Accountability Courts Conference Director, Probation Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Probation Reporting Contact Center (PRCC)
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
Washtenaw County Office of The Sheriff Preliminary Proposal Jail Space Expansion.
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Evidence-Based Intervention Services Community Corrections Partnership October 27, 2011.
Keir Boettcher Deputy District Attorney
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program.
Georgia Division of Child Support Services Department of Human Services Outreach Services.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Status Update Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission March 18, 2013.
O.P.E.N. Opportunity for Probation with Enforcement in Nevada Intermediate Sanction Program Nevada Department of Corrections Re-entry Services.
State of CT Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division Major Initiatives Update Presented to the Criminal Justice Policy Advisory Commission September.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
Planning for Re-alignment in San Diego
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Maine Board of Corrections March 25, 2009 Maine’s Unified Correctional System Design Development Process Discussion Presents: ONE MAINE ONE MAINE ONE SYSTEM.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Maine Board of Corrections March 18, 2009 Maine’s Unified Correctional System Design Development Process Discussion Corrections Working Group Presents:
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Update Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission November 7, 2012.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Replicating the Concepts Behind Project HOPE Dionne Addison and Stephanie Starr, Grant Administrators Sonya Dunlap, Project Coordinator.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Criminal Justice Reform and Reinvestment In Georgia © 2011 – 2015 Hon. Michael P. Boggs Thomas Worthy, Esq. Co-Chairs Georgia Council on Criminal Justice.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Douglas County, KS Criminal Justice Intercept Practices
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
All Things CACJ Ms. Taylor Jones
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Summit County Probation Services
Justice Division Strategic Planning
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Community Corrections Alternative Program
Business Model Refined Mission
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Courts Conference Director, Probation Operations GEORGIA Department of Corrections Probation Operations Probation Updates Presented at: Accountability Courts Conference By: Stan Cooper Director, Probation Operations May 22, 2013 1

Mission: PUBLIC SAFETY SERVE THE COURTS Probation Operations Mission: PUBLIC SAFETY SERVE THE COURTS

Probation Operations Who We Are 1,445 staff 1100+ Sworn staff (812 POs) 300+ Administrative staff and counselors 158,445 Offenders (as of 4-1-13) Active Supervision: 107,611 Standard risk offenders: 84,870 (78.9%) High risk offenders: 10,283 (9.6 %) Special Level (SPS,IPS,DRC) 12,458 (11.6 %) 49 Probation Circuits (aligned with judicial circuits) 100+ local Probation Offices 15 Day Reporting Centers (DRC’s) 4 Community Impact Programs (CIP’s) 4 Administrative Areas of Operation (regions) statewide 208 Superior Court Judges $97,180,947 Budget (FY’12)

Notice the steep trend line 10-year Growth (2002-2012) 29%! Notice the steep trend line Sentence length is 2x the national average 4 4

Probation Population by Crime Type

Focus Prior to New Supervision Model Standard High Special

New Probation Supervision Model Began September 1, 2011 PURPOSE: Assess offender’s need and risk Supervise high risk offenders / manage low risk offenders Balance surveillance and treatment Promote community supervision Respond swiftly, certainly and proportionately to violations EXPECTATIONS: Effectively identify and mitigate probationer risk and needs Efficiently apply available resources Greater officer presence in the “field” Reduced Recidivism = ENHANCED PUBLIC SAFETY!

Active Probation Caseload Sizes (Excludes Unsupervised) APPA Recommends GDC Target Caseload Actual Caseload Special (Intensive, Sex Offender, DRC) 20:1 40:1 58:1 High 50:1 60:1 Standard 200:1 287:1

Supervision Levels/Statuses (April 2013) High & Std levels are assigned by completion of an automated risk assessment Active Supervision Levels 107,611 offenders Special 12,458 High 10,283 Standard 84,870 Administrative/Unsupervised 812 Total POs 677 - Field Supervision 135 - Court Supervised/Active Probationers 162,140 Actively Supervised Offenders 105,366 Std 78.2% 82,393 High 9.5% 10,033 Special (Sex, IPS, DRC) 12.3% 12,940 Status 60,000+ 9

