan Hansen Utah State University Electric Snowmobile Team.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
MUEV Phase III By: Kevin Jaris & Nathan Golick. Introduction Petroleum is a finite resource. Demand for clean energy is driving the increase in the production.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
Delivering Innovative Solutions Sun Power Technologies is committed to developing innovative, integrated power electronics solutions for the markets that.
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge  Design Goals  Specifications  Snowmobile Modifications  Drive System  Battery choice  Maintenance  Conclusion.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
V2G: Vehicle to Grid Power Seth Insley CH 407H. Concept Cars use large amounts of power –Far more than other power uses 750 GW electric vs 12 TW from.
Electric Motorcycle Proposal John J. Romano Carleton B. Simpson Advisor: Dr. Allen Drake 28 September 2011.
SDSMT Zero Emissions Snowmobile Bennett Prosser, Kyle Roe.
M.E.F. Mechanical Energy Factory Mechanical Power Converter & Re-Generator System.
Wobel Company Delivery Car Possibilities. The Environmentally Efficient Choice.
Michigan Technological University Clean Snowmobile Enterprise Adrienne PironEthan Hill Zero Emissions Team.
Solar Powered Charging Station: Final Presentation Design Team: Ben Hemp Jahmai Turner Rob Wolf, PE Sponsors: Conn Center for Renewable Energy Dr. James.
Feedback Controlled Brushless DC Motor: Personal Electric Vehicle Application Summary Lecture.
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge  Design Goals  Specifications  Ergonomics and Emissions  Drive System  Motor/Motor Controller  Battery choice.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
PPT of topic § Electric Cars and Hybrid vehicles - Electric Cars
Energy Optimization in Electric Vehicles
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
CONTENTS ABSTRACT ELECTRIC VEHICLE - WORKING OF EV BATTERY
Innovations in Zero Emissions Snowmobile Technology
SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE (CSC) 2016 Team IUPUI
Single Speed Technical features 5 Speed Wheel dimension: 700 C
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
Dallas Streetcar & TOD - Bishop Arts
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
Clarkson University Electric Knights E54
Everything You Should Know About the Latest BMW X5 Series
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Clarkson Winter Knights
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presentation
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
ECV- VACUUM 7.2 KW URBAN Friendly Compact in Size 130 mm 240 L 20 L
Presentation transcript:

Wendigo 2014 – An Arctic and Antarctic Snowmobile Presented by Cyrille Goldstein Dante Filice March 6, 2014 McGill Electric Snowmobile Team

Design Criteria Operator concerns: – Sufficient range – Towing ability – Power and performance – Excellent driver interface Outfitter/Maintenance concerns: – Low cost – Serviceable – Durable – Easy to drive Environmental concerns: – Quiet

Chassis Selection Compared four types of snowmobiles from BRP: Ski Doo MXZ 550F meets our requirements best – Short track is more efficient Sufficient range – Light weight Higher performance – Low cost Affordable Sled Quality (weight) Tundra Sport 550F (Baseline) MXZ 550F Expedition Sport 550F Renegade Sport 550F Weight (2)000 Efficiency (3)0100 Handling (3)0111 Traction (3)011 Noise (3)0100 Packaging Space (3)0111 Cost (1)0100 Weighted Total01179

Range Sled usage at Summit Station, Greenland: Multiple short trips of 1.5 miles or less* Very few trips over 4 miles* Charging capability throughout the day 8-10 mile range deemed sufficient for extensive use at summit station *U Madison and U McGill summer testing data from Summit Station

Range PSAT simulation used to predict performance across different snow conditions. Validates that in all but poor snow conditions, our 10 mile range goal is attainable Based off of a 3.2 kWh battery pack (20 cells)

Battery Design Battery choice: – LTC 45 Ah Lithium Ion Cobalt cell – Higher capacity cell allows fewer cells for same capacity – less points of failure, less components in the pack Chose a pack size of 20 cells – Able to package entire power-train in the engine bay of the chassis – Allows us to meet our goal of 8-10 mile range for effective use in Greenland 26 cells possible to package – Requires moving power-train under the seat, hurting ergonomics, serviceability, and increasing cost – Used a simulation to compare the two options: 72V (20 cells)96V (26 cells) Range (miles)≈ 10≈14 Weight (lbs)6686 Cost$ 6000$ 7800

Towing Ability Trade off of a shorter (more efficient) track, is reduced traction An elevated hitch has been designed to increase the downwards force on the rear of the hitch.

