This project is financed, in part, by a DHHS grant from the Office of Community Services. © 2006 -2012 Community Action Association of Pennsylvania Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to the COMMISSIONER ORIENTATION. Enabling Legislation National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993.
Advertisements

PBJCEOC WHAT IS A COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY? Pine Bluff Jefferson County Economic Opportunities Commission.
THE STRATEGIC COUNCIL LEADERSHIP TRUST AND ENGAGEMENT NEW FUNDING SOURCES AND NEW DELIVERY VEHICLES Appendix 1 NEW FUNDING SERVOURCES AND NEW DELIVERY.
Determining Your Program’s Health and Financial Impact Using EPA’s Value Proposition Brenda Doroski, Director Center for Asthma and Schools U.S. Environmental.
Iowa Community Action Association Janet Carl, Facilitator.
Government Capacity Building Support program USAID Support to the
Regional Performance and Innovative Consortia(RPIC) Georgia Community Action Association Annual Conference Author: Lorraine Daniels, Executive Director.
Ready to Grow… Ready to Learn… Ready to Succeed Kentucky’s Plan for Kindergarten Readiness October 2012.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Federal Monitoring Update James Gray Program Specialist.
ROMA Next Generation Results-Oriented Management and Accountability
How to Write Goals and Objectives
DENVER CHILDREN’S ADVOCACY CENTER. ABOUT DCAC: Our mission is to prevent abuse, strengthen families, and restore childhood. DCAC works to improve the.
Developing Earmark Grant Performance Measures: Grant Proposal Section 3 Deanna Khemani.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
NCALHD Public Health Task Force NC State Health Director’s Conference January 2014 A Blueprint of the Future for Local Public Health Departments in North.
State Agency and Association Partnership The example from Oklahoma.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
This project is financed, in part, by a DHHS grant from the Office of Community Services. © 2006 Community Action Association of Pennsylvania Introduction.
This project is financed, in part, by a DHHS grant from the Office of Community Services. © Community Action Association of Pennsylvania Introduction.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Eshboev B.A. Head of the Department for Monitoring of implementation of national development programmes of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.
RUSS SPAIN, CCAP NICK BURROWS, CCAP SHERYL BAILEY, CCAP Strategic Planning The Award-Winning Way! THIS PRESENTATION CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
COMMUNITY Needs Assessment Overview
Verna P. Best, MSA Freeman Denton, MPA, NCRT NASCSP Annual Training Conference September 12, 2013 Phoenix, AZ North Carolina DHHS Division of Social Services.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
The challenge and promise of community based participatory research 1.
Joint Infant and Toddler Steering Committee/Early Learning Regional Coalition Statewide Meeting “Using our Data for Continuous Improvement” Organizational.
Community Action Partnership Learning Community Moving Forward with Peer Learning In Community Action September 12, 2014 Barbara Ledyard, Project Director.
Workplace Education Yields Demonstrable Benefits A presentation by Dr. Lloyd David delivered by Brooke S. Toomey of Creative Workplace Learning NETWORK.
Developing and Writing Winning Individual, Corporate and Foundation Proposals Robin Heller, Director, Corporate and Foundation Philanthropy, BBBSA Robert.
Promoting Effective Boards of Directors
Children, Young People and Families Early Intervention Fund and Adult Learning and Empowering Communities Fund Application support July/August 2015.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
ROMA In a Nutshell Oklahoma department of Commerce.
National ROMA Peer to Peer Trainers Developing an Individual Strategic Action Plan for
Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Professionals Unit 1 Part 2: Evaluation and The Logic Model.
Some important documents that you will need can be downloaded at
Brown Buckley Tucker CSBG Head Start LIHEAP WA P WIA.
Annual Report. Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Presentation by Don Mathis President and CEO, Community Action Partnership February 25, 2011.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Planning for Results National Peer to Peer (NPtP) ROMA Training Project Goal 5 – Agencies improve capacity to Achieve Results.
Collecting and Using Data ROMA Data for Management and Accountability.
AESuniversity NPI Reporting.  Session Overview  Terms and Definitions  Where It Fits Within MIS  Setup Process  User Process  Questions & Answers.
1 Partnerships and Collaboration: Building Interagency Teams Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI) An Overview Connie K
Division of Aging Services State Plan on Aging Georgia Department of Human Services Presenter: Jean O’Callaghan Deputy Director Division of Aging Services.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Jeb Bush Governor Lucy D. Hadi Secretary 1 OQM, PaRTs, Sterling Overview Florida Department of Children and Families Office of Quality Management Child.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs The Substance Abuse Research Consortium Semi Annual Meeting Improving the Quality, and Effectiveness.
CSBG ROMA NEXT GENERATION
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
CROW WING COUNTY PROBATION SERVICES TASK FORCE Presented by Central Minnesota Community Corrections.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
1 Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance Update.
Introduction to ROMA.
Results-Oriented Management and Accountability
ROMA Results Oriented Management and Accountability
Displaying the Results (But First Some Other Important Topics)
North Iowa Community Action
Introduction to ROMA Implementation for Boards
Achievement of Results for Boards
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
Presentation transcript:

This project is financed, in part, by a DHHS grant from the Office of Community Services. © Community Action Association of Pennsylvania Introduction to ROMA

What is ROMA?  Sometimes agencies will talk about their “ROMA report” or about the “ROMA program.”  ROMA, however, is a complete management and accountability process that is focused on the results achieved as a result of your agencies activities.

