Evaluation of the ASHE Project, Ecuador M. Garcés 1, D. Fee 1, and A. Steffke 1 D. McCormack 2 and R. Servranckx 3 H. Bass 4 and C. Hetzer 4 M. Hedlin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13 Nov 2001Infrasound Workshop, Kona Array Geometry and Signal Observations David A McCormack Head of Monitoring and Analysis Geological Survey of Canada,
Advertisements

Piezoceramic Sensors and Infrasound Technology
ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. GSN ANSS Traditional Waveform Review  The “morning run” Daily summarizes problems with availability, timing,
Infrasound Station Ambient Noise Estimates and Models: J. Roger Bowman, Gordon Shields, and Michael S. O’Brien Science Applications International.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Waveform Modeling and Comparisons with Ground Truth Events David Norris BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17 th Street Arlington, VA
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.
Infrasonic Observation near Active Volcanoes and its Results in Japan Hitoshi YAMASATO*, Takayuki SAKAI* and Yoshiaki FUJIWARA** *Meteorological Research.
Infrasound Signals Observed at I53US and I55US John V. Olson, Charles R. Wilson, C. A Szuberla and D. Osborne Infrasound Group, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Multi-parameter investigations at Fuego and Santiaguito volcanoes
Audiovisual Test in Progress. Milton Garcés 1, Claus Hetzer 1, Douglas Drob 2, Robert Woodward 3, Henry Bass 4, David McCormack 5, Läslo Evers 6, Michael.
Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino RESEARCH CENTRE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS.
1 Vertically Integrated Seismic Analysis Stuart Russell Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley Nimar Arora, Erik Sudderth, Nick Hay.
590 Lipoa Parkway, Suite 259 Kihei, Maui, Hawaii (Fax) Pacific Disaster Center.
Characterization of explosion signals from Tungurahua Volcano, Ecuador David Fee and Milton Garces Infrasound Laboratory Univ. of Hawaii, Manoa
Observations and Modeling of Infrasound Produced by Ocean Waves By Mark Willis Masters Student/Dept of Meteorology Acknowledgements: Milton Garces (HIGP/ISLA),
Image Courtesy HVO Seimoacoustics from Kilauea Volcano using multiple arrays David Fee and Milton Garces Infrasound Laboratory Univ. of Hawaii, Manoa
Reconstructing the Emission Height of Volcanic SO2 from Back Trajectories: Comparison of Explosive and Effusive Eruptions Modeling trace gas transport.
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, 3-7 November 2008, Bermuda WIND NOISE REDUCTION AT IMS INFRASOUND STATIONS Douglas R.
Bob Woodward, Bob Busby, Katrin Hafner, and David Simpson
The TIDDBIT HF Doppler Radar G. Crowley and F. Rodrigues
October, 2002 Infrasonic Signal Detection Using The Hough Transform D. J. Brown, B.L.N. Kennett, C. Tarlowski Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian.
Infrasound detector for Apatity group Asming V.E., Kola Regional Seismological Center, Apatity, Russia.
Collaborators  Rod Whitaker, George Randall [Los Alamos National Laboratory]  Relu Burlacu [University of Utah]  Chris Hayward, Brian Stump [Southern.
Infrasound Case Studies Paul Golden Southern Methodist University ITW 2008 With contributions from Eugene Herrin, Petru Negraru, David Anderson and Breanna.
Infrasonic Observations of Some Atmospheric Phenomena Ludwik Liszka Swedish Institute of Space Physics, SE , Umeå, Sweden.
Kenneth H. Underwood Atmospheric Systems Corporation Santa Clarita, CA NAQC 2011 San Diego1.
Elizabeth A. Silber, Douglas O. ReVelle, Wayne N. Edwards, Peter G. Brown The University of Western Ontario Presented at the Bermuda Infrasound Technology.
Infrasound Consortium for Applied Research 2002 Infrasound Technology Workshop, Netherlands Milton Garces Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii,
Infrasound in the Geosciences Henry E. Bass, Carrick Talmadge, and Kenneth Gilbert, National Center For Physical Acoustics, University of Mississippi Michael.
D McCormack, CTBT Infvrasound, KNMI Netherlands 29 October 2002 Towards Characterization of Infrasound Signals David A McCormack CTBT Verification Office.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
Modeling of Infrasound from the Space Shuttle Columbia Reentry Robert Gibson and David Norris BBN Technologies Arlington, Virginia, USA Infrasound Technology.
Detection, Propagation, and Modeling Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda, 2008.
THE ANALYSIS OF THE INFRASOUND SIGNALS FROM MAY 12 EARTHQUAKE WENCHUAN CHINA Wang Xiaohang Signal Processing Department North China Institute of Computing.
CTBTO/IDC Infrasound Technology Workshop in Bermuda, 3-7 November Preparing the Return of Infrasound Data Processing into IDC Operations Presented.
ITW2007: P. Campus Tokyo, November 2007 The IMS Infrasound Network: detection of a large variety of events, including volcanic eruptions Dr. Paola.
Changes in the Performance of the IMS Infrasound Network due to Seasonal Propagation Effects David Norris and Robert Gibson BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17.
Acoustic-gravity wave monitoring for global atmospheric studies Elisabeth Blanc 1 Alexis Le Pichon 1 Lars Ceranna 2 Thomas Farges 1 2- BGR / B3.11, Hannover,
Infrasound Workshop San Diego, USA October 2003 Infrasound Processing at the IDC and its Near-term Development P. Firbas, N. Brachet International.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Infrasound Technical Workshop 2008 Session 1 Summary – Sensors and Calibration.
Systems Check. Milton Garces and Claus Hetzer Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Manoa PMCC analyses of signals from the North American and.
1 Location and Characterization of Infrasonic Events Roger Bowman 1, Greg Beall 1, Doug Drob 2, Milton Garces 3, Claus Hetzer 3, Michael O’Brien 1, Gordon.
Infrasound from lightning Jelle Assink and Läslo Evers Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute Seismology Division ITW 2007, Tokyo, Japan.
October The Woomera Infrasound and Seismic Experiment David Brown 1 ; Clive Collins 1 ; Brian Kennett 2 1. Geoscience Australia 2. Australian National.
1 Description and Analysis of Infrasound Signals Recorded from the North Pacific Event of February 22, 2003 Joydeep Bhattacharyya 1, Claus Hetzer 2,Milton.
A Study on Characteristics of Seasonally Dependent Infrasound Propagation Based on the Ground-Truth Events from a Long- Term Experiment at a Quarry mine.
Analysis of regional infrasound signals at IMS infrasound array in Mongolia a RCAG/MAS P.O.B-152, Ulaanbaatar-51Mongolia b CEA/DASE BP12, Bruyeres-le-Chatel,
MODELLING OF THE HYDRO- ACOUSITC SIGNAL AS A TSUNAMI PRECURSOR F. Chierici (IRA-INAF) L. Pignagnoli (ISMAR-CNR) D. Embriaco (INGV) Nearest meeting, Berlin.
November, 2008 Bermuda ITW Numerical Simulation of Infrasound Propagation, including Wind, Attenuation, Gravity and Non-linearity Catherine de Groot-Hedlin.
Real-time infrasound localization on active Italian volcanoes E. Marchetti, M. Ripepe, G.Ulivieri and G. Lacanna Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università.
November 2007Infrasound Technology Workshop, Tokyo, JapanPage 1 Presented to: Infrasound Technology Workshop Tokyo, Japan PTS Experimental Infrasound Array.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
Estimates of a relative delay time of signals through analysis of their forms Sergey Kulichkov, Aleksey Chulichkov Dmitrii Demin A.M.Oboukhov Institute.
M. Garces, D. Fee, J. Park Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Manoa F. Ham Florida Institute of Technology Surf Infrasound from Oahu’s North.
National Center for Physical Acoustics 1986 The University of Mississippi Hurricane Studies Using Infrasound Claus Hetzer 1, Roger Waxler 1, Carrick Talmadge.
Dr. Milton Garces Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Manoa Ongoing Efforts in the Formation of an International Infrasound Consortium 2003 Infrasound.
Infrasound Technology Workshop – Tokyo, November Listen to the Sounds of the Antarctic Atmosphere L. Ceranna, A. Le Pichon & E. Blanc BGR / B3.11,
Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.
Seismic phases and earthquake location
Charles R. Wilson, John V. Olson and Daniel L
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Infrasound Technology Workshop, Bermuda Section 6
Refinement of Bolide Characteristics from Infrasound measurements
An Asia Pacific Natural Hazards and Vulnerabilities Atlas
Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone
IMS Infrasound Station Observations of the Recent Explosive Eruptions of Okmok and Kasatochi Volcanoes, Alaska J. V. Olson, K. Arnoult, C. A. L. Szuberla,
Summary of 2003 Infrasound Technology Workshop
Infrasonic observations of chemical explosions
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of the ASHE Project, Ecuador M. Garcés 1, D. Fee 1, and A. Steffke 1 D. McCormack 2 and R. Servranckx 3 H. Bass 4 and C. Hetzer 4 M. Hedlin 5 and R. Matoza 5 H. Yepes 6 and P. Ramon 6 1 Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2 Geological Survey of Canada, 1 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa K1A 0Y3 Ontario, Canada 3 Montréal Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre, Canadian Meteorological Centre, Meteorological Service of Canada 4 University of Mississippi 5 University of California, San Diego 6 Instituto Geofísico, Escuela Politécnica Nacional,Quito, Ecuador ITW, Bermuda, 2008

Bolides – low mass, hypersonic (10’s of km/s) short duration, broad band, moving source(s) distributed in space (line) Microbaroms - high mass (moving swaths of ocean), low velocity (m/s), nearly continuous, narrow band, multiple moving sources distributed in space (areas). Surf – medium mass, low velocity (10’s m/s), sustained over periods of days, broadband, multiple moving sources distributed over coastal areas. Volcanoes – high mass (erupted volumes of cubic km), medium to high speeds (up to ~Mach 1), impulsive to continuous durations, narrow and broadband signals, well localized surface source (point). Stationary in space, but very nonstationary in time. Due to substantially different physics, energy estimates for ocean and volcanic processes do not lend themselves well to equivalent yield scaling. Propose use of Watts and Joules for continuous and impulsive events, respectively. Well suited energy units for comparison with satellite methodologies. Acoustic to electrical energy efficiency for speakers is typically ~1- 10%. Efficient Geophysical Infrasound Sources Routinely Detected by IMS

TRANSIENTS: Explosions - impulsive, bipolar pulses with durations of seconds. Long Period events - possibly emergent events sustained for seconds to minutes. Spectral peaks in Hz band. Very Long Period Events - pulses in the 0.5 – Hz band TREMOR/JETTING: Near continuous oscillation sustained for minutes to years. Volcanosonic signals

ASHE Ecuador Instrumentation RIOE LITE MACE Sangay Tungurahua Reventador Galeras Ecuador RIOE  Tungurahua: 37 km LITE  Tungurahua: 251 km

Automatic explosive event identification Time period: 2/15/06- Fall 08 Automatically calculate azimuth, amplitude, duration, and acoustic energy >20,000 explosions at RIOE (37 km) >3500 explosions at LITE (251 km) High-pass filter data >.5 Hz STA/LTA  event onset and end time 2/5 secs, 3/40 secs Detection must be on all 4 channels Run PMCC between Hz 10 bands, 10 sec windows Families with correct azimuth (±7°) Minimum family size and amplitude

Explosions Range of 5 km, 40 km, and 250 km. Near field data courtesy of Kumagai and Molina, 2008

Localization No obvious cutoff amplitude Picked up everything over 0.7 Pa, but missed a few around 0.6 while picking up some as small as 0.2 Pa Detection may depend on local noise and high-altitude wind Using thermospheric arrivals for LITE and direct path for RIOE mean error (km) = Mean delta lat = Mean delta lon = Using stratospheric arrivals for LITE and direct path for RIOE Mean error (km) = Mean delta lat = Mean delta lon = Diffraction zone!

Case Study: 8/ Main Eruption: UTC Total Duration ~10.8 hours VEI 4 eruption inferred from satellite estimate of ash height >20 pyroclastic flows and up to 6 km lava fountain! Intense jetting ( ± 5 Pa at 37 km) Ejection of dark, ~24-km high, ash-laden plume.

System Training: Case Study of 8/ Growing list of case studies compare satellite-derived ash heights with acoustic signal intensity and character derived from arrays. Used fine-scale atmospheric specifications typically used for sound propagation studies.

System Training: Case Study of 8/ Spectrogram for the Plinian phase of the 8/16 eruption. Note the increase in energy and decrease in frequency of the signal around 0530 UTC. The frequency axis is plotted on a logarithmic scale.

Training Set: Tungurahua Eruption PSDs

Sustained Signal Identification and Monitoring Automatically posted on web page Free Space Acoustic Energy: E Acoustic =2πr 2 /ρc ∫ΔP(t) 2 dt r=source-receiver distance ρ=air density c=sound speed ΔP=change in pressure Acoustic power = Energy/time To minimize the effects of wind noise, the acoustic energy was calculated above 0.5 Hz (reprocessed above 0.1 Hz for some signals) Acoustic energy only calculated if PMCC results corresponded to significant acoustic signal arriving from ±7° of Tungurahua

Ops: Automatic Eruption Notification of 2/6/08 ASHE Activity Notification ASHE Explosion Notification Spectrogram, Acoustic Source Power, and Ash Cloud Height Used coarse atmosphere 5-minute notification latency!

Okmok and Kasatochi Detections by IMS stations: Latency of ~1h/1000 km (precedent: Anatahan, Chaiten) Kasatochi

Summary & Next Steps ASHE system demonstrated capability to reliably monitor volcanoes at regional distances, with an automatic eruption notification latency of 5 minutes or less for arrays deployed within 40 km. Although sufficiently mature, in the US this technology is not yet integrated into operational environments. Global Infrasound Network capable of detecting large eruptions with a latency of ~1h/1000 km. New global study will be initiated by ASHE team in Winter Future research on propagation studies, correlating ash emissions with different type of infrasonic signals, and a more complete understanding of jet noise. Extend existing detection and notification algorithms to other volcanic environments. Evolution and refinement of notification thresholds. Recommendations of the 4 th Meeting of the International Airways Volcano Watch Operations Group, Paris, France September 2008: That VAACs Montreal, Washington and Toulouse a) Continue to assess the feasability of using infrasound data to automatically identify ash producing volcanic eruptions b) prepare a report in time for consideration by the IAVWOPSG-5 Meeting (March 2010).