Launch, Explore, Summarize Instructional Model for Mathematics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Advertisements

Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
June Preszler and John Swanson Curriculum Curation for the Common Core.
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
1 Building Language Rich Math Classrooms for ELL Students OELAS Conference December 14, 2012 Steve Leinwand American Institutes for Research
Module Assessments: A Deep Dive Principal Strand NTI December, 2014.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Common Core Literacy Alignment: Adopt, Adapt, or Do Both?
Sherry Gettemy – Marcia Torgrude –
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Successfully Implementing High-Level Math Tasks
E LEMENTARY C OMMON C ORE I NSTITUTE M ATH L EAD T RAINING J’lene Cave Genevieve Silebi Shanon Cruz Jenny Kim.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
Changing Hearts and Minds to Improve Mathematics Instruction Ramona Unified School District.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Mathematics FPS Implementation Wednesday October 10,
Implementing Mathematics Common Core Module 1-2: Helping Students Orient to the Thinking of Others Janda Lannigan, Traci Loftin, Sarah Roggensack, Denise.
Principal Update Review of August 12 th Professional Development Day, Preview of upcoming Professional Development for K-2 Teachers.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Southwind High School August 5, 2015.
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 1 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Monday February 28, 2011.
Makes Sense Strategies Dimensions of teacher knowledge Declarative knowledge Procedural knowledge Conditional knowledge.
A process to collect information about content, assessment and thinking processes currently in place with a school. What concepts, skills, knowledge and.
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Planning for Equity Laura Maly Astrid Fossum Lee Ann Pruske Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Math Teacher Leader Training January 2011.
Welcome. Brain Energizer Complete this sentence: If I could throw caution to the winds and really risk, I would… Group Share.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 3: Exploring Standard Progressions across High School Courses.
WELCOME Day 3 EEA Summer 2012 Outcomes for Day 3 The participants will: synthesize their knowledge of the CCSS and available resources. share projects.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
March 21, 2011 Getting to Know the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
OPEN HOUSE, SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 Newfane Elementary School.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Human Systems (Digestive, Respiratory, Circulatory, and Excretory) THE BIG IDEAS! the human body needs systems in order to function without one of these.
Transitioning to the Common Core State Standards Moving Mathematics Both Content and Practice Regional District 6 Schools August 25, 2011 Diana Proto Avino.
Mini Lesson, Read Aloud,& Seminar The Connections.
Teaching Reading Comprehension
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
One District’s Collaborative Journey To Common Core Implementation.
Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.
Prepared by Joseph D. Cantara- Counsultant 1 Curriculum Mapping: A Road Map for The Common Core Standards: Session #2 The work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs: Presented.
TASKS 1. What is a Task? -word problem for which there is no obvious answer -students must create the steps for the solution -causes students to think.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Math Leadership Teams October, 2014.
CFN107 Election Day PD November 5, 2013 Danielle Herman WHAT DOES A COMMON CORE ALIGNED UNIT PLAN LOOK LIKE?
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
CCRS Implementation Team SCIENCE Quarterly Meeting #
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
MATH INITIATIVE OF EVERY STUDENT COUNTS Meaningful Distributed Practice.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
It’s the BIG ONE…… THE BIG 6. Well, What is it??? The BIG 6 is a problem solving, literacy process. It is useful for students in all academic settings,
A Deep Dive into the Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
S CHOOL T RANSITION T EAM C OLLABORATIVE L EARNING.
Assessment for Learning “Assessment for Learning”: A brief synopsis of a PLC working towards higher student achievement through assessment, data-based.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
“Five E” Learning Cycle: Engage
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
February 29, 2012 Albuquerque High School
Quality Comprehensive Improvement System
Reflecting on Research Lesson 1
Alignment of curriculum, instruction and classroom assessments
NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Five Tools and Processes for Translating the NGSS into Instruction and Classroom Assessment Tool 4: Using the 5E Instructional.
Presentation transcript:

Launch, Explore, Summarize Instructional Model for Mathematics VA – With the new Common Core standards, not only is what we are teaching changing but HOW we are teaching as well. We wanted some time with you to ensure that you have the information about the Launch, Explore, Summarize instructional model and where it fits with what we are already doing, and how you can lead and support. Vicky Armstrong * Sophia Burr

Does this seem familiar to you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdxEAt91D7k&feature=player_detailpage Show Kid Snippets: “Math Class” Think of a time when you were a student or a teacher when the lesson left you excited and/or with a deep understanding of the math? How did that experience compare to what you have just seen? Think, Pair, Share

Focusing on Instruction “Use the implementation of the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics as leverage for improving instructional practice.” -Cathy Seeley VA and SB –This is a prime opportunity for us to improve math instruction. We want our instruction to look differently than we just saw in the video. When we look at the number of students who need to retake Algebra multiple times and the number of students that need to take a remedial math class in college, it’s clear that our students need a stronger foundation in mathematics. We can use this time of change to our advantage to strengthen instruction, build deep conceptual understanding, and critical thinking. (SB)Share Jenga tower analogy. One of the ways we can do this is to increase the variety of instructional models. Today, we want to talk about the Launch, Explore, Summarize instructional model and how it relates to other valid instructional models.