These activities are all a part of the ROMA Cycle Cycle graphic created by B. Mooney and J. Jakopic from the Core Activities identified in OCS Information Memo 49, 2001

In 1993, Congress passed the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) by promoting a new focus on results, service quality and customer satisfaction." "The purposes of this Act are to improve Federal program effectiveness and public accountability GPRA -- Section 2 (b) Purposes GPRA applies to ALL organizations that receive federal dollars. It began a movement that continues today – where we are being asked “what happened?” as a result of our use of federal dollars.

The Office of Community Services formed the Monitoring and Assessment Task Force (MATF) In 1994, the MATF produced a National Strategic Plan which endorsed a “results- oriented” approach for CAAs. In the Strategic Plan, the MATF identified Six National Goals, representing the outcomes they found being reported across all CAAs. This was a way for the network to talk about their results using common terms. The Six National Goals were the primary results around which the CAA performance management was to be built.

Goal 1. Low-income people become more self-sufficient. (Family) Goal 2. The conditions in which low-income people live are improved. (Community) Goal 3. Low-income people own a stake in their community. (Community) Goal 4. Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved. (Agency) Goal 5. Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results. (Agency) Goal 6. Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations, achieve their potential by strengthening family and other supportive systems. (Family) The Six National Goals Representing three levels of results:

mandating implementation of a comprehensive performance-based management system across the entire Community Services Network. “Results-Oriented Management and Accountability,” or ROMA, was identified as that system. Next, in 1998, the CSBG Act was amended, Required performance reporting for the CSBG Network began October 1, 2001.

ROMA was defined as: “a sound management practice that incorporates the use of outcomes or results into the administration, management, and operation of community action agencies.” 1998, CSBG Act

CAAs must focus on the results, In addition to the services and activities provided by a CAA, of the programs it provides. the outcomes, or the changes, Remember, results can be individual/family, agency or community level.

CAAs have historically measured things like:  the number of food baskets distributed  the number of Meals-on-Wheels delivered  the number of children attending Head Start centers  the number of families receiving WIC services  the number of adults attending GED classes  the number of clients served per day

we must also be able to identify how these interventions produce results. While this is important, What changed because of these interventions?

Why is reporting on services provided by your agency not enough?

Take Me Out to the Ball Game:

To boost dwindling attendance the team promotes that:  Outfielders ran three times more laps during spring training.  Pitchers threw twice as many pitches during spring training.  Batters took four times as much hitting practice during spring training.  The team hired two new coaches and invested $100,000 in a state-of-the-art communications system to enable the Manager to talk with them so they can give real-time perspectives on each play from their strategic vantage points in the stands during the games.  By the All-Star break, the team is taking an average of 17 more swings at pitches per game... Situation: The team finished last in the prior season.

And the fans say, “So what?” because they’re still in last place, without a single player who deserves to be on the All-Star Team.

if they don’t get the results. What they care about is winning! The fans don’t care about the process

The Board of Directors is like the Owner and General Manager of a ball team. The Executive Director is like the Manager. The funders, community, and clients are like the fans who want to see results. Playing Ball with Community Action

changing lives and improving communities For Community Action Agencies, is how we score runs and win games.

Is it no wonder that our “fans” may also say: If all we tell the community is how much service we provided, “so what?”

Community members, just like the baseball fans, don’t care about the process if they don’t see that we get the results. What they care about, too, is winning … changing lives and improving communities!

Just like the baseball team that must hit the ball to score runs and win, Community Action won’t change lives without delivering services efficiently, compassionately, and intelligently. But….

Documenting the achievement of results is how we prove that we are a winning team. Remember: our results are changing lives and improving communities.

we will have the documentation (the evidence) to support our projections of the kinds of results we expect for families and communities. As CAAs collect and analyze results data over time, We will document the movement of families from poverty to self sufficiency and the positive changes in communities.

OCS reviewed the data submitted by local CAAs and State offices in the first mandatory reporting for As a result of this data review and in response to a need for a standardized system of reporting CAA results, OCS has established National Performance Indicators (NPIs). For us the NPIs are a list of expected outcomes, like the “hit and get on base” indicator in baseball. Implementation of National Indicators of Community Action Performance Beginning in 2005

The NPI report is sometimes called the ROMA report, because it is the “accountability” portion of the ROMA Cycle. Also it is based on the Six National ROMA Goals. In your CSBG work plan, CAAs are to project (or estimate) the number of units of service they will provide the number of people to be served, and also the number of results that will be achieved by these participants. Targeting Services and Results

 The public perception of human service agencies is not always positive.  Demonstrating success will win public support and improve public image.  The individual human-interest story is not a substitute for overall agency impact. It is a way to demonstrate the kinds of results that are being achieved.  Nothing is as powerful as documentation of how lives and communities have been positively impacted by association with your CAA. Remember:

Power Point presentation prepared by under a grant from the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Community Services. © Community Action Association of Pennsylvania, Barbara Mooney NPtP Project Director