Significance and effect sizes What is the problem with just using p-levels to determine whether one variable has an effect on another? Don’t EVER just.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Childhood exposure to domestic violence predicts relationship violence: A meta-analysis Markus Kemmelmeier and Kerry Kleyman.
Advertisements

Statistical Analysis and Data Interpretation What is significant for the athlete, the statistician and team doctor? important Will Hopkins
Meta-analysis: summarising data for two arm trials and other simple outcome studies Steff Lewis statistician.
EVAL 6970: Meta-Analysis Vote Counting, The Sign Test, Power, Publication Bias, and Outliers Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Spring 2011.
SAMPLING. Next week  2 book chapters  Outline of thesis proposal/paper intro  Find a scale and answer questions  Thought paper.
Introduction to Meta-Analysis Joseph Stevens, Ph.D., University of Oregon (541) , © Stevens 2006.
15 de Abril de A Meta-Analysis is a review in which bias has been reduced by the systematic identification, appraisal, synthesis and statistical.
Meta-analysis & psychotherapy outcome research
Practical Meta-Analysis -- D. B. Wilson
Heterogeneity in Hedges. Fixed Effects Borenstein et al., 2009, pp
1 of 27 PSYC 4310/6310 Advanced Experimental Methods and Statistics © 2013, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Adv. Experimental.
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org C2 Training: May 9 – 10, 2011 Data Analysis and Interpretation: Computing effect sizes.
Overview of Meta-Analytic Data Analysis
Daniel Acuña Outline What is it? Statistical significance, sample size, hypothesis support and publication Evidence for publication bias: Due.
Funded through the ESRC’s Researcher Development Initiative
Systematic Reviews Professor Kate O’Donnell. Reviews Reviews (or overviews) are a drawing together of material to make a case. These may, or may not,
Program Evaluation. Program evaluation Methodological techniques of the social sciences social policy public welfare administration.
Data Analysis in Systematic Reviews-Meta Analysis.
Data Analysis in Systematic Reviews
1 ICEBOH Split-mouth studies and systematic reviews Ian Needleman 1 & Helen Worthington 2 1 Unit of Periodontology UCL Eastman Dental Institute International.
Meta-analysis. Overview Definition  A meta-analysis statistically combines the results of several studies that address a shared research hypotheses.
How to Teach Statistics in EBM Rafael Perera. Basic teaching advice Know your audience Know your audience! Create a knowledge gap Give a map of the main.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Simon Thornley Meta-analysis: pooling study results.
Statistical Applications for Meta-Analysis Robert M. Bernard Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance and CanKnow Concordia University December.
Effect Size Estimation in Fixed Factors Between-Groups ANOVA
Effect Size Estimation in Fixed Factors Between- Groups Anova.
Systematic Reviews By Jonathan Tsun & Ilona Blee.
Meta-analysis and “statistical aggregation” Dave Thompson Dept. of Biostatistics and Epidemiology College of Public Health, OUHSC Learning to Practice.
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org C2 Training: May 9 – 10, 2011 Introduction to meta-analysis.
Effect Size Calculation for Meta-Analysis Robert M. Bernard Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance Concordia University February 24, 2010 February.
RevMan for Registrars Paul Glue, Psychological Medicine What is EBM? What is EBM? Different approaches/tools Different approaches/tools Systematic reviews.
Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Singh PP et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 407.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE MATHEMATICALLY-CHALLENGED Associate Professor Phua Kai Lit School of Medicine & Health Sciences Monash University (Sunway.
PH 401: Meta-analysis Eunice Pyon, PharmD (718) , HS 506.
Effect size calculation in educational and behavioral research Wim Van den Noortgate ‘Power training’ Faculty Psychology and Educational Sciences, K.U.Leuven.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
LECTURE 4 EPSY 652 FALL Computing Effect Sizes- Mean Difference Effects Glass: e = (Mean Experimental – Mean Control )/SD o SD = Square Root (average.
The expanding evidence for the efficacy of ACT: results from a meta analysis on clinical applications.
Retain H o Refute hypothesis and model MODELS Explanations or Theories OBSERVATIONS Pattern in Space or Time HYPOTHESIS Predictions based on model NULL.
116 (27%) 185 (43%) 49 (11%) How to critically appraise a systematic review Igho J. Onakpoya MD MSc University of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
WINKS 7 Tutorial 3 Analyzing Summary Data (Using Student’s t-test) Permission granted for use for instruction and for personal use. ©
1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 5: Critical assessment of evidence.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Evaluation of statistical methods for meta-analysis Julian Higgins School of Social and Community Medicine University of Bristol, UK 1 Cochrane Methods.
1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 27 Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-Analysis, Metasynthesis,
Chapter 11 Meta-Analysis. Meta-analysis  Quantitative means of reanalyzing the results from a large number of research studies in an attempt to synthesize.
Chapter 22 Inferential Data Analysis: Part 2 PowerPoint presentation developed by: Jennifer L. Bellamy & Sarah E. Bledsoe.
Week Seven.  The systematic and rigorous integration and synthesis of evidence is a cornerstone of EBP  Impossible to develop “best practice” guidelines,
Meta-analysis Overview
I-squared Conceptually, I-squared is the proportion of total variation due to ‘true’ differences between studies. Proportion of total variance due to.
Analyzing Small Group Research DR. Joann Keyton
Evaluation Research and Meta-analysis
Brady Et Al., "sequential compression device compliance in postoperative obstetrics and gynecology patients", obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 125, no.
H676 Week 3 – Effect Sizes Additional week for coding?
Meta-analysis: Conceptual and Methodological Introduction
Testing for moderators
Heterogeneity and sources of bias
Lecture 4: Meta-analysis
Evaluation Research and Meta-analysis
Stat 217 – Day 28 Review Stat 217.
Narrative Reviews Limitations: Subjectivity inherent:
McLeod 2007.
EAST GRADE course 2019 Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Fleminger.
Presentation transcript:

Significance and effect sizes What is the problem with just using p-levels to determine whether one variable has an effect on another? Don’t EVER just give p-range! Sample results: For boys, r (87) =.31, p =.03 For girls, r (98) =.24, p =.14 Significance test = effect size x study size Why are effect sizes important? What is the difference between statistical, practical, and clinical significance?

What should you report? 2 group comparison—treatment vs. control on anxiety symptoms 3 group comparison—positive prime vs. negative prime vs. no prime on number of problems solved 2 continuous variables—relationship between neuroticism and goal directedness 3 continuous variables—anxiety as a function of self- esteem and authoritarian parenting 2 categorical variables—relationship between answers to 2 multiple choice questions

Narrative vs. quantitative reviews When was the first meta-analysis? When was the term first used? What are the advantages of quant reviews? What are particular critiques of them? What are the three basic principles to guide meta- analysis?

Steps to meta-analysis

1. define your variables/question 1 df contrasts What is a contrast?

2. Decide on inclusion criteria What factors do you want to consider here?

3. Collect studies systematically Where do you find studies? File drawer problem Rosenthal’s fail-safe N # studies needed at p <.05= (K/2.706) (K(mean Z squared) = 2.706) Z = Z for that level of p K = number of studies in meta-analysis Funnel plot Rank correlation test for pub bias What can you do if publication bias is a problem? Trim and fill Sensitivity analysis Weight studies

Fig. 3. Funnel plots of 11 (subsets of) meta-analyses from 2011 and Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlman, and Banaij (2009). Marjan Bakker et al. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012;7: Copyright © by Association for Psychological Science

3. Calculate effect sizes If there is more than 1 effect per study, what do you do? What does the sign mean on an effect size? What are small, medium, and large effects? How can you convert from one to another? r or d? ey/Courses/EffectSizeConversion.pdf ey/Courses/EffectSizeConversion.pdf

Families of effect sizes 2 group comparisons (difference between the means) Cohen’s d Hedge’s g Glass’s d or delta Continuous or multi-group (proportion of variability) Eta squared η 2 Partial eta-squared η p 2 Generalized eta-squared η G 2 r, fisher’s z, R 2, adjusted R 2 ω 2 and its parts difference between η 2 and R 2 family

Nonparametric effect sizes Nonnormal data: convert z to r or d Categorical data: Rho Cramer’s V Goodman-Kruskal’s Lambda How can you increase your effect sizes? How can you calculate confidence intervals around your effect sizes? developmental-psychology/esci developmental-psychology/esci

Interpretation of effect sizes Recommended for at least most important findings PS U Binomial effect size display (p. 76) Relative risk Odds ratio Risk difference

4. Look at heterogeneity of effect sizes Chi-square test I 2 (measure based on Chi-square) Cochran’s Q Standard deviations of effect sizes Stem and leaf plot (p. 671) Box plot Forest plot What are common moderators you might test? How would you do that?

Forest plot

5. Combine effect sizes When should you do fixed vs. random effects? Should you weight effect sizes, and if so, on what? How can you deal with dependent effect sizes? Hunter and Schmidt method vs. Hedges et al. method Credibility intervals vs. confidence intervals

6. Calculate confidence intervals/ 7. Look for moderators What are common moderators you might test? How do you compare moderators?

“Meta-analysis” Comparing and combining effect sizes on a smaller level—when might you want to do this? How would you do it? Average within-cell r’s with fisher z transforms To compare independent r’s: Z = z 1 -z 2 /sqrt ((1/n-3) + (1/n-3)) To combine independent r’s: z = z 1 +z 2 /2

Write-up Inclusion criteria, search, what effect size Which m-a tech and why Stem and leaf plots of effect sizes (and maybe mods) Forest plots Stats on variability of effect sizes, estimate of pop effect size and confidence intervals Publication bias analyses

Side note Analysis of power (Appendix)

Terms Evolutionary epistemology Evidence-based practice Systems thinking Dynamical systems approaches Evaluation research

Issues with evaluation research What questions are asked? What methods are used? What unique issues emerge?

Types of evaluation Formative Needs assessment Evaluability assessment Structured conceptualization Implementation evaluation Process evaluation Summative Outcome evaluation Impact evaluation Cost-benefit analysis Secondary analysis Meta-analysis

Methods used for different ?s What is the scope of the problem? How big is the problem? How should we deliver the program? How well did we deliver it? What type of evaluation can we do? Was the program effective? What parts of the program work? Should we continue the program?

Evidence based medicine (Sackett et al.) Convert problem into question Find evidence Evaluate validity, impact, applicability Integrate patient experience and clinical judgment Review evaluation

What does the book author Mean by an “evaluation culture”? Is it a good thing?

Post spring break Readings on analyses (some to be ed out) Quant article critique is separate from thought paper (look for questions at end of syllabus) One more week then rough drafts due