Delivering Cohesion Policy : the Malta Experience Ms. Marlene Bonnici Permanent Secretary EU Funds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
Advertisements

MTEF BUDGET PROCESS – A TOOL FOR MAINSTREAMING MDGS
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Annual Meeting of ISPA Partners , Centre Borschette (CCAB), Brussels, 9-10 April From ISPA to Cohesion and Structural Funds DG Regio - Ispa.
Planning and Timely Implementation of Structural Funds Interventions Katarína Mathernová Director, DG Regional Policy European Commission 24 November 2005.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 ANNUAL MEETING OF ISPA PARTNERS 2003 FROM ISPA TO COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS BRUSSELS,
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
URBACT INFODAY FINLAND TOWARDS URBACT III Helsinki, 05 November 2014.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Enhancing Institutional and Administrative Capacity case: POLAND
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
Romania’s Reporting Activities under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol Mr. Vlad Trusca Head of Climate Change Unit, UNFCCC National Focal Point Ministry of.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Information Society 3rd Community Support Framework for Greece June 2001.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities David Hegarty NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit Ireland.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
Croatian Experience with Management of EU Funds Nataša Mikuš, Deputy State Secretary Central Office for Development Strategy and Coordination of EU Funds.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Evaluation Capacity building in Lithuania Presentation for Presentation for Evaluation Units Open days by Mrs. Ana Stankaitienė EU Programmes Management.
Capacity Building for the Kosovo Anti- Corruption Agency Constantine Palicarsky.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
PHARE TWINNING CONTRACT BG/2004/IB/TR/02/UE Strengthening the capacity of the Ministry of Transport to manage the Sectoral Operational Programme on Transport.
Lessons from Programme Evaluation in Romania First Annual Conference on Evaluation Bucharest 18 February 2008.
Profiling exercise of internally displaced persons’ situations in_______ General presentation of the project Official project launch event Date.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
Walter Boltz, Chairman ERGEG Gas Working Group 18 th Madrid Forum 28 September 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation in natural gas transmission.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism GR07 Research within.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Financing Natura 2000 WORKSHOPS 2nd meeting of the Steering Group, 2 March 2006.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Methodology of RIA for European integration purposes and practical examples Outsourcing RIA preparation to external consultants: project management issues.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
Твининг пројекат Европске Уније Успостављање механизма за спровођење ММR *** Twinning project Establishment of a mechanism for implementation of MMR Пројекат.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
Anna Borowska Civil Service Director
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
ESPON post 2013 Programme Kristīne Rasiņa
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN MALTA
Information on projects
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Presentation transcript:

Delivering Cohesion Policy : the Malta Experience Ms. Marlene Bonnici Permanent Secretary EU Funds

Planning – 30 to 36 months before Timing: Minimum months before indicative start of Programme, however this depends on national obligations (e.g. parliamentary approval, etc….). A number of processes have to happen simultaneously. Hence, the different structures responsible have to be co- ordinated and aligned.

Planning – 30 to 36 months before (cont.) Strong co-ordination and decision taking procedure in place (including political, technical and administrative dimensions). Set-Up Administrative structures: drafting, consultation and consolidation of documents.

MT – Co-ordination Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) chaired by the Parliamentary Secretary responsible for Finance within the Office of the Prime Minister. MT : IMC:-Core Members + ad hoc experts (as required) –Office of the Prime Minister; –Finance; –Economy; –Agriculture and fisheries; –Cabinet Secretariat; and –Managing / National Co-ordination Authority.

Consultative Process and Consultees Consultative process needs to be strongly managed and co-ordinated. Identify stakeholders: - Government Ministries and other public entities; - Local / regional Government; - Socio-Economic Partners; - Civil Society; - Political Parties; - Ad hoc experts; and - Other organisations implementing / managing EU funds and Programmes (demarcation).

Consultative Process and Consultees (cont. 1) Method/s of consultation : –SWOT workshops (broad and/or focused sessions); –Sectoral Working Groups; – Presentation and participation at stakeholders’ informal/ formal working sessions; and –bilateral meetings.

Consultative Process and Consultees (cont. 2) And receipt of feedback: –Questionnaires; –Interviews; –SWOT sessions; and –Minutes of bilateral sessions. IMPORTANT - STRONG MODERATOR

Administrative Set-Up Identify drafting team : –Contract out (issue tender – Timing!!!); –Internal Resources; or –A combination of both (MT experience so far). Establish procedures to manage communication flow between drafting team, feedback received and decision makers.

Preparatory Phase – Minimum 30 months before Launch tenders and contract: –Drafters/ Programming Consultants; –SEA Consultants; and –Ex-ante Evaluators. Set up co-ordination mechanism between the different inputs and deadlines for decisions.