CCSS Mathematics What does it mean to have a deep understanding of mathematics? VA – Let’s ask you, What does it mean to have a deep understanding of mathematics? (Ask the group to generate on a notes page per pair some responses to this question. After a few minutes, have pairs share out their responses and chart. Bring chart paper and notes pages. After facilitating this conversation, tie it to the coming slides by saying that our efforts with Common Core Math reflect the statements they have made) (5 Minutes))SB charts) A Mile Wide and an Inch Deep

Launch – Explore – Summarize VA and SB Use the Jigsaw activity and have people count off from 1-3. Ones will synthesize key ideas and questions on chart paper for the Launch section, twos will synthesize key ideas and questions for Explore, and 3’s will do summarize section. Each group will present their chart to the entire group. (20 minutes – Read independently and highlight, discuss with group, choose a recorder for chart and a presenter to present) SB – Reference back to the pictures – which part of the lesson are the pictures? (VA – Start the process with directions, SB and VA float among the groups to facilitate, SB close by referencing back to picture) SB – As an administrator as you walk through classrooms, it’s important for you to be able to identify what part of the lesson you’re seeing. Let’s “Explore” the instructional model…

Choose Three Ways Here is an example of a teacher using a Launch, Explore, Summarize lesson model. She doesn’t identify the parts, but there is a nice, natural flow to the lesson which includes all parts. Pay particular attention to the amount of time the teacher uses in the Launch period and the time given in the explore. She breaks the Explore portion of the lesson into chunks where the students explore individually, in pairs, and in small groups. This entire time takes about 15 minutes – about 5 minutes per chunk. Think about why she limits the amount of time exploring. Notice what the teacher is doing during the explore portion of the lesson. (Give our administrators a note-taking form for each lesson chunk. The form will be a T-chart with what teacher does and asks, what are the students doing. During the debrief, use stand-up, hand-up, pair up to have participants take their note-taking forms and discuss what they noticed. Return to seats, use Numbered Heads together to skim the article on the 8 Mathematical Practices and highlight the specific mathematical practices that took place during the lesson and note which segment of the lesson occurred in.) This will be a 15-20 minute segment. https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/problem-solving-math?fd=1 Teaching Channel, https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/problem-solving-math?fd=1

Launch – Explore – Summarize SB – Teacher Roles Launch: Launch and clarify task (connecting math to literature, “pose the problem” from Envision topic lessons, APK, engage thinking and problem solving skills to prepare to explore, the hook) Explore: Ask questions to engage, prompt, guide, clarify, and deepen student thinking Discuss/Summarize: Orchestrate the structure and flow of discussion LAUNCH EXPLORE SUMMARIZE

Teaching Cycle Connect student thinking Anticipate student thinking Summarize Launch Select and sequence student thinking LES vs EDI What do we want students to know? What should students be able to do? How do we want them to show this? How do the ideas, strategies and representations develop from the beginning to the end of a unit? Launch/Explore model for direct instruction of new strategies Explore Monitor student thinking Math Vision Project

Timeframe Launch Explore Summarize Did we activate background knowledge? Do students have enough information while maintaining the problematic nature of the task? Launch Explore When are students ready to move into the Discuss stage? SB Summarize What’s next? What are students taking away from the discussion? How does this align with our goals? Math Vision Project

Unit Planning and Launch, Explore, Summarize Consider your weekly PLCs as a place for your teachers to really “explore” this lesson model. They could collaboratively plan the lessons and then reflect on the effectiveness of the lesson afterward. Big Idea – Grain size of assessment analysis is at the end of the unit of instruction VA – Talk through the points on side

Discuss – Line Up As an administrator, how can you support your staff as they hone their skills with the Launch, Explore, Summarize model? Where does Direct Instruction fit within this Launch, Explore, Summarize model? When might be an appropriate time for a teacher to do a straight Direct Instruction lesson rather than a Launch, Explore, Summarize lesson? Which engagement structures would really support each phase of the lesson? VA – Facilitate SB chart during debrief of each question Question 1 – Release time for grade levels to do lesson studies, time during PLC to collaboratively plan, demonstrations from the coaches, agenda topic at staff meetings Question 2 – CFUs, concept development, TAPPLE, fits during the launch and during the summarize, APK in the launch, Closure during the summarize Question 3 – Tape Model, Area Model, fluency with algorithm when the standard calls for that Question 4 – Open-ended

Let’s Try One… Overheard in the ER as the sirens blare: “Oh my, look at this next one. He’s completely burned from head to toe.” “Not a problem, just order up 1000 square inches of skin from the graft bank.” You have two possible responses: “Oh, good – that will be enough.” OR “Oh, Bummer – we’re in trouble!”

Launch, Explore, Summarize Which response, “Oh, Good!” or “Oh, Bummer!” is more appropriate? (Instinctual Response) Explain your thinking to your team. Assuming you are the patient, how much skin would you hope they ordered up? Work with your group and show how you arrived at your answer and be prepared to defend it to the class. Have them do the summary portion, and stand up to share how they solved it (We’ll set a timer during the explore. We’ll walk around with a note pad to select three different ways to share. Before moving on, ask, “Was your mathematical thinking expanded? Was the problem engaging? Did you enjoy working in a group on the problem? Did someone in your group have a way of approaching the problem that expanded your thinking?

Red Light, Yellow Light, Green Light Red Light – One thing you commit to stop doing Yellow Light – One thing you need to continue doing Green Light – One Action/goal that’s new that you want to do between now and December

What does it look like when an adult has gaps in their mathematical understanding? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89frRi8GgGA&feature=player_detailpage Jenga Tower