Special High Standard Supervision Levels Supervision Types PROBATION SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS Supervision Levels Supervision Types Minimum Monthly Interactions Special Mental Health (Chronic Care needed; acting out) 2 Field 1 Field or Office 1 Collateral Total 4 IPS (Remove) DRC Phase 1 DRC Phase 2 SPS Tier 2 SPS Tier 1 1 Field 1 Field or Office 1 Collateral Total 3 Reentry RSAT Aftercare Phase 1 DRC Aftercare Phase 1 MH Reentry (from ITF/Level 3 Releases) High RSAT Aftercare Phase 2 1 Field or Office 1 Collateral DRC Aftercare Phase 2 Regular Mental Health (As Assessed) Standard 1 Interaction/ Compliance Confirmation Total 1 PRCC

Intensive Probation (IPS) Evolution: 1982 - 1998 IPS began 3 phases Length: 9 to 12 months Phase 1 = 5 contacts/week, curfew Phase 2 = 3 contacts/week, curfew Phase 3 = 1 contact/week, curfew opt. Home Confinement component available (1986-2000) 1999-2005 4 contacts per month

Intensive Probation (IPS) Evolution: 2006 - 2010 Two Tiered System (Tiers determined by risk assessment) 2011 – Present 4 interactions/mo. (12/qtr.) Length: Up to 9 months Tier 1: Standard & medium levels Length: 3 to 6 months Contact requirements (8/qtr) Tier 2: High & maximum levels Length: 6 to 9 months Contact requirements (18/qtr)

Intensive Probation Program 4,075 IPS cases 3.7% of active cases (107K) 2.5% of all cases (158K) 76 Intensive Probation Officers 10.6% of supervising officers devoted to 3.7% of the cases IPS cases supervised at Special level Not based on risk assessment New Supervision Model (September 1, 2011) IPS (Special Level): 4 required minimum interactions per month High Level: 3 required minimum interactions per month 13

Intensive Probation Program (cont.) IPS Breakdown and Supervision Cost ($3.87/day): 1,306 (32%) IPS cases (high level risk) $5,000 per day/$1.84 million per year 2,769 (68%) IPS cases (standard level risk) $10,700 per day/$3.9 million per year Over supervised based on their known risks Supervision components available to Courts: Curfew Drug Screen Community Service Close field Supervision 14

Mental Health Probation Supervision “People with mental illnesses are twice as likely as others under supervision to have their community sentence revoked — which only deepens their involvement in the criminal justice system.” “10 Essential Elements for Successful Supervision of Mental Health Probationers” The Justice Center

32,800 20 % Probation Population Suffers From a Mental Illness Mental Health Probation Supervision 20 % Probation Population Suffers From a Mental Illness (+/- 160,000 x 20%) 32,800 Note: GDC Mental Health/Health Services provides monthly information from Circuit reported data

Mental Health Probation Supervision “2,400 Mentally Ill Probationers Returned to Prison in 2011” 3500 probationers screened per month at intake for MH issues 13% (455) referred or receiving services June 2012, Process Action Team began the development of a Mental Health Probation Officer Specialist/Mental Health caseload Target date of July 1, 2013 17

Target Population Caseload Composition Based on MH criteria established by GDC MH Caseload Capacity = 40 Identified Regular Supervision Offenders Aftercare – 6 months Integrated Treatment Facility releases DRC Mental Health MH Level III+ prison releases MH Specialty Court probationers 18

Recent Initiatives Supervision Technology New Supervision Model Supervise high risk/Manage standard level Automated Risk Assessment Pre-Sentence Assessment Probation Options Management (POM) Technology Mini Notebooks/Laptops in Courtrooms Rapid ID Fingerprint Machine Field Communications (Radio) Enhancements E-Portal (16,000 sentences submitted since July 2012)

Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Centers (RSAT) 4 Probation RSATs (1000 beds total) 6 months in length (Return to 9 months currently under review) Male - Bainbridge, Northwest, Turner Female - Arrendale 2 Integrated Treatment Facilities (400 beds total) Focus on Mental Health/Substance Abuse (Dual Diagnosis) 9 months in length Male – Appling Female - West Central Aftercare component – Mental Health Probation Caseloads

Day Reporting Centers (DRC) (15 circuits) 1500 participants statewide Emphasis on Cognitive Thinking Skills Substance Abuse Mental Health Employment Recent Openings Savannah Lookout Mountain

DRC Lite Pilot Program Department of Corrections Probation Operations GEORGIA Department of Corrections Probation Operations DRC Lite Pilot Program Presented at: Accountability Courts Conference By: Betsy Thomas DRC Lite Coordinator, Probation Operations May 22, 2013 22