HPEV AC-15 motors with Curtis 1238 controller produce 34kW & 81Nm peak torque for good towing capacity. Extensive dynamometer testing to maximize efficiency. Acquired data for current, torque, efficiency, slip gain, power, and other parameters. Performance

Drive ratio chosen to have sufficient torque, while maintaining a high enough efficiency to meet our 8-10 mile range goal. 3:1 reduction chosen to keep our sled efficient in the 20mph hour range Motor at ≈3000 rpm, in the efficient range

Performance Also validated in a PSAT simulation of the loaded acceleration. Loaded acceleration provides insight into towing capacity, and performance under tow 3:1 ratio also keeps the design much simpler as opposed to a two stage reduction

Driver Interface By programming the Curtis 1238 motor controller we were able to integrate different driving modes based on application. – 4 modes: - Range (long distance, most efficient) - Pull (for maximum towing needs) - Handling - Acceleration Also a CAN system which communicates between dash, battery pack (BMS), motor controller and to a user (via Bluetooth) was integrated

Easy to Drive Easily understandable controls: Indicator lights to show state of battery pack and ground fault Displays, ignition sequence and cargo space same as IC sled. Weight distribution maintained from IC sled – familiar for beginner to advanced drivers Comments from subjective handling judges validate that keeping the sled weight, and weight distribution, similar to the IC sled is very desirable.

Serviceability Modular design leads to easy troubleshooting and maintenance. Electronics box, motor controller box, high voltage battery pack, low voltage enclosure. Whole boxes can be removed for service and maintenance. Complicated electronic work can happen off- board of the snowmobile Increases safety Lo Low voltage container

Durability Previous generation of LTC cells lasted 7 years Based on dynamometer testing the 7 year old cells were at 70% of their original capacity Slightly higher cost of LTC cells is justified due to their durability and reliability Also reduces environmental impact – battery cells do not need to be disposed of or recycled as often

Low Environmental Impact Noise Track and vibrating chassis components are the main sources of noise in electric sleds. Noise from track mitigated by sound absorbing and reflecting skirt that surrounds track. A studded track can be replaced with a quieter non-studded track without compromising towing capacity thanks to the elevated hitch design.

Sound Skirt Three layers : – Gore-Tex: sound absorbing, also tear proof and waterproof – Wood flour: sound dissipating, particulate matter dissipates sound energy, also light weight – Vinyl: Sound reflective, meant to reflect sound not already absorbed or dissipated by first layers, rated for snowmobile use to -40° F. Particularly targets frequencies between Hz, identified emitted frequencies from a snowmobile in the Hz range. Sacrifice made in targeting lower frequencies due to weight restriction. Innovative idea about the skirt is that it is easily adjustable or removable with no tools, can be adjusted for snow conditions, driver weight, or if there is no need to run quietly.

Conclusion Chassis: light weight, comfortable & affordable Range: 10+ miles, reliable energy accumulator Performance: low cost, simple and powerful powertrain New features such as sound skirt, performance selection switch and new body sled wrap. Improved dashboard with CAN and Bluetooth communication abilities. Affordable: approx. $16,000 MSRP Serviceability: modular and simple design, spares readily available Ergonomics & User friendliness : minimum modifications during electrical conversion and performs similar to the stock sled Low environmental impact: zero emissions & quiet operation

Questions?