Session 8, Unit 15 ISC-PRIME and AERMOD. ISC-PRIME General info. PRIME - Plume Rise Model Enhancements Purpose - Enhance ISCST3 by addressing ISCST3’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIR POLLUTION AND METEOROLOGY
Advertisements

Laboratory Modeling of Atmospheric Dispersion at the Fluid Modeling Facility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by William H. Snyder MiniTech.
Section 2: The Planetary Boundary Layer
1 8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling Presentation by Ken Steinberg on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute September 23, 2005.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
2. Dispersion We’re going to move on to the second major step in doing dose assessment.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
Use of Prognostic Meteorological Model Output in Dispersion Models Eighth Modeling Conference Research Triangle Park, NC.
AERMET 8 TH Modeling Conference RTP, NC September 22 – 23, 2005 Presented by: Desmond T. Bailey
Will Pendergrass NOAA/ARL/ATDD OAR Senior Research Council Meeting Oak Ridge, TN August 18-19, 2010 Boundary–Layer Dispersion Urban Meteorology 5/20/2015Air.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
0.1m 10 m 1 km Roughness Layer Surface Layer Planetary Boundary Layer Troposphere Stratosphere height The Atmospheric (or Planetary) Boundary Layer is.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Air Quality Modeling.
Session 1, Unit 1 Course Overview. Introduction Course – ENV 7335 Air Quality Modeling Instructor – Yousheng Zeng, Ph.D., P.E. Prerequisite – ENV 7331.
Yamada Science & Art Corporation PROPRIETARY A Numerical Simulation of Building and Topographic Influence on Air Flows Ted Yamada ( YSA.
Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
Dispersion Modeling 101: ISCST3 vs. AERMOD
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Ashok Kumar Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj Abhilash Vijayan
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Session 5, Unit 9 Modeling in the Presence of Stable Layers.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar University of Toledo Introduction.
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
Building Aware Flow and T&D Modeling Sensor Data Fusion NCAR/RAL March
GIS Applications for Air Quality Management Robert Wu 吳震球 South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCAEPAApril 26, 2008.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
Stable Atmosphere.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP MODEL INPUTS AND FEDERAL GUIDANCE CRISTINA GONZALEZ-MADDUX ITEP, RESEARCH SPECIALIST.
Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP
CITES 2005, Novosibirsk Modeling and Simulation of Global Structure of Urban Boundary Layer Kurbatskiy A. F. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
1 Tracer Experiments Barrio Logan Working Draft Do Not Cite or Quote Tony Servin, P.E. Shuming Du, Ph.D. Vlad Isakov, Ph.D. September 12, 2002 Air Resources.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
1 An Improved Approach To Updating Regulatory Dispersion Models 8 th Modeling Conference RTP, NC September 23, 2005.
Air Pollution Meteorology Ñ Atmospheric thermodynamics Ñ Atmospheric stability Ñ Boundary layer development Ñ Effect of meteorology on plume dispersion.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
1 THE AERMOD MODELING SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW FOR THE 8 TH MODELING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 22, 2005.
AERSCREEN Status and Update James Thurman, Ph.D. U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD Air Quality Modeling Group 2009 NESCAUM PMC Annual Meeting Mystic, CT.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Regulatory Models for Short-Range Air Quality Applications: Overview and Outlook Jeffrey C. Weil National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO For.
TERRAINS Terrain, or land relief, is the vertical and horizontal dimension of land surface. Terrain is used as a general term in physical geography, referring.
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Meteorological Site Representativeness and AERSURFACE Issues
Assessing Volcanic Ash Hazard by Using the CALPUFF System
Introduction and Fundamentals
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
BPIPPRM Course #423 Day 2 Afternoon Air Pollution Dispersion Models:
BPIPPRM Hands-on Course #423 Day 2 Afternoon
Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an Air-Pollution Episode Ana M. Lazarevska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Skopje University.
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Models of atmospheric chemistry
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Presentation transcript:

Session 8, Unit 15 ISC-PRIME and AERMOD

ISC-PRIME General info. PRIME - Plume Rise Model Enhancements Purpose - Enhance ISCST3 by addressing ISCST3’s deficiency in building downwash Development work funded by Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in 1992 Algorithm developed, codified, and incorporated into ISCST3 by Earth Tech, Inc. The combined computer program is called ISC-PRIME

ISC-PRIME Deficiency of ISC3 model Reported over predictions under light wind, stable conditions Discontinuities in the vertical, alongwind, and crosswind directions Assumption that the source is always collocated with the structure causing down washing Streamline flow over a structure is not taken into account Plume rise is not adjusted due to the velocity deficit in the wake or due to vertical wind speed shear Concentrations in the cavity region are not linked to material capture

ISC-PRIME The features that ISC-PRIME has and ISCST3 does not: Stack location with respect to building Influence of streamline deflection on plume trajectory Effect of wind angle on wake structure Effects of plume buoyancy and vertical wind speed shear on plume rise near building Concentration in near wake (cavity)

ISC-PRIME PRIME Approach Trajectory of plume near building is determined by 2 factors:  Descent of the air containing the plume material  Rise of the plume relative to the streamlines due to buoyancy or momentum effects Mean streamlines near building  Initial ascending upwind of the building  location and maximum height of roof-top recirculation cavity  length of downwind recirculation cavity (near wake)  Building length scale

ISC-PRIME Running ISC-PRIME Same way to run ISCST3 with exception of the following three additional keyword in the “SO” pathway:  BUILDLEN - projected length of the building along the flow  XBADJ - along-flow distance from the stack to the center of the upwind face of the projected building  YBADJ - across-flow distance from the stack to the center of the upwind face of the projected building BPIP is modified (called BPIP-PRIME) to produce these parameters

ISC-PRIME Independent evaluation by ENSR Evaluation was based on 14 studies  8 tracer studies  3 long-term studies  3 wind tunnel studies

ISC-PRIME Evaluation results:  ISC-PRIME is generally unbiased or conservative (overpredicting)  Statistically ISC-PRIME performs better than ISCST3  Under stable conditions, ISCST3 is too conservative and ISC-PRIME is much better  Under neutral conditions, the two models are comparable and ISC-PRIME is slightly better.

