Siemens – Local Controller Software with Adaptive Control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Graves, P.E. City Traffic Engineer Alpharetta, Georgia
Advertisements

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Planning for Success: Applying Systems Engineering to ASCT Implementation TRANSPO 2012 October 29, 2012 Eddie Curtis, PE FHWA Office of Operations / Resource.
.nowNAZTEC 1. Overview AGENDA Benefits Algorithm Simulation 2 Case Studies Real-time adaptive traffic control system Adjusts signal timing based on current.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
Peek – ACS Lite Deployment Quixote Traffic Corporation Peter Ragsdale August 17, 2006.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration ACS-Lite FHWA Adaptive Signal Control Systems Raj S. Ghaman, P.E. Team Leader, Office.
CALTRANS’ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS CTP 2040 PAC 1 Kris Kuhl Assistant Division Chief, Division of Traffic Operations 4/15/2014 CREATING.
1 Charlie Wetzel, PE, PTOE County Traffic Engineer Seminole County Florida 10/18/11.
Ramp Metering Pilot Project May 11th, 2010 E. Jason Sims, P.E. Kansas City Scout TMC Manager.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT. PURPOSE Purpose: Foster understanding through development of educational outreach materials Illustrate benefits and basic techniques.
Copyright © Siemens plc All rights reserved. Fuel for thought.
The City of Gdynia City rights in 1926 With Sopot and Gdańsk forms the Tri-City agglomeration It has inhabitants Port city, employment structure:
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Lec 24, Ch.19: Actuated signals and detectors (Objectives) Learn terminology related to actuated signals Understand why and where actuated signals are.
PASSER II SOFTWARE.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
© Copyright Siemens plc 2009 Fuel for thought. UK / Industry / Mobility / Traffic Solutions © Copyright Siemens plc 2009 April 2009TraffexPage 2 Fuel.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
Florida Department of Transportation District 4 TSM&O Program Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Installation in South Broward County ATMS.
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Oregon Microsimulation Roundtable March 2012
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
November 15, 2005 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION: A Coordinated Effort Tom Dancey, P.E. Signal System Engineer City of Springfield CITY OF SPRINGFIELD & MISSOURI DEPARTMENT.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Highway Transportation Engineering ITS Case Study Component 1 – Student Guide.
Company LOGO Ramp Meters. Company LOGO What are Ramp Meters? Part of NaviGAtor, Georgia DOT’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Also includes electronic.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
1 Adaptive Control Software – Lite (ACS-Lite) Eddie Curtis, P.E. FHWA Resource Center / HOTM NTOC Webcast March 27, 2008.
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
Wireless Sensor Network Solutions Regional Mobility Solutions Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other.
Traffic Control Systems - SCOOT/UTC ATD 98/07 -Transp.-Nr.: 1 / 00 Ord.-Nr.: SCOOT TRB Presentation on SCOOT January 2000.
SCATS 6.10 Release Review SMUG, March 2013 Sydney.
Smart Information for a Sustainable World True Adaptive Signal Control A Comparison of Alternatives Technical Paper # Presentation to the 18 th World.
Traffic Management System Status Update February, 2008.
© Infotripla Ltd 2005 Traffic monitoring with FCD- and traffic signal data in Tampere region VIKING Workshop Best practices on monitoring deployment 5.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
Technology Solutions for Tolling and Traffic Management N Video Detection Technology and Marketplace Michael Wieck Business Development Manager, Roadway.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
Mission Street Project Update Voyage 2070 Advance Operation Systems Using ASTRO Proactive Plan Selection Average and Split Variant operations Prepared.
Outline Sensys SensMetrics Solution SensMetrics Performance Measures
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
An ACSLite Case Study Riva Road in Annapolis, MD
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting
* Topic 7 Field Operations
ITE Midwestern District Conference June 20, 2017
School of Civil Engineering
TRAFFIC PRIORITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Erasmus Intensive Program
Presentation transcript:

Siemens – Local Controller Software with Adaptive Control Effective traffic control solutions

SEPAC 3.52/4.52 Controller Software New Feature Performance Measurements SPaT Priority Control USB Support 2

SEPAC® 3.52/4.52 Performance Measurement SEPAC Performance Logging is designed to capture internal and external controller events on a 1/10th second basis. It provides the logging abilities required by the Indiana Dept. of Transportation (InDOT). 3

SEPAC® 3.52/4.52 SPaT Messaging SPaT – Signal Phase and Timing Data Messaging Sends a UDP packet to the configured Destination address every tenth of a second Each UDP packet shall include: The minimum time before the phase will change to a different interval The maximum time before the phase will change to a different interval Current red, yellow or green status of each vehicle phase, pedestrian phase, and overlap Intersection Status Plan Number for TBC System Time 4

SEPAC® 3.52/4.52 Priority Control Buses and light rail trains need to stay on schedule to make public transportation an attractive alternative to other means of transportation. At the same time, keeping individual traffic flowing to avoid congestion, which causes a negative impact on the environment, is equally important. Giving high priority to public transportation without interrupting the general traffic flow has been a major challenge for conventional traffic control software in the past. 5

SEPAC® 3.51 Enhances Performance of Traffic Signal Control The latest version of the proven SEPAC traffic control software is focused on enhancing performance of traffic signal control for customers who use Light Rail Transit, Bus Rapid Transit and regular Traffic Signal Priority functionality. A new set of features improves the use of partial and full priority, with minimal impact on pedestrian and vehicle traffic. With more than 25 years of developing and testing, SEPAC is an unparalleled traffic signal priority software that enables mobility, safety and a better environment to help improve the quality of life in cities. 6

Increased Functionality to Meet Your Demanding Transportation Needs 4 phase banks Advance warning flashers Flashing left arrow with delay Red protect collision avoidance Bicycle detection and timing Advanced pedestrian functionality 7

Features Phases Coordination Detection/Inputs 16 vehicle phases 8 pedestrian phases 4 phase banks 4 timing rings 15 alternate sequences 16 overlaps 6 modes of coordination Locally based traffic responsive routines 250 events 5 modes for transition 3 auxiliary and 8 special functions 99 day and 10 week programs Free / flash / dimming 16 phase function maps 64 vehicle detectors* 8 pedestrian detectors* 8 system detectors* Ethernet detection interface for Sensys Ethernet Access Points (optional) *80 total detectors defaulted to listed configuration but can be programmed as different types, if necessary.

Modes of Operation SEPAC’s traffic capabilities include five modes of operation that allow for Time of Day (TOD) operations, week plans, time of year or holiday plans, which include: coordination, free and flash functions. Modes include: Standalone – All functionality is operational as a standalone unit. Time updates available through GPS syncs. Controller can be programmed to use the GPS output for keeping its internal TOD clock accurate. 1 Master Control – In conjunction with a Marc Master Controller, SEPAC will work within a closed loop system. 2 System Control – SEPAC has the ability to communicate to TACTICS® and operate under system control. 3 Manual – SEPAC can be controlled manually to run specific coordination routines when set to manual, including free operation. 4 Adaptive Control – SEPAC can accept commands from SCOOT® for adaptive control, if available. 5 9

Compatible with Siemens Controllers Designed for Siemens “M” series and Caltrans 2070 style controllers as well as ATC (Linux based) controllers 10

Siemens Adaptive Control Effective traffic control solutions

Current Traffic Landscape Annual delay per traveler increasing at a rapid pace Freeway usage is reaching peak capacity and spilling out onto arterials 12

Congestion Impacts All of Our Lives 80 billion tons of air pollution 170 billion gallons of excess gas Effects 33% of all accidents Possible delete © Siemens AG 2011 13

How Does Adaptive Control Work? Real time data collected 1 Information input is placed into algorithms 2 Special tuning, weighting and logic is factored 3 New timings are developed 4 Make a simple Block Diagram like Slide 38 14

Optimizing Signals Gives Added Benefit in Reducing Stops, Delays and Fuel Usage Achieves significant reductions in vehicle delay (21%), stops (25%), and fuel consumption (5%) 35% reduction in delays on a section of State Highway 6 in Houston, Texas $787,000 in benefits to the public for one year of operation in Bradenton, Florida 15

Siemens has two proven Adaptive Control systems to fit the unique needs of your city: ACS Lite and SCOOT® 16

ACS Lite Adaptive Signal Coordination Software 17

ACS Lite Overview Adapts and optimizes the splits and offsets of signal control patterns/plans along an arterial application Resulting in reduced delay, stops and fuel consumption Has flexibility to be deployed as an on-street master or as a centralized system

Goals of ACS Lite Siemens developed ACS Lite under contract to the Federal Highway Administration as a more accessible way to implement adaptive control Low Cost Design – make it easy Leverage existing infrastructure Standard US-style actuated controllers and logic (rings, phases, splits, barriers, gap-out/extension, etc.) Typical agency detector layouts Typical communications Use NTCIP Promote efficiency