DRC Lite Pilot Program 2012 Legislative Session CY 2013 23 23

DRC Lite Pilot Program PROBLEM Lack of Resources and Treatment Options in the Communities throughout rural Georgia 24 24

DRC Lite Pilot Program Concept: Provide enhanced supervision and programming for identified substance abusing offenders in rural circuits using the $750,000 allocated in FY 13 for pilot programs Program must be Mobile Scalable Repeatable Evidence Based Keyword – Outcomes Monitor and track outcomes by successful completions of program 25 25

DRC Lite Pilot Program Key Components: Early ID by Assessment Enhanced Supervision Circuit Cap of 35-50 probationers Frequent Random Drug Screens Substance Abuse and Cognitive Programming Swift, Certain, Proportionate Sanctioning Judicial Support Willing to hold monthly status hearings on offenders in programs Willing to assist GDC by diverting appropriate cases from hard beds to community supervision 26 26

DRC-Lite Pilot Program Significant Actions: Phase I 2 hours of programming 4 days per week Orientation and Initial Case Management Drug Screens: 2 x week Phase II Programming 2 days per week Individual Case Management Drug Screens: 4x month random or for cause Phase III SA Aftercare Classes 1day per week, then step down AA/NA and DOL referrals as needed Drug Screens: Random or for cause 1-2 Months 3-6 Months 6-12 Months Conducted by Spectrum Counselor M4C and Reentry Skill building Conducted by Spectrum Counselor Matrix Substance Abuse Classes/MRT Conducted by Spectrum Substance Abuse After Care Services Program Outside Referrals to AA/NA and DOL 27

DRC Lite Pilot Program Supervision Components Phase 1 and 2 4 minimum interactions each month Phase 3 3 minimum interactions each month All Phases Drug Testing 28 28

Viva Jr. Drug Testing System by Siemens DRC Lite Pilot Program Viva Jr. Drug Testing System by Siemens Accurate-Used now in Drug Courts and Accountability Courts Provide flexibility options for testing Up to 60 panels tested per hour Could be used for confirmation testing for other circuits 29 29

DRC Lite Pilot Program Tracking Wash Outs Drug usage Employment Address Changes New Arrests Participants as of May 1, 2013 = 154 30 30

DRC Lite Pilot Program Positive Incentives Sanctions 31 31

Feedback DRC Lite Pilot Program Judicial – Participant – Proud of the changes they have seen in repeat offenders Impressed at first status hearing – attitude, appearance, respect Best thing since sliced bread Participant – Want others to have this opportunity Want to impress the Judge and each other Appreciative Officer/Counselor - Amazed at Court Personnel, Public Defenders, Sheriff Office Comments See a difference in posture, appearance, attitude and pride in themselves See the big picture – it really does work 32 32

DRC Lite Pilot Program DRC Lite program Sites Alapaha - Appalachian Atlantic – expanded April 5, 2013 Cordele Middle – expanded April 5, 2013 Mountain – GRADUATION May 23, 2013 Northern Pataula – expanded April 5, 2013 Southwestern – GRADUATION May 2013 Toombs – GRADUATION June 11, 2013 Approximately 154 offenders are currently enrolled in this program in those 10 circuits

DRC Lite Pilot Program Warrants issued for technical violations = 61 Early Results Warrants issued for technical violations = 61 Warrants issued for new charges = 15 Drugs Screens obtained = 1105 Positive Drug Screens = 287 Positive rate during Phase 1 = 26% 34 34

DRC Lite Pilot Program Transportation Space Challenges Transportation Space Lack of community resources – AA/NA 35 35

Probation Operations Questions

Probation Detention Center 180 Day Cap Effect on Jail Backlog HB 1176 Effective Date 7-1-12 By statute the counties receive no jail subsidy for these cases.

Alternative Wait Times As of April 1, 2012 Male PDC – 1 to 2 weeks Female PDC - 5 to 6 months Male RSAT - 2 to 3 months Female RSAT - 6 months ITF (Male & Female) 1 to 2 weeks Boot Camp - 2 months

State Sentenced Inmates Source: Georgia Department of Community Affairs – March 2013

Local Jails Bed Space Utilization Only 19 of 146 jails are above capacity Source: Georgia Department of Community Affairs – March 2013

Pre-Sentence Assessment Concept Objectively identify cases “on the fence” for entry to prison Assess their risk and needs based on: Offender specific information Historical probation/institutional data Inform the Courts, DAs & PDs of available and appropriate options: Community Alternatives (non-custodial) GDC Alternatives (custodial)