ISC-PRIME Results of evaluation by EPA When no building data is included in the models, ISCST3 and ISC-PRIME produce the same results ISC-PRIME tend to be less conservative than ISCST3, but more conservative than observed values The results of the two model converge beyond 1 km, and become practically the same after 10 km Generally agree with ENSR’s evaluation and consider the objectives of PRIME have been met

AERMOD AERMIC – American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement Committee AERMOD – AMS/EPA Regulatory Model Goals of AERMOD – To replace ISC3 (AERMOD has not incorporated the dry and wet deposition features of ISC3) AERMOD is still a steady-state model, but a more sophisticated one than ISC3

AERMOD New or improved algorithms: Dispersion in both the convective and stable boundary layers (separate procedures are used for CBL and SBL) Plume rise and buoyancy Plume penetration into elevated inversions Computation of vertical profiles of wind, turbulence, and temperature The urban boundary layer The treatment of receptors on all types of terrain from the surface up to and above the plume height.

AERMOD AERMOD is a modeling system consisting of: AERMOD - AERMIC Dispersion Model AERMAP – AERMOD Terrain Preprocessor AERMET - AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor

AERMOD Data flow in AERMOD system

AERMOD AERMET Use met measurements to compute PBL parameters  Monin-Obukhov Length, L  Surface friction velocity, u *  Surface roughness length, z 0  Surface heat flux, H  Convective scaling velocity, w *  Convective and mechanical mixed layer heights, z ic and z im, respectively

AERMOD Met interface Compute vertical profiles of:  Wind direction  Wind speed  Temperature  Vertical potential temperature gradient  Vertical turbulence (  w )  Horizontal turbulence (  v ) Unlike ISC3, both  w and  v have more than 1 component Express inhomogeneous parameters in PBL as effective homogeneous values

AERMOD AERMAP

AERMOD Treatment of terrain No distinction between simple terrain and complex terrain Plume either impacts the terrain or/and follows the flow

AERMOD

Calculation of concentrations Simulate 5 plume types  Direct (real source at the stack)  Indirect (imaginary source above CBL to account for slow downward dispersion)  Penetrated (the portion of the plume that has penetrated into the stable layer)  Injected  Stable.

AERMOD For CBL, contributions from 3 types of plume For SBL, similar to ISC3

AERMOD Dispersion coefficients Contributed by three factors:  ambient turbulence  Turbulence induced by a plume buoyancy  Enhancements from building wake effects Plume rise Source characterization Added feature – irregularly shaped area sources Adjustment for urban boundary layer For nighttime only

AERMOD Evaluation Scientifically AERMOD has an advantage over ISC3 Performance evaluation:  Data: 4 short-term tracer study 6 conventional long-term monitoring  Results (after minor revisions): Nearly unbiased Generally better than ISCST3 Recommended for regulatory applications (rule proposed)

Session 8, Unit 16 CALPUFF

CALPUFF ISC3, AERMOD Steady-sate Plume Local-scale CALPUFF Non-steady-state Puff Long-range (up to hundreds of kilometers) Can simulate ISC3

CALPUFF Recommended by IWAQM IWAQM – Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling EPA U.S. Forest Service National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

CALPUFF CALPUFF System CALMET CALPUFF CALPOST Prepare meteorological fields. It generates hourly wind and temperature fields on a 3-D gridded modeling domain. A Gaussian puff dispersion model with chemical removal, wet & dry deposition, complex terrain algorithm, building downwash, plume fumigation, and other effects Postprocessing programs for the output fields of met data, concentrations, deposition fluxes, and visibility data

CALPUFF CALMET process Step 1 – Initial guess wind field is adjusted for kinematic effects of terrain, slope flows, terrain blocking effects Step 2 – Introduce observational data into Step 1 wind field to produce final wind field

CALPUFF CALMET data requirements Surface met data (wind, temp, precipitation, etc.) Upper air data (e.g., observed vertical profiles of wind, temp, etc.) Overwater observed data (optional) Geophysical data (e.g., terrain, land use, etc.)

CALPUFF Example CALMET wind field

CALPUFF CALPUFF concept and solutions Plume is treated as series of puffs  Snapshot approach  Sampling time – time interval between snapshots  Concentrations at receptors are determined at the snapshot time. One receptors may receive contributions from more than 1 puff  Puffs may move and evolve in size between snapshots  Separation between puffs: <1-2 . Otherwise, results are not accurate Problems – too many puffs (e.g., thousands puffs/hr) Solutions 1. Radially symmetric puffs, OR 2. Non-circular puff (slug)

CALPUFF Other CALPUFF features Dispersion (dispersion coefficients, buoyancy- induced dispersion, puff splitting, etc.) Building downwash Plume rise Overwater and coastal dispersion Complex terrain Dry and wet deposition Chemical reaction Visibility modeling Odor modeling Graphic User Interface (GUI)

CALPUFF CALPUFF data and computer requirements Up to 16 input files (control, met, geophysical, source, etc.) Up to 9 output files Computer requirements:  Memory: typical case – 32 MB; more for more sources  Computing time: for a 500 MHz PC, 218 sources and 425 receptors 9 hours for CALMET 95 hours for CALPUFF

CALPUFF Summary Primarily for long range modeling, but can be used for local modeling A puff model Non-steady state Very sophisticated Resource intensive