What Parameters Does it Adjust? Controllers use normal timing plans ACS Lite changes splits and offsets based on traffic demands Cycle length is changed by time-of-day (TOD) Actuated logic and sequences are used Still use TOD changes 20

Findings An ACS Lite system can help to effectively reduce travel time on main street and queue length on side streets during peak periods, which in turn improves system efficiency, reduces emission and fuel consumption. Up to 32% reduction in travel time on newly time signals Comparing peak time traffic parameters before and after the study, we observed, No significant difference in traffic volume Significant travel time reduction Significant side street queue length reduction Average of 20% reduction in side street queues 21 21

Ann Arundel County, Maryland Use Case Annapolis, Maryland area experienced significant traffic changes Implementation 12 Intersections on Riva Road Project Costs: $141,000 Results Test showed 82% improvement in afternoon peek travel times Overall delays reduced by 26% Expanding system to other corridors From “The Capital” Newspaper article 8/17/2011

Use Case A Unique System for Tyler, Texas Growing traffic delays are ranked as the #1 concern in Tyler, similar to many other towns in the U.S. Signal timing plans do not get updated frequently enough Corridor traffic flows smoothly at peak times, but there are unpredictable off-peak periods due to commercial nature of corridor Traditional timing plans are weak Offsets change during traffic or weather events 23

SCOOT® Performance You Can See… Adaptive Signal Coordination Software 24

SCOOT ® is an Adaptive Control engineering TOOL that can handle virtually any type of application Shrink down and add Leatherman 25

SCOOT® Worldwide Adaptive Control 200 systems worldwide Toronto Beijing London Dalian Minneapolis Santa Barbara Arlington County Chengdu Orange County Qingdao Cyprus Anaheim Chongqing Bahrain Cartagena Dubai Sao Paulo Rework and Update------ The Toronto pilot system of 75 intersections has now expanded to 240 intersection on line with the capability of 500. Toronto has over 1800 signals in its network Anaheim was a FHWA Field Operational Test to evaluate SCOOT control using existing UTCS detector- usually mid-block. The results showed improvements, in spite of reduced intersection count and construction However, it was not as good if full SCOOT detectors were implemented. Expansion of the system is currently under discussion. Arlington County is replacing an old UTCS system for its 230 intersection. Approximately 70 intersections will be under SCOOT control. Eagle is the prime contractor for this $2.5M project scheduled to be on line fall of 1999. Durban Santiago Port Elizabeth 26

SCOOT® System Architecture Traffic Control Functions Time-of-day control Traffic responsive control Quick response User interface to TACTICS and SCOOT The SCOOT server, via its scheduler, turns SCOOT on and off for the selected intersections. Once the EPAC controller receives the SCOOT commands over its communication channel, it responds. SCOOT control is dropped after 3 seconds of no SCOOT commands. The ACTRA system provides the normal traffic control functions: TOD control Traffic Responsive control Quick Response User interface to ACTRA and SCOOT The SCOOT server, via its scheduler, turns SCOOT on and Off for the selected intersections. Once the EPAC controller `sees’ the SCOOT commands over its comm.. channel, it responds. SCOOT controls is dropped after 3 seconds of no SCOOT commands. 27

Orange County, Florida Use Case Implementation Phase I – International Drive Phase II – Added intersections toward Disney World Phase III – Corridor approaching University of Central Florida Phase IV – UCF Campus Uses TACTICS® and SCOOT® in parallel Benefits Projected annual savings of $400,000 Convention Center traffic ingress & egress has been cleared efficiently Overall travel times and delays have been reduced Officer control of signals is no longer necessary Regular development and update of timing plans is not necessary Timing adjustment during long or short term lane closures is not necessary Real-time traffic data are monitored and archived

University of Minnesota Use Case Implementation Installed in University Of Minnesota area 39 intersections in grid with extended major corridors Includes traffic circle Adding additional intersections in Phase II Results Study to be completed soon General positive results Siemens added additional detection capability for complex intersection

Thank You for Your Attention! Daniel K. Nelson, P.E. PLM Product Manager Senior Applications Engineer Mobile: +1 (512) 415-4284 Tel.: +1 (512) 837-8343 daniel.nelson@siemens.com Siemens Industry, Inc. 8004 Cameron Rd Austin, TX 78754