Programming - Drafting Phase I – minimum 24 months before Consult relevant National Strategies (no point in re-inventing the wheel and timing). Commence drafting of first chapters (snapshot of socio-economic and territorial situation). IN PARALLEL: Launch consultation (SWOT) or similar exercise.

Programming - Drafting Phase I – minimum 24 months before (cont.) Simultaneously initiate SEA and Ex-Ante Evaluation. Prepare project pipe - line (particularly larger projects requiring multiple studies and permits).

Drafting Phase II – Minimum of 22 months before Consolidate inputs from the various parallel processes. Produce first "clinical” draft of the strategy and emerging priorities (IMP: keep the deadline). Submit for “internal consultation” (IMC / Cabinet).

Drafting Phase II – Minimum of 22 months before (cont.) Undertake any revisions at this stage (prepare justifications for any deviations from clinical draft). Start putting the fundamentals into the implementation system.

Launch for (Wider) Public Consultation - 20 months before Organise separate workshops/seminars well with set questions and competent moderators. It is important to focus. Invite stakeholders to submit written feedback. Important to give stakeholders sufficient time to react. Processing of feedback.

Consolidation and Final (first) Draft - 18 months before Consolidate draft strategy including: –Input from SEA and Ex-Ante which may require a second consultation process. –Prepare draft programmes (in small countries there will be a lot of overlap between the strategy and the OP/s). –Consolidate Implementation System.

Negotiations with the European Commission – 15 months Discuss any major issues with the EC as soon as these emerge. Present first draft to the EC and seek to address issues informally. Negotiations are by their very nature a process of give and take - hence identify the issues that are non-negotiable and prepare strong justifications.

Negotiations with the European Commission – 15 months (cont.) Outcome of negotiations may require further consultations at technical / political levels with various stakeholders. IMPORTANT – TIMING - Quick decision making procedures (at national level)

Final stages - 3 months before official launch Consolidation of final draft. Conclude any internal obligations with regard to MS approval of the document/s. Submission to the EC for approval (check submission procedures).

Final stages - 3 months before official launch (cont.) In parallel: - Ensure establishment of implementation system; - Set up Monitoring Committee and define criteria for the selection of operations;and - Prepare for launch of Programme (tendering for event).

Delivering Programmes Set up a strong but lean Implementation System: - Managing Authority in a central Ministry (use existing structures); - Light Structure - limited number of Intermediate Bodies; - Establish clear demarcation of who is doing what in the system; - Make sure your stakeholders own the system; and - Establish a mechanism of rapid escalation (including political).

Delivering Programmes(cont.1) Ensure capacity to implement: - S ufficient human resources across ALL horizontal stakeholders (internal and/or external recruitment); -Training and capacity building; - Set up a strong monitoring system; - Create foresight capacity (through monitoring); - Get the paperwork right; - Retain a degree of pragmatism and flexibility; and - Communicate your results.

Main Issues encountered (programming) Decisions on the structure responsible for co- ordination (and who should be involved). Selection of the drafters (in-house vs, outsourcing). Various (at times conflicting) inputs from the various processes (SEA, Ex-Ante and consultations). Selection of measures (within the priorities) suitable for Cohesion Policy financing (timing, eligibility, etc.).

Main Issues encountered (programming) (cont.) Identifying appropriate quantifiable indicators. Availability of data and statistics. Preparing project pipe-line. Setting up implementation system (especially first time round). Political implications (e.g. elections, changes within Government, etc..)

Problems encountered (implementation) Resistance to new set-up by Beneficiaries; Internal struggles on responsibilities / functions; Permission to recruit (austerity measures); (Very) steep learning curve; Availability of experienced trainers; High staff turn-over; Multiple parallel processes (different skills); Permitting; and Self-made unnecessary burdens / problems.

Possible Mitigation Measures Use existing structures (where possible). In-house drafters drawing upon existing sectoral and other strategies (or combination). Ideally one tender is issued for the various consultancies required with various experts involved in the different aspects of programming and planning.

Possible Mitigation Measures (cont.1) Hold in-depth discussions with technical experts to determine appropriate measures for CP. Use official (National Statistics) as much as possible. Keep detailed record of any targets, workings (in case of composite indicators) and baseline sources. Initiate discussions (including all stakeholders) at a very early stage on project pipe-line (do NOT leave this to chance).

Seek to use existing structures / procedures (perhaps drawing upon any existing experience with EU funding set-ups). Training and innovative capacity building measures. Write your own implementation system. Make time for evaluations and external feedback. Possible Mitigation Measures (cont. 2)

Consider a centralised / streamlined system (if possible): - Maximises on existing qualified / trained resources ; and - Minimises on internal conflicts. Possible Mitigation Measures (cont. 3)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION